Abstract
Some researchers think that EU social policy is hardly developed, they criticise the absence of a social policy and respective entitlements comparable to those in national environments and posit that EU market regulation undermines domestic social regulation (Offe 1998; Scharpf 1999). Decreased competences of national welfare states should be met with increased competences at EU-level (Kowalsky 1999; Schmid 2002). Besides socio-economic and judicial reasons given for a stronger integration, there are quite a few who also introduce political and legitimacy-related arguments. Along these lines, questions of effectiveness and legitimacy are interrelated and can only be solved together, while the acceptance of the EU can only be secured through a “social EU”. Differences exist, however, about the preconditions to be met in order to develop a stronger EU social policy (Offe and Preuß 2006; Scharpf 2007).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
For an overview of the different intergovernmentalist branches of European integration theory see Schimmelfennig 2004.
For an overview of the different kinds of institutionalism in European integration theory, see Pollack 2004.
For a review of the literature and in particular the German case, see Lessenich 2003.
For an overview over the different generations of Europeanisation literature, see Bache 2003.
Later, Börzel acknowledged the doubled-side nature of the process, with member states first transferring competencies to the EU which then in turn influence on their own policies and practices (Börzel 2001).
For others it is part of the problem, as participation in European elections has traditionally been low and not about European issues and as the proportions of the MEPs do not correspond to the size of the European nations. From this perspective there are structural limitations to the scale of representative democracy (Dahl 1999a).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2008). State of the art. In: Soft Governance in Hard Politics. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91810-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91810-5_2
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16367-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91810-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)