Skip to main content

Commodification: A Necessary Evil?

  • Chapter
Mehrwertiger Kapitalismus

Abstract

Critiques of capitalism come in two kinds. One kind attacks capitalism in practice. It is associated with Joseph Schumpeter, who targeted the monopolisation of capital for stifling the entrepreneurial spirit, the very soul of capitalism. The other critique is older and goes deeper, attacking capitalism in principle. It is associated with Karl Marx, who targeted the commodification of labour for alienating us from our common humanity. Whereas Schumpeter was worried about capitalism’s practical tendency to concentrate wealth and thereby arrest the economy’s natural dynamism, Marx objected to capitalism’s principled tendency to evaporate the solid core of our “species being“ through the price mechanism. Both critiques retain their power today, though to a large extent, they cut against each other. I shall explore this point here from the commodification side. I take seriously - but ultimately reject - the neo-liberal proposition that commodification is merely an institutionalised extension of natural liberty. However, this does not deny either the good or the bad consequences that have resulted from this process, both of which are connected, as Marx originally thought, to the kind of person that commodification makes us become.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker, Gary S. (1964): Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgmann, Albert (2006): A moral conception of commodification. In: N. Stehr/ C. Henning/ B. Weiler (eds.): The moralization of the market. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. pp. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Michael F. (2003): Who owns native culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall (1999): Macrohistory: Essays in sociology of the long run. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard (1982): The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve (2002): Knowledge management foundations. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve (2006): The market: source or target of morality?. In: N. Stehr/ C. Henning/ B. Weiler (eds.): The moralization of the market. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. pp. 129–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, Reiner/Nico Stehr (2001): Why is Werner Sombart not part of the core of classical sociology? In: Journal of Classical Sociology 1. pp. 257–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Anil (2007): Is a just system also fair? Traversing the domain of knowledge, institutions, culture and ethics. In: N. Stehr/ B. Weiler (eds.): Who owns knowledge? Knowledge and the Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books. pp. 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Fred (1976): The social limits to growth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert (1977): The passions and the interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitch, Edmund (1981): The law and economics of rights in valuable information. In: Journal of Legal Studies 9. pp. 683–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandeville, Bernard (1970): The fable of the bees. Harmondsworth UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Donald (1993): Things that make us smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert (1974): Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Emma (2001): Economic sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, David (2008): Political hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabright, Paul (2004): The company of strangers: A natural history of economic life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, David Ramsey (1992): From Marx to Mises: Post-capitalist society and the challenge of economic calculation. La Salle IL: Open Court Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stephan A. Jansen Eckhard Schröter Nico Stehr

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fuller, S. (2008). Commodification: A Necessary Evil?. In: Jansen, S.A., Schröter, E., Stehr, N. (eds) Mehrwertiger Kapitalismus. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91784-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91784-9_4

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15864-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91784-9

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics