Abstract
Latin America has a population of 547m (2008) and is the most urbanised of the developing areas of the world, with around 80% of its citizens living in cities (ECLA 2008).1 The region is marked by the most extreme variation in living standards in the world. The average income is $5,540 (World Bank 2008) but some 40% of the population live below the poverty line. As a result, Latin American societies are characterised by low levels of inclusiveness and weak citizenship. Despite the common heritage of Spanish and Portuguese colonialism, there is a surprisingly high degree of diversity with regard to administrative structures within the 19 nations, 350 states and regions and over 16,000 municipalities of the region. The four largest countries of the region (Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Venezuela) are federal nations while the rest are unitary nations. There is a long and enduring tradition of political and administrative centralisation in the region that spans both federal and unitary nations and which was reinforced by a period of authoritarian rule during the 1970s and 1980s. This legacy is epitomised by a presidential system with strong executive powers over sub-national tiers of government.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abers, Rebecca (1998): From Clientelism to Cooperation. Local Government, Participatory Policy and Civic Organisation in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Politics and Society 26 (1998)4: 511–538.
Ardaya, Ruben/ Thévoz, Laurent (2001): Promoting Popular Participation: Lessons to be Learned from the Bolivian Decentralisation Process. In: Mountain Research and Development 21 (2001)(3: 215–220.
Baierle, Sergio (2003): The Porto Alegre Thermidor. Brazil' s ‘Participatory Budget’ at the Crossroads. Socialist Register 2003. London: Merlin Press.
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo (2001): Participation, Activism and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory. Politics and Society (2001)29: 43–72.
Bland, Gary (2004): Enclaves and Elections: The Decision to Decentralize in Chile. In: Montero, Alfred / Samuels, David (Eds.) (2004): Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press: 94–121.
Bruce, Iain (2004): The Porto Alegre Alternative: Direct Democracy in Action. London: Pluto Press.
Cabrero, Enrique (1996): Las Políticas Descentralizadoras en el Ambito Internacional, Caracas: Nueva Sociedad: 72–95.
Campero, José/ Gray, George (2001): Gestión Pública Bajo Captura y Fragmentación Política: Cuatro Estudios de Caso en Bolivia. Revista Instituciones y Desarrollo (2001)10: 171–200.
Cunill, Nuria (1991): Participación Ciudadana. Caracas: Centro Latinoamericano de Administración Para el Desarrollo.
Cunill, Nuria (2003): Responsabilización por el Control Social. Cuadernos de Ciencias Sociales. 128. Costa Rica: FLACSO.
De la Maza, Gonzalo (2003): Innovaciones Ciudadanas y Políticas Públicas Locales en Chile, Reforma y Democracia 26 (2006): 137–164.
Faguet, Jean-Paul (2006): Decentralizing Bolivia: Local Government in the Jungle, in Bardhan, Pranab /Mookherjee, Dilip (Eds.) (2006): Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing Countries. A Comparative Perspective. MIT Press: 125–151.
Gaytán, María (2005): Los Comités Ciudadanas de Control y Vigilancia del Estado de México. Convergencia Mexico (2005) 39: 51–73.
Goldfrank, Benjamin (2002): The Fragile Flower of Local Democracy. A Case Study of Decentralization/Participation in Montevideo. Politics and Society (2002) 30: 51–83.
Gret, Marion/ Sintomer, Yves (2005): The Porto Alegre Experiment - Learning Lessons for Better Democracy. London: Zed Press.
Molina, Carlos (2003): Las Mancomunida des Municipales: Una Alternativa Para el Desarrollo Territorial. Granada: Unión Iberoamericana de Municipalistas.
Montecinos, Egon (2003): De la Asociatividad Municipal a la Asociatividad Estratégica. Granada: Unión Iberoamericana de Municipalistas.
Nickson, Robert Andrew/ Vargas, Claudia (2002): The Limitations of Water Regulation. The Failure of the Cochabamba Concession in Bolivia. Bulletin of Latin American Research 21 (2002)1: 99–120.
Nickson, Robert Andrew (2001): Establishing and Implementing a Joint Venture: Water and Sanitation Services in Cartagena, Colombia. Building Municipal Capacity for Private Sector Participation Series. New York: UNDP.
Nickson, Robert Andrew (2006)Public-Private Partnerships and Pro-Poor Development. The Experience of the Cordoba Water Concession in Argentina. In: Bangura, Yusuf /Larbi, George (Eds.) (2006): Public Sector Management Reform in Developing Countrie. Palgrave Macmillan Press: 255–273.
Norton, Alan (1994): International Handbook of Local and Regional Government: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Democracies. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
O' Neill, Kathleen (2005): Decentralizing the State. Elections, Parties and Local Power in the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prates, Luciano (1998): Descentralización, Intersectorialidad y Red en la Gestión de la Ciudad, Reforma y Democracia 18 (1998): 89–108.
Raczynski, Dagmar/ Cabezas, Mabel (1988): Ingresos y Gastos Municipales: Chile (1977–87) y Gran Santiago (1985/86). Santiago: CIEPLAN.
Rosales, Mario/ Valencia, Salvador (2007): Latin America. In: UCLG. Decentralization and Local Democracy in the World. Barcelona: United Cities and Local Governments.
Santos, Boaventura (1998): Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre. Toward a Redistributive Democracy, Politics and Society 26 (1998)4: 416–510.
Schneider, Aaron/ Baquero, Marcelo (2006): Get What You Want, Give What You Can. Embedded Public Finance in Porto Alegre. Brighton: IDS.
Souza, Celina (2001): Participatory Budgeting in Brazilian Cities. Limits and Possibilities in Building Democratic Institutions. Urban Governance, Partnerships and Poverty Research. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press.
Subsecretaría de Desarrollo Regional y Administrativo (1999): Asociativismo Municipal. Santiago: SUBDERE.
Willis, Eliza et. al. (1999): The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 34 (1999)1: 7–56.
World Bank (2008): World Development Report 2009. Washington: IBRD.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kersting, N., Caulfield, J., Nickson, R.A., Olowu, D., Wollmann, H. (2009). Local Governance Reforms in Latin America. In: Local Governance Reform in Global Perspective. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91686-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91686-6_3
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16953-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91686-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)