Abstract
The scene could be at any one of many informal gatherings in recent years. There are people standing and sitting, chatting and drinking, and conversation is flowing happily. When one of those present is asked what ‘he does’ he replies that he is in the Army. “What rank are you?” - “Lieutenant Colonel.” Waggishly, the other speaker (who has never been near the Army in his life) replies,“Oh, I must watch my step then!”, and draws himself up rather awkwardly into what he imagines to be a military pose, grins clownishly and raises a hand in a mock salute. On the same evening a television programme unfolds. It is a story of every-day life in a military unit. A lieutenant and his company sergeant major are conversing in loud voices. Private Smith, one of the chief characters in the drama, is standing on guard duty about fifteen feet away.“Sergeant Major, I can’t do anything to stop Private Smith being court- martialled. It’s what the Major wants and that’s that.” -“But you know what they’ll do to him Sir? He was only late for parade the once.” -“Yes, but that was the chance that the Major was waiting for. You know how things are between them. And anyway, who knows - two weeks in the glass-house may do him good.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature
Asad, Talal (1979): Anthropology and the Analysis of Ideology. In: Man, 14:4, 607–627.
Banton, Michael, P. (1965): The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology. London: Tavistock Publications.
Beattie, John (1966): Other Cultures: Aims, Methods and Achievements in Social Anthropology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Cerroni-Long, E. L. (1995): Insider Anthropology. Arlington, VA: National Association for the Practice of Anthropology.
Chapman, Brian (1967): The Science of Society: An Introduction to Sociology. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
Collins, Peter (2002): Connecting Anthropology and Quakerism: Transcending the Insider/Outsider Dichotomy. In: Arweck, Elizabeth/ Stringer, Martin D. (Eds.): Theorizing Faith: The Insider/Outsider Problem in the Study of Ritual. Birmingham: he University of Birmingham Press, 501–515.
Durkheim, Emile (1938): The Rules of Sociological Method. Edited by Catlin, George E. G., translated by Solovay, Sarah A./Mueller, John H. Chicago: Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Forsythe, Diana, E. (2001): Studying Those Who Study Us: An Anthropologist in the World of Artificial Intelligence. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fox, Kate (2004): Watching the English: The Hidden Rules of English Behaviour. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Giddens, Anthony (1976): New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.
Giddens, Anthony (1984): The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony (2001): Sociology. 4th edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony/ Turner, Jonathan, H. (1987): Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Grimshaw, Anna/ Hart, Keith(1993): Anthropology and the Crisis of Intellectuals. Cambridge: Prickly Pear Press.
Hockey, John (1986): Squaddies: Portrait of a Subculture. Exeter: University of Exeter.
Killworth, Paul (1997): Culture and Power in the British Army: Hierarchies, Boundaries and Construction. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Cambridge University.
Killworth, Paul (1998): The British Army in Northern Ireland: Internal Security Operations, Training, and the Cease-Fire. In: Cambridge Anthropology, 20:3, 1–20.
King, Anthony (2006) The Word of Command: Communication and Cohesion in the Military. In: Armed Forces and Society, 32:2, 493–512.
King, Anthony (2007): The Existence of Group Cohesion in the Armed Forces. In: Armed Forces and Society, 32:4, 638–645.
Kirke, Charles (1988): Social Structures in the Peninsular Army. In: RUSI Journal, Summer, 65–71.
Kirke, Charles (2000): A Model for the Analysis of Fighting Spirit in the British Army. In: Strachan, Hew (Ed.): The British Army, Manpower and Society into the Twenty-First Century. London: Frank Cass, 227–241.
Kirke, Charles (2002): Social Structures in the Regular Combat Arms Units of the British Army: A Model. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Cranfield University.
Kuper, Adam (1977): The Social Anthropology of Radcliffe-Brown. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Labaree, Robert, V. (2002): The Risk of ‘Going Observationalist’: Negotiating the Hidden Dilemmas of Being an Insider Participant Observer. In: Qualitative Research, 2:1, 97–122.
Lewis, David (1999): Revealing, Widening, Deepening? A Review of the Existing and Potential Contribution of Anthropological Approaches to ‘Third Sector’ Research’. In: Human Organization, 58:1, 73–81.
Loomba, N.Paul (1978): Management-A Quantitative Perspective. London: Collier Macmillan.
Loyal, Steven/ Barnes, Barry (2001): ‘Agency’ as a Red Herring in Social Theory. In: Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 13:4, 507–524.
Maina, Faith (2003): Indigenous ‘Insider’ Academics: Educational Research or Advocacy? In: Canadian Journal of Native Studies, XXIII:2, 207–226.
Mair, Lucy (1965): An Introduction to Social Anthropology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
MOD (1990): The Drill Manual, Army Code Number 70166. London: HMSO.
MOD (2001): Manual of Military Law Part I. 12th edition. London: HMSO.
Ortner, Sherry (1984): Theory in Anthropology Since the Sixties. In: Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26, 126–166.
Stewart, Nora Kinzer (1991): Mates and Muchachos: Unit Cohesion in the Falk-lands/Malvinas War. New York: Brassey’s (US) Inc.
Strachan, Hew (Ed.) (2000): The British Army, Manpower and Society into the Twenty-First Century. London: Frank Cass.
Thornborrow, Thomas (2005): The Construction of Collective Identity in the British Parachute Regiment: A Storytelling Approach. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Nottingham University.
Wilson, Brian (1990): Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications. Chiches-ter: John Wiley & Sons.
Wilson, Brian (2001): Soft Systems Methodology: Conceptual Model Building and its Contribution. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Zugbach, Reginald von (1988): Power and Prestige in the British Army. Aldershot: Avebury.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kirke, C. (2009). Seeing Through the Stereotype: British Army Culture — An Insider Anthropology. In: Armed Forces, Soldiers and Civil-Military Relations. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91409-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91409-1_1
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-16324-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91409-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)