Skip to main content

Governance von Innovationssystemen und die politische Ökonomie der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit

  • Chapter
Innovationssysteme

Auszug

Im Kontext politisch-ökonomischer Diskurse zu Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Globalisierung wird auch das institutionelle Verhältnis zwischen Markt und Staat neu bestimmt. Folgt man der Vorstellung, dass die spezifische Entwicklungsdynamik marktwirtschaftlicher Systeme auf der Durchsetzung technologischer und organisationeller Innovationen beruht, dann ist nach den institutionellen Voraussetzungen dieser Innovationsprozesse zu fragen. Der Innovationssysteme-Ansatz untersucht die institutionelle Architektur von Innovationsprozessen. Ein Innovationssystem umfasst jene Netzwerke aus Institutionen des privaten und öffentlichen Sektors, deren Interaktionen zur Generierung und Diffusion neuer Technologien beitragen. Wissen und Lernen gelten als fundamentale Struktur- und Handlungskomponenten, deren Gehalte über die institutionellen Netzwerke von Innovationssystemen artikuliert werden. In diesem Sinne gilt, dass die institutionellen Voraussetzungen technologischer Innovationsprozesse vielfältige Koordinationsformen umfassen, die wirtschaftlichen Wandel in einen spezifischen sozialökonomischen Kontext einbetten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Amable, B. (2003): The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A./ Cohendet, P. (2004): Architectures of knowledge. Firms, capabilities, and communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blättel-Mink, B. (2006): Kompendium der Innovationsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R. (1988): Technical change and the theory of ‘régulation’. In: Dosi, G./ Freeman, Ch./ Nelson, R./ Silverberg, G. / Soete, L. (Hrsg.): Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter. 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braczyk, H.-J./ Heidenreich, M. (1998): Regional governance structures in a globalized world. In: Braczyk, H.-J./ Cooke Ph./ Heidenreich, M. (Hrsg.): Regional innovation systems. The role of governances in a globalized word. London: UCL Press. 414–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (1999): The economic theory of the developmental state. In: Woo-Cumings, M. (Hrsg.): The developmental state. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. 182–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesnais, F. (1991): Technological competitiveness as a form of structural competitiveness. In: Niosi, J. (Hrsg.): Technology and national competitiveness. Oligopoly, technological innovation, and international competition, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 142–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conceição, P./ Heitor, M./ Lundvall, B.-Å. (2003): Towards a learning society. In: Conceição P./ Heitor, M./ Lundvall, B.-Å. (Hrsg.): Innovation, competence building and social cohesion in europe. Towards a learning society. Cheltenham: Elgar. 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Ph. (2001): Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy. In: Industrial and Corporate Change 10. 945–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2005): Capitalist diversity and change. Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalum, B./ Johnson, B./ Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992): Public policy in the learning society. In: Lundvall, B.-Å. (Hrsg.): National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter. 296–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1990): Economic change and its interpretation, or, is there a “Schumpeterian Approach”? In: Heertje, A./ Perlman, M. (Hrsg.): Evolving technology and market structure. Studies in Schumpeterian economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G./ Tyson, L./ Zysman, J. (1989): Trade, technologies, and development. A framework for discussing Japan. In: Johnson, C./ Tyson, L./ Zysman, J. (Hrsg.): Politics and productivity. The real story of why Japan works. New York: Ballinger. 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (1999): Understanding varieties in the structure and performance of national innovation systems. The concept of economic style. In: Groenewegen, J./ Vromen, J. (Hrsg.): Institutions and the evolution of capitalism. Implications of evolutionary economics. Aldershot: Elgar. 141–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2006): Institutions, entrepreneurship and the rationale of government. An outline of the Schumpeterian theory of the state. In: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 59.4. 497–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2007): Public policy, governance, and innovation. Entrepreneurial states in East Asian economic development. In: International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 3.1. 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2008a): Embedded entrepreneurship. The institutional dynamics of innovation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2008b): Innovationsstrategien und Regionalentwicklung. Theorie und Empirie regionaler Innovationsprozesse. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, A. (2008c): Introduction. The institutions of the market. In: Ebner, A./ Beck, N. (Hrsg.): The institutions of the market. Organisations, social systems, and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J./ Kuhlmann, S./ Smits, R. (2003): New governance for innovation. The need for horizontal and systemic policy coordination. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Paper Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis 2/2003. Karlsruhe: FhG-ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, Ch. (1997): Systems of innovation approaches. Their emergence and characteristics. In: Edquist, Ch. (Hrsg.): Systems of innovation. Technologies, organizations and institutions. London: Pinter, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, Ch. (2001): Innovation policy in the systems of innovation approach. Some basic principles. In: Fischer, M. M./ Fröhlich, J. (Hrsg.): Knowledge, complexity and innovation systems. Berlin: Springer, 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, Ch./ Johnson, B. (1997): Institutions and organizations in systems of innovation. In: Edquist, Ch. (Hrsg.): Systems of innovation. Technologies, organizations and institutions. London: Pinter. 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elam, M. (1997): National imaginations and systems of innovation. In: Edquist, Ch. (Hrsg.): Systems of innovation. Technologies, organizations and institutions. London: Pinter. 157–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, K. u. a. (1996): Systemic competitiveness. A new challenge for firms and governments. In: CEPAL Review 59. August. 39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001): Social skill and the theory of fields. In: Sociological Theory 19.2. 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (1995): Toward the learning region. In: Futures 27.5. 527–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Ch. (1987): Technology and economic performance. Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Ch. (1994): Technological revolutions and catching-up. ICT and the NICs. In: Fagerberg, J. u.a. (Hrsg.): The dynamics of technology, trade and growth. Aldershot: Elgar. 198–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Ch. (1995): The “national system of innovation” in historical Perspective. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics 19.1. 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Ch. (2002): Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems complementarity and economic growth. In: Research Policy 31. 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Ch. (2004): Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. In: Industrial and Corporate Change 13.3. 541–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Ch./ Perez, C. (1988): Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In: Dosi, G. u. a. (Hrsg.): Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter. 38–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Ch./ Louçã, F. (2001): As time goes by. From the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Ch./ Soete, L. (1997): The economics of industrial innovation, 3. Aufl., London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromhold-Eisebith, E. (2007): Bridging scales in innovation policies. How to link regional, national and international innovation systems. In: European Planning Studies 15.2. 217–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furman, J. F./ Porter, M. E./ Stern, S. (2002): The determinants of national innovative capacity. In: Research Policy 31. 899–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. (2004): From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. In: Research Policy 33. 897–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giersch, H. (1984): The age of Schumpeter. American Economic Review 74.2. 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, E. (1999): Innovationspolitik im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Zur neuen Architektur des Staatlichen. In: Grimmer, K./ Kuhlmann, S./ Meyer-Krahmer, F. (Hrsg.): Innovationspolitik in globalisierten Arenen. Opladen: Leske und Budrich. 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedoorn, J. (1994): Schumpeter. An appraisal of his theory of innovation and entrepreneurship. MERIT Research Memorandum 2/94-020. Maastricht: MERIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. A./ Soskice, D. (2001): An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Hall, P. A./ Soskice, D. (Hrsg.): Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanusch, H./ Pyka, A. (2007): Principles of Neo-Schumpeterian economics. In: Cambridge Journal of Economics 31.2. 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauff, V./ Scharpf, F. W. (1977): Modernisierung der Volkswirtschaft. Technologiepolitik als Strukturpolitik. Frankfurt am Main: EVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. R. (2000): Doing institutional analysis. Implications for the study of innovations. In: Review of International Political Economy 7.4. 595–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. R./ Boyer, R (1997): Coordination of economic actors and social systems of production. In: Hollingsworth, J. R./ Boyer, R. (Hrsg.): Contemporary capitalism. The embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, G./ Deeg, R. (2006): How many varieties of capitalism? Comparing the comparative institutional analysis of capitalist diversity. MPIfG Discussion Paper 06/2. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, D. (1996): Nationale Innovationssysteme, soziales Kapital und Innovationsstrategien von Unternehmen. In: Soziale Welt 47. 411–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002): The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (1992) Institutional learning. In: Lundvall, B.-Å. (Hrsg.): National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter. 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. (1996): Technologiepolitik als Lernprozeß. In: Grimm, D. (Hrsg.): Staatsaufgaben. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp. 391–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S. (1999): Politisches System und Innovationssystem in „postnationalen“ Arenen. In: Grimmer, K./ Kuhlmann S./ Meyer-Krahmer, F. (Hrsg.): Innovationspolitik in globalisierten Arenen. Opladen: Leske und Budrich. 11–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S. (2001): Future governance of innovation policy in europe three scenarios. In: Research Policy 30. 953–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, S./ Schmoch, U./ Heinze, T. (2003): Governance der Kooperation heterogener Partner im deutschen Forschungs-und Innovationssystem. Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Paper Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis 1/2003. Karlsruhe: FhG-ISI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larédo, P./ Mustar, P. (2001): General conclusion. Three major trends in research. In: Larédo, P./ Mustar, P. (Hrsg.): Research and innovation policies in the new global economy. Cheltenham: Elgar. 497–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütz, S. (2003): Governance in der politischen Ökonomie. MPIfG Discussion Paper 03/5. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1985): Product innovation and user-producer interaction. Industrial Development Research Series 31. Aalborg: Aalborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992a) Introduction. In: Lundvall, B.-Å. (Hrsg.): National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter. 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1992b): User-producer-relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. In: Lundvall, B.-Å. (Hrsg.): National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter. 45–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (1998): Why study national systems and national styles of innovation? In: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10.4. 407–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (2002): Innovation policy in the globalizing learning economy. In: Archibugi, D./ Lundvall, B.-Å (Hrsg.): The globalizing learning economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 273–291.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-Å. (2006): Nation states, social capital and economic development a system’s approach to knowledge creation and learning. Aalborg University Research Center on Development and International Relations Working Paper 135. Aalborg: Aalborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B-Å. (2007): National innovation systems analytical concept and development tool. In: Industry and Innovation 14.1. 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B-Å./ Johnson, B./ Andersen, E. S./ Dalum, B. (2002): National systems of production, innovation and competence-building. In: Research Policy 31. 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mani, S. (2002): Government, innovation and technology policy. An International Comparative Analysis. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2001): Triebkräfte der Technikentwicklung und die Rolle des Staates. In: Simonis, G./ Martinsen, R./ Saretzki, T. (Hrsg.): Politik und Technik. Analysen zum Verständnis von technologischem, politischem und staatlichen Wandel am Anfang des 21. Jahrhunderts. Politische Vierteljahresschrift. Sonderheft 31. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R. (2004): Governance Theory als fortentwickelte Steuerungstheorie? MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/1. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner, D. (1997): The network society. Economic development and international competitiveness as problems of social governance. London: Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2005): Institutional complementarities, path dependency, and the dynamics of firms. In: Morgan, G./ Whitley, R./ Moen, E. (Hrsg.): Changing capitalisms? Internationalization, institutional change, and systems of economic organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 415–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mytelka, L. K./ Smith, K. (2002): Policy learning and innovation theory. An interactive and coevolving process. In: Research Policy 31. 1467–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1995): Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change. In: Journal of Economic Literature XXXIII. 48–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (2002): The problem of market bias in modern capitalist economies. In: Industrial and Corporate Change 11. 207–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R. (2004): The challenge of building an effective innovation system for catch-up. In: Oxford Development Studies 32.3. 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R (2008): The co-evolution of institutions and technologies in market economies. In: Ebner, A./ Beck, N. (Hrsg.): The institutions of the market. Organizations, social systems and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 253–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R./ Rosenberg, N. (1993): Technical innovation and national systems. In: Nelson, R. (Hrsg.): National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R./ Winter, S. (1982): An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R./ Winter, S. (2002): Evolutionary theorizing in economics. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives 16.2. 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J./ Bellon, B. (1996): The globalization of national innovation systems. In: de la Mothe, J./ Paquet, G. (Hrsg.): Evolutionary economics and the new international political economy. London: Pinter. 138–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Niosi, J. u. a. (1993): National systems of innovation. In search of a workable concept. Technology in Society 15. 207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2000): Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005): Governance of innovation systems I. Synthesis Report. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. (1995) The end of the nation state? The rise of regional economies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P./ Pavitt, K. (1994): National innovation systems. Why they are important, and how they might be measured and compared. In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology 3.1. 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K./ Patel, P. (1999) Global corporations and national systems of innovation: who dominates whom? In: Archibugi, D./ Howells, J./ Michie, J. (Hrsg.): Innovation policy in a global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 94–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C. (1983): Structural change and the assimilation of new technologies in the economic and social systems. In: Futures 15.4. 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C. (1990): Technical change, competitive restructuring and institutional reform in developing countries. World Bank Strategic Planning and Review Discussion Paper 4. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990): The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quéré, M. (2004): National systems of innovation and national systems of corporate governance. A missing link? In: Economics of Innovation and New Technology 13.1. 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (1991): The work of nations. Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2004): Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Draft Manuscript, John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, September 2004. http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/rodrik/UNIDOsep.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti, P. P. (1996): Technological evolution, variety and the economy. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviotti, P. P. (2001): Networks, national innovation systems and self-organisation. In: Fischer, M. M./ Fröhlich, J. (Hrsg.): Knowledge, complexity and innovation systems. Berlin: Springer. 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schienstock, G. (2004): From path dependency to path creation. A new challenge to the systems of innovation approach. In: Schienstock, G. (Hrsg.): Embracing the knowledge economy. The dynamic transformation of the Finnish innovation system. Cheltenham: Elgar. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, V. (2008): Politiknetzwerke und die Steuerung komplexer Gesellschaften. In: Ebner, A./ Heine, K./ Schnellenbach, J. (Hrsg.): Innovation zwischen Markt und Staat. Die institutionelle Dynamik des wirtschaftlichen Wandels. Baden-Baden: Nomos. 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1926): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus, 2. Aufl., Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A (1939): Business cycles. A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process (2 Bände). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942): Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1951): Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In: Clemence, R. V. (Hrsg.): Essays of J. A. Schumpeter. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley. 248–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits, R./ Kuhlmann, S. (2004): The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. In: International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1.1–2. 4–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J./ Strange, S. (1991): Rival states and rival firms. Competition for world market shares. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M./ Scott, A.J. (1995): The wealth of regions. Market forces and policy imperatives in local and global context. In: Futures 27.5. 505–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storper, M. (1995): Regional technology coalitions. An essential dimension of national technology policy. In: Research Policy 24.6. 895–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tylecote, A. (1996): Managerial objectives and technological collaboration. The role of national variations in cultures and structures. In: Coombs, R. u. a. (Hrsg.): Technological collaboration. The dynamics of cooperation in industrial innovation. Cheltenham: Elgar. 34–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1996): Globalization and its limits. Reports of the death of the national rconomy are greatly exaggerated. In: Berger, S./ Dore, R. (Hrsg.): National diversity and global capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 60–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werle, R. (2003): Institutionalistische Technikanalyse. Stand und Perspektiven. MPIfG Discussion Paper 03/8. Köln: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R (1999): Divergent capitalisms. The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2000): The institutional structuring of innovation strategies. Business systems, firm types, and patterns of technical change in different market economies. In: Organization Studies 21.5. 855–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. (2005): How national are business systems? The role of states and complementary institutions in standardizing systems of economic coordination and control at the national level. In: Morgan, G./ Whitley, R./ Moen, E. (Hrsg.): Changing capitalisms? Internationalization, institutional change, and systems of economic organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 190–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H. (2002): Dystopia. Studien zur Krisis des Wissens in der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zysman, J. (1994): How institutions create historically rooted trajectories of growth. In: Industrial and Corporate Change 3.1. 243–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Birgit Blättel-Mink Alexander Ebner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ebner, A. (2009). Governance von Innovationssystemen und die politische Ökonomie der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Ebner, A. (eds) Innovationssysteme. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91349-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91349-0_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-14937-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-91349-0

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics