Skip to main content

Are unemployment insurance systems adapting to non-standard employment?

  • Chapter
Unemployment Insurance and Non-Standard Employment

Abstract

This chapter will discuss the features of the countries’ unemployment insurance systems that are important in respect of the benefit receipt of non-standard workers. The first, more theoretical part on the male breadwinner model will take up the second hypothesis, that countries vary concerning the connection between social insurance and standard employment. We shall address the following questions: Why do unemployment insurance systems fail to cover certain groups? And have there been developments to better cover groups that are excluded from or disadvantaged in unemployment insurance systems? In order to answer these questions we shall examine and compare the unemployment insurance schemes of the four countries. After briefly discussing the main principles and developments we shall focus on the design features that potentially influence the coverage of part-time and temporary workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

o

  • Rubery, J. / M. Smith / C. Fagan / D. Grimshaw (1998b) Women and European Employment. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen, M. / D. Meulders (2002) The Individualization of Rights in Social Protection Systems. In: H. Sarfati (ed) Labour Market and Social Protection Reforms in International Perspective: Parallel or Coverging Tracks?. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, D. (1996) Gender, equality, and welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, K. (1996) Das Normalarbeitsverhältnis und der männliche Familienernährer als Leitbilder der Sozialpolitik. In: Sozialer Fortschritt. Unabhängige Zeitschrift für Sozialpolitik 4. 106

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, R. (1988) „Versicherungsprinzip“ und Umverteilung — Einige theoretische Überlegungen zu den Grenzen des Versicherbaren. In: G. Rolf et al. (eds) Sozialvertrag und Sicherung. Zur ökonomischen Theorie staatlicher Versicherungs-und Umverteilungssysteme. Frankfurt/New York: Campus. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H. / M. Mercader-Prats (2003) EUROMOD Country Report: Spain (2001 Tax-Benefit System). 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. /J. Micklewright (1991) Unemployment Compensation and Labor Market Transitions: A Critical Review. In: Journal of Economic Literature 29. 1688

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. /J. Micklewright (1991) Unemployment Compensation and Labor Market Transitions: A Critical Review. In: Journal of Economic Literature 29. 1689

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy, U. (2000) Sozialreformen unter New Labour. In: Zeitschrift für ausländisches Arbeits-und Sozialrecht 14,2. 152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassler-Ristic, M. (1999) Atypische Beschäftigung in Spanien. In: E. Tálos (ed) Atypische Beschäftigung: Internationale Trends und Sozialstaatliche Regelungen. Wien: Manzsche Verlags-und Universitätsbuchhandlung. 388

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklewright, J. (1990) Why do less than a quarter of the unemployed in Britain receive unemployment insurance?. Working Paper. No. 90/17. Florence: European University Institute. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999b) The Tax/Benefit Position of Employees 1997. Paris. 59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, J. / M. Smith / C. Fagan / D. Grimshaw (1998a) State Policies and Women’s Employment and Unemployment Rates. In: J. Rubery et al. (eds) Women and European Employment. London/New York: Routledge. 171

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004a) Benefits and Wages Country Chapter: Denmark. Paris. 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesecke, J. / M. Groß (2005) Arbeitsmarktreformen und Ungleichheit. In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 16. 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimeno, J. / L. Toharia (1993) The effects of fixed-term employment on wages: theory and evidence from Spain. In: Investigaciones Econömicas 17,3. 475–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stascheit, U. / E. Turk (2004) Leitfaden für Arbeitslose. Der Rechtsratgeber zum SGB III. Stand 1.1. 2004. 21. Auflage. Leck: Fachhochschulverlag. 95

    Google Scholar 

  • Toharia, L. / M. A. Malo (2000) The Spanish Experiment: Pros and Cons of Flexibility at the Margin. In: G. Esping-Andersen et al. (eds) Why Deregulate Labour Markets?. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 321

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentolila, S. /J. Jimeno (2003) Spanish Unemployment: The End of the Wild Ride?. Documenta de Trabajo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäcker, G. (2001) Flexibilität und soziale Sicherung in Deutschland: Bestandsaufnahmen und Reformoptionen für die Alterssicherung. In: U. Klammer et al. (eds) Flexicurity — Soziale Sicherung und Flexibilisierung der Arbeits-und Lebensverhältnisse. Ministerium für Arbeit und Soziales, Qualifikation und Technologie des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. 477–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Are unemployment insurance systems adapting to non-standard employment?. In: Unemployment Insurance and Non-Standard Employment. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91197-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics