Bildung as Human Development: An educational view on the Capabilities Approach



The Capabilities Approach as an educational point of view A basic argument of our paper is that the capabilities approach elaborates an educational perspective. It contains a conception of justice based on considerations which come close to the German notion of Bildung.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, J., 2002: Capability Egalitarianism and Moral Selfhood. Paper at the Conference Promoting Women’s Capabilities: examining Nussbaum’s Approach, September 2002 in Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Alkire, S., 2004: Resourcing gender equality in education: thinking through rights. Paper presented at the seminar Beyond Access — Resources for Gender Equality and Quality Education April 2004, in Oxford. Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson E. S., 1999: What is the point of equality? In: Ethics 109: 287–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, E., 2006: Justifying the Capabilities Approach to Justice. Forthcoming in: Brighouse, H./ Robeyns, I. (eds.): Measuring Justice: Capabilities and Primary Goods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arndt, Ch./ Volkert, J., 2006: Assessing Capability Determinants in Germany: Concept and First Empirical Results. Paper at the 6th Human Development and Capability Association (HDCA) Conference at the University of Groningen, NL, August/September 2006.Google Scholar
  6. Arneson, R., 2002: Egalitarianism. In: Zalta, N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  7. Arneson, R., 2005: Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good Enough’ Is Not Good Enough. In: Kaufman, A. (ed.): Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems: London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Begg, I./ Berghman, J., 2002: Introduction: EU social (exclusion) policy revisited? In: Journal of European Social Policy 12,3: 179–194.Google Scholar
  9. Bénicourt, E., 2002: Is Amartya Sen a post-autistic economist? In: Post-Autistic Economics Review, 15,4 ( Scholar
  10. Bhargava, R., 1992: Individualism in Social Science: Forms and Limits of a Methodology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Biesta, G., 2002: How General Can Bildung Be? Reflections on the Future of a Modern Educational Ideal. In: Journal of Philosophy of Education 36,3: 377–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biesta G./ Tedder, M., 2006: How is Agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. Learning Lives/TLRP Working Paper 5. University of Exter. Exter.Google Scholar
  13. Bleicher, J., 2006: Bildung. In: Theory, Culture & Society 23: 364–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. BMAS, 2005: Lebenslagen in Deutschland — Der 2. Armuts-und Reichtumsbericht der Bundesregierung. Berlin: BMAS.Google Scholar
  15. Bittlingmayer, U./ Bauer, U./ Ziegler, H., 2005: Grundlinien einer politischen Soziologie der Ungleichheit und Herrschaft. In: Widersprüche, 98: 13–28.Google Scholar
  16. Bögenhold, D., 2001: Social Inequality and the Sociology of Life Style. In: The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60,4: 829–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Böhnke, P., 2007: Policy or Privacy — What Matters Most for Individual Weil-Being? Determinants of life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. WZB Discussion Paper — SP I 2007-203. Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
  18. Bojer, H., 2006: Resourcism as an alternative to capabilities: a critical discussion. Online: mora. Scholar
  19. Bonvin, J.-M./ Farvaque, N., 2005: Promoting Capability for Work. The Role of Local Actors. Preprint. Forthcoming in Deneulin, S. et al. (eds.): Capability and Justice. Towards Structural Transformation. La Haye: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bonvin, J.-M./ Farvaque, N., 2005: Social Opportunities and Individual Responsibility: The Capability Approach and the Third Way. In: Ethique et Economic No. 3.Google Scholar
  21. Bonvin, J.-M./ Thelen, M., 2003: Deliberative Democracy and Capabilities. The Impact and Significance of Capability for Voice. Paper at the 3rd Conference on the Capability Approach: From Sustainable Development to Sustainable Freedom, September 2003 in Pavia. Pavia.Google Scholar
  22. Borghi, V./ Van Berkel, R., 2005: Activation, participation, individualisation: shifting public private boundaries, shifting roles of citizens? Paper at the 3rd ESPAnet Conference, September 2005, Fribourg.Google Scholar
  23. Bourdieu, P., 1986: The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J. (ed.): Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  24. Bourdieu, P., 2000: Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Browne, J./ Stears, M., 2005: Capabilities, resources, and systematic injustice: a case of gender inequality. In: Politics Philosophy Economics 4: 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Butler, B., 2003. Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach: Political Criticism and the Burden of Proof. In: International Journal of Politics and Ethics, Spring 2003.Google Scholar
  27. Callinicos, A., 2000: Titel???? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  28. Clement, W., 2000: Contribution in: Social Democratic Party of Germany (ed.): Grundwerte heute: Gerechtigkeit. (Basic values today: Justice.) Berlin. Berlin: SPD.Google Scholar
  29. Cooke, B./ Kothari, U., 2001 (eds.): Participation: The New Tyranny? New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  30. Cohen G. A., 1993: Equality of what? On welfare, goods, and capabilities. In: Nussbaum, M./ Sen, A. (eds.): The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Cohen, E. H., 2001: A Structural Analysis of the R. Kahane Code of Informality: Elements toward a Theory of Informal Education. In: Sociological Inquiry 71,3: 357–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Crompton, R., 2006: Employment and the Family: The Reconfiguration of Work and Family Life in Contemporary Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. De Herdt, T., 2005: Capability-oriented social policy and the ability to appear in public without shame. In: Qizilbash, M./ Comim, F./ Alkire, S. (eds.): The Capability Approach. Concepts, Measures and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Dean, H./ Bonvin, J.-M./ Vielle, P./ Farvaque, N., 2004: Reconceptualising the European Employment Strategy from a capabilities and a rights Perspective. Paper presented at the final conference of the European Union COST A15 research network, Reforming Social Protection Systems in Europe. May 2004. Nantes.Google Scholar
  35. Dean, H./ Bonvin, J. M./ Vielle, P./ Farvaque, N., 2005: Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to-work policies. In: European Societies 71: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Deneulin, S., 2002: Perfectionism, Paternalism and Liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum’s Capability Approach. In: Review of Political Economy, 14: 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Drèze, J./ Sen, A., 1995: India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  38. Dworkin, R., 2000: Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Dworkin, R., 2002: Sovereign Virtue. Revisited. In: Ethics 113: 106–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Erikson, R., 1974: Welfare as a Planning Goal. In: acta sociologica 17,3: 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Erikson, R., 1993: Descriptions of Inequality: The Swedish Approach to Welfare. In: Nussbaum, M./ Sen, A. (eds.): The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Farvaque, N./ Robeyns, I., 2005: L’approche alternative d’Amartya Sen. Réponse à Emmanuelle Bénicourt. In: L’Economie Politique, 27,3: 38–51.Google Scholar
  43. Flores-Crespo, P., 2004: Situating education in the capability approach. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Capability Approach, September 2004. Pavia.Google Scholar
  44. Fraser, N., 1998: Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition and Participation. In: Peterson, G. (ed.): The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 19. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  45. Fraser, N., 1997: Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Garrett, J., 2001: The Ethics of Substantial Freedom. Western Kentucky University (Online: Scholar
  47. Gasper, D., 1997: Sen’s Capability Approach and Nussbaum’s Capability Ethics. In: Journal of International Development 9,2: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gasper, D., 2002: Is Sen’s capability approach an adequate basis for considering human development? In: Review of Political Economy 14: 435–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gasper, D., 2007: What is the capability approach? Its core, rationale, partners and dangers. In: The Journal of Socio-Economics 36: 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gautié, J., 2003: Which Third Way? Asset Based versus Capability Based Citizenship. Paper at the final Cost a 13 conference in Oslo, October 2003. Oslo.Google Scholar
  51. Giddens, A., 2002: Where Now for New Labour? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  52. Gutmann, A., 1987: Democratic Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hasenfeld, Y., 1983: Human Service Organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Hemerijck, A., 2006: Recalibrating Europe’s Semi-Sovereign Welfare. Berlin: WZB.Google Scholar
  55. Hate, C./ Klein, A./ Landhäußer, S./ Ziegler, H., 2007: Das Elend der Sozialen Arbeit — Die ‚neue Unterschicht‘ und die Schwächung des Sozialen. In: Kessl, F./ Reutlinger, C./ Ziegler, H. (eds.): Erziehung zur Armut? Soziale Arbeit und die ‚neue Unterschicht‘. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  56. Jordan, B., 2003: Social Work, Mobility and Membership. Social Work & Society 1: 1–12 (www. Scholar
  57. Kahane, R., 1975: Informal youth organizations: A general model. In: Sociological Inquiry 45,4: 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kahneman, D./ Diener, E./ Schwarz, N., 1999 (eds.): Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  59. Kraut, R., 1999: Politics, neutrality, and the good. In: Social Philosophy and Policy 16,1: 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kraut, R., 2007: What Is Good and Why: The Ethics of Weil-Being. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Kymlicka, W., 1995: Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lareau, A., 2003: Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  63. Lavin, C., 2005: Postliberal agency in Marx’s Brumaire. In: Rethinking Marxism 17,3: 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Layard R., 2005: Happiness: lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. LeGrand, J., 2003: Motivation, agency, and public policy: of knights and knaves, pawns and queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Levitas, R., 2004: Beyond bourgeois right: freedom, equality and Utopia in Marx and Morris. In: The European Legacy 9,5: 605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lister, R., 2002: Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Lister, R., 2004: Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  69. Marx, K., 1971: Capital. Volume III. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  70. Morris, P., 2002: The capabilities perspective: A framework for social justice. In: Families in Society 83,3: 365–373.Google Scholar
  71. Mollenhauer, K., 1983: Vergessene Zusammenhänge. München: Juventa.Google Scholar
  72. Navarro, V., 2000: Development and quality of life: a critique of Amartya Sen’s ‘Development as Freedom’. In: International Journal of Health Services 30: 661–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nolan, B./ Whelan, Ch., 1996: Resources, Deprivation and Poverty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  74. Nussbaum, M. C., 1990: Aristotelian Social Democracy. In: Douglass, B./ Mara, G. M./ Richardson, H. S. (eds.): Liberalism and the Good. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Nussbaum, M. C., 1992: Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism. In: Political Theory 20: 202–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nussbaum, M., 1995: Human Functioning and Social Justice: in Defence of Aristotelian Essentialism. In: Tallack, D. (ed.): Critical Theory: A Reader. New York: Harvestor/Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  77. Nussbaum, M. C., 1999: Gerechtigkeit oder Das gute Leben. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  78. Nussbaum, M. C., 2000: Women and Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Nussbaum, M. C., 2003: Aristotelian Social Democracy: Defending Universal Values in a Pluralistic World. In: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie 2003: 115–129.Google Scholar
  80. Nussbaum, M. C., 2003b: Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. Feminist Economics 9, 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Nussbaum, M. C., 2003c: The Complexity of groups: A Comment on Jorge Valadez. In: Philosophy and Social Criticism 29,1, S.57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nussbaum, M. C., 2006a: Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Nussbaum, M. C., 2006b: Poverty and Human Functioning: Capabilities and Human Functioning: Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements In: Grusky, D./ Kanbur, R. (eds.): Poverty and Inequality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Pauer-Studer, H., 2000: Autonom Leben. Reflexionen über Freiheit und Gleichheit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  85. Pauer-Studer, H., 2002: Freedom and Equality: Beyond Egalitarianism and Anti-Egalitarianism. In: Christensen, B., et al. (eds.): Wissen. Macht. Geschlecht. Akten der IAPH-Tagung Zürich 2000/Power. Gender. Knowledge. IAPH-Proceedings. Zürich: Chronos.Google Scholar
  86. Picht, G., 1964: Die deutsche Bildungskatastrophe. Freiburg: Walter Verlag.Google Scholar
  87. Pogge, Th., 2002: Can the Capability Approach be justified? In: Philosophical Topics 30,2: 167–228.Google Scholar
  88. Pressman, S./ Summerfield, G., 2002: Sen and Capabilities. In: Review of Political Economy, 14,4: 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rawls, J., 1971: A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Rawls, J., 1997: The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. In: University of Chicago Law Review 64: 765–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rawls, J., 2001: Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Reay, D., 2005: Beyond Consciousness? The Psychic Landscape of Social Class. In: Sociology 39: 911–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Robeyns, I., 2003: The capability approach: an interdisciplinary introduction. Teaching material for the training course preceding the 3rd International Conference on the capability approach in Pavia, September 2003. Pavia.Google Scholar
  94. Robeyns, I., 2005: The capability approach: a theoretical survey. In: Journal of Human Development 6,1: 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Robeyns, I., 2005a: Three models of education: rights, capabilities and human capital. Preprint. Online-Paper. Also published in: Theory and Research in Education 4,1: 69–84, 2006.Google Scholar
  96. Ruta, D./ Camfield, L./ Donaldson, C., 2007: Sen and the art of quality of life maintenance: Towards a general theory of quality of life and its causation. In: The Journal of Socio-Economics 36: 397–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Saito, M., 2003: Amartya Sen’s Capability approach to Education: A critical exploration. In: Journal of Philosophy of Education 37,1: 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Salais, R./ Villeneuve, R., 2004: Europe and the Politics of Capabilities. Introduction. In: Salais, R./ Villeneuve, R. (eds.): Europe and the Politics of Capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Savage, M./ Scott, J./ Crompton, R., 2005: Rethinking Class: Culture, Identities and Lifestyles. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  100. Sayer, A., 2005a: The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Sayer, A., 2005b: Class, Moral Worth and Recognition. In: Sociology 39,5: 947–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Schaber, P., 1998: Gründe für eine objektive Theorie menschlichen Wohls. In: Steinfath, H. (ed.): Was ist ein gutes Leben? Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  103. Sen, A., 1983: Poor, Relatively Speaking. In: Oxford Economic Papers. New Series 3,52: 153–169.Google Scholar
  104. Sen, A., 1985: Commodities and Capabilities. Lectures in Economics: Theory, Institutions, Policy. Volume 7. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  105. Sen, A. K., 1992: Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Sen, A. K., 1999: Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Sen, A., 2002: Rationality and Freedom. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Standing, G., 2003: CI, COAG and COG: a comment on a debate. In: Wright, E. O. (ed): Redesigning Distribution: basic income and stakeholder grants as alternative cornerstones for a more egalitarian capitalism. The Real Utopias Project Volume V London: Verso.Google Scholar
  109. Steinen, H./ Pilgram, A., 2003 (eds.): Welfare Policy from Below: Struggles Against Social Exclusion in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  110. Steinvorth, U., 1999: Gleiche Freiheit. Politische Philosophie und Verteilungsgerechtigkeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
  111. Sturma, D., 2000: Universalismus und Neoaristotelismus. Amartya Sen und Martha C. Nussbaum über soziale Gerechtigkeit. In: Kersting, W. (ed.): Politische Philosophie des Sozialstaats. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
  112. Swanson, J., 2000: Self Help: Clinton, Blair and the Politics of Personal Responsibility. In: Radical Philosophy 101: 29–38.Google Scholar
  113. Swedberg, R., 2003: Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Tobias, S., 2005: Foucault on Freedom and Capabilities. In: Theory Culture & Society 22,4: 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Thålin, M., 1990: Politics, Dynamics and Individualism — The Swedish Approach to Level of Living Research. In: Social Indicators Research 22,2: 155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Unterhalter, E., 2003: The capabilities approach and gendered education. In: Theory and Research in Education 1,1: 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Unterhalter, E./ Brighouse, H., 2003: ‘Distribution of What? How will we know if we have achieved education for all by 2015?’ Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on the Capability Approach, Pavia, September 2003.Google Scholar
  118. Unterhalter, E./ Walker, M., 2007 (eds.): Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  119. Van den Bosch, K., 2001: Identifying the Poor. Using subjective and consensual methods. Aidershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  120. Van Parijs, Ph., 1995: Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  121. Vester, M./ von Oertzen, P/ Geiling, H., et al., 2001: Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  122. Walker, M., 2004: Insights from and for education: the capability approach and South African girls’ lives and learning. Paper presented at the 4th International Capability Approach conference, University of Pavia, September 2004. Pavia.Google Scholar
  123. Weale, A., 2005: Welfare. In: Craig, E. (ed.): The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  124. Williams, A., 2002: Dworkin on Capability. In: Ethics 113: 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Winslow, T., 2006: Marx on the Relation between ‘Justice’, ‘Freedom’ and ‘Capabilities’. Paper presented as the 6th International Conference of the Human Development and Capability Association, September 2006 in Groningen.Google Scholar
  126. Wolff, J., 2003: Karl Marx. In: Zalta, E. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2003 Edition) URL =
  127. Wouters, C., 1986: Formalization and Informalization: Changing Tension Balances in Civilizing Processes. In: Theory, Culture and Society 3: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wright, E. O., 2002: Theses for mapping the contours of the Marxist tradition. Online-publication; Scholar
  129. Wright, E. O., 2006: What is so bad about capitalism? In: Wright, E. O. (ed.): Envisioning Real Utopias. Internet pre-print: Scholar
  130. Wright, E. O./ Brighouse, H., 2001: Complex Egalitarianism: a review of Alex Callinicos, in: Historical. Materialism 10: 193–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Young, I. M., 1987: Five Faces of Oppression. In: Young, I. M. (Hg.): Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  132. Ziegler, H., 2004: Jugendhilfe als Prävention: Die Refiguration sozialer Hilfe und Herrschaft in fortgeschritten liberalen Gesellschaftsformationen. Bielefeld.Google Scholar
  133. Zimmermann, B., 2006: Pragmatism and the Capability Approach. Challenges in Social Theory and Empirical Research. In: European Journal of Social Theory, 9,4: 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Allgemeine Erziehungswissenschaft an der Fakultät für Pädagogik der Universität BielefeldDeutschland
  2. 2.Erziehungswissenschaft mit dem Schwerpunkt Soziale Arbeit an der Fakultät für Pädagogik der Universität BielefeldDeutschland
  3. 3.Sozialpädagogik am Institut für Erziehungswissenschaft der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität MünsterDeutschland

Personalised recommendations