Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Capabilities — Handlungsbefähigung und Verwirklichungschancen in der Erziehungswissenschaft pp 165–197Cite as

Bildung as Human Development: An educational view on the Capabilities Approach

  • Chapter

Abstract

The Capabilities Approach as an educational point of view A basic argument of our paper is that the capabilities approach elaborates an educational perspective. It contains a conception of justice based on considerations which come close to the German notion of Bildung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, J., 2002: Capability Egalitarianism and Moral Selfhood. Paper at the Conference Promoting Women’s Capabilities: examining Nussbaum’s Approach, September 2002 in Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., 2004: Resourcing gender equality in education: thinking through rights. Paper presented at the seminar Beyond Access — Resources for Gender Equality and Quality Education April 2004, in Oxford. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E. S., 1999: What is the point of equality? In: Ethics 109: 287–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., 2006: Justifying the Capabilities Approach to Justice. Forthcoming in: Brighouse, H./ Robeyns, I. (eds.): Measuring Justice: Capabilities and Primary Goods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, Ch./ Volkert, J., 2006: Assessing Capability Determinants in Germany: Concept and First Empirical Results. Paper at the 6th Human Development and Capability Association (HDCA) Conference at the University of Groningen, NL, August/September 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneson, R., 2002: Egalitarianism. In: Zalta, N. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2002/entries/egalitarianism.

  • Arneson, R., 2005: Distributive Justice and Basic Capability Equality: ‘Good Enough’ Is Not Good Enough. In: Kaufman, A. (ed.): Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems: London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, I./ Berghman, J., 2002: Introduction: EU social (exclusion) policy revisited? In: Journal of European Social Policy 12,3: 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bénicourt, E., 2002: Is Amartya Sen a post-autistic economist? In: Post-Autistic Economics Review, 15,4 (www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issuel5/Benicourtl5.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhargava, R., 1992: Individualism in Social Science: Forms and Limits of a Methodology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G., 2002: How General Can Bildung Be? Reflections on the Future of a Modern Educational Ideal. In: Journal of Philosophy of Education 36,3: 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesta G./ Tedder, M., 2006: How is Agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. Learning Lives/TLRP Working Paper 5. University of Exter. Exter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, J., 2006: Bildung. In: Theory, Culture & Society 23: 364–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMAS, 2005: Lebenslagen in Deutschland — Der 2. Armuts-und Reichtumsbericht der Bundesregierung. Berlin: BMAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittlingmayer, U./ Bauer, U./ Ziegler, H., 2005: Grundlinien einer politischen Soziologie der Ungleichheit und Herrschaft. In: Widersprüche, 98: 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bögenhold, D., 2001: Social Inequality and the Sociology of Life Style. In: The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 60,4: 829–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhnke, P., 2007: Policy or Privacy — What Matters Most for Individual Weil-Being? Determinants of life satisfaction in the enlarged Europe. WZB Discussion Paper — SP I 2007-203. Berlin: WZB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojer, H., 2006: Resourcism as an alternative to capabilities: a critical discussion. Online: mora. rente.nhh.no/projects/EqualityExchange/Portals/0/articles/resourcismboyermarch2006.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, J.-M./ Farvaque, N., 2005: Promoting Capability for Work. The Role of Local Actors. Preprint. Forthcoming in Deneulin, S. et al. (eds.): Capability and Justice. Towards Structural Transformation. La Haye: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, J.-M./ Farvaque, N., 2005: Social Opportunities and Individual Responsibility: The Capability Approach and the Third Way. In: Ethique et Economic No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvin, J.-M./ Thelen, M., 2003: Deliberative Democracy and Capabilities. The Impact and Significance of Capability for Voice. Paper at the 3rd Conference on the Capability Approach: From Sustainable Development to Sustainable Freedom, September 2003 in Pavia. Pavia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, V./ Van Berkel, R., 2005: Activation, participation, individualisation: shifting public private boundaries, shifting roles of citizens? Paper at the 3rd ESPAnet Conference, September 2005, Fribourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., 1986: The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J. (ed.): Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., 2000: Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J./ Stears, M., 2005: Capabilities, resources, and systematic injustice: a case of gender inequality. In: Politics Philosophy Economics 4: 355–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, B., 2003. Nussbaum’s Capabilities Approach: Political Criticism and the Burden of Proof. In: International Journal of Politics and Ethics, Spring 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A., 2000: Titel???? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, W., 2000: Contribution in: Social Democratic Party of Germany (ed.): Grundwerte heute: Gerechtigkeit. (Basic values today: Justice.) Berlin. Berlin: SPD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B./ Kothari, U., 2001 (eds.): Participation: The New Tyranny? New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen G. A., 1993: Equality of what? On welfare, goods, and capabilities. In: Nussbaum, M./ Sen, A. (eds.): The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. H., 2001: A Structural Analysis of the R. Kahane Code of Informality: Elements toward a Theory of Informal Education. In: Sociological Inquiry 71,3: 357–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R., 2006: Employment and the Family: The Reconfiguration of Work and Family Life in Contemporary Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Herdt, T., 2005: Capability-oriented social policy and the ability to appear in public without shame. In: Qizilbash, M./ Comim, F./ Alkire, S. (eds.): The Capability Approach. Concepts, Measures and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, H./ Bonvin, J.-M./ Vielle, P./ Farvaque, N., 2004: Reconceptualising the European Employment Strategy from a capabilities and a rights Perspective. Paper presented at the final conference of the European Union COST A15 research network, Reforming Social Protection Systems in Europe. May 2004. Nantes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, H./ Bonvin, J. M./ Vielle, P./ Farvaque, N., 2005: Developing capabilities and rights in welfare-to-work policies. In: European Societies 71: 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S., 2002: Perfectionism, Paternalism and Liberalism in Sen and Nussbaum’s Capability Approach. In: Review of Political Economy, 14: 497–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J./ Sen, A., 1995: India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., 2000: Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R., 2002: Sovereign Virtue. Revisited. In: Ethics 113: 106–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R., 1974: Welfare as a Planning Goal. In: acta sociologica 17,3: 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R., 1993: Descriptions of Inequality: The Swedish Approach to Welfare. In: Nussbaum, M./ Sen, A. (eds.): The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farvaque, N./ Robeyns, I., 2005: L’approche alternative d’Amartya Sen. Réponse à Emmanuelle Bénicourt. In: L’Economie Politique, 27,3: 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Crespo, P., 2004: Situating education in the capability approach. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on the Capability Approach, September 2004. Pavia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., 1998: Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition and Participation. In: Peterson, G. (ed.): The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, 19. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., 1997: Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, J., 2001: The Ethics of Substantial Freedom. Western Kentucky University (Online: www.wku.edu/~jan.garrett/senethic.htm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D., 1997: Sen’s Capability Approach and Nussbaum’s Capability Ethics. In: Journal of International Development 9,2: 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D., 2002: Is Sen’s capability approach an adequate basis for considering human development? In: Review of Political Economy 14: 435–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D., 2007: What is the capability approach? Its core, rationale, partners and dangers. In: The Journal of Socio-Economics 36: 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautié, J., 2003: Which Third Way? Asset Based versus Capability Based Citizenship. Paper at the final Cost a 13 conference in Oslo, October 2003. Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., 2002: Where Now for New Labour? Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A., 1987: Democratic Education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfeld, Y., 1983: Human Service Organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, A., 2006: Recalibrating Europe’s Semi-Sovereign Welfare. Berlin: WZB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hate, C./ Klein, A./ Landhäußer, S./ Ziegler, H., 2007: Das Elend der Sozialen Arbeit — Die ‚neue Unterschicht‘ und die Schwächung des Sozialen. In: Kessl, F./ Reutlinger, C./ Ziegler, H. (eds.): Erziehung zur Armut? Soziale Arbeit und die ‚neue Unterschicht‘. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B., 2003: Social Work, Mobility and Membership. Social Work & Society 1: 1–12 (www. socwork.de/jordan.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane, R., 1975: Informal youth organizations: A general model. In: Sociological Inquiry 45,4: 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D./ Diener, E./ Schwarz, N., 1999 (eds.): Well-being: The foundation of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., 1999: Politics, neutrality, and the good. In: Social Philosophy and Policy 16,1: 315–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., 2007: What Is Good and Why: The Ethics of Weil-Being. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., 1995: Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A., 2003: Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, C., 2005: Postliberal agency in Marx’s Brumaire. In: Rethinking Marxism 17,3: 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard R., 2005: Happiness: lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand, J., 2003: Motivation, agency, and public policy: of knights and knaves, pawns and queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R., 2004: Beyond bourgeois right: freedom, equality and Utopia in Marx and Morris. In: The European Legacy 9,5: 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R., 2002: Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R., 2004: Poverty. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., 1971: Capital. Volume III. Moscow: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P., 2002: The capabilities perspective: A framework for social justice. In: Families in Society 83,3: 365–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenhauer, K., 1983: Vergessene Zusammenhänge. München: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, V., 2000: Development and quality of life: a critique of Amartya Sen’s ‘Development as Freedom’. In: International Journal of Health Services 30: 661–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, B./ Whelan, Ch., 1996: Resources, Deprivation and Poverty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., 1990: Aristotelian Social Democracy. In: Douglass, B./ Mara, G. M./ Richardson, H. S. (eds.): Liberalism and the Good. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., 1992: Human Functioning and Social Justice: In Defense of Aristotelian Essentialism. In: Political Theory 20: 202–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., 1995: Human Functioning and Social Justice: in Defence of Aristotelian Essentialism. In: Tallack, D. (ed.): Critical Theory: A Reader. New York: Harvestor/Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., 1999: Gerechtigkeit oder Das gute Leben. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., 2000: Women and Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., 2003: Aristotelian Social Democracy: Defending Universal Values in a Pluralistic World. In: Internationale Zeitschrift für Philosophie 2003: 115–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., 2003b: Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements: Sen and Social Justice. Feminist Economics 9, 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., 2003c: The Complexity of groups: A Comment on Jorge Valadez. In: Philosophy and Social Criticism 29,1, S.57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., 2006a: Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., 2006b: Poverty and Human Functioning: Capabilities and Human Functioning: Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements In: Grusky, D./ Kanbur, R. (eds.): Poverty and Inequality. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauer-Studer, H., 2000: Autonom Leben. Reflexionen über Freiheit und Gleichheit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauer-Studer, H., 2002: Freedom and Equality: Beyond Egalitarianism and Anti-Egalitarianism. In: Christensen, B., et al. (eds.): Wissen. Macht. Geschlecht. Akten der IAPH-Tagung Zürich 2000/Power. Gender. Knowledge. IAPH-Proceedings. Zürich: Chronos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picht, G., 1964: Die deutsche Bildungskatastrophe. Freiburg: Walter Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Th., 2002: Can the Capability Approach be justified? In: Philosophical Topics 30,2: 167–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, S./ Summerfield, G., 2002: Sen and Capabilities. In: Review of Political Economy, 14,4: 429–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., 1971: A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., 1997: The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. In: University of Chicago Law Review 64: 765–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., 2001: Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., 2005: Beyond Consciousness? The Psychic Landscape of Social Class. In: Sociology 39: 911–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I., 2003: The capability approach: an interdisciplinary introduction. Teaching material for the training course preceding the 3rd International Conference on the capability approach in Pavia, September 2003. Pavia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I., 2005: The capability approach: a theoretical survey. In: Journal of Human Development 6,1: 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I., 2005a: Three models of education: rights, capabilities and human capital. Preprint. Online-Paper. Also published in: Theory and Research in Education 4,1: 69–84, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruta, D./ Camfield, L./ Donaldson, C., 2007: Sen and the art of quality of life maintenance: Towards a general theory of quality of life and its causation. In: The Journal of Socio-Economics 36: 397–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, M., 2003: Amartya Sen’s Capability approach to Education: A critical exploration. In: Journal of Philosophy of Education 37,1: 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salais, R./ Villeneuve, R., 2004: Europe and the Politics of Capabilities. Introduction. In: Salais, R./ Villeneuve, R. (eds.): Europe and the Politics of Capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M./ Scott, J./ Crompton, R., 2005: Rethinking Class: Culture, Identities and Lifestyles. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A., 2005a: The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A., 2005b: Class, Moral Worth and Recognition. In: Sociology 39,5: 947–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaber, P., 1998: Gründe für eine objektive Theorie menschlichen Wohls. In: Steinfath, H. (ed.): Was ist ein gutes Leben? Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1983: Poor, Relatively Speaking. In: Oxford Economic Papers. New Series 3,52: 153–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1985: Commodities and Capabilities. Lectures in Economics: Theory, Institutions, Policy. Volume 7. Amsterdam/New York/Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K., 1992: Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K., 1999: Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 2002: Rationality and Freedom. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G., 2003: CI, COAG and COG: a comment on a debate. In: Wright, E. O. (ed): Redesigning Distribution: basic income and stakeholder grants as alternative cornerstones for a more egalitarian capitalism. The Real Utopias Project Volume V London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinen, H./ Pilgram, A., 2003 (eds.): Welfare Policy from Below: Struggles Against Social Exclusion in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinvorth, U., 1999: Gleiche Freiheit. Politische Philosophie und Verteilungsgerechtigkeit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturma, D., 2000: Universalismus und Neoaristotelismus. Amartya Sen und Martha C. Nussbaum über soziale Gerechtigkeit. In: Kersting, W. (ed.): Politische Philosophie des Sozialstaats. Weilerswist: Velbrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, J., 2000: Self Help: Clinton, Blair and the Politics of Personal Responsibility. In: Radical Philosophy 101: 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, R., 2003: Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S., 2005: Foucault on Freedom and Capabilities. In: Theory Culture & Society 22,4: 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thålin, M., 1990: Politics, Dynamics and Individualism — The Swedish Approach to Level of Living Research. In: Social Indicators Research 22,2: 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unterhalter, E., 2003: The capabilities approach and gendered education. In: Theory and Research in Education 1,1: 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unterhalter, E./ Brighouse, H., 2003: ‘Distribution of What? How will we know if we have achieved education for all by 2015?’ Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on the Capability Approach, Pavia, September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unterhalter, E./ Walker, M., 2007 (eds.): Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, K., 2001: Identifying the Poor. Using subjective and consensual methods. Aidershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, Ph., 1995: Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vester, M./ von Oertzen, P/ Geiling, H., et al., 2001: Soziale Milieus im gesellschaftlichen Strukturwandel. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M., 2004: Insights from and for education: the capability approach and South African girls’ lives and learning. Paper presented at the 4th International Capability Approach conference, University of Pavia, September 2004. Pavia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weale, A., 2005: Welfare. In: Craig, E. (ed.): The Shorter Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A., 2002: Dworkin on Capability. In: Ethics 113: 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, T., 2006: Marx on the Relation between ‘Justice’, ‘Freedom’ and ‘Capabilities’. Paper presented as the 6th International Conference of the Human Development and Capability Association, September 2006 in Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J., 2003: Karl Marx. In: Zalta, E. (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2003 Edition) URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries/marx.

  • Wouters, C., 1986: Formalization and Informalization: Changing Tension Balances in Civilizing Processes. In: Theory, Culture and Society 3: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O., 2002: Theses for mapping the contours of the Marxist tradition. Online-publication; www.ssc.wisc.edu/-wright/SOC621/16theses.PDF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O., 2006: What is so bad about capitalism? In: Wright, E. O. (ed.): Envisioning Real Utopias. Internet pre-print: www.ssc.wisc.edu/~wright/Published%20writing/ERU-c2.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O./ Brighouse, H., 2001: Complex Egalitarianism: a review of Alex Callinicos, in: Historical. Materialism 10: 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M., 1987: Five Faces of Oppression. In: Young, I. M. (Hg.): Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, H., 2004: Jugendhilfe als Prävention: Die Refiguration sozialer Hilfe und Herrschaft in fortgeschritten liberalen Gesellschaftsformationen. Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, B., 2006: Pragmatism and the Capability Approach. Challenges in Social Theory and Empirical Research. In: European Journal of Social Theory, 9,4: 467–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Allgemeine Erziehungswissenschaft an der Fakultät für Pädagogik der Universität Bielefeld, Deutschland

    Sabine Andresen Dr. (Professorin)

  2. Erziehungswissenschaft mit dem Schwerpunkt Soziale Arbeit an der Fakultät für Pädagogik der Universität Bielefeld, Deutschland

    Hans-Uwe Otto Dr. Dres. h.c. (Professur)

  3. Sozialpädagogik am Institut für Erziehungswissenschaft der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Deutschland

    Holger Ziegler Dr. (Juniorprofessor)

Authors
  1. Sabine Andresen Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans-Uwe Otto Dr. Dres. h.c.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Holger Ziegler Dr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Hans-Uwe Otto Holger Ziegler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Andresen, S., Otto, HU., Ziegler, H. (2008). Bildung as Human Development: An educational view on the Capabilities Approach. In: Otto, HU., Ziegler, H. (eds) Capabilities — Handlungsbefähigung und Verwirklichungschancen in der Erziehungswissenschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90922-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90922-6_10

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15671-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-90922-6

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation