Abstract
This chapter considers relationships between public relations and science. It suggests that public relations has been situated by science in three ways: by historical perceptions of science; by attempts to emulate a certain quantitative scientific method; and by seeking equivalent academic and social status to science. It argues that such perceptions may no longer be appropriate, that such attempts may be restrictive, and that such search is directing energies into limited channels less relevant to contemporary conditions. Adapting ideas from branding to academic disciplines, the chapter shifts attention away from emulation and towards the changing nature of discipline construction. It places these considerations in the context of attaining legitimacy and sustaining a competitive position for public relations to be a viable field for the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, M. (Eds.). (2007). The next generation of corporate universities: Innovative approaches for developing people and expanding organizational capabilities. San Francisco: John Wiley and Son.
Balmer, J. M. T. (1997). The acid test of corporate identity management. Journal of Marketing Management, 15,1–3, 69–92.
Balmer, J. T., & Greyser, S. A. (Eds.) (2003). Revealing the corporation: Perspectives on identity, image, reputation, corporate branding, and corporate-level marketing. London: Routledge.
Barnatt, C. (1995). Cyber business: Mindsets for a wired age. Chichester: John Wiley.
Bernstein, D. (1988). Corporate image and reality: A critique of corporate communications. London: Cassell and Advertising Association.
Blackett, T., & Boad, B. (Eds.). (1999). Co-branding: The science of alliance. London: MacMillan.
Botan, C., & Hazleton, V. (2006). Public relations in a new age. In C. Botan, & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 1–18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carey, A. (1995). Taking the risk out of democracy: Propaganda in the US and Australia. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
Clifton, R., & Maughan, E. (Eds.) (2000). Twenty-Five Visions: The Future Of Brands. London: Macmillan Business.
Commission on Public Relations Education (1999). Public Relations Education for the 21 st Century: A Port of Entry. New York: The Commission on Public Relations Education.
Editors of Lingua Franca (2000). The Sokal hoax: The sham that shook the academy. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press Bison Books.
Lederman, L., & Teresi, D. (1993). The god particle: If the universe is the answer, what is the question? New York: Delta.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Peregrine
Gad, T., & Rosencreutz, A. (2002). Managing brand me: How to build your personal brand. London: Momentum.
Gray, C. H., Figueroa-Sarriera, H. J., & Mentor, S. (1995). Cyborgology: Constructing the knowledge of cybernetic organisms. In C. H. Gray, H. J. Figueroa-Sarriera, & S. Mentor (Eds.), The cyborg handbook (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.
Gross, P., & Levitt, N. (1994). Higher superstition: The academic left and its quarrels with science. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_witness@second millennium. FemaleMan©meets_OncoMouseTM. London: Routledge.
Hacking, I. (1998). Social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Hebdige, D. (1990). Subjects in space. New Formations, 11(Summer), v–x.
Hertz, N. (2001). The silent takeover: Global capitalism and the death of democracy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Karlinger, J. (1997). The corporate planet: Ecology and politics in the age of globalization. San Francisco: Sierra Club.
Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Korten, D. (2000). The post-corporate world: Life after capitalism. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
McKie, D. (2001). Updating public relations: New science, research paradigms, and uneven developments. In R. Heath (Eds.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 75–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McKie, D., & Galloway, C. (in press). Warming warnings: Global challenges of risk and crisis communication. In R. L. Heath & D. O’Hair (Eds.), Handbook of crisis and risk communication. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
Murphy, J. (1987). What is branding? In J. Murphy (Eds.), Branding: A key marketing tool (pp. 1–12). London: MacMillan.
Newfield, C. (1993). What was political correctness? Race, the right, and managerial democracy in the humanities. Critical inquiry, 19(Winter), 308–336.
Newman, J. (1852/1947). The idea of a university. New York: Longman-Green.
Peters, J. D. (1989). John Locke, the individual, and the origin of communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 75(44), 387–399.
Shepherd, G. J. (1993). Building a discipline of communication. Journal of Communication, 43(3), 83–91.
Slack, J. (1994). The environment matters: Complicity, ethics, theoretical rigour, intervention. Australian Journal of Communication, 21(3), 1–13.
Sokal, A., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable nonsense: Postmodern intellectuals’ abuse of science. New York: Picador.
Wernick, A. (1991). Promotional culture: Advertising and ideology in late capitalism. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McKie, D. (2008). Situating Science: Public Relations, Status, and Theoretical Trends. In: Zerfass, A., van Ruler, B., Sriramesh, K. (eds) Public Relations Research. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_26
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15602-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-90918-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)