Skip to main content

Research process and empirical proceedings

  • Chapter
  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

Whether quantitative or qualitative, the design of an empirical study has to be specifically constructed according to the specifics of its object of investigation and the research context it is embedded in. In this chapter the proceedings of the research process will be substantiated and explained. It is essential to reveal the research process — its chronology, choice of methods and so on — for others and make it plausible and comprehensible in an inter-subjective context.744 In the first chapter this study shall be classified with respect to the paradigmatic research debate between the two main threads of empirical social research and relevant approaches of social research will be presented (5.1). Subsequently the choice for empirical research strategy, inquiry form, and inquiry instruments — document analysis, questionnaires and qualitative, semi-structured interviews — will be substantiated and justified and the proceedings will be depicted (5.2). The description of the field research will be done according to the conducted steps of the research process. Firstly the construction of the interview guides and questionnaires will be presented. In a second step the selection of the cases will be justified. Subsequent to that, account will be given about the actual survey. Then the method of analysis will be presented and at last conclusions will be drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Compare Forschauer, U., Lueger, M., 1998, Das qualitative Interview zur Analyse sozialer Systeme and Arbeitskreis Qualitative Sozialforschung, 1994, Verführung zum qualitativen Forschen.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Compare Liebscher, P., 1998, Quantity with Quality? Teaching Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in LIS Master’s Program, pp 668–680 and

    Google Scholar 

  3. Compare Table 5: Predispositions of Quantitative and Qualitative Modes of Inquiry following Glesne and Peshkin (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Glesne, C., Peshkin, A., 1992, Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Compare also Social Fact Paradigm. See Ritzer, G., 1975, Sociology, A Multiple Paradigm Science, pp 156–167.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry.

    Google Scholar 

  7. In accordance to Ritzer, G., 1975, Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science, p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Ebers, M., 1985, Organisationskultur: Ein neues Forschungsprogramm, p. 35 and Hofbauer, W., 1991, Organisationskultur und Unternehmensstrategie, Eine system-theoretisch-kybernetische Analyse, p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Compare Cox, T. Jr., Blake, S., 1991, Managing Cultural Diversity: Implications for Organizational Competitiveness, pp 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Thomas, D. A., Ely, J. E., 1996, Making Differences Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing Diversity, pp 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Compare Dass, P., Parker, B., 1999, Strategies for Human Resource Diversity: From Resistance to Learning, pp 68–80.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Compare Milliken, F. J., Martins, L. L., 1996, Searching for Common Threads, Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups, pp 402–433.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Compare also Sepehri, P., 2002, Diversity und Managing Diversity in internationalen Organisationen, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The researcher shall not enter the inquiry with preconceived views — which in reality is illusionary. That should actually be the researcher’s goal. Compare Flick, U., 1995, Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in der Psychologie und Sozialforschung, p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Own compilation following Glesne, C., Peshkin, A., 1992, Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Kasper, H., 1987, Organisationskultur: Über den Stand der Forschung, p. 24 and Osterloh, M., 1988, Methodische Probleme der empirischen Erforschung von Organisationskulturen, p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Compare, Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Schwandt, T., 1989, Solutions to the Paradigm Conflict; Coping with Uncertainty, pp 379–407.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Compare Schwarz, G., Unternehmenskultur als Element des Strategischen Management.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For further information see Patton, M. Q., 1990, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Scholz, C., Organisationskultur: Die 4 Erfolgsprinzipien.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Glesne, C., Peshkin, A., 1992, Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Compare Thomas, D.A.; Ely, R., 1996, Making Differences Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing Diversity, pp 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Dass, P., Parker, B., 1999, Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning, pp 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Compare The Karl Popper Web, URL: http://www.eeng.dcu.ie/~tkpw/, and O’Hear, A., 1989, Introduction to the Philosophy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Müller-Böling, D., 1990, Methodik der empirischen Organisationsforschung, p. 1494.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Barton and Lazarsfeld are of the opinion that every theory, regardless of the importance one attributes to this term, is revisable through qualitative social research, cited from Lamnek, S., 1995, Qualitative Sozialforschung, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  28. The abductive logic of research was formulated by Charles Sanders Peirce. Compare Peirce, C. S., 1955, Abduction and induction, pp 150–156, and Peirce, C. S., 1960, Collected papers (8 vols.).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Compare Kelle, U., 1994, Empirisch begründete Theoriebildung, p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Following Truzzi, M., 1985, Sherlock Holmes, p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  31. James, P. D. (1989). An unsuitable job for a woman, pp 34, 53.

    Google Scholar 

  32. See Truzzi, M., 1985, Sherlock Holmes, p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Compare Fox, R., 1998, Layered abduction and abductive inference, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Müller-Böling, D., 1990, Organisationsforschung, Methodik der empirischen, pp 1494–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Compare Müller-Böling, D., 1990, Organisationsforschung, Methodik der empirischen, p. 1496.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Müller-Böling, D., 1990, Organisationsforschung, Methodik der empirischen, p. 1496.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See Evered, R., Louis, M. R., 1981, Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Science, Inquiry from the Inside and Inquiry from the Outside’, pp 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Compare Louis, M. R., 1985, An Investigator’s Guide to Workplace Culture, pp 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  39. For further information see Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., 1994, Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook, and Lamnek, S., 1995, Qualitative Sozialforschung, Band 2: Methoden und Techniken.

    Google Scholar 

  40. This classic structure is recommended by many authors such as Flick, U., 1995, Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in der Psychologie und Sozialforschung, and Forschauer, U., Lueger, M., 1998, Das qualitative Interview zur Analyse sozialer Systeme. Compare also Schlüter, A., 2001, Institutioneller Wandel und Transformation. Restitution, Transformation und Privatisierung in der tschechischen Landwirtschaft, p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Compare Strauss, A., Corbin, J., 1996, Grundlagen Oualitativer Sozialforschung, pp 37.

    Google Scholar 

  42. See Hucke, J., Wollmann, H., 1980, Methodenprobleme der Implementationsforschung, p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Compare Mehl, P., 1997, Reformansätze und Reformwiderstände in Agrarsozialpolitik, p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See Hucke, J., Wollmann, H., 1980, Methodenprobleme der Implementationsforschung, p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  45. In this context compare Sepehri, P., 2002, Diversity und Managing Diversity in internationalen Organisationen. Wahrnehmungen zum Verständnis und ökonomischer Relevanz, pp 46.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Compare Scholz, C., Hofbauer, W., 1990, Organisationskultur: Die 4 Erfolgsprinzipien, pp 35.

    Google Scholar 

  47. See Trochim, W. M. K., 2004, Measurement Validity Types, from: The Web Center for Social Research Methods, URL: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/measval.htm, as of November 1st, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  48. See Sepehri, P., 2002, Diversity und Managing Diversity in internationalen Organisationen, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Compare for this Withen, P., 2004, An Overview of Research Design: 8. Operationalization, URL: http://people.uvawise.edu/pww8y/Resources/Methods/ResDesign/Operationalization.html#Top, as of November 8th, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Reliability has to do with the quality of measurement. In its everyday sense, reliability is the “consistency” or “repeatability” of measures. A measure is considered reliable if it would give us the same result over and over again (assuming that what we are measuring isn’t changing!). For further information see Trochim, W. M. K., 2004, Theory of Reliability, from: The Web Center for Social Research Methods, URL: http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/reliablt.htm, as of November 8th, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Own compilation following Withen, P., 2004, An Overview of Research Design: 8. Operationalization, http://people.uvawise.edu/pww8y/Resources/Methods/ResDesign/Operationalization.html#Top, as of November 8th, 2004 and Sepehri, P., 2002, Diversity und Managing Diversity in internationalen Organisationen, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  52. For further information on this issue see Garland, R., 1991, The Mid-Point on a Rating Scale: Is it Desirable?, pp 66–70, and Cox, E. P., 1980, The optimal number of response alternatives for a scale: a review, pp 407–442, and Friedman, H. H., Wilamowsky, Y., Friedman, L.W., 1981, A comparison of balanced and unbalanced rating scales, pp 1–7, and Matell, M.S., Jacoby, J., 1971, Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Study 1: Reliability and validity, pp 657–674.

    Google Scholar 

  53. See American Marketing Association, 2004, Marketing Glossary Dictionary, URL: http://www.marketingpower.com/live/mg-dictionary-view1363.php, as of November 10th, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Compare for this Thomas, D.A., Ely, R., 1996, Making Differences Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing Diversity, pp 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  55. See Dass, P., Parker, B., 1999, Strategies for managing human resource diversity: From resistance to learning, pp 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Compare Sepehri, P., 2002, Diversity und Managing Diversity in internationalen Organisationen.

    Google Scholar 

  57. See Milliken, F. J., Martins, L. L., 1996, Searching for Common Threads, Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups, pp 405.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Compare Milliken, F. J., Martins, L. L., 1996, Searching for Common Threads, Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups, pp 409.

    Google Scholar 

  59. See Milliken, F. J., Martins, L. L., 1996, Searching for Common Threads, Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups, pp 402–433.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Compare Cox, Taylor H., Blake, S., 1991, Managing Cultural Diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness, pp 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  61. See Cox, Taylor H., 1993, Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research and Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Compare Smith, J. A., 1995, Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibid., pp 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Compare Flick, U., 1995, Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in der Psychologie und Sozialforschung, and Smith, J. A., 1995, Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis, pp 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Compare Strauss, A., Corbin, J., 1996, Grundlagen Oualitativer Sozialforschung, and Smith, J. A., 1995, Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis, pp 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  66. E.g. study from Schlüter, A., 2001, Institutioneller Wandel und Transformation, Restitution, Transformation und Privatisierung in der tschechischen Landwirtschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  67. For further information on this see Flick, U., 1995, Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in der Psychologie und Sozialforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Compare for this Smith, J. A., 1995, Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis, p. 13, and Flick, U., 1995, Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in der Psychologie und Sozialforschung, p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  69. For more on funneling, see Guba, E. G., Lincoln, Y. S., 1981, Effective Evaluation: Improving the Usefulness of Evaluation of Results Through Responsive and Naturalistic Approaches.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Own compilation in accordance to creativity argument by Cox, T., Blake, S., 1991, Managing Cultural Diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness, pp 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Smith, J. A., 1995, Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis, p. 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Compare Schnell, R., Hill, P. B., Esser, E., 1993, Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, p. 391, and Smith, J. A., 1995, Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis, pp 17.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Own compilation in accordance to The Multicultural Organization’ by Taylor H. Cox, 1991, pp 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Compare Schnell, R., Hill, P. B., Esser, E., 1993, Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, p. 392.

    Google Scholar 

  75. See Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., 1994, Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Compare Lamnek, S., 1995, Qualitative Sozialforschung, Band 1: Methodologie, p. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  77. For further information on the selection of cases compare Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., 1994, Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Experts are considered as „.functional elites within an organisational an instituional context“ (translated by B.P.) following Meuser and Nagel (2003). Persons are considered experts if they have priviliged access to information and decision making processes.(Meuser and Nagel, 2005) Following Liebold and Trinczek (2002), experts posses spezial technical knowlegde on their field. Compare Liebold, R., Trinczek, R., 2002, Experteninterview, pp 33–71 and Meuser, M, Nagel, u., 2003, Das Experteninterview-Wissenssoziologische Voraussetzung und methodische Durchführung, p. 471 and Meuser, M., Nagel, U., 2002, Experteninterviews-vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht. Ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion., pp 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Classification following the United States Census Bureau, 2000, Race (United States Census).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Compare Schnell, R., Hill, P. B., Esser, E., 1993, Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, p. 394.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Andreas Diekmann (2000) points out that the rate of return depends on several characteristics. Amongst others such as length of the questionnaire, topic, or chance for a reward, a reminder also influences rate of return. For further information see Diekmann, A., 2000, Empirische Sozialforschung, pp 441 and an older study by Longworth, D. S., 1953, Use of a Mail Questionnaire, pp 310–313.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Diekmann, A., 2000, Empirische Sozialforschung, p. 441, translated by B.P..

    Google Scholar 

  83. For further information on SPSS compare Bühl, A., Zöfel, P., 2000, SPSS Version 10-Einführung in die moderne Datenanalyse unter Windows.

    Google Scholar 

  84. The method of transcription, whether ad verbatim or selectively, is defined by the nature of the study objective. Compare Strauss, A., Corbin, J., 1996, Grounded Theory: Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung, pp 14.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Thompson, R., 2002, Reporting the Results of Computer-assisted Analysis of Qualitative Research Data, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Compare Richards, T. J., Richards, L., 1994, Using computers in qualitative research, pp 445–462, and Lee, R. M., Fielding, N. G., 1991, Computing for qualitative research: Options, problems and potential, and Lee, R. M., Fielding, N. G., 1996, Qualitative Data Analysis: Representations of a Technology: A Comment on Coffey, Holbrook and Atkinson, URL: http://www.socresonline.org.uk./1/4/lf.html, as of February, 8th, 2005, and Coffey, A., Holbrook, B., Atkinson, P., 1996 Qualitative data analysis: Technologies and representation, URL: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/4.html., as of February, 8th, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  87. For further information on Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software compare Lee, R. M., Fielding, N. G., 1991, Computing for qualitative research: Options, problems and potential, and Kelle, U., 1999, Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden, and Mayring, P., 2000, Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, and Bong, S. A., 2002, Debunking Myths in Qualitative Data Analysis, and Thompson, 2002, R., 2002, Reporting the Results of Computer-assisted Analysis of Qualitative Research Data.

    Google Scholar 

  88. In accordance to Flick, U., 1995, Qualitative Forschung. Theorie, Methoden, Anwendung in der Psychologie und Sozialforschung, pp 107.

    Google Scholar 

  89. For further information see Kromrey, H., 1995, Empirische Sozialforschung, pp 245.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Concerning quality of empirical social research compare Diekmann, A., 2000, Empirische Sozialforschung, and Lamnek, S., 1995, Qualitative Sozialforschung. Band 2: Methoden und Techniken, and Kromrey, H., 1995, Empirische Sozialforschung.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Research process and empirical proceedings. In: Managing Diversity in Intergovernmental Organisations. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90891-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics