Advertisement

Wann und wie beeinflussen Normen das Verhalten: Eine sozial-kognitive Analyse

Chapter

Auszug

Im Umschlagtext ihres eindruckvollen Sammelwerkes „Social Norms“ (Hechter & Opp, 2001) klagen die Herausgeber, dass sich die Forschung über Normen überwiegend mit dem Inhalt und den Folgen von Normen befasst und dabei die wichtige Frage der Entstehung von Normen vernachlässigt habe. Konsequenterweise behandeln dann auch praktisch alle Kapitel dieses Buches die Entstehung von Normen. Obwohl ich die Meinung der Herausgeber bezüglich der Bedeutung von Theorien der Normenentstehung teile, scheint mir doch ein Aspekt der Konsequenzen von Normen von zumindest vergleichbarer Bedeutung, nämlich die Frage nach den Bedingungen, unter denen Normen das Verhalten beeinflussen, sowie nach den Prozessen, die diesen Einfluss vermitteln.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Aarts, H. & Dijksterhuis, A. (2003). The silence of the library: environment, situational norms, and social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & Custers, R. (2003). Automatic normative behavior in environments: The moderating role of conformity in activating situational norms. Social Cognition, 21, 447–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity I: a minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, Whole No. 416, 1–70.Google Scholar
  5. Bargh, J.A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). The automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait concept and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bless, H., Fiedler, K., & Strack, F. (2004). Social cognition. Brighton: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, M., & Bargh, J.A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling nature of automatically-activated stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33,541–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cialdini, R.B., Reno, R.R., & Kallgren, C.A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darley, J.M., & Batson, C.D. (1973). „From Jerusalem to Jericho“: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darley, J.M., & Lataná, B. (1970). Norms and normative behavior: Field studies of social interdependence. In J. Macauley & L. Berkowitz (Eds.). Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 83–102). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dijksternuis, A. & Bargh, J. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: The automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 1–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dijksterhuis, A. & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior or how to win a game of Trivial Pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (1999) Just going along: Nonconscious priming and conformity to social pressure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 578–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975) Beliefs, attitudes, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. Greenwald, A.G. (1975). Does the Good Samaritan parable increase helping? A comment on Darley and Batson’s no-effect conclusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 578–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. James, W. (1980). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  17. Harvey, M.D., & Enzle, M.E. (1981). A cognitive model of social norms for understanding the transgression-helping effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 866–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hechter, M. & Opp, K.-D. (Eds.) (2001). Social Norms. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Higgins, E.T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Krebs, D.L. (1970). Altruism: An examination of the concept and review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 258–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Krebs, D.L. & Miller, D.T. (1985). Altruism and aggression. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.). The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.) New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  23. Lataná, B., & Rodin, J. (1969). A lady in distress: Inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Macrae, N. & Johnston, L. (1998). Help, I need somebody: automatic action and inaction. Social Cognition, 16, 400–417.Google Scholar
  25. Norman, D.A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention and action: willed and automatic control of behavior. In R.J. Davidson, G.E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.). Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  26. Powers, W.T. (1989) Volition: a semi-scientific essay. In W. A. Herschberger (Ed.). Volitional action (pp. 21–37). Amsterdam: North-HollandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harpers & BrothersGoogle Scholar
  28. Trafimow, D., & Finlay, K.A. (1996). The importance of subjective norms for a minority of people: between-subjects and within-subjects analyses. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 820–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität UtrechtNiederlande

Personalised recommendations