Skip to main content
  • 1918 Accesses

Abstract

For almost half a century the European Community/Union had only one border to be concerned about, one source of external political power to contend with across that divide. What Winston Churchill dramatically described as the ’Iron Curtain’ was, at one level, the focus of righteous indignation for the West’s political class. But it also served a useful purpose, by raising an impenetrable barrier, a cordon sanitaire protecting the West from the uncertainties, the potential problems that might spill across from an entirely ’other’ and less developed Europe. A Europe where the stabilising influence of the territorial nation state rooted in a concept of universal rights, common citizenship and political affiliation above ‘mere’ primordial identity had failed to become embedded as a natural corollary of nationbuilding, industrial modernization and démocratisation as these sequential transformations had taken root in the West from the seventeenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. See Fuchs, D./ Klingermann, H.-D.: Eastward Enlargement of the European Union and the Identity of Europe, in: Mair, P./ Zielonka J. (eds): The Enlarged European Union: Diversity and Adaption, London 2002, pp. 19–54 (cit.: Fuchs/Klingermann: Enlargement).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gun, T.: Peoples against States: Ethnopolitical Conflicts and the Changing World System, in: International Studies Quarterly 3/1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, for instance, Mayhew, A.: Recreating Europe: The European Union’s Policy towards Central and Eastern Europe, Cambridge 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See the discussion of accession by Sedelmeir, U./ Wallace, H.: Eastern Enlargement: Strategy or Second Thoughts?, in: Wallace, H./ Wallace, W. (eds): Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a survey of the extent of these multiple problems and issues, see Kaplan, R.: Eastward to Tartary, New York 2000, especially at Parts II and III.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levitsky, S./ Lucan, A.: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism, in: Journal of Democracy 13/2002; Ottaway, M.: Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington D.C. 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. This issue is discussed at length by Zielonka J.: How New Enlarged Borders will Reshape the European Union, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 3/2001; and idem (ed.): Europe Unbound, London 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carrera, S./ Balzacq, T.: Migration, Borders and Asylum: Trends and Vulnerabilities in EU Policy, CEPS, Brussels 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See, for instance, Mazower, M.: The Balkans: A Short History, New York 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fuchs/Klingermann: Enlargement.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wolczuk, K.: Integration without Europeanisation: Ukraine and its Policy towards the European Union, European University Institute Working Papers. RSCAS 15/2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cited in Emerson, M.: European neighbourhood Policy: strategy or Placebo?, CEPS Working Document No. 215, November 2004, p. 14. (cit.: Emerson: neighbourhood).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See the recent defence of ENP: From Neighbourhood to Integration Policy? Are there concrete alternatives to enlargement, by Eneko Landaburu, Director General, DG External Relations, European Commission, CEPS Policy Brief No. 95, March 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scharpf, F.: The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration, in: Public Administration 66/1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See http://europa.eu.int/comm/world/enp/document_en.htrn. [22.01.2007].

    Google Scholar 

  16. European Commission: European Neighbourhood Policy: Strategy Paper, COM(2004) 373, Brussels, May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emerson: neighbourhood, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emerson, M./ Noutcheva, G.: Europeanisation as a Gravity Model of démocratisation, CEPS Working Document No. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sutton, A.: Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe: Impact of negative votes in the French and Dutch referenda (White Paper, and Case, Brussels, June 2005), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quoted in Emerson: neighbourhood, pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Knill, C./ Lehmkuhl, D.: How Europe Matters: Mechanisms of Europeanisation, European Integration Online Papers, 3 (7), [http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-007a.htm; 22.01.2007].

    Google Scholar 

  22. Grabbe, H.: How does Europeanisation Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity, in: Journal of European Public Policy 6/2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See, for instance, the critique offered by Hughes, J./ Sasse, G./ Gordon, C: Europeanization and Régionalisation in Central and Eastern Europe during the EU’s Eastward Enlargement: The Myth of Conditionality, New York 2004, at Chapter One; and ibid: Conditionality and Compliance in the EU’s Eastward Enlargement: Regional Policy and the Reform of Sub-national Governance, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 3/2004.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Emerson: neighbourhood, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dorussen, H.: Mixing Carrots with Sticks: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Positive Incentives, in: Journal of Peace Research 2/2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Carothers, T.: Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington D.C.1999; see also Emerson, M./Aydin, S./Noutcheva, G./Tocci, N./Vahl, M./Youngs, R.: The Reluctant Debutant — The EU as Promoter of Democracy in its Neighbourhood, in: Emerson, M. (éd.): Démocratisation in the European Neighbourhood, CEPS, Brussels, 2005 [http://shop.ceps.be; 22.01.2007] (cit.: Emerson et al.: Democratisation).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Emerson et al.: Democratisation.

    Google Scholar 

  28. European Commission: Commission Communication on the Instruments for External Assistance under the Future Financial Perspective 2007–2013, COM (2004) 628 final, 29 September 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  29. European Commission: Commission Staff Working Document: Qualitative Assessment of the Reform of External Assistance, SEC (2005) 963, Brussels, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Roberts, J.: The Turkish Gate — Energy Transit and Security Issues, EU-Turkey Working Paper No. 11, CEPS, Brussels, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Carrera, S./ Formisano, M.: An EU Approach to Labour Migration: What is Added Value and the Way Ahead?, CEPS Working Document No. 232, CEPS, Brussels, October 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Geddes, A.: Europe’s Border Relationships and International Migration Relations, in: Journal of Common Market Studies 4/2005.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Diez, T./ Stetter, S./ Albert, M.: The EU and the Transformation of Border Conflicts, EUBorderConf Working Paper, N.I, January 2004; and: Tocci, N.: Conflict Resolution in the European Neighbourhood: The Role of the EU as a Framework and as an Actor, EUI Working Papers RCSAS 29/2004.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Emerson: neighbourhood, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cortright, D.: Incentives and Cooperation in International Affairs, in: idem (ed.): The Price of Peace: Incentives and International Conflict Prevention, New York 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Emerson: neighbourhood, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Some of the issues here are discussed by Raik, K.: Promoting Democracy through Civil Society: How to Step up the EU’s Policy towards the eastern Neighbourhood, CEPS Working Document No. 237/2006 [http://www. ceps.be; 22.01.2007] and Diamond, L.: Rethinking Civil Society: Towards Democratic Consolidation, in: Journal of Democracy 3/1996; and Merkel, W.: Civil Society and democratic consolidation in East-Central Europe, in: Pridham, G./Agh, A. (eds): Prospects for democratic consolidation in East-Central Europe, Manchester 2001, pp. 96-114 (cit.: Merkel: Civil Society).

    Google Scholar 

  38. For a discussion of this important facet of transition see, for instance, Howard, M.: The weakness of Postcommunist Civil Society, in: Journal of Democracy 13/2002; Merkel: Civil Society.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mendelson, S./ Glenn, J.: Democracy Assistance and NGO Strategies in Post-Communist Societies, Carnegie Working Papers 8/2000 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  40. T. Christiansen/ J. E. Jorgensen: Transnational Governance “Above“ and “Below“ the State: The Changing Nature of Borders in the New Europe, in: Regional and Federal Studies 2/2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Hans-Georg Ehrhart Sabine Jaberg Bernhard Rinke Jörg Waldmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Neill, M. (2007). Between Democracy and Deterrence. In: Ehrhart, HG., Jaberg, S., Rinke, B., Waldmann, J. (eds) Die Europäische Union im 21. Jahrhundert. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90576-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90576-1_24

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15501-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-90576-1

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics