Skip to main content

Social Diversification: A Perspective for the Study of Social networks of Adolescents Offline and Online

  • Chapter
Grenzenlose Cyberwelt?

Abstract

Current academic and policy debates on the social implications of gaps in the adoption of information and communication technologies have focused on the “digital divide” concept to describe the uneven social distribution and use of the Internet (Anderson et al., 1995; Fong, Wellman, Kew and Wilkes, 2004). Information and communication technologies (ICT’s) are conceived as an agent of change in society because they support the rapid creation, diffusion and access of information, the formation of social networks, and the accumulation of social capital (Lin, 2001; DiMaggio et al., 2001). In this sense, many suggest that ICT’s can reduce social inequalities by lowering the cost of information and enhancing the ability of socially marginal groups to gain human capital, compete for good jobs, and enhance their life chances (Anderson, et al., 1995). At the same time, many scholars are concerned that the Internet is creating a post-industrial society of information haves and have-nots that exacerbates rather than alleviate existing inequalities (DiMaggio and Hargittai, 2001). Reducing the digital divide has become a concern of social activists, non-profit organizations, political activists, and governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, Robert, Tora Bikxon, Sally Ann Law and Birdger Mitchell. (1995). Universal access to Email: Feasibility and Social Implications. Santa Monika, CA: Rand Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotterell, John. (1996). Social Networks and Social Influences in Adolescence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul and Eszter Hargitai. (2001). From the Digital Divide to the Digital Inequality. Working Paper: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott. (1981). “The Focused Organization of Social Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 86: 1015–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, Scott. (1982). “Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates.” American Sociological Review 47: 797–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, Eric, Barry Wellman, Melissa Kew and Rima Wilkes. (2001). “Correlates of the Digital Divide: Individual, Household and Spatial Variation.” Report to Office of Learning Technologies, Human Resources Development Canada, June, 84 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, James, E. and Ronald E. Rice. (2002). Social Consequences of Internet use. Access Involvement and Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, Robert, Micahel Patterson, Vicki Lundmark, Sara Kiesler, Tridas Mukopadhyay and William Scherlis. (1998). “Internet Paradox: A Social Technology that Reduces Social Involvement and Psychological Well-Being?” American Psychologist 53: 1011–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Nan. (2001): Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press Horton

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, Miller, Lyn Smith-Lovin and James M. Cook. (2002). “Birds of a Feather: Homophile in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, Katelin., Amie.S. Green and Marcie.E.G. Gleason. 2002. “Relationship Formation on the Internet: What is the Big Attraction?” Journal of Social Issues 58: 9–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesch, Gustavo S. and Yael Levanon.(2003). “Community Networking and Locally-Based Social Ties in Two Suburban Localities.” City and Community 2: 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, Malcom R. and Kory Floyd. 1996. “Making Friends in Cyberspace.” Journal of Communication 46: 80–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, Jan. (2005). The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. London: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, Barry. (2001). “Computer Networks As Social Networks.” Science 293: 2031–2034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolak, Janis, Mitchell Kimberly. J. and David Finkelhor (2003). “Escaping or Connecting? Characteristics of Youth Who Form Close Online Relationships.” Journal of Adolescence 26: 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mesch, G.S. (2007). Social Diversification: A Perspective for the Study of Social networks of Adolescents Offline and Online. In: Grenzenlose Cyberwelt?. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90519-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90519-8_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15319-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-90519-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics