Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Das Endogenitätsproblem politischer Institutionen und die Optionen von „Electoral“ und „Constitutional Engineering“

  • Chapter
Demokratisierung im internationalen Vergleich

  • 2064 Accesses

Auszug

Die Transformationsprozesse in Lateinamerika und Osteuropa haben institutionalistischen Perspektiven zu neuer Konjunktur verholfen. Freie Wahlen sind nicht das einzige, hinreichende Kriterium, um ein demokratisches politisches System zu bestimmen, freie Wahlen sind jedoch die conditio sine qua non für die Einrichtung eines demokratischen politischen Systems. In dieser Optik bezieht sich Demokratisierung auf zwei wesentliche Desiderate, einmal auf die Bestellung einer verantwortlichen und handlungsfähigen Legislative, deren Effektivität gerade bei der Bewältigung und konkreten Gestaltung des politischen und ökonomischen Systemwechsels gefragt ist, und weiter auf die Inklusion und Repräsentation der wahlberechtigten Bürger im Parlament, die das wesentliche Scheidungskriterium von Diktatur und Demokratie ist und die demokratische Legitimation politischer Entscheidungen erst herstellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. Literatur

  • Amorim Neto, Octavio/ Cox, Gary W. (1997): Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties. In: American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Josephine T./ Jackman, Robert W. (2005): Strategic fools: electoral rule choice under extreme uncertainty. In: Electoral Studies 24(1):65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus (2002): The effects of negotiation demoeraey: A comparative analysis. In: European Journal of Political Research 41(1):81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, Thomas Ramsden/ Ashworth, H.P.C. (1901): Proportional representation applied to party government: a new electoral System. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, Kenneth (2001): A Theory of Electoral Systems. University of Dublin, January 05. Paper, Trinity College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, Kenneth (2004): Models of electoral System change. In: Electoral Studies 23(3):363–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, Kenneth/ Hayden, Jacqueline (2004): Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland’s Electoral System, 1989–2001. In: Journal of Politics 66(2):396–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, Kenneth/ Schiemann, John W. (2001): Institutional Choices in New Democracies. Bargaining over Hungary’s 1989 Electoral Law. In: Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(2): 153–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg-Schlosser, Dirk/ Mitchell, Jeremy (Hrsg.) (2002): Authoritarianism and Demoeraey in Europe, 1919–39. Comparative Analyses, Houndmills, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, Sarah/ Millard, Frances/ Popescu, Marina/ Williams, Kieran (2002): Embodying Demoeraey. Electoral System Design in Post-Communist Europe. Houndmills, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, Vernon/ Butler, David (Hrsg.) (1983): Demoeraey and Elections. Electoral Systems and Their Political Consequences, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix, Carles (1999): Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choiee of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies. In: American Political Science Review 93(3):609–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, John M. (2000): Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions. In: Comparative Political Studies 33(6/7):735–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. (1990): Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomer, Josep M. (1995): Strategies and Outcomes in Eastern Europe. In: Journal of Democracy 6(2):74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colomer, Josep M. (Hrsg.) Handbook of Electoral System Choiee, Houndmills, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomer, Josep M. (2004): The Strategy and History of Electoral System Choiee. In: Colomer, Josep M. (Hrsg.): 3–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Gary W. (1987): Electoral Equilibrium under Alternative Voting Institutions. In: American Journal of Political Science 31(1):82–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Gary W. (1994): Strategie Voting Equilibria under the Single Non-Transferable Vote. In: American Political Science Review 88(3):608–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Gary W. (1997): Making Votes Count. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert A. (1998): On Demoeraey. New Haven, London:.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPalma, Giuseppe (1990): To Craft Democracies. An Essay on Democratic Transitions. Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, Maurice (1959): Die politischen Parteien. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Harry (1963): Introduction: The Impact of Electoral Systems on Representative Government. In: Apter, David E. (Hrsg.) Comparative Politics. A Reader. London: The Free Press of Glencoe Eckstein, Harry/ Apter, David E. (Hrsg.): 247–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, Harry/ Apter, David E. (Hrsg.) (1963): Comparative Politics. A Reader. London: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon (1997): Afterword: the making of postcommunist presidencies. In: Taras, Raymond (Hrsg.) (1997): 225–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon/ Offe, Claus/ Preuss, Ulrich (1998): Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies. Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, Frederick C. (1959): A Critique of Recent Writings on Political Parties. In: Journal of Politics 21(3):423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, Hartmut (1996): Soziologie. Frankfurt am Main, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finer, Herman (1935): The case against proportional representation. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, Carl Joachim (1937): Constitutional government and politics: nature and development. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtak, Robert K. (Hrsg.) (1990): Elections in Socialist States. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, Bernard/ Lijphart, Arend (Hrsg.) (1986): Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grofman, Bernard/ Mikkel, Evald/ Taagepera, Rein (1999): Electoral Systems Change in Estonia, 1989–1993. In: Journal of Baltic Studies 30(3):227–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumm, John C. (1958): Theories of Electoral Systems. In: Midwest Journal of Political Science 2(4):357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermens, Ferdinand Aloys (1933): Demokratie und Wahlrecht. Eine wahlrechtssoziologische Unters. zur Krise d. parlamentarischen Regierungsbildung. Paderborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermens, Ferdinand Aloys (1951): Demokratie oder Anarchie? Untersuchungen über die Verhältniswahl. Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermens, Ferdinand Aloys (1963): The Dynamics of Proportional Representation. In: Apter, David E. (Hrsg.) Comparative Politics. A Reader. London: The Free Press of Glencoe Eckstein, Harry/ Apter, David E. (Hrsg.): 254–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, Arthur N. (1911): Direct primaries and the second ballot. In: American Political Science Review 5(4):535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesse, Eckhard (1985): Wahlrecht zwischen Kontinuität und Reform. Eine Analyse der Wahlsystemdiskussion und der Wahlrechtsänderungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949–1983. Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsi, Marek M./ Nalepa, Monika A. (2004): Poland: Learning to Manipulate Electoral Rules. In: Colomer, Josep M. (Hrsg.): 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, Lauri/ Quenter, Sven (2002): Electoral Systems, Party System Fragmentation and Government Instability. In: Mitchell, Jeremy (Hrsg.) Authoritarianism and Demoeraey in Europe, 1919–39. Comparative Analyses, Houndmills, Basingstoke Berg-Schlosser, Dirk/ Mitchell, Jeremy (Hrsg.) (2002): 131–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Richard S. (1997): Democracy and Elections. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, Vladimir Orlando (1950): Constitutional Government and Democracy. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert/ Mansfeldova, Zdenka/ Markowski, Radoslaw/ Tóka, Gabór (1999): Post-Communist Party Systems. Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopecký, Petr (2004): The Czech Republic: Entrenching Proportional Representation. In: Colomer, Josep M. (Hrsg.): 347–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupavičius, Algis (Hrsg.) (2001): Lithuania’s Seimas Election 1996: The Third Turnover: Analyses, Documents and Data (Founding Elections in Eastern Europe), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • La Palombara, Joseph G. (1953): The Italian Elections and the Problem of Representation. In: American Political Science Review 47(3):676–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakeman, Enid (1970): How Democracies Vote. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakeman, Enid/ Lambert, James D. (1963): Voting in Democracies. In: Apter, David E. (Hrsg.) Comparative Politics. A Reader. London: The Free Press of Glencoe Eckstein, Harry/ Apter, David E. (Hrsg.) (1963): 281–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend (1984): Democracies. Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend (1992): Democratization and Constitutional Choices in Czecho-Slovakia, Hungary and Poland 1989–91. In: Journal of Theoretical Politics 4(2):207–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend (1994): Electoral Systems and Party Systems. A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945–1990. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend (1999): Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend/ Grofman, Bernard (Hrsg.) (1984): Choosing an Electoral System. Issues and Alternatives. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipson, Leslie (1964): The Democratic Civilisation. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, James Ramsay (1909): Socialism and Government. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, W. J. M (1957): The Export of Electoral Laws. In: Political Studies 4(3):240–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matakas, Juozas (2001): Elections and Electoral Systems in Lithuania in the 20th Century. In: Krupavičius, Algis (Hrsg.) (2001): 53–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, Iain (1991): Forms of Representation and Systems of Voting. In: Held, David (Hrsg.) Political Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press. 172–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meilen, Sidney L.W. (1943): The German people and the post-war world. In: American Political Science Review 37(4):607–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkel, Evald/ Pettai, Vello (2004): The Baltics: Independence with Divergent Electoral Systems. In: Colomer, Josep M. (Hrsg.) (2004): 332–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millard, Frances (2003): Elections in Poland 2001: electoral manipulation and party upheaval. In: Communist and Post-Communist Studies 36(1):69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa (2004): Electoral Engineering. Voting Rules and Electoral Behavior. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, Peter/ Shvetsova, Olga (1994): Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties. In: American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 100–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. Bingham (2000): Elections as Instruments of Democracy. Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. Bingham/ Vanberg, Georg S. (2000): Election Laws, Disproportionality and Median Correspondence: Implications for Two Visions of Democracy. In: British Journal of Political Science 30(3):383–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, Douglas W. (1967): The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws. New Haven, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remington, Thomas F. (1998): Political Conflict and Institutional Design: Paths of Party Development in Russia. In: Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 14(1–2):201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, Thomas F./ Smith, Steven S. (1996): Political Goals, Institutional Context, and the Choice of an Electoral System: The Russian Parliamentary Election Law. In: American Journal of Political Science 40(4): 1253–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, Thomas F./ Smith, Steven S. (1997): Theories of Legislative Institutions and the Organization of the Russian Duma. In: American Journal of Political Science 42(2):545–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William H. (1982): The Two-Party System and Duverger’s Law. An Essay on the History of Political Science. In: American Political Science Review 76(4):753–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, Stein (1970): Citizens, Elections, Parties. Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, Stein (2000): Staat, Nation und Demokratie in Europa. Die Theorie Stein Rokkans aus seinen gesammelten Werken rekonstruiert und eingeleitet von Peter Flora. Frankfurt am Main:.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustow, Dankwart A. (1950): Some Observations on Proportional Representation. In: Journal of Politics 12(1):107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1976): Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Bd. 1. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1986): The Influence of Electoral Systems: Faulty Laws or Faulty Method? In: Lijphart, Arend (Hrsg.) Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press Grofman, Bernard/ Lijphart, Arend (Hrsg.) (1986): 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1994): Comparative Constitutional Engineering. An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, Eimer Eric (1942): Party Government. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas C. (1980): The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemann, John S. (2001): Hedging against Uncertainty: Regime Change and the Origins of Hungary’s Mixed-Member System. In: Wattenberg, Martin P. (Hrsg.) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems. The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford Shugart, Matthew S./ Wattenberg, Martin P. (Hrsg.): 231–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemann, John W. (2004): Hungary: Compromising on a Mixed System. In: Colomer, Josep M. (Hrsg.): 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, Michael (1985): Changes in Electoral Systems as ‘Interventions’: Another Test of Duverger’s Hypothesis. In: European Journal of Political Research 13(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, Matthew S. (2001): ‘Extreme’ Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed-Member Alternative. In: Wattenberg, Martin P. (Hrsg.) Mixed-Member Electoral Systems. The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford Shugart, Matthew S./ Wattenberg, Martin P. (Hrsg.): 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shugart, Matthew S./ Wattenberg, Martin P. (Hrsg.) (2001): Mixed-Member Electoral Systems. The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shvetsova, Olga (2003): Endogenous Selection of Institutions and Their Exogenous Effects. In: Comparative Constitutional Economy 14(2): 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, Rein/ Shugart, Matthew S. (1989): Seats and Votes. The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, Rein/ Shugart, Matthew S. (1993): Predicting the Number of Parties: A Quantitative Model of Duverger’s Mechanical Effect. In: American Political Science Review 87(2):455–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, Raymond (Hrsg.) (1997) Postcommunist Presidents, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George (1990): Nested Games. Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. Fisher (1918): The reform of representation. London:.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fritz-Thyssen-Stiftung, Deutschland

    Guido Tiemann (Dr. und Postdoc-Stipendiat)

Authors
  1. Guido Tiemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Gert Pickel Susanne Pickel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tiemann, G. (2006). Das Endogenitätsproblem politischer Institutionen und die Optionen von „Electoral“ und „Constitutional Engineering“. In: Pickel, G., Pickel, S. (eds) Demokratisierung im internationalen Vergleich. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90423-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90423-8_11

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-15113-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-90423-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation