Double Vulnerability: Older Women and Health in Slovenia



Demographic trends in Slovenia follow the same pattern as in other developed countries: for the last twenty years they have showed birth rates decreased by almost 50 per cent, and a constantly increasing number of older citizens (Jakoš, 2002). At the moment, there are 14.6 % of people above 65 (Šelb-Šemerl et al, 2004) and according to a demographic projection, it is expected that older people will represent approximately 16.5 % of the total population in 2020 (Jakoš, 1999). This trend is reported to be on the rapid increase – in the year 2040 the calculations for Slovenia predict 30% of the population to be older people than 65 years of age (Hvalič Touzery, 2005). With respect to gender there is a noticeable misbalance especially in the oldest old stage of life, the majority of the old people being women.


Social Support Social Network United Nations Development Programme Homeless Youth Close Family 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ashley DF, Wasserman S. Social support and social networks: synthesis and review. In: Levy JA, Pescosolido BA (ed.). Social networks and health. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd., 2002: 29–72.Google Scholar
  2. Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millenium. Soc Sci Med 2000, 6: 843–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boh, K. in skupina. Stratifikacija in kvaliteta zivljenja v Jugoslaviji 1987 [kodirna knjiga]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani. Institut za sociologijo in filozofijo pri Univerzi v Ljubljani, 1987. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani. Arhiv druzboslovnih podatkov [i-zdelava, distribucija], 2000.Google Scholar
  4. Bosnia H, Marmot G, Hemingway H, Nicholson AC, Brunner E, Stansfeld SA. Low job control and risk of coronary heart disease. In: Whitehall II (prospective cohort) study. BMJ 1997;314: 558–565.Google Scholar
  5. Choi NG, Wodarski JS. The relationship between social support and health status of elderly people: Does social support slow down physical and functional deterioriation? Social Work Research 1996, 20: 52–63.Google Scholar
  6. Cotman C. Synaptic plasticity. New York: Guilford Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  7. Černigoj Sadar N. Spolne razlike v formalnem in neformalnem delu. V: Jogan M. (ed.). Tranzi-cija in (ne)enakost med spoloma. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za druzbene vede: Slovensko sociolosko drustvo, 2000 (Druzboslovne razprave, 2000; 16: 31-52), available from URL:, accessed: July 14,2006.Google Scholar
  8. Černigoj Sadar N. Stress in the work-place [in Slovene]. Teorija in praksa. 2002, 39:81–102.Google Scholar
  9. Doyal L. What makes women sick? Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. Ferligoj, A. et al. Omrezja socialnih opor prebivalstva Slovenije. 2002 [kodirna knjiga]. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za druzbene vede in Institut Republike Slovenije za socialno varstvo.Google Scholar
  11. Grundy E. Ageing and Vulnerable Elderly People: European Perspectives. Ageing & Society, 2006; 26: 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanzek M (ed). Human development report. Slovenia 1998. Ljubljana: Institute of Macroeconomic Analyses and Development & United Nations Development Programme; 1998.Google Scholar
  13. Hanzek M (ed). Human development report. Slovenia 1999. Ljubljana: Institute of Macroeconomic Analyses and Development & United Nations Development Programme; 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Hart C. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London (etc.): SAGE Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. Hlebec V, Kogovšek T. The stick and the carrot of secondary data in social network analysis [in Slovene]. Druzboslovne razprave 2005; 21:189–203.Google Scholar
  16. Hlebec V, Kogovšek T. Hypothetical versus actual support providers in comparative network research. Metodol. zv., 2005; 2(1): 73–93, available from URL:, accessed: July 14, 2006.Google Scholar
  17. Hvalič Touzery S. The oldest old in Slovenia: a demographiccal overview [in Slovene]. Kakovostna starost 2005; 8: 2–20.Google Scholar
  18. Jakoš A. Elderly population in Slovenia–demographic situation and projections [in Slovene]. Zdrav var 1999; 38: 50–53.Google Scholar
  19. Jakoš A. The demographic threshold [in Slovene]. Urbani izziv 2002; 13: 60–66.Google Scholar
  20. Javornik J, Korošec V (eds). Human development report. Slovenia 2003. Ljubljana: Institute of Macroeconomic Analyses and Development & United Nations Development Programme; 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Jogan M. (ed.). Tranzicija in (ne)enakost med spoloma. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za druzbene vede: Slovensko sociološko društvo, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. Konjuo Mrčela A. Spolna konstrukcija menedzerskih vlog: stekleni organizacijski stropovi v devedesetih. V: Jogan M. (ed.). Tranzicija in (ne)enakost med spoloma. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za druzbene vede: Slovensko sociološko društvo, 2000 (Druzboslovnerazprave, 2000; 16: 53-78), available from URL:, accessed: July 14,2006.Google Scholar
  23. Kiecolt-Glaser J et al. Psychosocial modifiers of immunocompetence in medical students. Psychosom Med 1984, 46: 7–14.Google Scholar
  24. Kiecolt-Glaser J et al. Marital quality, marital disruption and immune function. Psychosom Med 1987, 49: 17–27.Google Scholar
  25. Klemenc D, Pahor M (eds). Nurses in Slovenia [in Slovene]. Ljubljana: DMSZT, 2001.Google Scholar
  26. Matcha DA. The sociology of aging. A social problem perspective. Boston (etc.): Allyin and Bacon, 1997.Google Scholar
  27. Mohorčič-Šolar V, Bergant M, Emeršič B, Ivančič A, Kodelja-Starin J, Kraigher T. Women in education and work [in Slovene]. Ljubljana: ACS, 1995.Google Scholar
  28. Novak M. Hazardiranje s starostjo. Teorija in praksa, 1998; 35: 1042–1056.Google Scholar
  29. Pahor M, Domajnko B. An integrated approach to the health of the elderly people in Slovenia: literature review from 1994 to June 2004 [in Slovene]. Kakovostna starost, 2005; 8: 20–31.Google Scholar
  30. Pahor M, Hlebec V. Social netwoks and health: transition in Slovenia (in Slovene). To appear in: Zdravstveno varstvo/Slovenian journal of public health, 2006Google Scholar
  31. Schroder B E, Marianty R. A Framework for Understanding Old-Age Vulnerabilities. Ageing & Society, 2006; 26: 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shye D et al. Gender differences in the relationship between social network support and mortality: a longitudinal study of an elderly cohort. Soc Sci Med 1995, 41: 935–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SORS-Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. Druzine v Sloveniji (12.5.2005), available from URL:, accessed: October 8, 2005.
  34. SORS-Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. Ob dnevu zena (7.3.2006), available from URL:, accessed: July 6, 2006.
  35. Šelb-Šemerl J, Rok-Simon M, Kelšin N, Ivas N. Aging of population in Slovenia: demographic changes and some health care consequences [in Slovene]. Zdrav vestn 2004; 73: 526–531.Google Scholar
  36. Švab A. Kako skrbna je drzava?: konceptualizacija skrbi v druzinski politiki v Sloveniji = Does the state really care?: conceptualisation of care in family policy in Slovenia. V: SEVENHUIJSEN, Selma (ur.), ŠVAB, Alenka (ur.). Labirinti skrbi: pomen perspektive etike skrbi za socialno politiko, (Zbirka Politike). Ljubljana: Mirovni inštitut, Inštitut za sodobne druzbene in politične študije, 2003, str. 51–73.Google Scholar
  37. Toš N., Malnar B. Druzbeni vidiki zdravja. Ljubljana: FDV-IDV, 2002.Google Scholar
  38. Unger JB et al. Stress, coping and social support among young homeless youth. Journal of Adolescent Research 1998, 13: 134–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ule M. Spregledana razmerja: o druzbenih vidikih sodobne medicine. Maribor: Aristej, 2003.Google Scholar
  40. World Health Organization. Social determinants of health: the solid facts. Available from URL: cities/Documentation/, accessed: December 1, 2003.
  41. Zaletel-Kragelj L, Pahor M. Risk factors for non-communicable diseases in adults in Slovenia. Frequency of observed phenomena. Stress and related phenomena in women [in Slovene]. Ljubljana: Katedra za javno zdravje Medicinske fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Health StudiesUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations