Skip to main content

Private Security Companies: Agents of Democracy or Simply Mercenaries?

  • Chapter

Abstract

Since the setting up of the first private security companies (PSCs) the term has been synonymous with mercenaries. Such a claim was justified in the early days when there were strong links between these two groups of actors. Watchguard, for example, employed mercenaries to launch a military operation against Qadaffi in 1970 (Hoe 1999: 410). Since then, the industry has changed beyond recognition. Instead of being perceived as guns for hire, many in the international community now recognize that PSCs can make a valuable contribution to international peace and security through training and other areas of expertise. What is emerging today is their integration into strategic complexes that now operate in many parts of the developing world and that are responsible for addressing the democratic deficit found in many weak and failing states. As the chapter explains below, such complexes are made up of governments, international organizations, international non-governmental organizations (INGOs), multinational corporations and now PSCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. At the time of the crisis, there was a clear conflict between the British government’s short-term and long-term interests. In the short term, the interests of Aden were paramount since it was necessary not to disrupt the merger between Aden Colony and Aden Protectorate, while recognition of the Yemen would have such an effect. At the same time, the long-term view was that a republican victory in Yemen was inevitable. (Cabinet Office, Document on Yemen No. Cab 130/189).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The unofficial approach also allowed the British government the opportunity to deny having anything to do with the operation. (Foreign Office, Telegram No. 670, Prem. 11/4929).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Jäger Gerhard Kümmel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kinsey, C. (2007). Private Security Companies: Agents of Democracy or Simply Mercenaries?. In: Jäger, T., Kümmel, G. (eds) Private Military and Security Companies. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90313-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics