Skip to main content

Informal Regulation: An Economic Perspective on the Private Security Industry

  • Chapter

Abstract

The literature on military privatization is predominantly skeptical about the possibility of successfully providing military security through private companies. Most scholars argue that without a much stricter and more comprehensive system of formal regulations, the use of private actors to provide security would be too risky. Their argument is based on the assumption that private actors in military roles have greater incentives to behave in potentially harmful ways than their institutional counterparts in the state organized military. (Singer 2003a: 151)

The author would like to thank Prof. Christopher Dandeker for his useful suggestions and comments to this article.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Exceptions to this rule are Hartley (2004) and Fredland/Kendry (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The cost-plus contracts that are most widely used under these circumstances do not specify quantities of a service or good (Hartley 2004: 204).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Singer even claims that the losses among PSC personnel have been proportionally higher than among US soldier in Iraq (Singer 2004d: 7).

    Google Scholar 

  4. The GAO (2003: 2), e.g., explicitly criticizes the lack of monitoring and back-up plans to substitute for PSCs if they should fail to provide their service.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The DoD now holds PSCs responsible for the actions of their employees (Avant 2005: 235).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The corporate structure of PSCs is generally less hierarchical than the military and there is less discipline (Donaldson 2005; Worcester 2005).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Thomas Jäger Gerhard Kümmel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drutschmann, S. (2007). Informal Regulation: An Economic Perspective on the Private Security Industry. In: Jäger, T., Kümmel, G. (eds) Private Military and Security Companies. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90313-2_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics