Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Politische Korruption in Mexiko

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Das politische System Mexikos

  • 3130 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das mexikanische politischen System wird nach weit verbreiteter Vorstellung für grundlegend korrupt gehalten wird. Von literarischen Erzählungen über akademische Studien und journalistische Berichte bis hin zu offiziellen Gutachten, Umfragen, Sprüchen und volkstümlichen Legenden scheinen alle eine alte Wahrnehmung zu nähren, nach der die Korruption einen Teil des täglichen Lebens in Mexiko ausmacht. Sie ist eine Art dauerhaftes, inhärentes Merkmal, das alle Macht- und Regierungsebenen durchdringt und ein Teil der politischen Kultur des gesamten Landes (Morris 1987, 1991 und 2009; DePalma 1996; Del Castillo und Guerrero 2004; Avilés 2004; ENCUP 2001, 2003, 2005, 2008 und 2012; Sarsfield 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Adcock, R. (2005): “What is a concept?”, Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series, Mexiko- Stadt.: IPSA–CIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adcock, R. und Collier, D. (2001). Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research. American Political Science Review, 95 (3), 529–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avilés Fabila, R. (2004). Conaliteg, corrupción de estado bajo la lupa de la prensa. http://casoconaliteg.com/index2.php?do_rtf=1&id=90 [Zugegriffen: 23. Februar 2013]

  • Bailey, J. (2009). Corruption and Democratic Governability. In: C. H. Blake, & S.D. Morris. Corruption and Democracy in Latin America (S. 60–76). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, C. (2003). Electoral Competition and Institutional Change in Mexico. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, C. H. (2009). Public Attitude toward Corruption. In: Ch H. Blake, & S. D. Morris, Corruption and Democracy in Latin America (S. 94–110). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, C. H., & Martin, C. (2006). The Dynamics of Political Corruption: Reexamining the Influence of Democracy. Democratization 13 (1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinegar, A. (2009). Evaluating Citizens Attitudes about Corruption in Chile. In: Ch H. Blake, & S. D. Morris, Corruption and Democracy in Latin America (S. 131–149). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, J. (2011). Mañana o pasado. El misterio de los mexicanos. Mexiko- Stadt: Aguilar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattemberg, G., & Moreno, A. (2005). The Individual Bases of Political Trust: Trends in New and Established Democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18 (1), 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corruptómetro (2001). Corruptómetro. Mexiko-Stadt: Transparencia Mexicana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corruptómetro (2002). Corruptómetro. Mexiko-Stadt: Transparencia Mexicana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz Jiménez, F., & Cruz Montiel, J.T. (2009). Negocios de Familia. biografía no autorizada de Enrique Peña Nieto y el Grupo de Atlacomulco. Mexiko-Stadt: Editorial Planeta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Castillo, A., & Guerrero M.A. (2004). Percepciones de la corrupción en la ciudad de México ¿predisposición al acto corrupto? Mexiko-Stadt: Consulting and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Castillo, A. (2003). Medición de la corrupción. Un indicador de la rendición de cuentas. Mexiko-Stadt: Auditoría Superior de la Federación.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiPalma, A. (1996). How a Tortilla Empire Was Built on Favoritism. New York Times, 15. Februar 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Nueva York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, Todd A. (2004). México´s Postelectoral Concertacesiones. The Rise and Demise of a Substitutive Informal Institution. In: G. Helmke, & S. Levitsky (Hrsg.). Informal Institutions and Democracy. Lessons from Latin America (S. 227–248). Maryland: The John Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENCBG (2001). Encuesta Nacional sobre Corrupción y Buen Gobierno. Mexiko-Stadt: Transparencia Mexicana.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENCBG (2003). Encuesta Nacional sobre Corrupción y Buen Gobierno. Mexiko-Stadt: Transparencia Mexicana.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENCBG (2005). Encuesta Nacional sobre Corrupción y Buen Gobierno. Mexiko-Stadt: Transparencia Mexicana.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENCUP (2001). Encuesta Nacional sobre Cultura Política. Mexiko-Stadt: SEGOB.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENCUP (2003). Encuesta Nacional sobre Cultura Política. Mexiko-Stadt: SEGOB.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENCUP (2005). Encuesta Nacional sobre Cultura Política. Mexiko-Stadt: SEGOB.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENCUP (2008). Encuesta Nacional sobre Cultura Política. Mexiko-Stadt: SEGOB.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENCUP (2012). Encuesta Nacional sobre Cultura Política. Mexiko-Stadt: SEGOB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni-Havely, E. (2002). Exchanging Material Benefits for Political Support: A Comparative Analysis. In: A.J. Heidenheimer, & M. Johnston (Hrsg.). Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts (S. 223–250). New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (2003). Minor corruption just part of life in Peru. NotiSur (4. April).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. A. (2002). Defining Corruption. In: A. J. Heidenheimer, & M. Johnston (Hrsg.). Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts (S. 25–40). New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, J., & Strom C. T. (2004). Political Corruption and Institutions: The role of Unitarism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science (34), 295–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero Gutiérrez, E. (2002). La reinvención del gobierno en la transición democrática: rendición de cuentas en la administración pública en México. VII Congreso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y la Administración Pública, Lissabon, 8 bis 11 Oktober.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1999). Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenheimer, A. J., & Johnston, M (2002). Introduction to Part 1. In: A. J. Heidenheimer, & M. Johnston (Hrsg.). Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts (S. 3–14). New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, J. S. (1998). Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Post Communist Transitions. World Politics (50): 203–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, J. (1989). Political Corruption in the U.S.S.R. In: A.J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston, & V.T. LeVine (Hrsg.). Political Corruption: A Handbook (S. 449–465). New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. (2005). Syndromes of Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krauze, E. (2012). La tormenta perfecta. Letras Libres, 167, November, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. O. (1993). Political Economy of Policy Reform in Developing Countries. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, T. D., & Montinola, G.R. (2001). Comparative Political Corruption: Issues of Operationalization and Measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (3), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latinobarómetro (2011). Informe 2011. Corporación Latinobarómetro. Santiago de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzetti, L., & Blake, C. H. (1996). Market Reforms and Corruption in Latin America. Review of International Political Economy 3 (4), 662–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez de Hoyos, I. (2002). Competencia y competitividad electoral en México, 1977–1997. Política y Gobierno 10 (1), 139–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinar Horcasitas, J. (1991). El tiempo de la legitimidad. Mexiko-Stadt: Cal y Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, A. (2002). Corruption and Democracy: A Cultural Assessment. Comparative Sociology 1 (3–4), 495–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. D. (1987). Corruption and the Mexican Political System. Corruption and Reform 2, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. D. (1991). Corruption and Politics in the Contemporary Mexico. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. D. (1999). Corruption and the Mexican Political Systems: Continuity and Change. Third World Quarterly 20 (3), 623–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S. D. (2009). Political Corruption in Mexico. The Impact of Democratization. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. American Political Science Review 61 (2), 417–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O´Donnell, G. (1994). Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O´Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O´Donnell, G. (2003). Horizontal Accountability: The Legal Institutionalization of Mistrust. In: S. Mainwaring, & C. Welna (Hrsg.). Democratic Accountability in Latin America (S. 34–54). Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1971). The Logic of Collective Action. Publics Good and the Theory of Group. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paz. O. (1984) [1950]. El laberinto de la soledad. Mexiko-Stadt: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paz, O. (1998) [1950]. Das Labyrinth der Einsamkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (2000). Democracia y mercado: reformas políticas y económicas en Europa del Este y América Latina. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, S.  (1992) [1934]. El perfil del hombre y la cultura en México. Mexiko-Stadt: Espasa-Calpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehren, A. (2009): The Crisis of Democratic State. In: Ch H. Blake, & S. D. Morris, Corruption and Democracy in Latin America (S. 46–59). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government. Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (2006). International Handbook of the Economics of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarsfield, R. (2010): “¿Tierra de hombres infames?” La economía política de la corrupción en América Latina. A Contracorriente, 7 (3), 459–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarsfield, R. (2012). The Bribe Game: Microfoundations of Corruption in Mexico. Justice System Journal 33 (2), 215–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarsfield, R. (2013). “¿Es racional, desde el punto de vista individual, obedecer la ley?: Microfundamentos del estado de derecho en México”. Gestión y Política Pública 22(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1980). Partidos y sistemas de partidos. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. M. (2009). Corruption, Accountability Reforms, and Democracy in Brazil. In: Ch H. Blake, & S. D. Morris, Corruption and Democracy in Latin America (S. 150–168). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, S. C. (2009). Democracy, Economic Policy, and Political Corruption in Comparative Perspective. In: Ch H. Blake, & S. D. Morris, Corruption and Democracy in Latin America (S. 25–45). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, N. (2001). The Politics of Permanent Crisis. Managing African Economies, 1979–1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Calle Potosí No. 15, CP 76095, Santiago de Querétaro, México

    Dr. Rodolfo Sarsfield

Authors
  1. Dr. Rodolfo Sarsfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodolfo Sarsfield .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung e. V., Müncheberg, Germany

    Barbara Schröter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sarsfield, R. (2015). Politische Korruption in Mexiko. In: Schröter, B. (eds) Das politische System Mexikos. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19689-3_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19689-3_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19688-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19689-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation