Abstract
There are many good reasons for taking burdensome legislative action. Serious risk to life, security and defence issues require absolute certainty. Classic rules help to provide consistency, in that everyone has to abide by similar rules and organisations cannot choose to opt in or out. Furthermore, they come with clear legal means of redress if the law is broken. This is one of the main reasons why so-called ‘alternative policy instruments’ are often disregarded. Snyder (1995) describes them as ‘rules of conduct which in principle have no legally binding force, but which nevertheless may have practical effect’. They lack the aspect of legal certainty, which has led to the little flattering categorization of ‘soft law’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaeding, M. (2013). Towards an EU Regulatory Framework for an Effective Single Market. In: Towards an Effective European Single Market. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19684-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19684-8_7
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19683-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19684-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)