Advertisement

Supervision and evaluation: objectives, practices and helpful aspects

  • Hannes Krall
  • Jutta Fürst

Abstract

Supervision in psychodrama training aims to improve the learning of trainees through reflection on their own practice. The deepening of theoretical knowledge, development of technical skills and the focusing on personal and interpersonal awareness should be taken into consideration.

Keywords

Role Reversal Case Work Supervision Group Therapeutic Work Psychotherapy Training 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Caspar, F. (2005). Die Entwicklung klinischer Informationsverarbeitung. In A. R. Laireiter, & U. Willutzki (Hrsg.), Ausbildung in Verhaltenstherapie (pp. 239-262). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  2. Crits-Christoph, P., Cooper, A., & Luborsky, L. (1988). The accuracy of therapists’ interpretations and the outcome of dynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 490-495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gandolfo, R. L., & Brown, R. (1987). Psychology intern ratings of actual and ideal supervision of psychotherapy. Journal of Training and Practice in Professional Psychology, 1, 15-28.Google Scholar
  4. Gray, L. A., Ladany, N., & Walker, J. (2001). Psychotherapy Trainees' Experience of Counterproductive Events in Supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48 (4), 371-383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kahl-Popp, J. (2004). Lernziel: Kontextbezogene psychotherapeutische Kompetenz. Forum der Psychoanalyse. 20, 4, Springer, Medizin Verlag. 403-418.Google Scholar
  6. Kellermann, P. F. (1992). Focus on psychodrama. The Therapeutic Aspects of Psychodrama. London: Jessica Kingsley Publisher.Google Scholar
  7. Kraler, Ch., & Andreatta, P. (2006). Effectiveness of Psychotherapy training – On the evaluation of psychotherapeutic competence. SPR - Society of Psychotherapy Research: From Research to Practice, Book of Abstracts. Norderstedt, Germany.Google Scholar
  8. Ladany, N., Hill, C. E, Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclose to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43 (1), 10-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A Close Look at Conflictual Supervisory Relationsships: The Trainee's Perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48 (4), 384-395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reichelt, S., & Skjerve, J. (2002). Correspondence between supervisors and trainees in their perception of supervision events. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58 (7), 759-772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reising, G. N. & Daniels, M. H. (1983). A study of Hogan’s model of counselor development and supervision. Journal of Counseling and Development, 30, 235-244.Google Scholar
  12. Ronnestad, M. H., & Skovholt, T. (1997). Berufliche Entwicklung und Supervision von Psychotherapeuten. Psychotherapeut, (5), 299-306.Google Scholar
  13. Ronnestad, M. H. & Skovholt, T. M. (1993). Supervision of Beginning and Advanced Graduate Students of Counseling and Psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling and Development, 71, 396-405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruskin, R. (1994). When Supervision May Fail: Difficulties and Impasses. In S. E. Greben, & R. Ruskin (Eds.): Clinical Perspectives on Psychotherapy Supervision (pp. 213-261). Washington: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  15. Williams, A. (1995). Visual and Active supervision. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  16. Worthen, V., & McNeill, B. W. (1996). A Phenomenological Investigation of “Good” Supervision Events. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43 (1), 25-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hannes Krall
  • Jutta Fürst

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations