Advertisement

Promoting research-practice: supervision as an ideal moment to develop the role of a psychodramatist-researcher

  • Gabriela Moita
  • António Roma-Torres

Abstract

Research in psychodrama is commonly referred to as a necessity. Psychodrama, like the vast majority of psychotherapies, is far from achieving a desirable level of empirical validation of its effectiveness and there is still a lot of research to be done on the therapeutic process. In order to foster research, this paper proposes the integration of research skills in the training programme of the psychodramatist.

Keywords

Research Skill Empirical Validation Therapeutic Process Basic Research Design Psychotherapy Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brito, V. (2006). Um convite à pesquisa: epistemologia qualitativa e psicodrama. In A.M. Monteiro, D. Merengué & V. Brito (Eds.), Pesquisa qualitativa e psicodrama (pp.14–56). São Paulo: Editora Ágora.Google Scholar
  2. Bustos, D. (1979). O teste sociométrico. Fundamentos, técnica e aplicações. São Paulo: Editora brasiliense.Google Scholar
  3. CORE System Group, (1998). CORE System (Information Management) Handbook. Leeds: CORE System Group.Google Scholar
  4. CORE System Group, (1999). The CORE System User Manual. Leeds: CORE System Group.Google Scholar
  5. Elliott, R. (1996). Client interview schedule change. Unpublished research instruments, University of Toledo.Google Scholar
  6. Elliott, R., Mack, C., & Shapiro, D. (1999). Simplified Personnal Questionaire procedure. Retrieved from http://www.experientialresearches.org/instruments.html [Oct. 2, 2010].
  7. Elliott, R. (2002). Hermeneutic single case efficacy design. Psychotherapy Research 12, 1–20.Google Scholar
  8. Evans, C., Mellor-Clark, J. Margison, F. Barkham, M., Audin, K., Connell, J., & McGrath, G. (2000). CORE: Clinical outcomes in routine evaluation. Journal of Mental Health, 9.3, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goncalves, O. F. (March 2007). O regresso à ciência básica. Editorial do Boletim Informativo de Psicologia, Nº 3 (2), Retrieved from http://www.dicas.sas.uminho.pt/uploads/BIPsi%20%20of%202007.pdf20Fevereiro% [April 15, 2007].
  10. Kipper, D. A. & Hundal, J. (2005). The Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI): The relationship Between nonspontaneity and spontaneity. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 58, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kipper, D. A., & Shemer, H. (2006). The Revised Spontaneity Assessment Inventory (SAI), Spontaneity, Well-Being and Stress. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 59, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Krall, H., Fuerst, J., & Doganer, I. (2009). TRAIN - Towards Research in an International Network of Trainees. In Minutes of the Catania FEPTO RC Meeting October 16–18, 2009, Retrieved from http://www.fepto.eu/storage/files/documents/TRAIN.pdf
  13. Llewelyn, S. (1988). Psychological therapy as viewed by clients and therapists. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Monteiro, A.M., Merengué, D. & Brito, V. (2006). Pesquisa Qualitativa e Psicodrama. São Paulo: Editora Ágora.Google Scholar
  15. Moreira, P., Gonçalves, O. & Beutler, L. E. (2005). Métodos de Selecção de Tratamento. Porto: Porto Editora.Google Scholar
  16. Sales, C. et al. (2007). Psychotherapists Openness to Routine Naturalistic Idiographic Research? Health and Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 145–161.Google Scholar
  17. Wieser, S. (2007). Studies on treatment effects of psychodrama psychotherapy. In C. Baim, J. Burmeister & M. Maciel (Eds.), Psychodrama: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 271–292). New York, NY US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Moita
  • António Roma-Torres

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations