Advertisement

The Analysis of Preconditions for the Fostering of Democratic Behavioural Orientations in Business Organizations – The ODEM Questionnaire (POPD)

  • Wolfgang G. Weber
  • Christine Unterrainer
Chapter

Abstract

Is it possible to support the (further) development of democratic and democracy-related orientations through structures and practices of democratic decision-making in business organizations embedded in a capitalistic economy? This is the frame research question of the project series ODEM that is performed within the research centre Psychology of Everyday Activity (PsyAll) and the research platform Organizations and Society (OrgSoc) at the University of Innsbruck.

Keywords

Spillover Effect Political Engagement Employee Participation Political Efficacy Behavioural Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature

  1. Adman, P. (2008): Does workplace experience enhance political participation? A critical test of a venerable hypothesis. In: Political Behavior 30. 1. 115–138Google Scholar
  2. Ashforth, B. E./Saks, A. M. (2000): Personal Control in Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation with Newcomers. In: Human Relations 53. 3. 311–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, B. R. (1984): Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartölke, K./Eschweiler, W./Flechsenberger, D./Palgi, M./Rosner, M. (1985): Participation and control. Spardorf: WilferGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkowitz, M. W./Grych, J. H. (1998): Fostering Goodness: Teaching Parents to Faciliate Children’s Moral Development. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Education, The Office for Studies in Moral Development and EducationGoogle Scholar
  6. Bibouche, S. (2003): Neue Orientierungen und Engagementformen von jugendlichen Arbeitnehmer/Innen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady, H. E./Verba S./Schlozman K. L. (1995): A resource model of political participation. In: American Political Science Review 89. 271–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brief, A. P./Motowidlo, S. J. (1986): Prosocial organizational behaviors. In: Academy of Management Review 11. 710–725Google Scholar
  9. Bungard, W./Koop B./Liebig C. (Eds.) (2004): Psychologie und Wirtschaft leben. Heidelberg: Hüthig-FachverlageGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, J. P./Campbell R. J./Associates (Ed.) (1990): Productivity in organizations. San Francisco: Josse-BassGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter, N. (2006): Political participation and the workplace: The spillover thesis revisited. In: British Journal of Politics & International Relations 8. 3. 410–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper, C. L./Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.) (2001): Trends in organizational behavior. Vol.8: Employee versus owner issues in organizations. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Cornforth, C. (1983): Some Factors Affecting the Success and Failure of Worker Co-operatives: A Review of Empirical Research in the UK. In: Economic and Industrial Democracy 4. 163–190Google Scholar
  14. Cornforth, C. (1995): Patterns of Cooperative Management: Beyond the Degeneration Thesis. In: Economic and Industrial Democracy 16. 487–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crouch, C. (2004): Post Democracy. Cambridge, Mass.: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  16. Damon, W. (1998): Political development for a democratic future. In: Journal of Social Issues 54. 612–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davis, M. H. (1980): A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. In: JSAS Catalogue of Selected documents in Psychology 10. 85Google Scholar
  18. Doll, J./Dick, M. (2000): Protestantische Ethik und humanitär-egalitäre Ethik. Studien zur Entwicklung zweier deutschsprachiger Ethikskalen. In: Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 21. 2. 138–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisenberg, N. (1989): The development of prosocial values. In: Eisenberg et al. (1989): 87–103Google Scholar
  20. Eisenberg, N./Reykowski, J./Staub, E. (Eds.) (1989): Social and moral values. Hillsdale NY: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  21. Elden, J. M. (1981): Political efficacy at work: The connection between more autonomous forms of workplace organization and a more participatory politics. In: American Political Science Review 75. 43–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flodell, C. (1989): Miteinander oder Gegeneinander – eine sozialpsychologische Untersuchung über Solidarität und Konkurrenz in der Arbeitswelt. Wiesbaden: Deutscher UniversitaetsverlagGoogle Scholar
  23. Gardell, B. (1983): Worker participation and autonomy: a multi-level approach to democracy at the work place. In: Heller (1983): 353–387Google Scholar
  24. Gentile G.-C./Wehner T. (Eds) (2007): Bürgerschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen [Special Issue]. Wirtschaftspsychologie 1Google Scholar
  25. Geulen, D. (1982): Soziales Handeln und Perspektivenübernahme. In: Geulen (1982): 24–72)Google Scholar
  26. Geulen, D. (Ed.) (1982): Perspektivenübernahme und soziales Handeln. Frankfurt/M.: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar
  27. Graham, J. W./Cumsille, P. E./Elek-Fisk, E. (2003): Methods for handling missing data. In: Schinka/Velicer (2003): 87–114Google Scholar
  28. Goletz, H. P. (2001): Partizipation in Kleinbetrieben: Korrelate, Moderatoren und Mediatoren. Unpublished master thesis. Marburg: Universität, Fachbereich PsychologieGoogle Scholar
  29. Greenberg, E. S./Grunberg, L./Daniel, K. (1996): Industrial work and political participation: Beyond “simple spillover”. In: Political Research Quarterly 49. 305–330Google Scholar
  30. Greenberg, E. S. (2008): Spillovers from cooperative and democratic workplaces: Have the benefits been oversold? In: Sullivan/Snyder (2008): 219–239Google Scholar
  31. Habermas, J. (1990): Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Boston: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Hammer, T. H. (1990): New developments in profit sharing, gainsharing, and employee ownership. In: Campbell et al. (1990): 328–366Google Scholar
  33. Heller, C. C. F. A. (Ed.) (1983): Organizational Democracy and Political Processes (Vol. 1, International Yearbook of Organizational Democracy). Chichester: WileyGoogle Scholar
  34. Heller, F. (1998): Playing the devil’s advocate: Limits to influence sharing in theory and practice. In: Heller et al. (1998): 144–189Google Scholar
  35. Heller, F. (2003): Participation and power: A critical assessment. In: Applied Psychology: An International Review 52. 1. 144–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heller, F. A./Drenth, P./Koopman, P./Rus, V. (1988): Decisions in organizations: A Three country comparative study. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  37. Heller, F./Pusic, E./Strauss, G./Wilpert, B. (Eds.) (1998): Organizational participation – Myth and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hoff, E-H./Lempert W./Lappe, L. (1991): Persönlichkeitsentwicklung in Facharbeiterbiographien. Bern Stuttgart Toronto: Verlag Hans HuberGoogle Scholar
  39. Holz-Ebeling, F./Steinmetz, M. (1995): Wie brauchbar sind die vorliegenden Fragebogen zur Messung von Empathie? Kritische Analyse unter Beruecksichtigung der Iteminhalte. In: Zeitschrift fuer Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 16. 11–32Google Scholar
  40. Hurrelmann, K./Grundmann, M./Walper S. (Eds.) (2008): Handbuch Sozialisationsforschung (7. vollst. Überarb. Aufl.). Weinheim: BeltzGoogle Scholar
  41. IDE International Research Group (1981): Industrial democracy in Europe. London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  42. Jurschitz, P. (2008): Demokratie dynamisch: Demokratische Strukturen in Wirtschaft und Gemeinde. Wien: BraumüllerGoogle Scholar
  43. Katz, I./Hass, R. G. (1988): Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational studies of dual cognitive structures. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55. 893–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keller, M./Malti, T. (2008): Sozialisation sozio-moralischer Kompetenzen. In: Hurrelmann et al. (2008): 410–423Google Scholar
  45. Klein, K. J./Hall, R. J. (1988): Correlates of employee satisfaction with stock ownership: Who likes an ESOP most? In: Journal of Applied Psychology 73. 630–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klicperová-Baker, M. (Ed.) (1998): Ready for democracy? Civic culture and civility with a focus on Czech Society. Prague: Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  47. Kline, R. B. (1998): Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. New York: GuilfordGoogle Scholar
  48. Lind, G. (2002): Ist Moral lehrbar? Berlin, Germany: NomosGoogle Scholar
  49. Lohmann, A./Prümper, J. (2006): Fragebogen zur direkten Partizipation im Büro (FdP-B). Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Validität. In: Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 50 (N.F. 24). 4. 119–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLaney, M. A./Hurrell, J. J. (1988): Control, stress, and job satisfaction in Canadian nurses. In: Work & Stress 2. 3. 217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mohiyeddini, C./Montada, L. (1996): Selbstwirksamkeit-Gerechte-Welt-Skala. Unpublished. Trier: Universität TrierGoogle Scholar
  52. Moldaschl, M. (2004): Partizipation und/als/statt Demokratie. Zum Entwicklungsverhältnis von gesellschaftlicher Demokratisierung und organisationaler Partizipation. In: Weber et al. (2004): 216–245Google Scholar
  53. Oser, F./Althof, W. (2001): Moralische Selbstbestimmung. Stuttgart: Klett-CottaGoogle Scholar
  54. Pateman, C. (1970): Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  55. Pircher Verdorfer, A. (2010): Das soziomoralische Klima als Bestandteil des Organisationsklimas: Zu Inhalt und Wirkung soziomoralischer Ressourcenpotentiale in Organisationen auf prosoziale, moralische und demokratieförderliche Handlungsbereitschaften und Wertorientierungen der Beschäftigten. Unpublished dissertation thesis. Universität Innsbruck, InnsbruckGoogle Scholar
  56. Power, F. C./Higgins, A./Kohlberg, L. (1989): Lawrence Kohlberg’s approach to Moral Education. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Putnam, R. O. (1993): Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  58. Rooney, P. M. (1993): Effects of Worker Participaton in the USA. Managers’ perception vs. Empirical Measures. In: Rosenstein (1993): 134–152Google Scholar
  59. Rosenstein, W. M. L. E. (Ed.) (1993): International Handbook of Participation in Organizations. Vol. III: The Challenge of New Technology and Macro-Political Change. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  60. Rubenowitz, S./Norrgren, F./Tannenbaum, A. S. (1983): Some social psychological effects of direct and indirect participation in ten Swedish companies. In: Organization Studies 4. 243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schinka, J. A./Velicer, W. F. (Eds.) (2003): Research methods in psychology. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  62. Schooler, C./Mulatu, M. S./Oates, G. (2004): Occupational self-direction, intellectual functioning, and self-directed orientation in older workers: Findings and implications for individuals and societies. In: American Journal of Sociology 110. 161–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shperling, Z./Rousseau, D. M. (2001): When employers share ownership with workers. In: Cooper/Rousseau (2001): 19–44Google Scholar
  64. Spreitzer, G. (2007): Giving peace a chance: Organizational leadership, empowerment, and peace. In: Journal of Organizational Behavior 28. 8. 1077–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Staufenbiel, T./C. Hartz (2000): Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Entwicklung und erste Validierung eines Messinstruments. In: Diagnostica 46. 73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Strauss, G. (1998): Participation works – if conditions are appropriate. In: Heller et al. (1998): 191–219Google Scholar
  67. Sullivan, J. S. B./Snyder, M. (Eds.) (2008): Cooperation and its consequences for public life. Malden: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  68. Ulrich, P. (2001): Integrative WirtschaftsethikGrundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Oekonomie (3rd ed.). Bern, Switzerland: Paul HauptGoogle Scholar
  69. Unterrainer, C./Palgi, M./Weber, W. G./Iwanowa, A./Oesterreich, R. (2011): Structurally anchored organizational democracy: Does it reach the employee? In: Journal of Personnel Psychology 10. 3. 118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vilmar, F./Weber, W. G. (2004): Demokratisierung und Humanisierung der Arbeitein Ueberblick. In: Weber et al. (2004): 105–143Google Scholar
  71. Weber, W. G. (2004): Entscheidungsbeteiligung, Commitment und prosoziale Orientierung in selbstverwalteten und Genossenschaftsunternehmen. In: Bungard et al. (2004): 428–433Google Scholar
  72. Weber, W. G./Pasqualoni, P.-P./Burtscher, C. (Eds.) (2004): Wirtschaft, Demokratie und Soziale Verantwortung. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & RuprechtGoogle Scholar
  73. Weber, W. G./Unterrainer, C./Höge, T. (2008): Sociomoral atmosphere and prosocial and democratic value orientations in enterprises with different levels of structurally anchored participation. In: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung/ German Journal of Human Resource Research 22. 2. 171–194Google Scholar
  74. Weber, W. G./Unterrainer, C./Schmid, B. E. (2009): The influence of organizational democracy on employees’ socio-moral climate and prosocial behavioral orientations. In: Journal of Organizational Behavior 30. 8. 1127–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weber, W. G./Unterrainer, C. (2009): Perceived Organizational Participation and Democracy (POPD) Questionnaire and Guidelines. PsycTESTSTM (database). Washinton, DC: American Psychological Association [Database record]. Retrieved from PsycTESTS. doi: 10.1037/t03637–000Google Scholar
  76. Wegge, J./Jeppesen, H. J./Weber, W. G./Pearce, C. L./Silva, S. A./Pundt, A., et al. (2010): Promoting work motivation in organizations: Should employee involvement in organizational leadership become a new tool in the organizational psychologist’s kit? Journal of Personnel Psychology 9. 4. 154–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weibler, J./Czada, R./Müller-Jentsch, W. (2010): Diskurs. In: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 24. 3. 297–311Google Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang G. Weber
  • Christine Unterrainer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations