Skip to main content

Critique as Premise. Reflections on methodological commonalities between critical rationalism and critical theory

  • Chapter
Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences
  • 2708 Accesses

Abstract

In both scholarly and popular literature, there have been numerous writings underlining thedifferences between critical rationalism and critical theory. Not the least of these was the controversy between Karl R. Popper and Theodor W. Adorno concerning the "methodology of the social sciences" at a 1961 seminar of the German Society for Sociology, which became known in social science history as the Positivismusstreit or "positivism dispute" (cf. Adorno et al., 1969), and which reinforced the image of two scholarly philosophies diametrically opposed on theoretical-methodological grounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • Adorno, Theodor W., Hans Albert, Ralf Dahrendorf, Jurgen Habermas, Harald Pilot, and Karl R. Popper. 1969.Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie. Dar- mstadt/Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 1973.Negative Dialectics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974. Minima Moralia. Reflections from Damaged Life. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 1984.Aesthetic Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahms, Hans-Joachim. 1994. Positivismusstreit. Die Auseinandersetzungen der Frankfurter Schule mit dem logischen Positivismus, dem amerikanischen Pragmatismus und dem kritischen Rationalismus . Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisby, David. 1972. The Popper-Adorno Controversy: The Methodological Dispute in German Sociology.Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2: 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max. 1947.Eclipse of Reason. New York: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, Max and Theodor W. Adorno. 2002.Dialectic of Enlightenment. Philosophical Fragments. Stanford: SUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuth, Herbert. 1989. Wissenschaft und Werturteil. Zu Werturteilsdiskussion und Positivismusstreit. Tubingen : Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Franz L. 1957. The Concept of Political Freedom (first published in 1953). In The Democratic and the Authoritarian State. Essays in Political and Legal Theory, ed. and with a preface by Herbert Marcuse, 160–200. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1945a. The Open Society and its Enemies. Vol. I: The Spell of Plato. London/Henley : Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R.1945bLondon/Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1958, 1997. Zum Thema Freiheit. Speech presented at the European Forum, Alpbach, Austria, August 25, 1958. InErkenntnis, Geschichte undPolitik. 3rd ed., 155–172. Munich: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1959.The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1963.London/Henley: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1982.The Open Universe. An Argument for Indeterminism. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salzborn, S. (2012). Critique as Premise. Reflections on methodological commonalities between critical rationalism and critical theory. In: Salzborn, S., Davidov, E., Reinecke, J. (eds) Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18898-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics