Skip to main content

What do citizens expect from a democracy? An invariance test and comparison between East and West Germany with the ISSP 2004

  • Chapter
Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences
  • 2683 Accesses

Abstract

One of the prerequisites for a functioning democracy is that its citizens support by and large its democratic system. However, such support cannot be taken for granted and should be monitored. Furthermore, different people may have different perceptions, expectations, and understanding of the concept of democracy. This may be especially true for citizens socialized in different political systems like those in Eastern and Western Europe before the fall of the iron curtain, where the concept of democracy and the rights of citizens in a democracy were communicated in quite different ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arbuckle, James L. 2007. Amos 16.0 User’s Guide. Chicago: SPSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billiet, Jaak. 2003. Cross-Cultural Equivalence with Structural Equation Modeling. In Cross-Cultural Survey Methods, eds. Janet A. Harkness, Fons J. R. Van de Vijver, and Peter Ph. Mohler, 247–264. New York, NY: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth, A. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, Barbara M., Richard J. Shavelson, and Bengt O. Muthén. 1989. Testing for the Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Structures: The Issue of Partial Measurement Invariance. 105:456–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Fang F. 2007. Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. 14(3): 464–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, Eldad, Peter Schmidt, and Shalom. H. Schwartz. 2008. Bringing Values Back. Testing the Adequacy of the European Social Survey to Measure Values in 20 Countries. 72: 420–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, John L. and John J. McArdle. 1992. A Practical and Theoretical Guide to Measurement Invariance in Aging Research. 18: 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Litze and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. 6: 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. 1971. Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations. 36: 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, Todd D., David W. Slegers, and Noel A. Card (2006). A Non-arbitrary Method of Identifying and Scaling Latent Variables in SEM and MACS Models. 13(1): 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, Herbert W., Kit-Tai Hau, and Zhonglin Wen. 2004. In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings. 11: 320–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saris, Willem E., Albert Satorra, and William van der Veld (2009). Testing Structural Equation Models or Detection of Misspecifications? 16: 561–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, Joseph L. and John W. Graham. 2002. Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art. 7: 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sörbom, Dag. 1974. A General Method for Studying Differences in Factor Means and Factor Structure between Groups. 27: 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M. and Hans Baumgartner. 1998. Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research. 25: 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, Robert J. and Charles E. Lance. 2000. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. 3: 4–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davidov, E., Braun, M. (2012). What do citizens expect from a democracy? An invariance test and comparison between East and West Germany with the ISSP 2004. In: Salzborn, S., Davidov, E., Reinecke, J. (eds) Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18898-0_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics