1. Kayser 1992 [1948]. Bes. S. 56–59. — H.H. Lehnert: »Q. und fiktive Strukturen«. In: Rice University Studies 53.4 (1967) S. 13–21.Google Scholar
  2. L. Danneberg: »Einfluß«. In: Weimar 1997. S. 424–429.Google Scholar
  3. A. Höfele: »20th-century Intertextuality and the Reading of Shakespeare’s Sources«. In: Poetica 48 (Tokio, 1997) S. 211–227.Google Scholar
  4. H. James: Shakespeare’s Troy. Drama, Politics, and the Translation of Empire, Cambridge 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ausg. »Shakespeare’s Plutarch« (Hg. M.A. Grail) der Zs. Poetica 48 (Tokio, 1997).Google Scholar
  6. R.C. Holub: »Nietzsche and the Paradigm of Influence Studies. A Review Article«. In: Modern Language Review 100.4 (2005) S. 1043–1053.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland 2008

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations