Skip to main content

“There It Is Again”. On Objects, Technologies, Science, and the Times

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Feminist Philosophy of Technology

Part of the book series: Techno:Phil – Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Technikphilosophie ((TPAHT,volume 2))

  • 792 Accesses

Abstract

Materialist feminism, since its start in the late 1980’s (see for instance Haraway D Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–99, 1988), has been occupied with the questions of science and technology. The concepts accepted, the methodologies applied, the representations that (seemingly and unseemingly) dominated its narratives, have been critically examined ever since. Especially today, as the ecological crises are becoming such an important field of study in academia, it is of fundamental importance to ask ourselves th key question ‘how matter comes to matter’ and to rethink, in what way the politics of modernity and its white, male and upper class assumptions of normality, are still at the heart of todays the scientific agenda. Of course, these agendas are blured, complex and do not easily reveal their preferences. Living in 2019, an age in which the blood of Uranus has polluted mother Earth (Gaia) like never before, the furies of materialist thinking demand us to search for modernities conditions for truth and to see in what way we need to change life as a whole. And let us not start with the Subject, as we did this since 1968, but with the Object, the starting point of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Anthropocentrism refers to the idea that thinking, in Modern times, started from a very specific and implicit idea of the Human Being. Phallogocentrism, a concept coined by Jacques Derrida, more or less refers to a similar perspective yet stresses that the Modernist view was by definition Male.

  2. 2.

    Coined by the dutch physicist Paul Crutzen in the year 2000, the Anthropocene is supposed to be the era in which the human being is the dominant geological force.

  3. 3.

    N. David Mermen stresses that it makes no sense not to include fields like quantum mechanics into an analysis of the study of the everyday. He states: “There has always been talk to the effect that quantum mechanics describes not the physical world but our knowledge of the physical world. This intrusion of human knowledge into physics is distastefully anthropocentric.” (In Barad 2007: 323).

  4. 4.

    Identity politics, though often at work in very different ways, tend to stress a particular ‘group identity’, a stigma that demands to be defended at all costs.

  5. 5.

    For Braidotti, bios is the rational, the organized life whereas zoe is the irrational, the wild (see for instance 2006).

References

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2006). Transpositions. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. & F. Guattari. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, A. (2016). The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. In Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Proietti, A. Pickston, F. Graffitti, P. Barrow, D. Kundys, C. Branciard, M. Ringbauer & A. Fedrizzi. (2019). “Experimental rejection of observer-independence in the quantum world”, arXiv:1902.05080v1 [quant-ph] 13 Feb.

  • McNeill, J.R. & P. Engelke. (2014). The Great Acceleration: an Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945. Cambridge: The Belknap press of Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Melitopoulos, A. & M. Lazarato. (2012). Assemblages, a Life of Particles. Installation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N. (2007). The Concept of Nature. Charleston: Bibliobazaar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1995). The Natural Contract. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2010). Cosmopolitics 1. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2015). In Catastrophic Times. Ann Arbor: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rick Dolphijn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dolphijn, R. (2019). “There It Is Again”. On Objects, Technologies, Science, and the Times. In: Loh, J., Coeckelbergh, M. (eds) Feminist Philosophy of Technology. Techno:Phil – Aktuelle Herausforderungen der Technikphilosophie, vol 2. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04967-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04967-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04966-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04967-4

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics