Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ellipsen

  • Chapter
Book cover Handbuch Pragmatik

Zusammenfassung

Der Begriff ›Ellipse‹ wird in der Literatur nicht einheitlich verwendet und ist aufgrund der Heterogenität des Phänomenbereichs auch nicht ganz einfach zu definieren. In erster Annäherung kann man unter Ellipsen sprachliche Äußerungen verstehen, die in einem zu präzisierenden Sinne unvollständig sind oder von kompetenten Sprecher/innen (des Deutschen) als unvollständig aufgefasst werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Asher, Nicholas/Lascarides, Alex (2003): Logics of Conversation. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auer, Peter (1993): Zur Verbspitzenstellung im gesprochenen Deutsch. In: Deutsche Sprache 23, 193–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, Ellen (1990): Nonsentential Constituents. Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring, Daniel/Hartmann, Katharina (1998): Asymmetrische Koordination. In: Linguistische Berichte 174, 172–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, Robyn (2002): Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Malden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1957): Syntactic Structures. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christ, Rüdiger (2011): Linkstilgung und Phonologische ›Quasi‹-Identität. In: Linguistische Berichte 228, 371–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, Peter/Jackendoff, Ray: (2005): Simpler Syntax. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Werner (2000): Über die syntaktische Position der Satztopiks im Deutschen. In: ZAS Papers in Linguistics 20, 137–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, Katharina (2017): Elliptische Strukturen in SMS. Eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung des Schweizerdeutschen. Berlin/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, Norbert (1988): Über das Nulltopik im Deutschen. In: Sprache und Pragmatik 3, 19–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, Jonathan/Sag, Ivan (2000): Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haegeman, Liliane (2013): The syntax of registers: Diary subject omission and the privilege of the root. In: Lingua 130, 88–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, Jorge (1979): Deletion in Coordinate Structures. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, Jorge/Sag, Ivan (1976): Deep and surface anaphora. In: Linguistic Inquiry 7, 391–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Katharina (2000): Right Node Raising and Gapping. Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion. Philadelphia/Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, Tilman N. (1990): Assumptions about asymmetric coordination in German. In: Joan Mascaró/Marina Nespor (Hg.): Grammar in Progress. Glow Essays for Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht, 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horch, Eva/Reich, Ingo (2017): The Fragment Corpus (FraC). In: Proceedings of the 9th International Corpus Linguistics Conference, Birmingham (UK), https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-artslaw/corpus/conference-archives/2017/general/paper194.pdf.

  • Jacobs, Joachim (2008): Wozu Konstruktionen? In: Linguistische Berichte 213, 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Kyle (im Druck): Gapping and stripping. In: Jeroen van Craenenbroeck/Tanja Temmermann (Hg.): The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Wolfgang (1993): Ellipse. In: Joachim Jacobs/Arnim von Stechow/Wolfgang Sternefeld et al. (Hg.): Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung. 1. Halbband. Berlin/New York, 763–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Wolfgang/Stutterheim, Christiane von (1987): Quaestio und referentielle Bewegung in Erzählungen. In: Linguistische Berichte 109, 163–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konietzko, Andreas (2016): Bare Argument Ellipsis and Focus. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechner, Winfried (2004): Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, Robin (2017): Sentential or not? – An experimental study on the syntax of fragments. In: Sam Featherston/Robin Hörnig/Reinhild Steinberg et al. (Hg.): Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2016, University of Tübingen, online publication system, https://publikationen.unituebingen.de/xmlui/handle/10900/77066.

  • Lemke, Robin/Schäfer, Lisa/Reich, Ingo (2018): Don’t be uninformative! – Experimental Studies on Information Theory and Fragment Usage. Poster at Cuny 2018, Davis, CA. In: https://osf.io/583qd/.

  • Lobeck, Anne (1995): Ellipsis. Functional Heads: Licensing, and Identification. New York/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason (2001): The Syntax of Silence – Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason (2004): Fragments and ellipsis. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 661–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason (2006): Sluicing. In: Martin Everaert/Henk van Riemsdijk (Hg.): The Syntax Companion. London, 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Jason (im Druck): Ellipsis: A survey of analytical approaches. In: Jeroen van Craenenbroeck/Tanja Temmermann (Hg.): The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, Donna Jo (1985): Verb phrase deletion in English: A base-generated analysis. In: Journal of Linguistics 21, 281–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, Dennis/Struckmeier, Volker (2018): Particles and deletion. In: Linguistic Inquiry 49(2), 393–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, François (2010): Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Ingo (2002): Question/Answer-Congruence and the semantics of wh-phrases. In: Theoretical Linguistics 28, 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Ingo (2003): Frage, Antwort und Fokus. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Ingo (2007): Toward a uniform analysis of short answers and gapping. In: Kerstin Schwabe/Susanne Winkler (Hg.): On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 467–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Ingo (2009): »Asymmetrische Koordination« im Deutschen. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Ingo (2011): Ellipsis. In: Klaus von Heusinger/Claudia Maienborn/Paul Portner (Hg.): Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Bd. 2. Berlin/New York, 1849–1874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Ingo (2017): On the omission of articles and copulae in German newspaper headlines. In: Linguistic Variation 17(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Craige (1996): Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In: Jae-Hak Yoon/Andreas Kathol (Hg.): Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, Bd. 49, Ohio State University. 91–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats (1992): Ellipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. In: Steve Berman/Arild Hestvik (Hg.): Proceedings of the Stuttgarter Ellipsis Workshop. Number 29 in Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John R. (1967): Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. thesis, MIT. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, Ivan A. (1976): Deletion and Logical Form. Ph.D. thesis, MIT. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandig, Barbara (1971): Syntaktische Typologie der Schlagzeile. Ismaning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, Roger (1999): Givenness, AvoidF and other constraints on the placement of accent. In: Natural Language Semantics 7, 141–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, Dan/Wilson, Deirdre (1987): Précis of relevance: Communication and cognition. In: Behavioral and Brain Science 10, 697–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stainton, Robert J. (2006): Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, Jason (2000): Context and logical form. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stowell, Tim (1991): Empty heads in abbreviated English. GLOW abstract. Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen/Temmermann, Tanja (Hg.) (2018): The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin (1977): Discourse and logical form. In: Linguistic Inquiry 8, 101–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin (1995): Ellipsis. Ms., Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität des Saarlandes, Saarlandes, Deutschland

    Ingo Reich

Authors
  1. Ingo Reich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland

    Frank Liedtke  & Astrid Tuchen  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reich, I. (2018). Ellipsen. In: Liedtke, F., Tuchen, A. (eds) Handbuch Pragmatik. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_24

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04623-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04624-6

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation