Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experimentelle Pragmatik

  • Chapter
Handbuch Pragmatik

  • 13k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Eine neue Entwicklung im Bereich der Pragmatikforschung stellt die experimentell ausgerichtete Pragmatik dar. Die Entwicklung und Nuancierung theoretischer Modelle wurde seit der Jahrtausendwende maßgeblich durch experimentelle Herangehensweisen vorangetrieben (vgl. z. B. Breheny/Katsos/Williams 2006; Cummins/Sauerland/Solt 2012; Noveck 2001). Ausgangspunkt war die theoretische Debatte über die Abgrenzung pragmatischer Operationen und die Semantik-Pragmatik Schnittstelle, die durch empirische Befunde unterstützt werden sollte (vgl. z. B. Huang/Snedeker 2009; Rubio Fernández 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Arnold, Jennifer E. (2010): How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. In: Language and Linguistics Compass 4/4, 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, Simon/Leslie, Alan M./Frith, Uta (1985): Does the autistic child have a »theory of mind«? In: Cognition 21/1, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina/Schumacher, Petra B. (2016): Towards a neurobiology of information structure. In: Caroline Féry/Shinichiro Ishihara (Hg.): The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure. Oxford, 581–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, Leon/Grodner, Daniel J. (2012): Speaker knowledge influences the comprehension of pragmatic inferences. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38/5, 1450–1460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breheny, Richard/Katsos, Napoleon/Williams, John (2006): Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. In: Cognition 100/3, 434–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Susan E./Clark, Herbert H. (1996): Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22, 1482–1493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Schmidt, Sarah/Hanna, Joy E. (2011): Talking in another person’s shoes: Incremental perspective-taking in language processing. In: Dialogue & Discourse 2/1, 11–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunyé, Tad T./Ditman, Tali/Mahoney, Caroline R./Augustyn, Jason S./Taylor, Holly A. (2009): When you and I share perspectives: Pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. In: Psychological Science 20/1, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, Chris/Sauerland, Uli/Solt, Stephanie (2012): Granularity and scalar implicature in numerical expressions. In: Linguistics and Philosophy 35, 135–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Louise (2009): Clinical Pragmatics. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, Rick/Duran, Nicholas D. (2011): The cognitive dynamics of negated sentence verification. In: Cognitive Science 35/5, 983–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filik, Ruth/Leuthold, Hartmut/Wallington, Katie/Page, Jemma (2014): Testing theories of irony processing using eye-tracking and ERPs. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 40/3, 811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisson, Steven/Pickering, Martin J. (1999): The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25/6, 1366–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernsbacher, Morton Ann/Shroyer, Suzanne (1989): The cataphoric use of the indefinite this in spoken narratives. In: Memory and Cognition 17/5, 536–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, Raymond W./Colston, Herbert L. (2012): Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glucksberg, Sam (2003): The psycholinguistics of metaphor. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7/2, 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundel, Jeanette K./Hedberg, Nancy/Zacharski, Ron (1993): Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. In: Language 69/2, 274–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtgraves, Thomas (1994): Communication in context: Effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20/5, 1205–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence (1972): On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Yi Ting/Snedeker, Jesse (2009): Online interpretation of scalar quantifiers: Insight into the semantics– pragmatics interface. In: Cognitive Psychology 58/3, 376–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsos, Napoleon/Bishop, Dorothy V. M. (2011): Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature. In: Cognition 120/1, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaup, Barbara/Lüdtke, Jana/Zwaan, Rolf A. (2006): Processing negated sentences with contradictory predicates: Is a door that is not open mentally closed? In: Journal of Pragmatics 38/7, 1033–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keysar, Boaz/Barr, Dale J./Balin, Jennifer A./Brauner, Jason S. (2000): Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. In: Psychological Science 11/1, 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissine, Mikhail (2013): From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulakova, Eugenia/Nieuwland, Mante S. (2016): A review of experimental evidence for the dual meaning of counterfactuals. In: Language and Linguistics Compass 10/2, 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Stephen (2000): Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, Belem G./Vaid, Jyotsna (2017): Psycholinguistic approaches to humor. In: Salvatore Attardo (Hg.): The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor. New York, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, Henrike/Tomasello, Michael (2007): How 14-and 18-month-olds know what others have experienced. In: Developmental Psychology 43/2, 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Ira A. (2001): When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. In: Cognition 78, 165–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Ira A./Posada, Andres (2003): Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. In: Brain and Language 85/2, 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Ira/Reboul, Anne (2008): Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language. In: Trends in Cognitive Science 12/11, 425–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio Fernández, Paula (2007): Suppression in metaphor interpretation: differences between meaning selection and meaning construction. In: Journal of Semantics 24/4, 345–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Petra B. (2013): When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: Towards a new approach of compositionality. In: Frontiers on Psychology 4, 677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Petra B. (2014): Content and context in incremental processing: »the ham sandwich« revisited. In: Philosophical Studies 168, 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Petra B. (2019): Metonymy. In: Chris Cummins/Napoleon Katsos (Hg.): The Oxford Handbook of Experimental Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurz, Matthias/Radua, Joaquim/Aichhorn, Markus/Richlan, Fabio/Perner, Josef (2014): Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. In: Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 42, 9–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R. (1979): Metaphor. In: Michael Reddy/Andrew Ortony (Hg.): Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, 83–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, Dan/Wilson, Deirdre (1986): Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spychalska, Maria/Kontinen, Jarmo/Werning, Markus (2016): Investigating scalar implicatures in a truth-value judgement task: evidence from event-related brain potentials. In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31/6, 817–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian, Ye/Ferguson, Heather/Breheny, Richard (2016): Processing negation without context – why and when we represent the positive argument. In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31/5, 683–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, Michael (2009): Die Ursprünge der menschlichen Kommunikation. Frankfurt a. M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland, Hanna/Bambini, Valentina/Schumacher, Petra B. (2014): The role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension: evidence from masked priming ERP. In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, 583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, Heinz/Perner, Josef (1983): Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. In: Cognition 13/1, 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität zu Köln, Köln, Deutschland

    Petra B. Schumacher

Authors
  1. Petra B. Schumacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland

    Frank Liedtke  & Astrid Tuchen  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schumacher, P.B. (2018). Experimentelle Pragmatik. In: Liedtke, F., Tuchen, A. (eds) Handbuch Pragmatik. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04624-6_11

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04623-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04624-6

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation