Advertisement

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ahlstrom, R. & Engen, T. (1987). Discriminations between weak and strong odors by smokers, non-smokers and passive smokers. In University of Stockholm (Ed.), Reports from the Department of Psychology No. 654. University of Stockholm, 1–7.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L.S. & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Parc, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Altner, H. & Boeckh, J. (1990). Geschmack und Geruch. In R.F. Schmidt & G. Thews (Hrsg.), Physiologie des Menschen ( 24. Auflage). Berlin: Springer, 320–329.Google Scholar
  4. Ames, R.G. & Stratton, J.W. (1991). Acute health effects from community exposure to N-propyl mercaptan from an ethoprop (Mocap®)-treated potato field in Siskiyou County, California. Archives of Environmental Health, 46, 213–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachrach, K.M.& Zautra, A.J. (1985). Coping with a community stressor: the threat of a hazardous waste facility. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 26, 127–141.Google Scholar
  6. Bahnmüller, H. (1984). Olfaktometrie von Dibutylamin, Acrylsäuremethylester, Isoamylalkohol und eines Spritzverdünners für Autolacke–Ergebnisse eines VDI-Ringvergleichs. Staub–Reinhaltung der Luft, 44, 352–358.Google Scholar
  7. Barinaga, M. (1991). How the nose knows: olfactory receptor cloned. Science, 252, 209–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986): The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum, A., Gatchel, R.J. & Schaeffer, M.A. (1983). Emotional, behavioral and physiological effects of chronic stress at Three Mile Island. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baum, A., Singer, J.E. & Baum, C.S. (1981). Stress and the environment. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 4–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Becker, P., Bös, K. & Woll, A. (1994). Ein Anforderungs-Ressourcen-Modell der körperlichen Gesundheit: Pfadanalytische Überprüfungen mit latenten Variablen. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, II (1), 25–48.Google Scholar
  12. Billings, A.G. & Moos, R.H. (1980). The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bortz, J. (1993). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler ( 4. Auflage). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Both, R., Otterbeck, K. & Prinz, B. (1993). Die Geruchsimmissions-Richtlinie. Kommentar und Anwendung in der Praxis. Staub–Reinhaltung der Luft, 53, 407–412.Google Scholar
  15. Bowler, R.M. & Schwarzer, R. (1991). Environmental anxiety: assessing emotio- nal distress and concerns after toxin exposure. Anxiety Research, 4, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruvold, W.H., Rappaport, S.M., Wu, T.C., Bulmer, B.E., DeGrange, C.D. & Kooler, J.M. (1983). Determination of nuisance odor in a community. Journal WPCF, 55, 3, 229–233.Google Scholar
  17. Buck, L. & Axel, R. (1991). A novel family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell, 65, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bullinger, M. (1989). Psychological effects of air pollution on healthy residents–a time-series approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bullinger, M. (1993). V-13 Befindlichkeitsstörungen. In H.E. Wichmann, H.-W. Schlipköter & G. Fülgraff (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Umweltmedizin: Toxikologie, Epidemiologie, Hygiene, Belastungen, Wirkungen, Diagnostik, Prophylaxe. Landberg/Lech: ecomed.-Losebl.-Ausgabe.Google Scholar
  20. Cain, W.S., See, L.C. & Tosun, T. (1986). Irritation and odor from formaldehyde: Chamber studies. In Proceedings of the ASHRAE International Conference on Air Quality (1986). Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers, 126–137.Google Scholar
  21. Campbell, J.M. (1983). Ambient stressors. Environment and Behavior, 15, 355380.Google Scholar
  22. Cannon, W.B. (1932). The wisdom of the body. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  23. Carp, F.M. (1987). Environment and aging. In H.D. Stokols & J. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York: Wiley & Sons, 329–360.Google Scholar
  24. Cattell, R.B. (1966). The Scree-Test for the number of factors. Multivariate Be-haviour Research, 1, 245–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cavalini, P.M. (1992). It’s an ill wind that brings no good. Studies on odour annoyance and the dispersion of odorant concentrations from industries. Dissertation, Universität Groningen, Niederlande. Groningen: University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Cavalini, P.M., Koeter-Kemmerling, L.G., Pulles, M.P.J. (1991). Coping with odour annoyance and odour concentrations: three field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Clark, C.R. (1984). The effects of noise on health. In D.M. Jones & A.J. Chapman (Eds.), Noise and society. Chichester: John Wiley, 111–124.Google Scholar
  28. Cohen, F. & Lazarus, R.S. (1979). Coping with the stresses of illness. In G.C. Stone, F. Cohen & N.E. Adler (Eds.), Health psychology: a handbook. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 217–254.Google Scholar
  29. Collins, D., Baum, A. & Singer, J. (1983). Coping with chronic stress at Three Mile Island: psychological and biochemical evidence. Health Psychology, 2, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cowart, B.J. (1989). Relationships between taste and smell across the adult life span. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 561, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Craik, K.H. (1987). Environmental perception and environmental annoyance: issues of measurement and interpretation. In H.S. Koelega (Ed.), Environmental annoyance: characterization, measurement, and control. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 45–49.Google Scholar
  32. Creer, R.N., Gray, R.M. & Treshow, M. (1970). Differential responses to air pollution as an environmental health problem. Journal of Air Pollution Control Association, 20, 814–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Deane, M., Sanders, G. & Jonsson, E. (1977). Trends and community reactions to odors from pulp mills Eureka, California 1969–1971. Environmental Research, 14, 232–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Deane, M. & Sanders, G. (1978): Annoyance and health reactions to odor from refineries and other industries in Carson, California 1969–1971. Environmental Research, 15, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. De Boer, J., Van der Linden, J. & Van der Pligt, J. (1987). Air pollution, annoyance and coping. In H.S. Koelega (Ed.), Environmental annoyance: characterization, measurement, and control. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 165–174.Google Scholar
  36. DeJoy, D.M. (1984). The nonauditory effects of noise: review and perspectives for research. Journal of Auditory Research, 24, 123–150.Google Scholar
  37. Doty, R.L. (1975). An examination of the relationship between the pleasantness, intensity and concentration of 10 odorous stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 492–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Engen, T. (1982). The perception of odors. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Engen, T. (1986). Perception of odor and irritation. Environment International, 12, 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Engen, T. (1987). Remembering odors and their names. American Scientist, 75, 497–503.Google Scholar
  41. Evans, G.W. & Jacobs, S.V. (1981). Air pollution and human behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 37, 95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Evans, G.W. & Jacobs, S.V. (1982). Air pollution and human behavior. In G.W. Evans (Ed.), Environmental stress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 105–132.Google Scholar
  43. Evans, G.W., Jacobs, S.V. & Frager, N.B. (1982). Behavioral responses to air pollution. In A. Baum & J. Singer (Eds.), Advances in Environmental Psychology (Vol. 4 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 237–270.Google Scholar
  44. Evans, G.W. & Campbell, J.M. (1983). Psychological perspectives on air pollution and health. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 4, 137–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Evans, G.W. & Cohen, S. (1987). Environmental stress. In H.D. Stokols & J. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons, 571–610.Google Scholar
  46. Evans, G.W. & Tafalla, R. (1987): Measurement of environmental annoyance. In H.S. Koelega (Ed.), Environmental annoyance: characterization, measurement, and control. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 11–28.Google Scholar
  47. Evans, G.W., Colome, S.D. & Shearer, D.F. (1988). Psychological reactions to air pollution. Environmental Research, 45, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fidell, S. (1984). Why is annoyance so hard to unterstand? In H.S. Koelega (Ed.), Environmental annoyance: characterization, measurement, and control. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 51–56.Google Scholar
  49. Fleming, R., Baum, A. & Singer, J.S. (1984). Toward an integrative approach to the study of stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 939949.Google Scholar
  50. Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R.S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Frankenhaeuser, M. (1980). Psychoneuroendocrine approaches to the study of stressful person-environment transactions. In H. Selye (Ed.), Selye’s Guide to Stress Research. New York: Van Nostrand, 46–70.Google Scholar
  52. Frye, R.E., Schwartz, B.S. & Doty, R.L. (1990). Dose-related effects of cigarette smoking on olfactory function. Journal of American Medical Association, 263, 1233–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Geruchsimmissions-Richtlinie (1994). Feststellung und Beurteilung von Geruchsimmissionen (1994). Länderausschuß für Immissionsschutz, LAI-Schriftenreihe No. 5, Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
  54. Glass, D.C. & Singer, J.E. (1972). Urban Stress: Experiments on noise and social stressors. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  55. Goldsmith, R.E. (1973). Annoyance and health reactions to odor from refineries and other industries in Carson, California, 1972. In J.R. Goldsmith (Ed.), Health and Annoyance Impact of Odor Pollution. Berkeley, CA: Epidemiological Studies Laboratory, California Department of Health Services.Google Scholar
  56. Gros, E. & Griefahn, B. (1985). Habituelle Schlafqualität und Lärmbelästigung bei Anwohnern von Straßen mit hoher Verkehrsdichte. Zeitschrift für Lärmbekämpfung, 32, 100–107.Google Scholar
  57. Guski, R. (1987). Lärm - Wirkungen unerwünschter Geräusche. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  58. Gyr, S. & Grandjean, E. (1984). Industrial noise in residential areas: effects on residents. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 53, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hangartner, M. (1983). Bewertung von Geruchsimmissionen. Forum Städtehygiene, 34, 106–111.Google Scholar
  60. Hangartner, M. (1988). Bewertung von Geruchsbelästigungen. Staub–Reinhaltung der Luft, 48, 81–85.Google Scholar
  61. Hellman, T.M. & Small, F.H. (1974). Characterization of odor properties of 101 petrochemicals using sensory methods. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 24, 979–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hodapp, V., Neuhahn, F. & Reinschmidt, U. (1996). Evaluation eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung von Umweltbesorgnis. Zeitschrift. für Gesundheitspsychologic, IV (1), 22–36.Google Scholar
  63. Interdisziplinärer Arbeitskreis für Lärmwirkungsfragen beim Umweltbundesamt (1990). Belästigung durch Lärm: Psychische und körperliche Reaktionen. Zeitschrift für Lärm bekämpfung, 37, 1–6.Google Scholar
  64. Jaakkola, J.J.K., Vilkka, V., Marttila, O., Jäppinen, P. & Haathela, T. (1990). The South Karelia air pollution study. The effects of malodorous sulphur compounds from pulp mills on respiratory and other symptoms. American Review of Respiration Diseases, 142, 1344–1350.Google Scholar
  65. Janke, W., Erdmann, G. & Kallus, W. (1985). Streßverarbeitungsfragebogen (SVF). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  66. Jonah, B.A., Bradley, J.S. & Dawson, N.E. (1981). Predicting individual subjective responses to traffic noise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 490–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jonsson, E., Deane, M. & Sanders, G. (1975). Community reactions to odors from pulp mills: a pilot study in Eureka, California. Environmental Research, 10, 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI. Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Mooresville, Ind.: Scientific Software, Inc.Google Scholar
  69. Kaiser, H.F. & Dickmann, K. (1962). Sample and population score matrics and sample correlation matrics from an arbitrary population correlation matrix. Psychometrica, 27, 179–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kastka, J. (1976). Untersuchungen zur Belästigungswirkung der Umweltbedingungen Verkehrslärm und Industriegerüche. In G. Kaminski (Hrsg.), Umweltpsychologie - Perspektiven - Probleme - Praxis - Konzepte der Humanwissenschaften Stuttgart: Klett,-187–223.Google Scholar
  71. Kastka, J. (1981). Psychologische Indikatoren der Verkehrslärmbelästigung. In A. Schick (Hrsg.), Akustik zwischen Physik und Psychologie. Stuttgart: Klett, 68–86.Google Scholar
  72. Kastka, J. (1982). Erfassung und Bewertung von Gerüchen und ihrer Belästigungswirkung. In VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) (Hrsg.), VDI Berichte, Band 416. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag, 16–28.Google Scholar
  73. Kastka, J. (1984). Untersuchungen zur Belästigung durch Verkehrslärm. Umweltpsychologische Analysen zu einem umwelthygienischen Konzept. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Oldenburg.Google Scholar
  74. Kastka, J., Noack, R. & Mau, U. (1986). Längs- und Querschnittsuntersuchungen zur Geruchsbelästigung bei Katastererhebungen des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. In VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) (Hrsg.), VDI-Berichte, Band 561, Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag, 255–270.Google Scholar
  75. Kastka, J. & Noack, R. (1987): On the interaction of sensory experience, causal attributive cognitions and visual context parameters in noise annoyance. In H.S. Koelega (Ed.), Environmental annoyance: characterization, measurement, and control. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 345–362.Google Scholar
  76. Kirschbaum, C. (1991). Cortisolmessung im Speichel. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  77. Knasko, S.C., Gilbert, A.N. & Sabini, J. (1990). Emotional state, physical wellbeing, and performance in the presence of feigned ambient odor. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1345–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kobal, G. & Hummel, T. (1991). Olfactory evoked potentials in humans. In T.V. Getchell et al. (Eds.), Smell and Taste in Health and Disease. New York: Raven, 255–275.Google Scholar
  79. Koelega, H.S. (1987). Environmental annoyance: characterization, measurement, and control. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1–7.Google Scholar
  80. Kryter, K.D. (1985). The effects of noise on man. New York: Academic Press. Lazarus, R.S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: MacGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  81. Lazarus, R.S. (1977). Psychological stress and coping in adaptation and illness. In Z.J. Lipowski, D.R. Lipsitt & P.C. Whybrow (Eds), Psychosomatic medicine: current trends and clinical implications. New York: Oxford University Press, 14–26.Google Scholar
  82. Lazarus, R.S. & Cohen, J.B. (1977). Environmental stress. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: advances in theory and research. New York: Plenum Press, 89–125.Google Scholar
  83. Lazarus, R. & Launier, R. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In L.A. Pervin & M. Lewis (Eds.), Internal and external determinants of behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 287–327.Google Scholar
  84. Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  85. Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1, 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Levy-Leboyer, C. & Moser, G. (1987): Individual differences in noise annoyance: four explanations. In H.S. Koelega (Ed.), Environmental annoyance: char-acterization, measurement, and control. Amsterdam. Elsevier, 293–301.Google Scholar
  87. Lindvall, T. & Radford, T.P. (1973). Measurements of annoyance due to expo-sure to environmental factors. Environmental Research, 6, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Lipscomb, J.A., Goldman, L.R., Satin, K.P., Smith, D.F., Vance, W.A. & Neutra, R.R. (1991). A follow-up study of the community near the McColl waste disposal site. Environmental Health Perspectives, 94, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Lorig, T.S. (1989). Human EEG and odor response Progress in Neurobiology33,387–398 Google Scholar
  90. Lorig, T.S. & Schwartz, G.E. (1988). Brain and odor: I. Alteration of human EEG activity and behavior. Psychobiology, 16, 281–284.Google Scholar
  91. Lorig, T.S., Schwartz, G.E., Herman, K.B. & Lane, R.D. (1988). Brain and odor: II. EEG activity during nose and mouth breathing. Psychobiology, 16, 285–287.Google Scholar
  92. Lorig, T.S., Huffman, E.S., DeMartino, A.J. & DeMaro, J. (1989). EEG effects of low level galaxolide administration. Chemical Senses (zitiert nach Lorig, 1989 ).Google Scholar
  93. Maschke, C., Breinl, S., Grimm, R. & Ising, H. (1992). Der Einfluß von Nachtfluglärm auf den Schlaf and die Katecholaminausscheidung. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, 35, 119–122.Google Scholar
  94. Mason, J.W. (1975). A historical view of the “stress”-field. Journal of Human Stress, 1, 22–36.Google Scholar
  95. Meijer, H., Knipschild, P. & Sallé, H. (1985). Road traffic noise annoyance in Amsterdam. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 56, 285–297.Google Scholar
  96. Moskowitz, H.R. (1978). Odors in the environment: hedonics, perfumery and odor abatement. In E.C. Carterette and M.P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of Perception. Vol X Perceptual Ecology New York: Academic Press, 307–347.Google Scholar
  97. Muller, F. (1992). Scaling of psychological tension in reaction time experiments for the measurement of the efficiency of psychological performance with and without background noise. In G. Borg & G. Neely (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the International Society for Psychophysics. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Psychology, 147–152.Google Scholar
  98. Muller, F. & Paulsen, R. (1993). Zur Wirkung von Schall auf die geistige Leistungsfähigkeit. In Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Lufthygiene and Silikoseforschung (Hrsg.), Umwelthygiene. Jahresbericht 1993/94, 26, 80–101.Google Scholar
  99. Murphy, C. (1983). Age-related effects on the threshold, psychophysical function, and pleasantness of menthol. Journal of Gerontology, 38, 217–222.Google Scholar
  100. Murphy, C. (1987). Olfactory psychophysics. In T.E. Finger & W.L. Silver (Eds.), Neurobiology in Taste and Smell. New York, NY: Wiley, 251–273.Google Scholar
  101. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on odors from stationary and mobile sources (1979). Odors form stationary and mobile sources. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Press.Google Scholar
  102. Neuf, M. (1988). Untersuchungen zur Verwendbarkeit ausgewählter Methoden zur Erfassung psychischer Umweltwirkungen und ihre Anwendbarkeit in Feld- und Experimentalforschung. Unveröffentliche Diplomarbeit, Universität Würzburg.Google Scholar
  103. Neutra, R., Lipscomb, J., Satin, K. & Shusterman, D. (1991). Hypotheses to explain the higher symptom rates observed around hazardous waste sites. Environmental Health Perspectives, 94, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Öhrström, E., Björkman, M. & Rylander, R. (1988). Noise annoyance with regard to neurophysiological sensitivity, subjective noise sensitivity and personality variables. Psychological Medicine, 18, 605–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Otto, D., Molhave, L., Rose, G., Hudnell, H.K. & House, D. (1990). Neurobehavioral and sensory irritant effects of controlled exposure to a complex mixture of volatile organic compounds. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 12, 649–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Perrin, M.L. (1987). Annoyance felt by populations living near odour-emitting industries. In H.S. Koelega (Ed.), Environmental annoyance: characterizations, measurement, and control. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 141–152.Google Scholar
  107. Pfeiffer, K.P., Köck, M., Pichler-Semmelrock, F. & Möse, J.R. (1990). Relationen zwischen Geruchshäufigkeit und Geruchsbelästigung–ein dreistufiges Modell. In VDI-Kommission Reinhaltung der Luft (Hrsg.), Gerüche. Stand der Erkenntnisse zur Ermittlung von Belastung und Belästigung. VDI-Schriftenreihe Band 12. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag, 77–85.Google Scholar
  108. Plattig, K.H. (1992). 111–2.2.9. Olfaktorische Diagnostik. In H.E. Wichmann, H.-W. Schlipköter & G. Fülgraff (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Umweltmedizin: Toxikologie, Epidemiologie, Hygiene, Belastungen, Wirkungen, Diagnostik, Prophylaxe. Landberg/Lech: ecomed.-Losebl.-Ausgabe.Google Scholar
  109. Prinz, B., Otterbeck, K. & Koch, E. (1990). Überlegungen in NRW zur Bewertung von Geruchsstoffimmissionen. In VDI-Kommission Reinhaltung der Luft (Hrsg.), Gerüche. Stand der Erkenntnisse zur Ermittlung von Belastung und Belästigung. VDI Schriftenreihe Band 12. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag, 125–155.Google Scholar
  110. Prinz, B. & Both, R. (1993). Ermittlung und Bewertung von Geruchsimmissionen. Aus der Tätigkeit der LIS Essen, 1992, 42–52.Google Scholar
  111. Pulles, M.P.J. & Cavalini, P.M. (1989). Odour concentrations and odour annoyance: a study around sugar refineries. In L.J. Brasser & W.C. Mulders (Eds.), Man and his ecosystem. Proceedings of the 8th World Clean Air Congress 1989. Amsterdam. Elsevier, 117–122.Google Scholar
  112. Rotton, J., Barry, T., Frey, J. & Soler, E. (1978). Air pollution and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rotton, J., Yoshikawa, J., Francis, J. & Hoyler, P. (1978). Urban atmosphere: evaluative effects of malodorous air pollution. Atlanta, Ga.: Southeastern Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  114. Rotton, J., Frey, J., Barry, T., Milligan, M. & Fitzpatrick, M. (1979). The air pollution experiment and physical aggression. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Runderlaß des Ministers für Umwelt, Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft und des Ministers für Wirtschaft, Mittelstand und Technologie des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (1986). MN 88, 1658 ff.Google Scholar
  116. Russell, J.A. & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Scarborough, M.E., Ames, R.G., Lipsitt, M.J. & Jackson, R.J. (1989). Acute health effects of community exposure to cotton defoliants. Archives of Environmental Health, 44, 355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Schaeffer, M.A. & Baum, A. (1984). Adrenal cortical response to stress at Three Mile Island. Psychosomatic Medicine, 46, 227–237.Google Scholar
  119. Schönpflug, W. & Schulz, P. (1979). Lärmwirkungen bei Tätigkeiten mit kom-plexer Informationsverarbeitung. Feldstudien in einem Industriebetrieb und Laboruntersuchungen. Berlin: Freie Universität/Umweltbundesamt. Selye, M. (1956). The stress of life. New York: MacGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  120. Shustennan, D. (1992). Critical review: the health significance of environmental odour pollution. Archives of Environmental Health, 47, 76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Shusterman, D., Lipscomp, J., Neutra, R. & Satin, K. (1991). Symptom prevalence and odor-worry interaction near hazardous waste sites. Environmental Health Perspectives, 94, 25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Steinheider, B. & Winneke, G. (1992). Materialienband zur GeruchsimmissionsRichtlinie in Nordrhein-Westfalen - Psychophysiologische und epidemiologische Grundlagen der Wahrnehmung und Bewertung von Geruchsimmissionen. Interner Bericht im Auftrag des Ministers für Umwelt, Raumordnung und Landwirtschaft des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  123. Steinheider, B. & Winneke, G. (1993). Industrial odours as environmental stressors: Exposure-annoyance-associations and their modification by coping, age and perceived health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Steinheider, B., Winneke, G. & Schlipköter, H.-W. (1993). Somatische und psychische Wirkungen intensiver Geruchsimmissionen. Eine Fallstudie aus der Substratherstellung für die Champignonzucht. Staub–Reinhaltung der Luft, 53, 425–431.Google Scholar
  125. Steinheider, B. & Paulsen, R. (1994). Wirkungsunterschiede von Verkehrsimmissionen zwischen Anwohnerinnen einer Klein- und einer Großstadt. In D.W. Timp & R. Günther (Hrsg.), Berichte aus Forschung und Praxis. Veröffentlichungen des BDP-Bundesausschusses Umweltpsychologie. 2 /94, 99–105.Google Scholar
  126. Steinheider, B., Winneke, G. & Both, R. (1996). Die Wirkungen von Tierstallemissionen auf die Anwohner: Eine Erhebung in der Umgebung eines Schweinemastbetriebes. In J. Hartung & F. Neisel (Hrsg.), Die gesundheitliche Bedeutung von Intensivtierhaltungen für die Anwohner Kongreßbericht der Deutschen Veterinärmedizinischen Gesellschaft, im Druck.Google Scholar
  127. Stokols, D. (1979). A congruence analysis of stress. In I. Sarason & C. Spielberger (Eds.), Stress and anxiety, Vol. 6. New York, NY: Hemispere, 27–53.Google Scholar
  128. Strahilevitz, M., Strahilevitz, A. & Miller, J.E. (1979). Air pollutants and the admission rate of psychiatric patients. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 205–207.Google Scholar
  129. TA Lärm Nr. 34 033 (1968). Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift über genehmigungsbedürftige Anlagen nach §16 der Gewerbeordnung-GewO. Technische Anleitung zum Schutz gegen Lärm.Google Scholar
  130. Van den Hazel, P.J. & Waegemaekers, C.H.F.M. (1991/92). Odour annoyance in a residential area near a papermill. Public Health Review, 19, 251–262.Google Scholar
  131. Van Kamp, I. (1990): Coping with noise and its health consequences Dissertation, Universität Groningen, Niederlande. Groningen: STYX & PP Publications.Google Scholar
  132. VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) (1986). Olfaktometrie. Geruchsschwellenbestimmung. Grundlagen. VDI-Richtlinie 3881 Blatt 1.Google Scholar
  133. VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) (1991). Ausbreitung von Geruchsstoffen in der Atmosphäre. VDI-Richtlinie 3782 Blatt 4, Gründruck.Google Scholar
  134. VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) (1993). Bestimmung der Geruchsstoffimmission durch Begehungen. VDI-Richtlinie 3940.Google Scholar
  135. Vielhaber, M. (1990). Die Wirkung von Geruchsreizen auf das Spontan-EEC; im Schlaf. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  136. Watson, D. & Clark, L.E. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Watson, D. & Pennebaker, J.W. (1989). Health complaints, stress and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Weiffenbach, J. M. & Bartoshuk, L.M. (1992). Taste and smell. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 8, 543–555.Google Scholar
  139. Weinstein, N.D. (1982). Community noise problems: evidence against adaptation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2, 87–97.Google Scholar
  140. Whittet, H.B. & Royston, R. (1991). Cortical evoked response olfactometry. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 84, 400–402.Google Scholar
  141. Winneke, G. (1992). Structure and determinants of psychophysiological response to odorant/irritant air pollution. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 641, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Winneke, G. (1994). VII-4 Geruchsstoffe. In H.E. Wichmann, H.-W. Schlipköter & G. Fülgraff (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Umweltmedizin: Toxikologie, Epidemiologie, Hygiene, Belastungen, Wirkungen, Diagnostik, Prophylaxe. Landberg/Lech: ecomed.-Losebl.-Ausgabe.Google Scholar
  143. Winneke, G. & Kastka, J. (1977). Odor pollution and odor annoyance in industrial areas of the Rhine-Ruhr region. In J. Le Magnen & P. McLeod (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste VI. London IRL Ltd., 471–479.Google Scholar
  144. Winneke, G. & Kastka, J. (1984). Bewertungssystem für Gerüche auf der Basis von Belästigungsdaten. In Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Lufthygiene- und Silikoseforschung (Hrsg.), Umwelthygiene. Luftverunreinigung. Wirkung auf den Menschen. Düsseldorf, 103–114.Google Scholar
  145. Wieneke, G., Plattig, K.H., Brandl, U. & Berresheim, H.-W. (1986). Extraolfaktorische Wirkungen geruchsintensiver Stoffe. In Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (Hrsg.), Geruchsstoffe: Quellen, Ausbreitung, Wirkungen, Olfaktometrie, technische und administrative Maßnahmen. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag, 411425.Google Scholar
  146. Wieneke, G. & Kastka, J. (1987): Comparison of odour-annoyance data from different industrial sources: problems and implications. In H.S. Koelega (Ed.), environmental annoyance: characterization, measurement, and control. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 129–137.Google Scholar
  147. Winneke, G., Berresheim, H.-W., Kotalik, J. & Kabat, A. (1988). Vergleichende olfaktometrische Untersuchungen zu Formaldehyd und Schwefelwasserstoff. Staub — Reinhaltung der Luft, 48, 319–324.Google Scholar
  148. Winneke, G., Harkort, R., Ratzki, E. & Steinheider, B. (1990), Zusammenhänge zwischen Geruchshäufigkeit und Belästigungsgrad. In VDI-Kommission Reinhaltung der Luft (Hrsg.), Gerüche. Stand der Erkenntnisse zur Ermittlung von Belastung und Belästig ung. VDI-Schriftenreihe Band 12. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag, 63–77.Google Scholar
  149. Winneke, G. & Neuf, M. (1992). Psychological response to sensory stimulation by environmental stressors: state or trait. Applied Psychology, 41, 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Wieneke, G., Berresheim, H.W., Steinheider, B. & Neuf, M. (1993). Psychophysiological correlates of annoyance. Posterpräsentation auf der 21. Tagung Psychophysiologische Methodik in Würzburg.Google Scholar
  151. Winneke, G., Neuf, M. & Steinheider, B. (1996). Separating the impact of exposure and personality in annoyance response to environmental stressors, particularly odors. Environment International, 22, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Wohlwill, J.F. (1974). Human response to levels of environmental stimulation. Human Ecology, 2, 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Wysocki, C.J. & Gilbert, A.N. (1989). National Geographic Smell Survey–effects of age are heterogenous. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 561, 12–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Yoshida, T. & Nakamura, S. (1988). Subjective ratings of health status and railway noise. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 127, 593–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Zeidner, M. & Shechter, M. (1988). Psychological responses to air pollution: some personality and demographic correlates. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brigitte Steinheider

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations