Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Framework conditions for acquisitions in Poland

  • Chapter
M&A and Privatisations in Poland

  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

Poland has historically been a victim of its strategic geographic position between Germany and Russia, with its borders fluctuating throughout the century. In addition to Germany and Russia, Poland also borders the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Ukraine, Belarus and Lithuania.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See also Appendix 2: Political structure of Poland

    Google Scholar 

  2. THE ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT (EIU), Status: September 1999

    Google Scholar 

  3. POLISH AGENCY FOR FOREIGN INVESTMENTS — PAIZ (1998) Poland, International Economic report 1997/98, PAIZ (1998) Poland Fundamental Facts and Figures 1998

    Google Scholar 

  4. THE ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT (2nd quarter 1999) Country Report: Poland, p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  5. EIU (2nd quarter 1999) Country Report: Poland, see above

    Google Scholar 

  6. The European Commission’s regular Opinion, issued in October 1998, pointed to Poland’s generally favourable progress in moving to meet the terms of EU accession. The Commission recognised that provided it strengthens the pace of industrial restructuring and maintains open trade policies, Poland will be able to cope with competitive pressure and market forces within the EU in the medium term. However, areas that still demand action include, among others, the privatisation of the remaining state enterprises, and the restructuring and modernisation of the coal, steel and agricultural sectors. EIU (2nd quarter 1999) Country Report: Poland, see above

    Google Scholar 

  7. N.N. (October 5 1999) Brüssel hofft auf neuen Schwung für die Erweiterung, in FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG — FAZ, Nr 231, p. 26

    Google Scholar 

  8. According to these criteria, membership requires that the candidate country:

    Google Scholar 

  9. has achieved stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law and human rights (political criteria);

    Google Scholar 

  10. has a functioning market economy and the ability to cope with competitive pressures and market forces within the EU (economic criteria);

    Google Scholar 

  11. has the ability to take on the obligations of membership, including adherence to the aims of political, economic and monetary Union (legal and institutional criteria).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT — EBRD (November 1999) Transition Report; see also DR. EGGERSTEDT, H. (November 15 1999) Emerging Markets Research, Commerzbank AG: Central and Eastern Europe: Two Reports on Progress, in Emerging Markets, No. 30/1999

    Google Scholar 

  13. LIPOWSKI, A. (1998) Towards normality, overcoming the heritage of central planning economy in Poland in 1990–1994, Adam Smith Research Centre & Centre for Social and Economic Research Warsaw p. 9

    Google Scholar 

  14. See also REISINGER, H. (1994) Marktoffensive in Osteuropa, Übernahme oder Neugründung von Unternehmen see above. p. 23

    Google Scholar 

  15. MILANOVIC, B. (1989) Liberalisation and Entrepreneurship; Dynamics of Reform in Socialism and Capitalism, New York, in The Economist (September 21 1991) Survey: Business in Eastern Europe, p.10

    Google Scholar 

  16. Several Polish industries, including shoes and textile industries and heavy industries such as iron and steel, were produced for distribution in the former USSR. In return, Poland received oil and other natural resources that it lacked. Overall, heavy industry — e.g. iron, steel, cement — received preferential treatment in Polish economic planning. Consumer product industries, such as soap, confectionery and drinks, were neglected. The service sector barely existed. See GAY, G. (1995) Poland European Tiger, Euromoney Publications PLC, pp. 28ff

    Google Scholar 

  17. Compare also with HARE, P.; HUGES, G. (1991) The international competitiveness of industries in Czechoslovakia, Hungary and Poland, in European Economy, Special Edition, Nr 2, CEC, Brüssel

    Google Scholar 

  18. In comparison, subsidies in OECD countries were approximately at 2.3% of GDP, See OECD (1992) Reforming the Economies of Central and Eastern Europe, p. 36

    Google Scholar 

  19. BLUM, P. (November 2 1993) Unwanted Tanks, The Slovak Republic, Financial Times Survey, p. 12

    Google Scholar 

  20. Compare with WOLMUTH, K. Zur Transformation von Plan- und Marktwirtschaften, in FISCHER J.; MESSNER, F.; WOHLMUTH, K. (1992) Die Transformation der osteuropäischen Länder in die Marktwirtschaft, pp. 33–57

    Google Scholar 

  21. OECD (1992) Reforming the Economies of Central and Eastern Europe, see above, p.65

    Google Scholar 

  22. LIPOWSKI, A., Towards normality, overcoming the heritage of central planning economy in Poland in 1990–1994, see above, p. 10ff.

    Google Scholar 

  23. GAY, G., Poland European Tiger, see above, pp. 13ff

    Google Scholar 

  24. See BERG, A.; SACHS, J. (April 1992) Structural Adjustment and International Trade in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland’s Economic Policy and GOMULKA, S. (1992) Polish Economic Reform, 1990–1991: Principles, Policies and Outcomes, Cambridge Journal of Economics, No. 16

    Google Scholar 

  25. For example, in 1990, Bulgaria had an inflation rate of 335%, Poland 554%, in Russia approximately 1,450% in 1992, see OECD (1992) Reforming the Economies of Central and Eastern Europe, see above, p. 23

    Google Scholar 

  26. See Appendix 3–6: Poland’s economic structure, quarterly indicators and trade data, direction and structure of trade, in EIU (2nd quarter 1999) Country Report Poland

    Google Scholar 

  27. See KPMG POLSKA (January 1999) Investment in Poland p. 12 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Own analysis of various 5-year-forecast tables of EIU and comprehensive research in REUTERS.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See EIU (2nd quarter 1999) Country Report, see above; REUTERS (July-December 1999; EBRD (November 1999) Transition Report. See also Appendix 7: Outlook of economic situation in 2000

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Appendix 8–10: CEE comparisons of GDP development 1990–2000, inflation 1990–2000 and unemployment 1990–2000. A comprehensive research on these data was done, especially regarding GDP and inflation, where diverging information has often been found. This is especially true for data from the beginning of the 1990s, but to some extent also for recent years.

    Google Scholar 

  31. EBRD (November 1999) Transition Report; BANK AUSTRIA (3/99) East-West Report and estimates Institute LIFEA.

    Google Scholar 

  32. PAIZ (1999), see also N.N. (November 01 1999) Inflation und höhere Arbeitslosigkeit begleiten Polens Wachstum, in Handelsblatt, p. 8

    Google Scholar 

  33. See also PAIZ (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  34. PAIZ (1999

    Google Scholar 

  35. PAIZ (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Status May 2000

    Google Scholar 

  37. In 1998, Poland reached an unemployment rate of approximately 10%, similar to most of the EU countries. However, unemployment has been rising again. The Northern areas of Poland around Slupsk and Suwalski continue to suffer exceptionally high unemployment (above 18%) while Warsaw and other booming regions (Katowice, Krakow, Poznan) have rates well below the average (2–4%). EBRD (1999) Transition Report; OECD (1999) Economic Surveys Poland; REUTERS (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  38. The share of total exports to Germany was 36.3% in 1998 with a turnover of USD 22.6bn. The share of total imports accounted for 26.4%. Italy, France and Russia are further important trading partners. See EIU (1999) Country Report, see above, and REUTERS (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  39. COMMERZBANK AG (September 1999) Länderrisikoanalyse Polen

    Google Scholar 

  40. See EIU (1999) Country Report; EBRD (November 1999) Transition Report and REUTERS (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  41. See Appendix 11: EBRD (1999) Private sector share of the GDP in Central and Eastern Europe

    Google Scholar 

  42. Own portfolio design, status end of 1999, discussed with DR. EGGERSTEDT, H., Head of Emerging Markets Research, Commerzbank AG; model based on KRALJIC, P. (1990) The Economic Gap Separating East and West, in The McKinsey Quarterly, pp. 62–74

    Google Scholar 

  43. In this context, market entry decisions have to be carefully evaluated. In industries such as telecommunications, energy or cement, you have to be first in the country to take a predominant market position. However, for example, the Russian crisis in 1998 has shown that risks linked to those businesses should not be underestimated.

    Google Scholar 

  44. See also DUNNING, J.H. (February 1994) Re-evaluating the benefit offoreign direct investment, Transnational Corporations, 3rd edition, No. 1 p. 39

    Google Scholar 

  45. PAIZ (February 2000); PAIZ data covers investment outlays in excess of USD lm and estimates of investment projects lower than USD lm, which include the flow of investment in the form of acquisitions of more than 10% of shares in Polish companies, loans and credits given by parent companies to their subsidiaries in Poland and reinvestment of profit in Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See Appendix 12: Overview of Special Economic Zones in Poland

    Google Scholar 

  47. PAIZ (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  48. At the end of 1999, for example, with regard to the automotive sector, Poland has become the 7th largest automobile market in Europe, with car sales growth rates of approximately 20% (3rd place in Europe). Meanwhile, Italian Fiat has a market share of ca. 28%, followed by Daewoo with a 27% market share. General Motors covers ca. 9%, Czech Skoda 7%, and French Renault 5% of the Polish car market. It is estimated that Polish car sales will grow by a further 5% in 2000. See VWD-NEWS (December 23 1999) Mittel- und Osteuropa, Reormländer und Baltische Republiken, Eschborn, No. 249

    Google Scholar 

  49. MINISTRY OF THE STATE TREASURY (September-December 1998), Department of European Integration and Foreign Relations, Privatisation quarterly, Warsaw, page 20

    Google Scholar 

  50. Based on HABUDA, J. (7/1992) Wirtschaftliche Entwicklung und Perspektiven in Ungarn, Polen und der CSFR, in WO Schnelldienst, pp. 17–22; see also REISINGER, H., see above, p. 26

    Google Scholar 

  51. SÜß, D. (15/1997) Privatisierung in Polen, der Tschechischen Republik und Ungarn: Das Erlösparadoxon und seine Auflösung, Frankfurter Institut für Transformationsstudien (FIT) an der Europa Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder)

    Google Scholar 

  52. MINISTRY OF THE STATE TREASURY (1997) Polish Enterprises in Privatisation Process. General information, Profile, Warsaw, p. 5

    Google Scholar 

  53. Appendix 13 lists further legal acts upon which privatisation is based. See PATZ (December 1999) The Polish Privatisation Process in 1990 –1998

    Google Scholar 

  54. Own overview

    Google Scholar 

  55. SÜß, D. see above

    Google Scholar 

  56. Based on the Law on National Investment Funds and Their Privatisation of 30 April 1993, implementation started in December 1995. For an overview of the NIFs see Appendix 14: National Investment Funds

    Google Scholar 

  57. PAIZ, see above, internet source

    Google Scholar 

  58. MINISTRY OF THE STATE TREASURY Polish Enterprises in Privatisation Process, see above, p. 23

    Google Scholar 

  59. KPMG POLSKA (January 1999) Investment in Poland, 5th edition p. 16

    Google Scholar 

  60. MINISTRY OF THE STATE TREASURY Polish Enterprises in Privatisation Process, see above. See also PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS (February 1998) Doing business in Poland, p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  61. For example, a tender was launched in January 2000 to search an advisor to handle the privatisation of Poland’s biggest power plant in Belchatow, which was planned to be privatised in 2001, later postponed. Furthermore, tender for advisors were launched regarding the privatisation of the companies of the Polish spirits sector. See VWD-NEWS (December 1999) Mittel- und Osteuropa, Reformländer und Baltische Republiken, Eschborn, No. 249. See also example in Appendix 15: Privatisation methods for Polmos companies/ spirits sector

    Google Scholar 

  62. See also THE PRIVATISATION AGENCY (June 1999) Disposal of shares in the course of public invitation to negotiation and Disposal of shares in the course of public offer.

    Google Scholar 

  63. The information memorandum includes the operational review of the company and extracts of the financial, legal and environmental reviews.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Access to the company is usually denied to potential purchasers until an indicative bid has been made.

    Google Scholar 

  65. MINISTRY OF THE STATE TREASURY (1997) Polish Enterprises in Privatisation Process, see above, p. 18

    Google Scholar 

  66. MINISTRY OF THE STATE TREASURY (1997) Polish Enterprises in Privatisation Process, see above, p. 20

    Google Scholar 

  67. For example, size of the company, value, financial performance of the last three years, prospects, etc.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Liquidation based on the Privatisation Law, in contrast to Liquidation based on the State Enterprise Law (Bankruptcy).

    Google Scholar 

  69. KWASNIEWSKI, J. (1992) Vademecum prywatyzacji II (Privatisation manual II), Poltext, Warszawa, p.52;

    Google Scholar 

  70. BALTOWSKI, M. (1996) Prywatyzacja przedsiebiorstw panstwowych. Przebieg i ocena (Privatisation of state owned companies. Implementation and valuation.), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, p. 26

    Google Scholar 

  71. KWASNIEWSKI, J. (1992) Vademecum prywatyzacji II (Privatisation manual II), see above, p. 54;

    Google Scholar 

  72. BALTOWSKI, M. Prywatyzacja przedsiebiorstw panstwowych (Privatisation of state owned companies), see above, p. 27; SURDYKOWSKA, S.T. (1996) Prywatyzacja (Privatisation), Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, pp. 41–45

    Google Scholar 

  73. DABROWSKI, J.M. (1996) Privatisierung der polnischen Wirtschaft: Fünf Jahre Erfahrung, Berlin, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung

    Google Scholar 

  74. See KPMG POLSKA Investment in Poland, see above, p. 21 and PRICEWATERHOUSE-COOPERS Doing business in Poland, see above

    Google Scholar 

  75. MINISTRY OF THE STATE TREASURY (June-September 1999) Department of European Integration and Foreign Relations, Privatisations Quarterly, Warsaw, p. 7

    Google Scholar 

  76. WASACZ, E., Minister of State Treasury (September 15 1999) press-conference on the Economic Forum Poland-East, quoted by Polish press agency PAP

    Google Scholar 

  77. INTERFAX INFORMATION SERVICES (September 20–24 1999) Poland Business Report, Volume 01, Issue 26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Christiane Tewes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tewes, C. (2001). Framework conditions for acquisitions in Poland. In: M&A and Privatisations in Poland. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99195-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99195-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8244-7415-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-99195-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation