Skip to main content

Solidarität aus sozialpsychologischer Sicht

  • Chapter
Solidarität

Zusammenfassung

Solidarität ist kein wissenschaftlicher, sondern ein sozialpolitischer Begriff und meint die Verpflichtung einer Gemeinschaft gegenüber ihren Mitgliedern. Der Gedanke der Reziprozität, d.h. des wechselseitigen Lebens und Nehmens, ist wichtig. Inzwischen wird der Begriff alltagssprachlich verwendet und dabei oft überstrapaziert. So hat er zwar im Laufe der Zeit an Bedeutungsvielfalt gewonnen, aber gleichzeitig an Präzision verloren. Historisch gesehen ist die Bedeutung des Begriffes eng mit der Arbeiterbewegung und der Durchsetzung von Grundrechten verbunden. In unserer heutigen Welt gibt es viele Anlässe, in denen immer wieder zu Solidarität mit ganz verschiedenen Empfängern aus ganz verschiedenen Gründen aufgerufen wird. Oft ist der Grundgedanke der Solidarität dabei sehr verwässert; es handelt sich fast nur noch um Appelle zu materieller Hilfeleistung, damit akute oder chronische Notfälle gelindert werden. Aber vielleicht ist dies einfach die moderne Variante von Solidarität.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Abrams, D. & Hogg, M.A. (1990). Social identity theory. Constructive and critical advances. New York: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice and ethnic relations. In P.A. Katz (Ed.), Towards the elimination of racism (pp. 245–308 ). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L. & Dixon, R.A. (1992). Psychological compensation: A theoretical framework. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 259–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C.D. (1994). Why act for the public good? Four answers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 603–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R.F. & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayertz, K. (1998). Solidarität. Begriff und Problem. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D.J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (vol. 6, pp.1–62.). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berking, H. (1994). Solidarischer Individualismus. Ein Gedankenspiel. Ästhetik und Kommunikation, 85 /86, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierhoff, H.W. & Küpper, R. (1998). Sozialpsychologie der Solidarität. In K. Bayertz (Hrsg.), Solidarität. Begriff und Problem (pp. 263–296 ). Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M.B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 17 (5), 475–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. & Chen, Y.R. (1996). The moderating role of self-esteem and self-construal in reaction to a threat to the self: Evidence from the People’s Republic of China and the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice. Its social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerulo, K.A. (1997). Identity construction: new issues, new directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinnirella, M. (1998). Exploring temporal aspects of social identity: The concept of possible social identities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 227–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, J. & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96 (4), 608–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1996). Social identification. In E.T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (pp. 777–798 ). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doise, W. (1986). Levels of explanation in social psychology. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1988). Die Gesellschaft der Individuen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S. & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of a housing community. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, K., Herlth, A. & Strohmeier, K.P. (1997). Solidarität unter den Bedingungen ent-falteter Modernität. In K. Gabriel, A. Herlth, & K.P. Strohmeier (Hrsg.), Modernität und Solidarität. Konsequenzen gesellschaftlicher Modernisierung (pp. 13–27 ). Frei-burg, Basel, Wien: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Anastasio, P.A., Bachman, B.A. & Rust, M.C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (vol. 4, pp. 1–25 ). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heatherton, T.F. & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 895–910. Hofstede, G. ( 1980 ). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hondrich, K.O. & Koch-Arzberger, C. (1992). Solidarität in der modernen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/M: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J.A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 367–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C.H. (1988). Measurement of individualism-collectivism. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, L. (1998). Meaning and identity in „cyberspace“: the performance of gender, class, and race online. Symbolic Interactionism, 21, 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama, S. & Markus, H.R. (1995). Culture and self: Implications for internationalizing psychology. In N.R. Goldberger & J. Veroff (Eds.), The culture and psychology reader (pp. 366–383 ). New York: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M.J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilli, W. (1990). Soziale Identität–integrative Überlegungen zu einem sozialwissenschaftlichen Bezugsrahmen. In D. Frey (Hrsg.), Bericht über den 37. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Kiel 1990 (pp. 331–335 ). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H.R. & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, K., Bargh, J. (1998). Coming out in the age of the internet: identity „demarginalization“ through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 681–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, K.D. (1995). Psychologie der Selbstdarstellung. 2. überarb, Aufl., Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, T.M., Carpenter, S.L., Sedikides, C & Li, F. (1993). Differential processing of in-group and out-group information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyama, N. (1990). Some recent trends in Japanese values: Beyond the individual-collective dimension. International Sociology, 5, 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmonari, A., Pombeni, M.L. & Kirchler, E. (1992). Evolution of the self concept in adolescence and social categorization processes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology, (vol. 3, pp. 285–308 ). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reykowski, J. (1994). Collectivism and individualism as dimensions of social change. In U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.C: Choi & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism. Theory method and applications (pp. 276–292 ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T.F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunck, C. (2000). Nationale Identität im geteilten und wiedervereinten Deutschland. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C. & Strube, M.J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (vol. 29, pp. 209–269 ). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O.J., White, B.J., Hood, W.R. & Sherif, C.W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The robber’s cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, B. & Mummendey, A. (1997). Selbst, Identität und Gruppe: Eine sozialpsychologische Analyse des Verhältnisses von Individuum und Gruppe. In A. Mummendey & B. Simon (Hrsg.), Identität und Verschiedenheit: Zur Sozialpsychologie der Identität in komplexen Gesellschaften (pp. 11–38 ). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1979). Self-monitoring processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 12, pp. 85–128 ). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, L.E. & Fiske, S.T. (1995). Motivation and cognition in social life: A social survival perspective. Social Cognition, 13, 189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W.B., Griffin, J.J., Predmore, S.B. & Gaines, B. (1987). The cognitive-affective crossfire: When self-consistency confronts self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 881–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Rament, C., Billig, M. & Bundy, R. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24 ). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi, J.T., Lindskold, S. & Rosenfels, P. (1985). Introduction to social psychology. St. Paul, MN: West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D. & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.C., Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A. & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 20, 454–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H.C. (1989). The self and social behaviour in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H.C. (1999). Cross-cultural psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utz, S. (1999). Virtuelle Gemeinschaften und soziale Identität. In M. Bornewasser & R. Wakenhut (Hrsg.), Ethnisches und nationales Bewußtsein zwischen Globalisierung und Regionalisierung (pp. 229–244 ). Frankfurt/M., Berlin: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, D.A. (1978). Reduction of intergroup discrimination through individuation of the outgroup. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1361–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuthenow, R. (1991). Acts of compassion. Caring for others and helping ourselves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K.S. (1988). Will societal modernization eventually eliminate cross-cultural psychological differences? In M. Bond (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology (pp. 67–85 ). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulehner, P.M. (1996). Solidarität: Begriff Dimension und Vorrat. In P.M. Zulehner, H. Denz, A. Pelinka & E. Talus (Hrsg.), Solidarität. Option für die Modernisierungsverlierer (pp. 51–87 ). Innsbruck, Wien: Tyrolia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Leske + Budrich, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lilli, W., Luber, M. (2001). Solidarität aus sozialpsychologischer Sicht. In: Bierhoff, HW., Fetchenhauer, D. (eds) Solidarität. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97521-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97521-8_12

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-3088-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-97521-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics