Skip to main content

Dialectal Variation inside CP as Parametric Variation

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft ((LINGB,volume 5))

Abstract

The embedded sentence is nowadays generally considered to be the maximal projection of the complementiser C (Pesetsky 1982; Chomsky 1986). Correspondingly, sentences are analysed as CP’s. Spec-Head agreement and X’-theory interact to allow not only for a head position but also for a Spec position. This neatly accounts for examples like the following:

I would like to thank Hans den Besten, Marine) Gerritsen, Jarich Hoekstra, Wim Kosmeyer and Jan-Wouter Zwart, the editors Werner Abraham and Josef Bayer, and the participants of the conference “Dialektsyntax in den germanischen Sprachen” for useful discussion and/or comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Besten, H den (1989): Studies in West Germanic Syntax. Dissertation. University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, D. (1981): Roots of Language. Karoma: Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachin, P. (1977): “Of + inversie ( II)”. De Nieuwe Taalgids 70, 422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986): Barriers. MIT Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1992): “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory”. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge (USA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Debrabandere, F. (1976): “De SVf-woordorde in Zinnen met een Aanloop”. In: Handelingen van de Koninklijke Commissie voorToponomie en Dialectologie. Drukkerij G. Michiels: Tongeren, 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, M. (1991): Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialectsyntaxis (AND). P.J. Meertens lnstituut: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeman, T. (1979): “COMP-Agreement?”. In: W. Zonneveld and F. Weerman (1979), Linguistics in the Netherlands. Foris: Dordrecht, 291–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, G. de and F. Weerman (1986): “Finiteness and Verb-Fronting in Frisian”. In: H. Haider and M. Prinzhom, eds., Verb-Second Phenomena in the Germanic Languages. Foris: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, G. de (1987): “De Syntacticus als Frisist”. In: S. Dyk and J. Hoekstra ( 1987 ), Ta de Fryske Syntaksis. Fryske Academy: Ljouwert, 57–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haan, G. de (1988): “Hoofd-en Bijzinnen: Traditie en Progressie”. Handelingen van het 40ste Nederlands Filologen Congres, 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeringen, C. van (1939): “Congruerende Voegwoorden”. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsche Taal-en Letterkunde 58, 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, E. (1991): Licensing Conditions on Phrase Structure. Dissertation, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, J. (1987): “’Verb-Second’ en de ‘Imperativus Pro Infinitivo’ in het Fries”. Taalkundig Bulletin (TABU) 17, 96–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, J. and L. Marâcz (1989): “Some Implications of I-to-C Movement in Frisian”. In: H. Bennis and A. van Kemenade, eds., Linguistics in the Netherlands 1989. Foris: Dordrecht, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1992): “Word Order”. GLOW Colloquium, Lisboa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, H. (1984): The Syntax of Verbs. Foris: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koster, J. (1986): “The Relation between Pro-drop, Scambling and Verb Movements”. Ms. University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langedijk, H. (1963): Hé, is dat Westfries? Drukkerij ‘West-Friesland’: Hoorn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, P. (1987): Effects of Head-Movement on Theories of Subjacency and Proper Government. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, J. (1986): “Inflection and Conjunction in Modem Irish”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 245–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meer, G. van der (1988): “Reported Speech and the Position of the Finite Verb”. Leuvense Bijdragen 77, 301–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, G. van der (1991): “The ‘Conjugation’ of Subclause Introducers: Frisian -ST”. North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE), 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdiep, G.S. (1932): “Syntaxis en Dialectstudie I en II”. Onze Taaltuin 1, 23–27, 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdiep, G.S. (1940): De Volkstaal van Katwijk-aan-Zee. Standaard Boekhandel: Antwerpen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdiep, G.S. (1949): Stylistische Grammatica. Zwolle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D. (1982): Paths and Categories. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzack, C. and A. Holmberg (1989): “The Role of AGR and Finiteness in Germanic VO-languages”. GLOW Newsletter 22, 53–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J.-Y. (1989): “Verb-Movement, Universal Grammar and the Structure of IP”. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemsdijk, H. van (1989): “Movement and Regeneration”. In: P. Benincâ, ed., Dialect Variation and the Theory of Grammar. Foris: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • RND (1930–1982): E. Blancquaert en W. Pée, eds.: Reeks Nederlands Dialect-atlassen. Antwerpen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooy, J. de (1965): Als-Of-Dat. Van Gorcum, Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooy, J. de (1978): “Het ene ‘of’ is het andere niet”. De Nieuwe Taalgids 71, 146–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J.R. (1967): Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safir, K. and D. Pesetsky (1981): “Inflection, Inversion and Subject Clitics”. Proceedings of North-East Linguistic Society (NELS) 11, 331–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanacker, V.F. (1968): “Syntaktische Daten aus Französisch-Flämischen Tonbandaufnahmen”. Verhandlungen des 2ten Internationalen Dialektologenkongresses, Beiheft 4 der Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung. Franz Steiner Verlag: Wiesbaden, 844–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weijnen, A. (1966): Nederlandse Dialectkunde. Van Gorcum: Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1981): “On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ’head of a word”’. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, J. (1874): Algemeen Nederduitsch en Friesch Dialecticon. Martinus Nijhoff, ‘s Gravenhage (reprinted ( 1972 ) Dr. Martin Sändig oHG: Wiesbaden ).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, J.-W. (1992): “Verb-Movement and Complementizer Agreement”. GLOW Newsletter 26. Ms. University of Groningen, 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Werner Abraham Josef Bayer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoekstra, E. (1993). Dialectal Variation inside CP as Parametric Variation. In: Abraham, W., Bayer, J. (eds) Dialektsyntax. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft, vol 5. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97032-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97032-9_8

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12422-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-97032-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics