Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Politikwissenschaftliche Integrationstheorien in Interaktion. Der synoptische Ansatz II

  • Chapter
Theorien europäischer Integration

Part of the book series: Grundlagen für Europa ((GRUNDE,volume 7))

  • 331 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag ist ein weiterer Versuch, auf der Basis der Diskussion der Stärken und der Schwächen der politikwissenschaftlichen Integrationstheorien ein synoptisches Erklärungsmodell zu entwickeln, das der Komplexität des Integrationsprozesses Rechnung trägt und die einseitigen und verkürzten Hypothesen der vorhandenen traditionellen und neueren Ansätze überwindet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Klaus Busch, Spill-over-Dynamik und Spill-back-Potential in der europäischen Währungsintegration, in: Markus Jachtenfuchs/Beate Kohler-Koch (Hrsg.), Europäische Integration, Opladen 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Busch, Integrationstheorien in Interaktion. Ein synoptischer Ansatz, in: Uwe Carstens/Carsten Schlüter-Knauer (Hrsg.), Der Wille zur Demokratie. Traditionslinien und Perspektiven, Berlin 1998, S. 285–314.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zahlreiche Autoren plädieren in jüngster Zeit für eine Synthese der Integrationstheorien, z.B. Jeppe Tranholm-Mikkelsen, Neo-functionalism: Obstinate or Obsolete? A Reappraisal in the Light of the New Dynamism of the EC, in: Millennium, Vol. 20 No. 1, 1991, S. 1–22;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christian Welz/Christian Engel, Traditionsbestände politikwissenschaftlicher Integrationstheorien: Die Europäische Gemeinschaft im Spannungsfeld zwischen Integration und Kooperation, in: Armin von Bogdandy (Hrsg.), Die Europäische Option, Baden-Baden, 1993;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laura Cram, Integration theory and the study of the European policy process, in: Jeremy Richardson (ed), European Union: Power and Policy-making, London 1996;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Claus Giering, Europa zwischen Zweckverband und Superstaat. Die Entwicklung der politikwissenschaftlichen Integrationstheorie im Prozeß der europäischen Integration, Bonn 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ernst B. Haas, The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950–1957, Stanford 1958, S. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ernst B. Haas, The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950–1957, Stanford 1958 S. 283ff.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ernst B. Haas, The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950–1957, Stanford 1958 S. 311.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vgl. Tranholm-Mikkelsen, Neo-functionalism (wie Anm. 3).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vgl. Tranholm-Mikkelsen, Neo-functionalism (wie Anm. 3), S. 4ff; vgl. auch Welz/ Engel, Traditionsbestände politikwissenschaftlicher Integrationstheorien (wie Anm. 3).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vgl. Philippe C. Schmitter, A Revised Theory of Regional Integration, in: Leon N. Lindberg/Stuart A. Scheingold (eds), Regional Integration — Theory and Research, Cambridge 1971, S. 232–264.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vgl. Joseph S. Nye, Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functionalist Model, in: Lindberg/Scheingold (eds), Regional Integration — Theory and Research, Cambridge 1971, S. 192–231.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vgl. Wayne Sandholtz/John Zysman, Recasting the European Bargain, in: World Politics, Vol. 42 No. 4, 1989;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robert O. Keohane/Stanley Hoffmann, Conclusions: Community Politics and Institutional Change, in: William Wallace (ed), The Dynamics of European Integration, London 1990, S. 276–300; Tranholm-Mikkelsen, Neo-functionalism (wie Anm. 3).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vgl. Tranholm-Mikkelsen, Neo-functionalism (wie Anm. 3), S. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Andrew Moravcsik, Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31 No. 4 (1993), S. 496.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Andrew Moravcsik, Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31 No. 4 (1993), S. 492.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Andrew Moravcsik, Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31 No. 4 (1993), S. 493ff.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Andrew Moravcsik, Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31 No. 4 (1993) S. 507.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrew Moravcsik, Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31 No. 4 (1993) S. 474.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Andrew Moravcsik, Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31 No. 4 (1993) S. 474.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vgl. Daniel Wincott, Institutional Interaction and European Integration: Towards an Everyday Critique of Liberal Intergovernmentalism, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 33 No. 4, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kenneth A. Armstrong, New institutionalism and European Union legal studies, in: Paul Craig/Carol Harlow (eds), Lawmaking in the European Union, 1998, S. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kenneth A. Armstrong, New institutionalism and European Union legal studies, in: Paul Craig/Carol Harlow (eds), Lawmaking in the European Union, 1998 S. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Simon J. Bulmer, The Governance of the European Union: A New Institutionalist Approach, in: Journal of Public Policy, Vol.13 No. 4 (1994), S. 378.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Paul Pierson, The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis, in: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 29 No. 2 (1996), S. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paul Pierson, The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis, in: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 29 No. 2 (1996), S. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paul Pierson, The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis, in: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 29 No. 2 (1996), S. 135ff.

    Google Scholar 

  30. John Peterson, Understanding Decision-Making In The European Union — Towards A Framework For Analysis, The University of York, Department of Politics, Working paper No.4, 1994, S. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  31. John Peterson, Understanding Decision-Making In The European Union — Towards A Framework For Analysis, The University of York, Department of Politics, Working paper No.4, 1994, S. 7ff.

    Google Scholar 

  32. John Peterson, Understanding Decision-Making In The European Union — Towards A Framework For Analysis, The University of York, Department of Politics, Working paper No.4, 1994, S. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Adrienne Héritier, Policy-Netzwerkanalyse als Untersuchungsinstrument im europäischen Kontext: Folgerungen aus einer empirischen Studie regulativer Politik, in: Héritier (Hrsg.), Policy-Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung, Opladen 1993, S. 446.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Peterson, Understanding Decision-Making (wie Anm. 26), S. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vgl. Hussein Kassim, Policy Networks, Networks and European Union Policy Making: A Sceptical View, in: West European Politics, Vol. 17 No. 4 (1994), S. 22;

    Google Scholar 

  36. John Peterson, Policy Networks and European Union Policy Making: A Reply to Kassim, in: West European Politics, Vol. 18 No. 2 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wolfgang Schumann, Neue Wege in der Integrationstheorie. Ein policy-analytisches Modell zur Interpretation des politischen Systems der EU, Opladen 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. J. Anderson, The State of the (European) Union: From the Single Market to Maastricht, from Singular Events to General Theories, in: World Politics, Vol. 47 No. 3 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vgl. Schmitter, A Revised Theory (wie Anm. 9), S. 235ff.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vgl. Karl W. Deutsch u.a., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area — International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, Princeton 1957; Haas, The Uniting of Europe (wie Anm. 4); Schmitter, A Revised Theory (wie Anm. 9); Nye, Comparing Common Markets (wie Anm. 10).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Deutsch u.a., Political Community (wie Anm. 35), S. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vgl. Amitai Etzioni, Political Unification — A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces, New York 1965;

    Google Scholar 

  43. Haas, The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950–1957, Stanford 1958; Schmitter, A Revised Theory (wie Anm. 9); Nye, Comparing Common Markets (wie Anm. 10);

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ronald Inglehart, The Silent Revolution, Princeton 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Deutsch u.a., Political Community (wie Anm. 35), S. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ebd. S. 47f. und S. 85f.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vgl. Werner J. Feld, Sociological Theories of European Integration, in: Hans J. Michelmann/Panayotis Soldatos (eds), European Integration. Theories and Approaches, Lanham 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Inglehart, The Silent Revolution (siehe Anm. 37).

    Google Scholar 

  49. R. Inglehart/J.-R. Rabier/K. Reif, The Evolution of Public Attitudes Toward Integration: 1970–1986, in: Journal of European Integration, Vol. 10, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vgl. Richard C. Eichenberg/Russel J. Dalton, Europeans and the European Community: the dynamics of public support for European integration, in: International Organization, Vol. 47 No. 4 (1995), S. 528ff.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vgl. Armin von Bogdandy, Supranationale Union als neuer Herrschaftstypus. Entstaatlichung und Vergemeinschaftung in staatstheoretischer Perspektive, in: Integration, Nr. 4, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ernest Wistrich, The United States of Europe, London 1994, S. 102f.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zur Legitimationsproblematik vgl. insbesondere: Peter Graf Kielmannsegg, Integration und Demokratie, in: Markus Jachtenfuchs/Beate Kohler-Koch (Hrsg.), Europäische Integration, Opladen 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vgl. Lawrance J. Sharpe, British Scepticism and the European Community. A Guide for Foreigners, unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, Oxford 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vgl. Richard Münch, Das Projekt Europa. Zwischen Nationalstaat, regionaler Autonomie und Weltgesellschaft, Frankfurt a. M. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Haas, The Uniting of Europe (wie Anm. 37), S. 313.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Vgl. Schmitter, A Revised Theory (wie Anm. 9), S. 249; Nye, Comparing Common Markets (wie Anm. 10), S. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Dorette Corbey, Dialectical Functionalism. Stagnation as a Booster of European Integration, in: International Organization, Vol. 49 No. 2, 1995, S. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Vgl. Schmitter, A Revised Theory (wie Anm. 9), S. 253f.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Wincott, Institutional Interaction (wie Anm. 19).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sandholtz/Zysman, Recasting the European Bargain (wie Anm. 11).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Anne-Marie Burley/Walter Mattli, Europe before the Court. A Political Theory of Legal Integration, in: International Organization, Vol. 47 No. 1, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Pierson, The Path to European Integration (wie Anm. 23).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Vgl. z. B. Mary Troy Johnston, The European Council. Gatekeeper of the European Community, Boulder 1994;

    Google Scholar 

  65. Fiona Hayes-Renshaw/Helen Wallace, The Council of Ministers, London 1996;

    Google Scholar 

  66. Martin Westlake, The Commission and the Parliament. Rivals or Partners in the European Policy-Making Process?, London 1994;

    Google Scholar 

  67. Joseph H.H. Weiler, Journey to an Unkown Destination: A Retrospective and Prospective of the European Court of Justice in the Arena of Political Integration, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 31, 1993, S. 417–446.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Moravcsik, Preferences and Power (wie Anm. 13), S. 499ff.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Fritz W. Scharpf, Politische Optionen im vollendeten Binnenmarkt, in: Jachtenfuchs/ Kohler-Koch (Hrsg.), Europäische Integration, Opladen 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Schmitter, A Revised Theory (wie Anm. 9); Nye, Comparing Common Markets (wie Anm. 10).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tranholm-Mikkelsen, Neo-functionalism (wie Anm. 3).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Klaus Busch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Essen, Deutschland

    Wilfried Loth (Professor für Neuere Geschichte, ehem. Präsident des Kulturwissenschaftlichen Instituts Essen) (Professor für Neuere Geschichte, ehem. Präsident des Kulturwissenschaftlichen Instituts Essen)

  2. Universität zu Köln, Deutschland

    Wolfgang Wessels (Professor für Politikwissenschaft) (Professor für Politikwissenschaft)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Leske + Budrich, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Busch, K. (2001). Politikwissenschaftliche Integrationstheorien in Interaktion. Der synoptische Ansatz II. In: Loth, W., Wessels, W. (eds) Theorien europäischer Integration. Grundlagen für Europa, vol 7. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94969-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94969-1_10

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-2886-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-94969-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation