Abstract
This chapter discusses gender issues in design of information technology: are there gender issues, and what could they be? It is relatively easy to apply a gender perspective to the result of design: the artifact. Artifacts are designed to communicate with gender stereotypes in contemporary society (including stereotypes of work). Applying gender perspectives to artifacts is not very different from other kinds of social analysis of use activities or artifacts in context. Applying a gender perspective to the design process is more difficult. Some aspects of design can, however, benefit from such analysis: the ideas and visions that guide the design process come from someone who has gender. I do not claim that women software designers always design different software from their male colleagues. However, the design process will benefit from having different sets of experiences as a basis for ideas and visions. These ideas were presented in a plenary lecture at ifu.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbate, Janet (1994). The Internet Challenge. In: Summerton, Jane (ed.): Changing Large Technical Systems. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, pp. 193–210.
Akrich, Madeleine (1992). The De-Scription of Technical Objects, In: Bijker, Wiebe E. & Law, John (eds). Shaping Technology/Building Society. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Bjerknes, Gro & Bratteteig, Tone (1988). Computers — Utensils or Epaulets? The Application Perspective Revisited. In: AI and Society, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 258–266.
Bratteteig, Tone (forthcoming). Making change. Working in and between design and use in systems development. Thesis, Department of Informatics, University of Oslo.
Bratteteig, Tone & Stolterman, Erik (1997). Design in groups — and all that jazz. In: Kyng, Morten & Mathiassen, Lars (eds). Computers and Design in Context. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, pp. 289–316.
Bratteteig, Tone & Verne, Guri (1997). Feminist or merely critical? In search of a Gender Perspective in Informatics. In: Moser, Ingunn & Aas, Gro Hanne (eds.) Technology and Democracy — Comparative Perspectives. Workshop on “Gender, Technology and politics in transition?”, Jan. 17–19, Oslo: TMV, pp. 59–74.
Bowker, Geoffrey C. & Star, S. Leigh (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Cockburn, Cynthia (1985). Machinery of Dominance: Women, Men and Technical Know-how. London: Pluto Press.
Cockburn, Cynthia & Ormrod, Sue (1994). Masculinity and Technology — Making Meaning, Giving Value, Achieving Dominance. In: Gunnarson, Ewa & Trojer, Lena (eds.). Feminist Voices on Gender, Technology and Ethics. Luleå: Centre of Women’s Studies, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, pp. 122–131.
Cross, Nigel; Christiaans, Henri & Dorst, Kees (1997). Analysing Design Activity. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Dourish, Paul & Button, Graham (1998). Technomethodology: Paradoxes and Possibilities. Proceedings of CHI’96. ACM SIGCHI, New York, pp. 19–26.
Haraway, Donna J. (1991): A Cyborg Manifesto. In: Haraway, Donna J.: Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Assoc. Books.
Huff, Charles W. & Cooper, Joel (1987): Sex Bias in Educational Software: The Effect of Designers’ Stereotypes on the Software They Design. In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17:6, pp. 519–532.
Latour, Bruno (1996): Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Laurel, Brenda (2001): Utopian Entrepreneur, Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Mörtberg, Christina (1997): “Det beror på att man är kvinna …” Gränsvandrerskor formas och formar informationsteknologi (“It’s because one is a woman …” Transgressors are shaped and shape information technology), PhD. Thesis, Department of Work Science: Gender and Technique, University of Luleâ.
Orlikowski, Wanda J. (1992): Learning from Notes. In: Proceedings of CSCW’92 ACM, pp. 362–369.
Star, S. Leigh & Ruhleder, Karen (1994): Steps Towards an Ecology of Infrastructure: Complex Problems in Design and Access for Large-Scale Collaborative Systems. In: Proceedings of the CSCW ’94, ACM, pp. 253–264.
Suchman, Lucy A. (1994): Do Categories Have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, vol. 2 no 3, pp. 177–190.
Turkle, Sherry & Papert, Seymour (1990): Epistemological Pluralism: Styles and Voices within the Computer Culture. Sign, Autumn 1990.
Wajcman, Judy (1991): Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Waldén, Louise (1994): “Those living sewing machines...” or Is Male to Female as Technology to Humanism. In: Gunnarson, Ewa & Trojer, Lena (eds): Feminist Voices on Gender, Technology and Ethics. Centre of Women’s Studies, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, pp. 32–42.
Winograd, Terry (ed.) (1996): Bringing Design to Software. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bratteteig, T. (2002). Bringing Gender Issues to Technology Design. In: Floyd, C. (eds) Feminist Challenges in the Information Age. Schriftenreihe der internationalen Frauenuniversität »Technik und Kultur«, vol 5. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94954-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94954-7_8
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-3255-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-94954-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive