Advertisement

Grundformen hierarchischer Koordination

  • Peter-J. Jost
Chapter
  • 186 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Das 20. Jahrhundert war lange Zeit geprägt von unzähligen Kontroversen über die Vor- und Nachteile der kapitalistischen Marktwirtschaft gegenüber dem kommunistischen Wirtschaftssystem. Auf der einen Seite stand die Anreiz- und Selektionsfunktion des privatwirtschaftlichen Tauschs, auf der anderen Seite die Planungsund Steuerungsfunktion der zentralen Planungsbehörde. Die osteuropäischen Revolutionen Anfang der 90er Jahre und die seither in Gang gesetzten Transformationsprozesse in den ehemals kommunistischen Ländern haben diesen Debatten ein Ende gesetzt: Das kommunistische System der Planwirtschaft ist zusammengebrochen und wurde vom kapitalistischen System der Marktwirtschaft abgelöst.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturhinweise

  1. Brickley, J., C. Smith und J. Zimmerman. 1997. Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture. Burr Ridge, Ill.: Irwin.Google Scholar
  2. Nordsieck, F. 1934. Grundlagen der Organisationslehre. Stuttgart: Poeschel.Google Scholar
  3. Porter, M. 1985. Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hammer, M. and J. Champy. 1993. Reengineering the Corporation. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  5. Lawrence, P. and J. Lorsch. 1967. Organization and Environment. Boston, Ma.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Filley, A., R. House and S. Kerr. 1976. Managerial Process and Organizational Behavior. Glenview, Ill.: Scott.Google Scholar
  7. Dietl, H. 1993. Institutionenund Zeit. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, G. and K. Murphy. 1992. The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Economics 57:1137–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang, X. and J. Borland. 1991. A Microeconomic Mechanism for Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy 99:460–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bulow, J., J. GEANAKOPLOS und P. KLEMPERER. 1985. Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements. Journal of Political Economy 93:488–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole. 1986. Dynamic Models of Oligopoly. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts. 1992. Economics,Organization, and Management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Herzberg, F. 1974. Work and the Nature of Man. London: Granada Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Herzberg, F. B. Mousener and B. Synderman. 1959. The Motivation to Work. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Myers, M. 1964. Who are your motivated workers? Harvard Business Review 42:73–88.Google Scholar
  16. Kanter, R. 1983. The Change Masters. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Manz, C. and H. Sims. 1987. Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 32:106–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bowen, D. and E. Lawler III. 1995. Empowering Service Employees. Sloan Management Review 36:73–84.Google Scholar
  19. Boyett, J. and H. Conn. 1992. Workplace 2000: The Revolution Reshaping American Business. New York: Pinguin.Google Scholar
  20. Hammer, M. and J. Champy. 1993. Reengineering the Corporation. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  21. Pinchot, G. and E. Pinchot. 1993. The End of Bureaucracy and the Rise of the Intelligent Organization. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  22. Jensen, M. and W. Meckling. 1995. Specific and General Knowledge, and Organizational Structure. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 8:4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dalton, M. 1950. Conflicts between Staff and Line Managerial Officers. AmericanSocological Review 15:81–90.Google Scholar
  24. Golembiewski, R. 1967. Organizing Men and Power: Pattern of Behavior and Line-Staff-Models. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  25. Ames, C. 1963. Payoff from Product Management. Harvard Business Review 41:141–148.Google Scholar
  26. Luck, D. and T. Nowack. 1965. Product Management — Vision Unfulfilled. Harvard Business Review 43:143–154.Google Scholar
  27. Davis, S. and P. Lawrence. 1977. Matrix. Reading, Ma.: Addision Wesley.Google Scholar
  28. Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, K., S. Harkins und B. Latane. 1979. Identifiability as a Deterrent to Social Loafing: Two Cheering Experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40:303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. George, J. 1992. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Origins of Perceived Social Loafing in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 35:191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. A Synthesis of the Research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. March, J. and H. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Luhmann, N. 1968. Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  34. Gutenberg, E. 1951. Grundlagen der Betriebswirtschaftslehre Bd.1: Die Produktion. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Seiwert, L. 1979. Das Substitutionsgesetz der Organisation. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium WiSt 8:76–78.Google Scholar
  36. Weimer, T. 1988. Das Substitutionsgesetz der Organisation. Eine theoretischeFundierung. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  37. Weitzmann, M. 1980. The Ratchet Principle and Performance Incentives. Bell Journal of Economics 11:302–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Osborne, M. and A. Rubinstein. 1990. Bargaining and Markets. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Shaw, M. 1932. A Comparison of Individual and Small Groups in the Rational Solution of Complex Problems. American Journal of Psychology 44:491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ziller, R. 1957. Group Size: A Determinant of the Quality and Stability of Group Decisions. Sociometry 20:165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Katzenbach, J. and D. Smith 1993. The Wisdom of Teams. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mueller, D. 1979. Public Choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Buchanan, J. and G. Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jost, P.-J. 1998b. Strategisches Konfliktmanagement in Organisationen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  45. Arrow, K. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Schmalenbach, E. 1948. Kostenrechnung und Preispolitik. Köln: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  47. Horngreen, C. and G. Forster. 1991. Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  48. Zimmerman, J. 1995. Accounting for Decision Making and Control. Burr Ridge, Ill.: Irwin.Google Scholar
  49. Ewert, R. and A. Wagenhofer. 1997. Interne Unternehmensrechnung. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Holmstrom, B. and J. Tirole. 1991. Transfer-Pricing and Organizational Form. Journal of Law,Economics, and Organizations 7:201–228.Google Scholar
  51. Laux, H. and F. Liermann 1993. Grundlagen der Organisation. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. Radner, R. 1975. A behavioral model of cost reduction. Bell Journal of Economics 6:196–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Radner, R. and M. Rothschild. 1975. On the allocation of effort. Journal of Economic Theory 10:358–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Keren, M. and D. Levhari. 1983. The internal organization of the firm and the shape of average costs. Bell Journal of Economics 14:474–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Geanakoplos, J. and P. Milgrom. 1991. A Theory of Hierarchies Based on Limited Managerial Attention. Journal of the Japenese and International Economy 5:205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williamson, O. 1967. Hierarchical Control and Optimum Firm Size. Journal of Political Economy 75:123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Kennedy, P. 1994. Information Processing and Organization Design. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25:37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Beckmann, M. 1988. TinbergenLectures on Organization Theory. Berlin: Spinger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Frese, E. and A. Werder 1993. Zentralbereiche. Organistorische Formen und Effizienzbeurteilung. In E. Frese, A. v. Werder and W. Maly, Zentralbereiche und praktische Erfahrungen. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  61. Taylor, F. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. In F. Taylor, Scientific Management. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  62. Fayol, H. 1916. AdministrationIndustrielle et Générale. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  63. Anthony, R. 1965. Planning and Control Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Albach, H. 1967: Die Koordination der Planung im Großunternehmen. In E. Schneider, Rationale Wirtschaftspolitik und Planung in der Wirtschaft von heute. Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik Bd. 45. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  65. Galbraith J. and R. Kazanjian. 1986. Strategy Implementation: The Role of Structure and Process. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Galbraith, J. 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, Ma.: Addision Wesley.Google Scholar
  67. Galbraith, J. 1977. Organization Design. Reading, Ma.: Addision Wesley.Google Scholar
  68. Stinchcombe, A. 1990. Information and Organizations. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  69. Marschak, J. and R. Radner. 1972. Economic Theory of Teams. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Menard, C. 1996a. Inside the Black Box: The Variety of Hierarchical Forms. In J. Groenewegen, Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  71. Menard, C. 1996b. Transaction cost economics. Northhampton, Ma.: Elgar.Google Scholar
  72. Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. A Synthesis of the Research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  73. Duncan, R. 1979. What is the Right Organization Structure? Decision Tree Analysis Provides the Answer. Organizational Dynamics 12:59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Leavitt, H. and T. Whisler. 1958. Management in the 1980’s. Harvard Business Review 36:41–48.Google Scholar
  75. Davenport, T. and J. Short. 1990. The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign. Sloan Management Review 32:11–27.Google Scholar
  76. Davenport, T. 1993. Process Innovation - Reengineering Work through Information Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  77. Venkatraman, N. 1994. IT-Enabled Business Transformation: From Automation to Scope Redefintion. Sloan Management Review 35:73–87.Google Scholar
  78. Stinchcombe, A. 1990. Information and Organizations. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  79. Arrow, K. 1974. The Limits ofOrganization. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler GmbH, Wiesbaden 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter-J. Jost
    • 1
  1. 1.Wissenschaftlichen Hochschule für Unternehmensführung (WHU) in KoblenzVallendarDeutschland

Personalised recommendations