Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Konsensus, methodologische Verfahrensweisen und die Trivialisierbarkeit von Entscheidungen im Forschungsprozeß

  • Chapter
Wissenschaftssoziologie

Zusammenfassung

Drei Ansätze beherrschen die empirisch-soziologischen Analysen des Wissenschaftssystems: Untersuchungen der normativen und sozialen Struktur von Wissenschaftlergemeinden (z. B. Hagstrom 1965; Cole und Cole 1967; 1968; Crane 1965; 1969; Zuckerman 1967; Blume und Sinclair 1974); Untersuchungen der organisatorischen Bedingungen wissenschaftlicher Produktivität und Kreativität (z. B. Marcson 1960; Kornhauser 1962; Pelz und Andrews 1966; Gordon und Marquis 1966; Saxberg und Slocum 1968; Smith 1970; 1971; Benson 1973); und historisch soziologische Fallstudien über die Entwicklung und Institutionalisierung wissenschaftlicher Disziplinen und Spezialgebiete (Mullins 1972; Cardwell 1972; Ben-David und Collins 1974; Lemaine 1975; Mulkay und Edge 1973; Stehr 1973).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Benutzte Bibliographie

  • Ben-David, Joseph, und R. Collins, Soziale Faktoren im Ursprung einer neuen Wissenschaft: der Fall der Psychologie, in: Wissenschaftssoziologie I I, P. Weingart(Hrsg.), Frankfurt am Main, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Kenneth J.,The Analysis of Bureaucratic-Professional Conflict: Functional versus Dialecti-cal Approaches, in: The Sociological Quarterly 14 (1973), S. 376–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, Stuart S., und Ruth Sinclair, Aspects of the Structure of a Scientific Discipline, in: Social Process of Scientific Development, R. Whitley ( Hrsg. ), London 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell, D. S. L.,The Organisation of Science in England, London 1972 (revised edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Diana,Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A Study of Productivity and Recognition, in: American Sociological Review 30 (1965), S. 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Diana Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the „Invisible College“ Hypothesis, in: American Sociological Review 34 (1969), S. 335–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Stephen,und Jonathan R. Cole,Scientific Outputs and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science, in: American Sociological Review 32 (1967), S. 377— 3 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, Stephen,und Jonathan R. Cole, Visibility and the Structural Bases of Scientific Resarch, in: American Sociological Review 33 (1968), S. 397–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan,Social Structure and Science Structure, Paper presented at the Institute for Advanced Studies, Guest Lecture, Wien 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, J. C.,Secretiveness and Competition for Priority of Discovery in Physics, in: Minerva 9 (1971), S. 472–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Gerald,und Sue Marquis,Freedom, Visibility of Consequences and Scientific Innovation, in: American Journal of Sociology 72 (1966), S. 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen,Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie, Frankfurt am Main 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom,Warren A., The Scientific Community, New York 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson L. Contrary Imaginations, London 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson L. Frames of Mind, London 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, William, Scientists in Industry, Verley: University of California Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn Thomas S. The History of Science, in: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Bd. 14 (1968), S. 74–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago 1962; Zweite erw. Aufl., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers Cornelis J., Mono- and Polyparadigmatic Developments in Natural and Social Sciences, in: Social Process of Scientific Development, R. Whitley (Hrsg.), London 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemaine, G.,Les stratégies de recherche et la naissance d’une specialité: l’example des recherches sur le sommeil, in: Social and Cognitive Factors in the Emergence of Scientific Disciplines, C. Heller, G. Lemaine und R. MacLeod (Hrsg.), 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodahl, Janice Beyer,and Gerald Gordon,The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments, in: American Sociological Review 37 (1972), S. 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcson, Simon,The Scientist in American Industry, Princeton, N. J.: Industrial Relation Section, Princeton University, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins Nicholas C. The Development of a Scientific Speciality: The Phage Group and the Origins of Molecular Biology, in: Minerva, 10 (1972), S. 51–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay M. J., und D. O. Edge, Cognitive, Technical and Social Factors in the Emergence of Radio Astronomy, in: Information sur les Sciences Sociales 12 (1973), S. 25–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelz, Donaldund Frank M. Andrews, Scientists in Organizations, New York 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • SandküH. J. (Hrsg.), Marxistische Wissenschaftstheorie. Studien zur Einführung in ihren Forschungsbereich, Frankfurt am Main 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxberg Borje O., and John W. Slocum, The Management of Scientific Manpower, in: Management Science 14 (1968), S. 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Clagett G, Consultation and Decision Process in a Research and Development Laboratory, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 15 (1970), S. 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Clagett G Scientific Performance and the Composition of Research Teams, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 16 (1971), S. 486–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, Nico, Paradigmatic Crystallization: Patterns of Interrelations Among Areas of Competence in Sociology, in: Social Science Information, 13 (1973), S. 119–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storer, Norman W. The Hard Sciences and the Soft: Some Sociological Observations, in: Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 86 (1967), S. 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, Stephen Edelston, The Uses of Argument, London 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard, Cognitive and Social Institutionalization of Scientific Specialities and Research Areas, in: Social Process of Scientific Development, R. Whitley, (Hrsg.), London 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Harriet, Novel Laureates in Science: Patterns of Productivity, Collaboration and Authorship, in: American Sociological Review 32 (1967), S. 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Harriet, and Robert K. Merton, Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, Structure and Functions of the Referee System, in: Minerva 9 (1971), S. 66–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Karin D. Knorr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Nico Stehr René König

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knorr, K.D. (1975). Konsensus, methodologische Verfahrensweisen und die Trivialisierbarkeit von Entscheidungen im Forschungsprozeß. In: Stehr, N., König, R. (eds) Wissenschaftssoziologie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94332-3_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94332-3_15

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-11326-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-94332-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation