Zusammenfassung
Entsprechend den Empfehlungen, die 1967 von der “President’s Commission” zur Problematik von Jugenddelinquenz und Jugendkriminalität vorgelegt wurden, entwickelte sich das Konzept der Diversion in den Vereinigten Staaten zu einer nationalen Reformstrategie mit dem Ziel, Prävention und Kontrolle von Jugenddelinquenz sicherzustellen. Diversion sollte dazu beitragen, die Kontakte von -jugendlichen Delinquenten mit dem formellen Jugendgerichtssystem zu reduzieren. Dies sollte entweder dadurch erreicht werden, daß betreffende Jugendliche an Einrichtungen überwiesen werden, die nicht Bestandteil des Jugendgerichtssystem sind, oder auch dadurch, daß gegenüber solchen Jugendlichen mit informellen Maßnahmen seitens des Jugendgerichtspersonals reagiert wird. Diversionsmaßnahmen können dabei an beliebiger Stelle zwischen Festnahme eines Jugendlichen, Überstellung an das Jugendgericht und richterlichem Urteil zur Anwendung kommen. Die finanzielle Unterstützung derartiger Maßnahmen durch die “Law Enforcement Assistance Administration” führte zu einer staatenübergreifenden explosionsartigen Ausbreitung von Diversionsprogrammen.
Übersetzung und redaktionelle Bearbeitung: Norbert Herriger und Peter Malinowski
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Black, D./Reiss, A., Police control of juveniles. In: Americain Sociological Review, 15/1970, S. 63–77
Blomberg, T., Diversion and accelerated social control. In: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 68/1977, S. 274–282
Blomberg, T., Widening the net: An anomaly in the evaluation of diversion programs. In: Klein, M./Teilmann, K. (eds.), Handbook of Criminal Justice Evaluation, Beverly Hills, California, Sage Publications, 1980
Bohnstedt, R., Answers to three questions about juvenile diversion. In: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 1978
Cicourel, A., The social organization of juvenile justice, New York, John Wiley, 1968
Ferdinand, T./Luchterhand, E., Inner city youth, the police, the juvenile court and justice. In: Social Problems, 18/ 1962, S. 510–527
Fishman, R., Criminal recidivism in New York City: An evaluation of the impact of rehabilitation and diversion services, New York, Praeger, 1977
Gold, M./Williams, J., The effect of getting caught. Apprehension of the juvenile offenders as a cause of subsequent delinquencies. In: Prospectus, 3/1969, S. 1–12
Goldman, N., The differential selection of juvenile offenders for court appearance, National Council on Crime and Delinquency, Washington D.C., 1963
Hackler, J., Logical reasoning versus unanticipated consequences: Diversion programs as an illustration, Ottawa Law Review, 1976
Hagan, J., The labeling perspective, the delinquent, and the police. In: Canadian Journal of Criminology and Corrections, 14/1972, S. 150–165
Hylton, J., Community corrections and social control: A Canadian perspective, Vortrag vor dem 110. Kongress der ‘American Correctional Association’, mimeo, 1980
Klein, M., Alternative dispositions for juvenile offenders, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif., 1975
Klein, M., Pivotal ingredients of.police juvenile diversion programs, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif., 1975
Klein, M., Deinstitutionalization and diversion of juvenile offenders: A litany of impediments. In: Morris, N./Tonry, M. (eds.), Crime and Justice, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1979
Kutchins, H./Kutchins, S., Pretrial diversionary programs: New expansion of law enforcement activity camouflaged as rehabilitation, Vortrag vor der Versammlung der Pacific Sociological Association1 in Hawaii, 1975
Mahoney, A.R., The effect of labeling upon youths in the juvenile justice system: A review of the evidence. In: Law and Society Review, 8/1974, S. 583–614
Martinson, R., What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. In: The Public Interest, 1974
Mattingly, J./Katkin, D., The Youth Sercice Bureau: A reinvented wheel? Vortrag vor der Versammlung der ‘Society for the study of social problems’, San Francisco, 1975
McEachern, A.W./Bauzer, R., Factors related to disposition in juvenile police contacts. In: Klein, M/Myeroff, B. (eds.), Juvenile gangs in context, New Jersey, Prentice Hall, 1967, S. 148–160
Palmer, S., Martinson revisited. In: Crime and delinquency, 1976
Piliavin, I./Briar, S., Police encounters with juveniles. In: American Journal of Sociology, 70/1964, S. 206–214
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice/National Crime Commission, Task force report: Juvenile Delinquency and Youth Crime, Washington D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice/National Crime Commission, The challenge of crime in a free society, Washington D.C.,.U.S. Government Printing Office, ‘1967
Public System Inc., California correctional system intake study, Sunnyvale, California, 1974
Sarri, R., Juvenile aid panels: An alternative to juvenile court processing. In: Brantigham, S. /Blomberg, T. (eds.): Courts and Diversion: Policy and operation studies, Beverly Hills, Calif., Stage Publications, 1979
State of California/Department of the Youth Authority: The evaluation of juvenile diversion programs: Survey of Diversion programs, Sacramento, Calif., November 1975
State of California/Department of the Youth Authority, The evaluation of juvenile diversion programs: First Annual Report, Sacramento, Calif., September 1975
Terry, R., Discrimination in the handling of juvenile offenders by social control agencies. In: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 4/1967, S. 218–230”
Thomas, C./Sieverdes, Ch., Juvenile court intake: An analysis of discretionary decision-making. In: Criminology, 12/ 1975, S. 413–432
Thornberry, T., Punishment and crime, the effect of legal dispositions on subsequent criminal behaviour, unveröffentlichte Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1971
Thornberry, T., Race, socio-economic status and sentencing in the juvenile justice system. In: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64/1973, S. 90–98
Tittle, CR., Book review of R. Fishman 1977 Criminal Recidivism in New York City. In: Contemporary Sociology, 1979
Vorenberg, E./Vorenberg, J., Early diversion from the criminal justice system: Practice in search of a theory. In: Ohlin, K. (ed.), Prisoners in America, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice Hall, 1973
Ward, R.H., The labeling theory: A critical Analysis. In: Criminology, 9/1971
Wellford, Ch., Labeling theory and criminology. In: Social Problems, 22/1975, S. 332–345
Williams, J./Gold, M., From delinquent behaviours to official delinquency. In: Social Problems, 20/1972, S. 209–227
Wilson, M., What works? Revisited. In: The Public Interest, 1980
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blomberg, T.G., Blomberg, R.J. (1985). Die Ausdehnung des Netzes sozialer Kontrolle durch Diversion. In: Brusten, M., Herriger, N., Malinowski, P. (eds) Entkriminalisierung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93565-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93565-6_5
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-11756-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-93565-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive