Skip to main content
  • 302 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Henderson, M. E., Morris, L. L., and Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1987). How to measure attitudes. In J. L. Herman (Ed.), Program evaluation kit ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. L., Morris, L. L., and Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1987). Evaluator’s handbook. In J. L. Herman (Ed.), Program evaluation kit ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. A., Morris, L. L., and Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1987). How to assess program implementation. In J. L. Herman (Ed.), Program evaluation kit ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. I. (1987). Diagnosing organizations (Applied Social Research Methods, 8 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. A., Morris, L. L., and Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1987). How to assess program implementation. In J. L. Herman (Ed.), Program evaluation kit ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, J., and Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. (1986). The whole is greater: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in evaluation studies. New Directions For Program Evaluation: Naturalistic Evaluation, 30, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarz, D. (1985). Quality and quantity in evaluation research: A divergent view. Evaluation and Program Planning, 8 (4), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannen, J. (Ed.). (1992). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. Brookfield, VT: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Jr., Cook, T. D., and Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Counseling Association/Association for Assessment in Counseling. (1991). Responsibilities of users of standardized tests. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbum, N. M., and Sudman, S. (1979). Improving interview method and questionnaire design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of fair testing practices for education. (1988). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, Joint Committee on Testing Practices.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., and Zaal, J. N. (Eds.). (1991). Advances in educational and psychological testing. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K., and Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19 (4), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J., and Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research (Qualitative Research Methods Series, 1 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M., and Goetz, J. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions For Program Evaluation: Naturalistic Evaluation, 30, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L. (Ed.). (1989). Educational measurement. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., and Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20 (8), 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. L., Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., and Lindheim, E. (1987). How to measure performance and use tests. In J. L. Herman (Ed.), Program evaluation kit ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Principles for fair student assessment practices for education in Canada. (1993). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: University of Alberta, Centre for Research in Applied Measurement and Evaluation, Joint Advisory Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Jr., Cook, T. D., and Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S., and Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Asking questions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Counseling Association/Association for Assessment in Counseling. (1991). Responsibilities of users of standardized tests. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K., and Zaal, J. N. (Eds.). (1991). Advances in educational and psychological testing. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, K., and Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19 (4), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, J., and Miller, M. L. (1986). Reliability and validity in qualitative research (Qualitative Research Methods Series, 1 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. and Goetz, J. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., and Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions For Program Evaluation: Naturalistic Evaluation, 30, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. L. (Ed.). (1989). Educational measurement. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (1990). Design sensitivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. L., Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., and Lindheim, E. (1987). How to measure performance and use tests. In J. L. Herman (Ed.), Program evaluation kit (2° ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Jr., Cook, T. D., and Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., and Webb, N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1975). Audit of evaluation. In S. B. Anderson, et al. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of educational evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, K. D., and Glass, G. V. (1978). Basic statistics for the behavioral sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. T. (1975). Quality control. In S. B. Anderson, et al. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of educational evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S., and Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic data collection (Qualitative Research Methods, 10 ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D. (1989). Multilevel analysis of educational data. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., and Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., and Erlebacher, A. (1975). How regression artifacts in quasi-experimental evaluations can mistakenly make compensatory education look harmful. In M. Guttentag and E. L. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. S. (1985). The elements of graphing data. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., and Morris, L. L. (1987). How to analyze data. In J. L. Herman (Ed.), Program evaluation kit ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freed, M. N., Ryan, J. M., and Hess, R. K. (1991). Handbook of statistical procedures and computer applications to education and the behavioral sciences. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H. (1987). Multilevel models in educational and social research. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, K. D., and Glass, G. V. (1978). Basic statistics for the behavioral sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, R. M. (1991). Statistics: A spectator sport. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Experimental Education. (1993). The role of statistical significance testing in contemporary social science: A special issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (1992). Misuse of ANCOVA and related „statistical control“ procedures. Reading Psychology, 13(1), iii-xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, W. (1991). Research methods in education ( 5th ed. ). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, B. F., and Miller, W. L. (1992). Doing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N. G., and Lee, R. M. (1991). Using computers in qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M., and Goetz, J. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leninger, M. (Ed.). (1985). Qualitative research methods in nursing. Orlando, FL: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A source book of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. In J. L. Herman (Ed.), Program evaluation kit ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods ( 2nd ed. ). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1991). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, M., and Papagiannis, M. (1990). Do’s and don’ts for offering effective recommendations. Evaluation Practice, 11 (2), 121–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. F. (1989). Evaluability assessment: A practical approach. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1976). Evaluation bias and its control. In G. V. Glass (Ed.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 1 ). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwandt, T. A., and Halpern, E. S. (1988). Linking auditing and meta-evaluation: Enhancing quality in applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stufflebeam, D. L. (1974). Metaevaluation. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, The Evaluation Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen, B. R., and Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

James R. Sanders

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Leske + Budrich, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanders, J.R. (2000). Genauigkeitsstandards. In: Sanders, J.R. (eds) Handbuch der Evaluationsstandards. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93234-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-93234-1_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-2766-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-93234-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics