Skip to main content

Morphological Deficits in Aphasia: Problems of Representation, Access or Integration?

  • Chapter
Linguistics and Cognitive Neuroscience

Part of the book series: Linguistische Berichte ((LINGB))

  • 54 Accesses

Abstract

A considerable amount of recent work in aphasia has focused on one particular “type” of aphasic deficit known as “agrammatism”. Agrammatism is typically characterised in terms of the speech output of the patient. If an aphasic patient produces slow, hesitant, syntactically simple speech which contains very few grammatical morphemes, then this patient is usually given the label “agrammatic”. Although there has been considerable debate as to whether agrammatism constitutes a distinct syndrome, this issue remains unresolved (cf. Caramazza 1984). However, the label continues to be used as a useful way of describing the general characteristics of the speech output of certain patients, although it currently carries little explanatory weight.

I thank DE and JG for their patience at enduring so many years of testing, Mary Cooke for carrying out many of the studies reported here, and the MRC (UK) for their generous support over the years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bates, E. & B. Wulfeck (1989): “Crosslinguistic studies of aphasia”. In: B. MacWhinney & E. Bates, eds., The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M, L. Nickels & S. Byng (1992): “Patterns of sentence processing deficits: Processing simple sentences can be a complex matter”. Journal of Neurolinguistics 6, 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. (1982): The TROG: Test for the reception of grammar. Medical Research Council, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D., M. Garrett & E. Zurif (1980): “Syntactic deficits in Broca’s aphasia”. In: D. Caplan, ed., Biological studies of mental processes. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byng, S. (1988): “Sentence processing deficits: Theory and therapy”. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5 (6), 629–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A. (1984): “The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification”. Brain and Language 21, 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. & E. Zurif (1983): “Aphasia: Information processing in language production and reception”. In: B. Butterworth, ed., Language Production, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodglass, H. & E. Kaplan (1983): The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarmann, H.J. & H. Kolk (1991): “Syntactic priming in Broca’s aphasics: Evidence for slow activation”. Aphasiology 5 (3), 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1987): “Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition”. Cognition 25, 71–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W.D., L.K. Tyler, S. Waksler & L. Older (1994): “Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon”. Psychological Review 101 (1), 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marslen-Wilson, W.D. & A. Welsh (1978): “Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech”. Cognitive Psychology 10, 29–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. & J. Elman (1986): “The TRACE model of speech perception”. Cognitive Psychology 18, 1–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, G. & A. Caramazza (1988): “Dissociation of inflectional and derivational morphology”. Brain and Language 35, 24–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrin, R. & L.K. Tyler (1993): “Automatic access to lexical semantics in aphasia: Evidence from semantic and associative priming”. Brain and Language 45, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrin, R. & L.K. Tyler (1994): “Dissociations of lexical function: Semantics, syntax and morphology”. Cognitive Neuropsychology (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L.K. (1992): Spoken Language Comprehension: An experimental approach to disordered and normal processing. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L.K. & H. Cobb (1987): “Processing bound grammatical morphemes in context: The case of an aphasic patient”. Language and Cognitive Processes 2, 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L.K. & R. Ostrin (1994): The processing of simple and complex words in an agrammatic patient. Neuropsychologia (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, L.K., R. Ostrin, M. Cooke & H. Moss (1994): “Automatic access of lexical information in Broca’s aphasics: Against the automaticity hypothesis”. Brain and Language (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurif, E., A. Caramazza & R. Meyerson (1972): “Grammatical judgements of agrammatic aphasics”. Neuropsychology 10, 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tyler, L.K. (1994). Morphological Deficits in Aphasia: Problems of Representation, Access or Integration?. In: Hillert, D. (eds) Linguistics and Cognitive Neuroscience. Linguistische Berichte. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91649-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91649-5_11

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-91649-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics