Skip to main content

Modernity and Clarity

The Story of a Failed Romance

  • Chapter
Ambivalenz

Abstract

Ambivalence, ambiguity, equivocality ... These words convey the feeling of mystery and enigma; they also signal trouble, whose name is uncertainty, and a dismal state of mind, called indecision or hesitation. When we say that things or situations are ambivalent, what we mean is that we cannot be sure what is going to happen, and so neither know how to behave, nor can predict what the outcome of our actions will be. Instinctively or by learned habit, we dislike and fear ambivalence, that enemy of security and self-assurance. We are inclined to believe that we would feel much safer and more comfortable if situations were unambiguous — if it were clear what to do and certain what would happen if we do it.

They constantly try to escape From the darkness outside and within By dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good.

T.S. Eliot

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Arendt, Hannah, 1978: The Life of the Mind, Bd. 2: Willing. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baczko, Bronislaw, 1989: Utopians Lights. The Evolution of the Idea of Social Progress. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumeyat, M.F., 1987: The Sceptic in his Place and Time. S. 13–43 in: Richard H. Popkin und Charles Schmitt (Hg.): Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Wolfenbütteler Forschungen, Bd. 35. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Destutt de Tracy, Antione L., 1970: Elements d’idéologie, Bd. I. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund, 1973: Civilization and its Discontents. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Emmet, 1978: Destutt de Tracy and the Origins of “Ideology”. Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olaso, Ezequiel de, 1987: Leibniz and Scepticism. S. 133–168 in: Richard H. Popkin und Charles Schmitt (Hg.): Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Wolfenbütteler Forschungen, Bd. 35. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picavet, François, 1971: Les Idéologues. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Richard H., und Charles Schmitt, 1987: Introduction. S. 7–11 in: dies. (Hg.): Scepticism from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Wolfenbütteler Forschungen, Bd. 35. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Richard, 1979: The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley u.a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, Hans (Hg.), 1970: Kant’s Political Writings. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voegelin, Eric, 1975: From Enlightenment to Revolution. Durham, N. Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Leske + Budrich, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bauman, Z. (1997). Modernity and Clarity. In: Luthe, H.O., Wiedenmann, R.E. (eds) Ambivalenz. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91433-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91433-0_5

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-1913-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-91433-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics