Zusammenfassung
In 1935 there appeared a paper with the above title (Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen 1935) in The Physical Review. This paper was the outgrowth of a number of discussions held by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and myself at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. The purpose of the discussions was to help us understand the concepts and principles of quantum mechanics, and what we thought we understood troubled us. For the conclusion we reached in these discussions was that the answer to the above question is, “No”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Belinfante, F. J. 1973. A Survey of Hidden-Variables Theories, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Bell, J. S. 1971. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Proc. of Int. School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, B. d’Espagnat, ed., Course 49, p. 171, Academic Press, N.Y.
Bohm, D. and Aharonov, Y. 1957. Phys. Rev. 108, 1070.
Bohr, N. 1936. Phys. Rev. 48, 696.
Clauser, J. F. and Shimoni, A. 1978. Reports on Progress in Physics (to appear).
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. 1935. Phys. Rev. 47, 777.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosen, N. (1979). Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?. In: Aichelburg, P.C., Sexl, R.U. (eds) Albert Einstein. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91080-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91080-6_6
Publisher Name: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag
Print ISBN: 978-3-528-08425-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-91080-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive