Advertisement

Communication Network Liaisons as Cultural Interpreters for Organizational Adaptation in Japan-Europe Business Environments

Chapter
Part of the Journal of International Business book series (MIR)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose a design for organizational adaptation in foreign business environments from the view of network theories.

This study elaborates the role of liaisons as cultural interpreters who can coordinate two or more different cultural systems.

Keywords

Local Group Multinational Corporation Mutual Orientation Network Link Local Employee 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boisot, M., Convergence revisited: The codification and diffusion of knowledge in a British and a Japanese firm, Journal of Management Studies, 1, 1983, pp. 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bush, J. B./Frohman, A. L., Communication in a network organization, Organizational Dynamics, 20, 2, 1991, pp. 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chikudate, N. Cross-cultural analyses of cognitive systems in organizations: Acomparison between Japanese and American organizations, Management International Review, 31, 3, 1991, pp. 219–231.Google Scholar
  4. Daft, R. L./Weick, K. E., Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems, Academy of Management Review, 9, 2, 1984, pp. 284–295.Google Scholar
  5. Edstrom, A./Galbraith, J. R., Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 1977, pp. 248–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farace, R. V./Monge, P. R./Russell, H. M., Communicating and organizing, Random House, New York 1977.Google Scholar
  7. Farace, R. V./Taylor, J. A./Stewart, J. P., Criteria for evaluation of organizational communication effectiveness: Review and synthesis, in: Ruben, B. (Eds.), Communication Yearbook, 2, 1978, pp. 271–292.Google Scholar
  8. Fulk, J./ Boyd, B., Emerging theories of communication in organizations, Journal of Management, 17, 2, 1991, pp. 407–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gelbe, G., Segregation and intra-urban mobility of a high-status ethnic group: The case of the Japanese in D ü sseldorf, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 9, 4, 1986, pp. 461–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grove, C./Torbiorn, I., A New conceptualization of intercultural adjustment and the goals of training, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 1985, pp. 205–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gudykunst, W. B., Bridging difffferences: Effective intergroup communication, Sage, Newbury Park 1991.Google Scholar
  12. Hofstede, G., Culture’s consequences, Sage, Newbury Park 1984.Google Scholar
  13. Hofstede, G., Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, McGraw-Hills, London 1991.Google Scholar
  14. Industry Week, Myths about Japanese management, October 5, 1987, pp. 49–53.Google Scholar
  15. Johanson, J./Mattsson, L., Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: A network approach compared with the transaction-cost approach. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17, 1, 1987, pp. 34–48.Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell, J. C., Social network in urban situations, Manchester University Press, Manchester 1969.Google Scholar
  17. Nelson, R. E., Social networks and organizational interventions: Insight from an area-wide labormanagement committee, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 1986, pp. 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nelson, R. E., The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations, Academy of Management Journal, 32, 1989. pp. 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Omens, A./Jenner, S. R./Beatty, J. R., Intercultural perceptions in United States subsidiaries, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, II, 1987, pp. 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pearce, J. A./David, F. R., A social network approach to organizational design-performance, Academy of Management Review, 8, 3, 1983, pp. 436–444.Google Scholar
  21. Ross, I. C./Harary, F., Identification of the liaison persons of an organization: Using the structure matrix, Management Science, 1, 1955, pp. 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. SanAntonio, P. M., Social mobility and language use in an American company in Japan, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 1987, pp. 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. SanAntonio, P. M., Japanese and American communication at business meetings, Paper presented at the conference on Cumminication in Japan and the U.S. Sponsored by Intercultural Communication Division, Speech Communication Association, March 14–15, 1991, California State University at Fullerton, Fullterton, CA, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  24. Tichy, N. M./Fombrun, C., Network analysis in organizational settings, Human Relations, 32, 1979, pp. 923–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Torbiörn, I., Living abroad: Personal adjustment and personnel policy in overseas setting, Wiley, New York 1982.Google Scholar
  26. Wall Street Journal, American scholars in Japan are lured to more profitable careers in business, June 25, 1987, pp. 20.Google Scholar
  27. Weick, K., The social psychology of organizing,. McGraw-Hill, New York 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationAsia UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations