Advertisement

TAST — A System that Supports Group Authoring of Computer Manuals

  • Brigitte Endres-Niggemeyer
  • Alfred Kobsa
  • Paul Schmidt

Abstract

“Technical Authors’ Studio (TAST)” is meant to improve the working conditions and professional competence of technical writers and the quality of computer manuals by a software system which will provide a better knowledge support. The system is designed as a shell so that other areas of cooperative professional authoring can easily be catered for by integration of special knowledge bases.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, R.B. (1990) User Models: Theory, Method and Practice. In: International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 32, p. 511–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augustine, D. (1987) Writer’s helper (Software review). In: Computers and the humanities 21, p. 119–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bligh, D. (ed.) (1986) Teach Thinking Through Discussion. University of Surrey: Society for Research into Higher Education & NFER-NelsonGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockmann, R.J. (1990) Writing Better Computer User Documentation: From Paper to Hypertext. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  5. Dale, R. (1989) A Rule-Based Approach to Computer-Assisted Copy Editing. In: 2nd Computers and Writing Conference, Sheffield, July 1989Google Scholar
  6. Dale, R. (1990) Automating House Style. Paper presented at the BCS Conference on Aspects of Quality in Electronic Publishing. University of Kent at CanterburyGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis, C.A./ Gibbs, S.J./Rein, G.L. (1990) Design and Use of a Group Editor. In: Cockton, G. (ed.) Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers (North Holland)Google Scholar
  8. Ferraris, M./Caviglia, F./Degl’Innocenti, R. (1989) Word Prof: A Writing Environment on Computer. In:Educational Technology International (ETTI) 27/1, p. 33–42Google Scholar
  9. Fish, R.S./Kraut, R.E./Leland, M.D.P./Cohen, M. (1988) Quilt: A Collaborative Tool for Cooperative Writing. In: Allen, R.B. (ed.) Conference on Office Information Systems. ACM Press.Google Scholar
  10. Flower, L. (1985) Problem Solving Strategies for Writing. 2nd ed. San Diego: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirschmann, A. (1990) Das Hilfesystem MATHILDE: Ein intelligentes Hilfesystem ßr den graphisch orientierten Texteditor Comfo Tex auf der Basis von Dialoggeschichte und Auswertung von Benutzerplänen. Ph.D. Diss., Dept. of Humanities, Univ. of Regensburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  12. Horton, W. K.(1990) Designing & Writing Online Documentation. Help Files to Hypertext. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
  13. Hougthon-Alico, D. (1985) Creating Computer Software User Guides. New York: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
  14. Jensen, K. (1989) The Broad-Coverage Natural Language Analysis System. In: International Parsing Technologies Workshop 1989, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, August 1989. Carnegie- Mellon-Universityp, p. 425–441Google Scholar
  15. Kass, R./Finin, T. (1988) Modeling the User in Natural-Language Systems. In: Computational Linguistics 14, p. 5–22Google Scholar
  16. Kwasny, S.C./Sondheimer, N.K. (1981) Relaxation Theories for Parsing Ill-Formed Input. In: Computational Linguistics 7/2, p. 99–108Google Scholar
  17. Lang, S.M./Dürr, M (1991) Hypertext and Object Orientation: The Dual Approach. In: Appelrath, H.J. (ed.) Datenbanksysteme in Büro, Technik und Wissenschaft. Kaiserslautern: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  18. Lannon, J.M. (1985) Technical Writing. Boston: Little, Brown and CompanyGoogle Scholar
  19. Leland, M.D.P./Fish, R.S./Kraut, R.E. (1988) Collaborative Document Production Using Quilt. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Portland, Oregon: ACM SIGCHI & SIGOIS, p. 206–215Google Scholar
  20. Macdonald, N.H./Frase, L.T./Gingrich, P.S./Keenan, S.A.(1982): The Writer’s Workbench: Computer Aids for Text Analysis. In: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 30/1, p. 105–110Google Scholar
  21. Malcolm, H./Gaines, B.R. (1991) A Word Processor Supporting Group Writing. Research Report. Dept of Computer Science, University of CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  22. Mann, W./Thompson, S.A. (1987) Rhetorical Structure Theory: Description and Construction of Text Structures. In: Kempen, Gerard (ed.) Natural Language Generation. Dordrecht: Nijhoff Publ.Google Scholar
  23. Moore, C.M. (1987) Group Techniques for Idea Building. Newbury Park, CA: SageGoogle Scholar
  24. Mills, G.H./J.A. Walter (1986) Technical Writing. New York: CBS College PublishingGoogle Scholar
  25. Rousseau, N.P./Candy, L. (1991) A Pragmatic Approach to Software Development Tool Evaluation within the FOCUS Project. Paper presented at Psychology of Programming Interest Group Workshop on Evaluation of Software Development Tools, 15th March 1991, LUTCHI Research Centre report No. LUTCHI/0101.Google Scholar
  26. Rosenbaum, S./Walters, R.D. (1986) Audience Diversity: A Major Challenge in Computer Documentation. In: IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 29, p. 48–55Google Scholar
  27. Sandman, P.M./Klompus, C.S. / Yarriso, B.C. (1985) Scientific and Technical Writing. New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar
  28. Shan, Y.-P./Thorn, J./Rooks, M.C. (1988)WE 1.0 User’s Manual. Univ. of North Carolina, Dept. of Computer Science, Rep. TR88- 036.Google Scholar
  29. Sharp, R. (1990) The CAT2 Machine Translation System. In: Proceedings of COLING ’90, August 20–24, Helsinki. Helsinki.Google Scholar
  30. Sharpies, M./Pemberton, L. (1990) Starting from the Writer: Guidelines for the Design of User-Centred Document Processors. In: Computer Assisted Language Learning 2, p. 37–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shrlidit (1990) Shrlidit LL- A Shared Editor for the Apple Macintosh. User’s guide and technical description. Cognitive Science and Machine Intelligence Laboratory, University of Michigan, November 1990Google Scholar
  32. Smith, H. W. (1989) Group versus Individual Problem Solving and Type of Problem Solved. In: Small Group Behaviour 20/3, p. 357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Streitz, N.A./Hannemann, J./Thuering, M. (1989) From Ideas and Arguments to Hyperdocuments: Travelling through Activity Spaces. Darmstadt: GMD-Arbeitspapier 402, July 1989Google Scholar
  34. Stuart, A. (1988) The Technical Writer. New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar
  35. Unland, R./Schlageter, G. (1990) Object-Oriented Database Systems: Concepts and Perspectives. In: A. Blaser (ed.) Database Systems of the 90’s. Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  36. Wahlster, W./Kobsa, A. (1989) User Models in Dialog Systems. In: Kobsa, A./Wahlster, W. (eds.) User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  37. Wright, P.C./Monk, A.F. (1991) The Use of Think-Aloud Evaluation Methods in Design. In: ACM/SIGCHI Bulletin 23, p. 55–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brigitte Endres-Niggemeyer
  • Alfred Kobsa
  • Paul Schmidt

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations