Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement pp 511–528Cite as

FUhrung von Innovationsteams

  • Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag hat das Ziel, aufbauend auf der einschlägigen konzeptionellen und empirischen Literatur, wesentliche Grundsätze zur Führung von Innovationsteams darzustellen. Deshalb beginnt dieser Aufsatz zunächst mit einer kurzen Diskussion der Begriffe Team und Teamarbeit; letztere insbesondere vor dem Hintergrund ihrer Bedeutung für die erfolgreiche Bearbeitung innovativer Aufgaben in Organisationen. Im Hauptteil des Beitrags werden wichtige Elemente der Teamgestaltung und Teamführung aufgezeigt. Der Beitrag schließt mit einer zusammenfassenden Würdigung, in der weiterer Forschungsbedarf zu diesem Thema anhand von einigen zentralen Beispielen hervorgehoben wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Allen, T.J. (1971): Communication networks in R&D laboratories, R&D Management, 1, 14–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, D.G. und D.F. Caldwell (1992): Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barczak, G. und D. Wilemon (1992): Successful new product team leaders, Industrial Marketing Management, 21, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, R.M., N.L. Kerr und R.S. Atkin (1978): Effects of group size, problem difficulty, and sex on group performance and member reactions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(11), 1224–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.L. und K.M. Eisenhardt (1995): Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions, Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 343–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, P.F. und C.H. Bell (1986): Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment, Academy of Management Journal, 29(2), 305–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M.A., G.J. Medsker und A.C. Higgs (1993): Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups, Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, V., P. Coughlan und C.A. Voss (1996): Development of a technical innovation audit, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 105–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G. (2001): Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch, 3. Aufl., Cambridge, Massachusetts, Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtright, J.A., G.T. Fairhurst und I.E. Rogers (1989): Interaction patterns in organic and mechanistic systems, Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 773–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMeuse, K.P. und S.J. Liebowitz (1981): An empirical analysis of team-building research, Group & Organization Studies, 6(3), 357–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., M.A. Glynn und R.K. Kazanjian (1999): Multi-level theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective, Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 286–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. und B.N. Tabrizi (1995): Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 84–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faix, W.G. und A. Laier (1996): Soziale Kompetenz: Wettbewerbsfaktor der Zukunft, 2. Aufl., Wiesbaden, Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R.C. und M.D. Fottler (1995): Empowerment: A matter of degree, Academy of Management Executive, 9(3), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R.C. und W.A. Randolph (1992): Cross-functional structures: A review and integration of matrix organization and project management, Journal of Management, 18(2), 267–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, C.J.G. (1988): Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladstein, D.L. (1984): Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J.R. (1987): The design of work teams, in: Lorsch, J.W. (Hrsg.): Handbook of organizational behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkins, S.G. und R.E. Petty (1982): Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1214–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högl, M. und H.G. Gemünden (2001): Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence, Organization Science, 12(4), 435–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högl, M. und K.P. Parboteeah (2003): Goal setting and team performance in innovative projects: On the moderating role of teamwork quality, Small Group Research, 34(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högl, M., K.P. Parboteeah und H.G. Gemünden (2003): When teamwork really matters: task innovativeness as a moderator of the teamwork-performance relationship in software development projects, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20, 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högl, M., K.P. Parboteeah und C.L. Munson (2003): Team-level antecedents of individuals’ knowledge networks, Decision Sciences, 34(4), 741–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högl, M. und L. Proserpio (2004): Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects, Research Policy, 33(8), 1153–1165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högl, M. und S.M. Wagner (2005): Buyer-supplier collaboration in product development projects, Journal of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högl, M. und K. Weinkauf (2005): Managing task interdependencies in multi-team projects: A longitudinal study, Journal of Management Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högl, M., K. Weinkauf und H.G. Gemünden (2004): Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study, Organization Science, 15(1), 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. und L. Mann (1977): Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment, New York, The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K.A. (1995): A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of in-tragroup conflict, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R.T. (1986): Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organisa tions, Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 715–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, R.T. (1994): Technology-information processing fit and the performance of R&D project groups: A test of contingency theory, Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 167–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kernaghan, J.A. und R.A. Cooke (1990): Teamwork in planning innovative projects: Improving group performance by rational and interpersonal interventions in group process, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(2), 109–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J.R. und L.J. Schaumann (1993): Group goals, group coordination, and group member motivation, Human Performance, 6(1), 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., K. Williams und S. Harkins (1979): Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A. und G.P. Latham (1985): The application of goal setting to sports, Journal of sports psychology, 7, 205–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E.A. und G.P. Latham (1990): A theory of goal setting and task performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankin, D., S. Cohen und T.K. Bikson (1996): Teams and technology: Fulfilling the promise of the new organization, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C.C. und H.R Sims (1987): Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C.C. und H.R Sims (1991): Super Leadership: Beyond the myth of heroic leadership, Organizational Dynamics, 19(4), 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S.A., S.G. Cohen und A.M. Mohrman (1995): Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., J.J. Martocchio und D.D. Frink (1994): A review of the influence of group goals on group performance, Academy of Management journal, 73(5), 1285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E.M., O.C. Walker und R.W. Ruekert (1995): Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness, Journal of Marketing, 59, 48–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks, C.D. und R. Cowlin (1995): Group discussion as affected by number of alternatives and by a time limit, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 62(3), 267–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P.B. (2000): Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(2), 237–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, M.B., J.K. Pinto und J.E. Prescott (1993): Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation, Management Science, 39(10), 1281–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, R. und C.Y. Nicholson (2001): Structural and contextual correlates of charged behavior in product development teams, journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 154–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M.J. und M.A. Campion (1999): Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings, Journal of Management, 25(2), 207–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, M.J. und M.A. Campion (1994): The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management, Journal of Management, 20(2), 503–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggar, S. (2002): Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model, Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S.I., R.L. Beard und E. Salas (1992): Team Building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments, in: Kelley, K. (Hrsg.): Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology, Amsterdam, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (2003): Improving the creativity of organizational work groups, Academy of Management Executive, 17(1), 96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vegt, G.S. van der, B.J.M. Emans und E. van de Vliert (2001): Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction, Personnel Psychology, 54, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, K. (1994): Improving group task performance: The role of group goals and group efficacy, Human Performance, 7(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R.E., A.J. Mento und E.A. Locke (1987): Task complexity as a moderator of goal effects: A meta-analysis, journal of Applied Psychology, 72(3), 416–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachary, W.B. und R.M. Krone (1984): Managing creative individuals in hightechnology research projects, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 31(1), 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenger, T.R. und B.S. Lawrence (1989): Organzational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication, Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 353–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhls für Führung und Personalmanagement, Wissenschaftlichen Hochschule für Unternehmensführung in Vallendar, Burgplatz 2, 56179, Vallendar, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Martin Högl (Inhaber)

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Martin Högl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Olshausenstraße 40, 24098, Kiel, Deutschland

    Sönke Albers (Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Innovation Neue Medien und Marketing) (Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Innovation Neue Medien und Marketing)

  2. Universität St. Gallen, Dufourstrasse 40a, 9000, St. Gallen, Schweiz

    Oliver Gassmann (Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Innovationsmanagement am Institut für Technologiemanagement) (Inhaber des Lehrstuhls für Innovationsmanagement am Institut für Technologiemanagement)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Högl, M. (2005). FUhrung von Innovationsteams. In: Albers, S., Gassmann, O. (eds) Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90786-8_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-90786-8_28

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-322-90787-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-90786-8

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation