Skip to main content

Stellenwert und Kriterien der Studentenauswahl an US-Hochschulen

  • Chapter
Hochschulorganisation und Hochschuldidaktik

Part of the book series: ZfB-Ergänzungschefte ((ZFB,volume 3))

  • 140 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alger, J. R. (1997): The Educational Value of Diversity, Academe, 83 /1, 20–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993): What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited,San Francisco (Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. (1989): A Theory of Association: Social Status, Prices and Markets, Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 653–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooker, G.; Klastorin, T. D. (1981): To the victors the spoils? College athletics and alumni giving, Social Science Quarterly, 62, 744–750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J. A. (1997): Business Week guide to the best business schools, 5. Auflage, McGraw-Hill (New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation (1994): A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education — 1994 Edition, Princeton, NJ (Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, P. J.; Frank, R. H. (1993): The Growing Concentration of Top Students at Elite Schools, in: Clotfelter, C. T.; Rothschild, M. (Hrsg.): Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education, Chicago/London (University of Chicago Press), 121–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, E. A.; Goldberg, I. (1998): Crafting a Class: College Admissions and Financial Aid 1955–1994, Princeton, NJ (Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, W. (1998): On Higher Ground: Education and the Case for Affirmative Action,New York (Teachers College Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetter, J. H. (1995): Questions and Admissions: Reflections on 100,000 Admissions Decisions at Stanford, Stanford, CA (Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Franck, E.; Opitz, C. (1999): Hochschulen als „Sortiereinrichtungen“ in Humankapitalmärkten, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 69, 1313–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, M. (Hrsg.) (1997): Affirmative Action’s Testament of Hope: Strategies for a New Era in Higher Education, Albany, NY (State University of New York Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladieux, L. E. (1996): A Diverse Student Body: The Challenge of Equalizing College Opportunities, The Journal of College Admission, 152 /153, 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, I. (1988): Affirmative Action and the Legacy of Racial Injustice, in: Katz, P. A.; Taylor, D. A. (Eds.): Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy, New York/London (Plenum Press), 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1986): A Theory of Status Organizations, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 2, 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1968): Der Wettbewerb als Entdeckungsverfahren,Kieler Vorträge NF 56, Kiel (Institut für Weltwirtschaft).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, M. A. (1997): A is for Admission. The Insider’s Guide to Getting into the Ivy League and Other Top Colleges, New York (Warner Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard, R. (1985): Choosing Elites,New York (Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler-Braun, K. (1998): Affirmative Action, WiStWirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 27, 365–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Gary M (1988): How selective are selective private colleges? Research in Higher Education, 29, 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R. E.; Tinsley, M. (1987): Athletics versus academics? Evidence from SAT scores, Journal of Political Economy, 95, 1103–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, P. M. et al. (1998): College Rankings: Democratized College Knowledge for Whom? Research in Higher Education, 39, 513–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M. S.; Schapiro, M. O. (1990): Selective Admission and the Public Interest,New York (College Entrance Examination Board).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, H. J. (1996): Studierfähigkeit und Hochschulzugang, in: Meyer, H. J.; Mtiller-Böling, D. (Eds.): Hochschulzugang in Deutschland—Status quo und Perspektiven, Gütersloh (Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung), 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mixon, F. G. (1995): Athletics versus Academics? Rejoining the Evidence from SAT Scores, Education Economics, 3, 277–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, R. W. (1992): A Gentle War: The College Admissions Office Versus the Faculty, Change, May/June 1992, 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Böling, D. (1996): Wettbewerb im Hochschulzugang, in: Meyer, H. J.; Müller-Böling, D. (Eds.): Hochschulzugang in Deutschland—Status quo und Perspektiven, Gütersloh (Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung), 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsweek (1997): How to Get Into Graduate School 1998,(Newsweek Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T.; Terenzini, P. T. (1991): How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research,San Francisco (Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, R. (1989): Business Schools in den USA: Mythen und Fakten. Berlin/New York (de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, L. (1995): It’s Academic — or Is It? Admissions Standards and Big Time College Football, Social Science Quarterly, 76, 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. M. (1992): College Admission Policies in the 1990s: A Look Toward the Future,New York (College Entrance Examination Board).

    Google Scholar 

  • TIME/The Princeton Review (1997): The Best College For You and How To Get In: 1998 Edition,(Time Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. A. (1984): The Analysis of Status, in: Clark, B. R. (Hrsg.): Perspectives on Higher Education, Berkeley et al. (University of California Press), 132–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twale, D. J; Douvanis, C. J.; Sekula, F. J. (1992): Affirmative action strategies and professional schools: case illustrations of exemplary programs, Higher Education, 24, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissenschaftsrat (1985): Empfehlungen zum Wettbewerb im deutschen Hochschulsystem, Köln (Wissenschaftsrat)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education (1996): Digest of Education Statistics 1996, Washington, D.C. (U.S. Department of Education/National Center of Education Statistics).

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. News (1997): America’s Best Colleges 1998, Washington, D.C. (U.S. News & World Report Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willingham, W. W.; Breland, H. M. (1982): Personal Qualities and College Admissions,New York (College Entrance Examination Board).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Horst Albach Peter Mertens

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Gabler-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schwirten, C. (2000). Stellenwert und Kriterien der Studentenauswahl an US-Hochschulen. In: Albach, H., Mertens, P. (eds) Hochschulorganisation und Hochschuldidaktik. ZfB-Ergänzungschefte, vol 3. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89810-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89810-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-409-13960-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-89810-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics