Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Innovation und Absatz pp 35–62Cite as

Determinanten und Wirkungen der Teamarbeit in innovativen Projekten: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: ZfB-Ergänzungshefte ((ZFB,volume 2))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alderfer, Clayton P. (1987): An intergroup perspective on group dynamics; in: Handbook of organizational behavior; Lorsch, J. W. (Hrsg.); Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; S. 190–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancona, Deborah G.; Caldwell, David F. (1992a): Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance; Organization Science; Vol. 3, No. 3; S. 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkenstein, Martin (1987): Koordination von Forschung and Entwicklung und Marketing; Marketing ZFP; Heft 2, Mai 1987; S. 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bösch, Thomas (1996): Beurteilung individueller Teamfähigkeiten — Ein prozessorientierter Ansatz; Bamberg: Difo-Druck GmbH, (zugl. St. Gallen, Univ., Diss., 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braaten, Leif J. (1991): Group cohesion: A new multidimensional model; Group; Vol. 15, No. 1; S. 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannick, Michael T.; Prince, Ashley; Prince, Carolyn; Salas, Eduardo (1995): The measurement of team process; Human Factors; Vol. 37, No. 3; S. 641–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff, Klaus (1994): Management organisatorischer Schnittstellen — unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Koordination von Marketingbereichen mit Forschung und Entwicklung; Berichte aus den Sitzungen der Joachim Jungius-Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften e.V., Hamburg; Jg. 12, Heft 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, Felix C. (1993): Kommunikation und Leistung in Projektarbeitsgruppen: Eine empirische Untersuchung an Software-Entwicklungsprojekten; Aachen: Shaker Verlag, (zugl. Gießen, Univ., Diss., 1993 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, Felix C. (1994a): Intensive Kommunikation lohnt sich für SE-Projekte; in: Produktivität und Qualität in Software-Projekten; Brodbeck, Felix C.; Frese, Michael (Hrsg.); München, Wien: R. Oldenburg Verlag; S. 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, Felix C. (1994b): Software-Entwicklung: Ein Tätigkeitsspektrum mit vielfältigen Kornmunikations-und Lernanforderungen; in: Produktivität und Qualität in Software-Projekten; Brodbeck, Felix C.; Frese, Michael (Hrsg.); München, Wien: R. Oldenburg Verlag; S. 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bühner, Rolf (1997): Personalmanagement ( 2. Auflage); Landsberg/Lech: Moderne Industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, Michael A.; Medsker, Gina J.; Higgs, A. Cathrine (1993): Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups; Personnel Psychology; Vol. 46, No. 4; S. 823–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, Michael A.; Papper, Ellen M.; Medsker, Gina J. (1996): Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension; Personnel Psychology; Vol. 49, No. 2; S. 429–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Dorwin (1968): The nature of group cohesiveness; in: Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.); Cartwright, Dorwin; Zander, Alvin (Hrsg.); London: Tavistock Publications; S. 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cianni, Mary; Wnuck, Donna (1997): Individual growth and team enhancement: Moving toward a new model of career development; Academy of Management Executive; Vol. 11, No. 1; S. 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Susan G.; Chang, Lei; Ledford, Gerald E. (1997): A hierarchical construct of self-management leadership and its relationship to quality of work life and perceived work group effectiveness; Personnel Psychology; Vol. 50; S. 275–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Robert A.; Szumal, Janet L. (1994): The impact of group interaction styles on problem-solving effectiveness; Journal of Applied Behavioral Science; Vol. 30, No. 4; S. 415–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, Richard L. (1992): Organization Theory and Design; St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, Daniel R.; Hart, Stuart L.; Kahn, Joel A. (1996): From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model; Academy of Management Journal; Vol. 39, No. 4; S. 1005–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domsch, Michel E.; Gerpott, Torsten J. (1995): Führung in Forschung und Entwicklung; in: Handwörterbuch der Führung (2. Auflage); Kieser, Alfred (Hrsg.); Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel; S. 369–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faix, Werner G.; Laier, Angelika (1996): Soziale Kompetenz: Wettbewerbsfaktor der Zukunft ( 2. Auflage); Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg (1981): Innovationsmarketing: Interaktionsbeziehungen zwischen Hersteller und Verwender innovativer Investitionsgüter; Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), (zugl. Saarbrücken, Univ., Diss., 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg (1983): Echte Führungsentscheidungen — empirische Beobachtungen zu Gutenbergs Idealtypologie; Die Betriebswirtschaft; Vol. 43, No. 1; S. 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg (1990): Erfolgsfaktoren des Projektmanagements — eine kritische Bestand-saufnahme der empirischen Untersuchungen; Projekt Management; 1and2/90; S. 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg (1995): Zielbildung; in: Handbuch der Unternehmensführung; Corsten

    Google Scholar 

  • Hans; Reiß, Michael (Hrsg.); Wiesbaden: Gabler; S. 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, Hans Georg; Högl, Martin (1998): Teamarbeit in innovativen Projekten: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme der empirischen Forschung; Zeitschrift für Personalforschung; Vol. 12, No. 3, S. 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gersick, Connie J. G. (1988): Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development; Academy of Management Journal; Vol. 31; S. 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstein, Deborah L. (1984): Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness; Administrative Science Quarterly; Vol. 29; S. 499–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Paul S., Ravlin, Elisabeth; Schminke, Michael (1987): Understanding groups in organizations; in: Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 9); Staw, B. W.; Cummings, L. L. (Hrsg.); Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; S. 121–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Abbi; Hauser, John R. (1992): Patterns of communication among marketing, engineering and manufacturing: A comparison between two new product development teams; Management Science; Vol. 38, No. 3; S. 360–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gully, Stanley M.; Devine, Dennis J.; Whitney, David J. (1995): A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence; Small Group Research; Vol. 26, No. 4; S. 497–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, Richard A. (1995): Introduction: At the intersection of team effectiveness and decision making; in: Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations; Guzzo, Richard A.; Salas, Eduardo and Associates (Hrsg.); San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass; S. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, Richard A.; Dickson, Marcus W. (1996): Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness; Annual Review of Psychology; Vol. 47; S. 307–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, Richard A.; Shea, Gregory P. (1992): Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations; in: Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (3rd. ed.); Dunnette, M. D.; Hough, L. M. (Hrsg.); Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press; S. 269–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, Richard A.; Shea, Gregory P. (1992): Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations; in: Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (3rd. ed.); Dunnette, M. D.; Hough, L. M. (Hrsg.); Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press; S. 269–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. Richard (1987): The design of work teams; in: Handbook of organizational behavior; Lorsch, J. W. (Hrsg.); Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; S. 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. Richard; Walton, Richard E. (1986): Leading groups in organizations; in: Designing effective work groups; Goodman, Paul S.; and Associates (Hrsg.); San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass; S. 72–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptman, Oscar; Hirji, Karim K. (1996): The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: An empirical study of cross-functional teams; IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management; Vol. 43, No. 3; S. 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, Jürgen (1991): Wider die Gleichmacherei der Organisation von Führungsentscheidungen; Zeitschrift für Ausbildung and Hochschulkontakt; Vol. 20, No. 1; S. 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschildt, Jürgen (1993): Innovationsmanagement; München: Verlag Franz Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, Geert H. (1991): Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind; London: McGraw-Hill. Högl, Martin (1998): Teamarbeit in innovativen Projekten: Einflußgrößen and Wirkungen. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag Gabler, zugl.: Karlsruhe, Univ., Diss., 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högl, Martin; Gemünden, Hans Georg (1998): Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: An Empirical Analysis of Software Development Teams in Germany. Competitive Paper at the Academy of Management Meeting 1998, San Diego, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C. (1960): Theorie der sozialen Gruppe; Köln: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Lawrence R. (1982): Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement; Journal of Applied Psychology; Vol. 67, No. 2; S. 219–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Lawrence R.; Demaree, Robert G.; Wolf, Gerrit (1984): Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias; Journal of Applied Psychology; Vol. 69, No. 1; S. 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, David W.; Johnson, Roger T.; Ortiz, Ann E.; Stanne, Marybeth (1991): The impact of positive goal and resource interdependence on achievement, interaction, and attitudes; Journal of General Psychology; Vol. 118, No. 4; S. 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Ralph (1982): The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance; Administrative Science Quarterly; Vol. 22; S. 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Ralph; Allen, Thomas J. (1988): Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) Syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R and D project groups; in: Readings in the management of innovations; Tushman, Michael L.; Moore, William L. (Hrsg.); Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company; S. 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Robert T. (1986): Predictors of the performance of project groups in RandD organisations; Academy of Management Journal; Vol. 29, No. 4; S. 715–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernaghan, John A.; Cooke, Robert A. (1990): Teamwork in planning innovative projects: Improving group performance by rational and interpersonal interventions in group process; IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management; Vol. 37, No. 2; S. 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Katherine J.; Dansereau, Fred; Hall, Rosalie J. (1994): Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis; Academy of Management Review; Vol. 19, No. 2; S. 195–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, James R.; Schaumann, Linda J. (1993): Group goals, group coordination, and group member motivation; Human Performance; Vol. 6, No. 1; S. 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, Gary P.; Locke, Edwin A. (1987): Goal setting — A motivational technique that works; in: The great writings in management and organizational behavior; Boone, Louis E.; Bowen, Donald D. (Hrsg.); New York: McGraw-Hill; S. 396–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Paul R.; Lorsch, Jay W. (1967): Differentiation and integration in complex organisations; Administrative Science Quarterly; Vol. 12; S. 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lechler, Thomas (1997): Erfolgsfaktoren des Projektmanagements; Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, (zugl. Karlsruhe, Univ., Diss., 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Daniel; Slem, Charles (1995): Team work in research and development organizations: The characteristics of successful teams; International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics; Vol. 16; S. 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, John M.; Moreland, Richard L. (1990): Progress in small group research; Annual Review of Psychology; Vol. 41; S. 585–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Edwin A.; Latham, Gary P. (1985): The application of goal setting to sports; Sport Psychology Today; Vol. 7; S. 205–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Edwin A.; Latham, Gary P. (1990): A theory of goal setting and task performance; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankin, Don; Cohen, Susan; Bikson, Tora K. (1996): Teams and technology: Fulfilling the promise of the new organization; Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, Charles C.; Sims, Henry P. (1987): Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leader-ship of self-managing work teams; Administrative Science Quarterly; Vol. 32; S. 106–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Joseph E. (1964): Social psychology: A brief introduction; New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Ben B.; Lassiter, Donald L. (1992): Team composition and staffing; in: Teams: Their training and performance; Swezey, Robert W.; Salas, Eduardo (Hrsg.); Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation; S. 75–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, Brian; Copper, Carolyn (1994): The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration; Psychological Bulletin; Vol. 115, No. 2; S. 210–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, Oswald (1992): Arbeitszufriedenheit; in: Handwörterbuch der Organisation (3. Auflage); Frese, Erich (Hrsg.); Stuttgart: C. E. Poeschel Verlag; S. 198–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, Anne M.; Martocchio, Joseph J.; Frink, Dwight D. (1994): A review of the influence of group goals on group performance; Academy of Management Journal; Vol 73, No. 5; S. 1285–1301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasch, Jürgen (1994): Software-Entwicklung im Team: Mehr Qualität durch das dialogische Prinzip der Projektarbeit; Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, Mary Beth; Pinto, Jeffrey K. (1990): Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development; Journal of Product Innovation Management; Vol. 7; S. 200–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, William E.; Marrache, Myriam; Lacroix, Renée; Richardsen, Astrid M.; Jones, Barry D. (1983): Cohesion as a basic bond in groups; Human Relations; Vol. 36, No. 2; S. 93–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, Robert D.; Jones, Steven D.; Roth, Philip L.; Stuebing, Karla K.; Ekeberg, Steven E. (1988): Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity; Journal of Applied Psychology; Vol. 73, No. 2; S. 337–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rühli, Edwin (1992): Koordination; in: Handwörterbuch der Organisation (3. Auflage); Frese, Erich (Hrsg.); Stuttgart: C. E. Poeschel Verlag; S. 1164–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, Christian (1992): Effektivität and Effizienz; in: Handwörterbuch der Organisation (3. Auflage); Frese, Erich (Hrsg.); Stuttgart: C. E. Poeschel Verlag; S. 533–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, Stephan; Göpfert, Jan (1996): Structuring Manufacturer-Supplier Interaction in New Product Development Teams: An Empirical Analysis; in: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on industrial marketing and purchasing (Vol. 1); Gemünden, Hans Georg; Ritter, Thomas; Walter, Achim (Hrsg.); Karlsruhe: Universität Karlsruhe; S. 557–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seashore, Stanley E. (1954): Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group; Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seers, Anson (1989): Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research; Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process; Vol. 43; S. 118–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seers, Anson; Petty, M. M.; Cashman, James F. (1995): Team-member exchange under team and traditional management: A naturally occuring quasi-experiment; Group and Organization Management; Vol. 20, No. 1; S. 18–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, Gregory P.; Guzzo, Richard A. (1987): Groups as human resources; Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management; Vol. 5; S. 323–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Michael J.; Campion, Micheal A. (1994): The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management; Journal of Management; Vol. 20, No. 2; S. 503–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, Eric; DeMeuse, Kenneth P.; Futrell, David (1990): Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness; American Psychologist; Vol. 45, No. 2; S. 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Beard, Rebecca L.; Salas, Eduardo (1992): Team Building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments; in: Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology; Kelley, K. (Hrsg.); Amsterdam, Holland: Elsevier; S. 117–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, Dean (1984): Cooperation theory and organizations; Human Relations; Vol. 37, No. 9; S. 743–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, Dean (1995): Cooperation theory, constructive controversy, and effectiveness: Learning from crisis; in: Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations; Guzzo, Richard A.; Salas, Eduardo and Associates (Hrsg.); San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass; S. 79–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, Victor H. (1987): A new look at managerial decision making; in: The great writings in management and organizational behavior; Boone, Louis E.; Bowen, Donald D. (Hrsg.); New York: McGraw-Hill; S. 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, John A. (1995): Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups; Academy of Management Journal; Vol. 38, No. 1; S. 152–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, Laurie R. (1992): Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance; Journal of Applied Psychology; Vol. 77, No. 5; S. 682–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, Kristina (1994): Improving group task performance: The role of group goals and group efficacy; Human Performance; Vol. 7, No. 1; S. 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiendieck, Gerd (1992): Teamarbeit; in: Handwörterbuch der Organisation; Frese, Erich (Hrsg.); Stuttgart: C. E. Poeschel Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachary, William B.; Krone, Robert M. (1984): Managing creative individuals in high-technology research projects; IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management; Vol. 31, No. 1; S. 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Angewandte Betriebswirtschaftslehre und Unternehmensführung, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Waldhornstr. 27, D-76131, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

    Dr. Martin Högl (wissenschaftlicher Angestellter)

Authors
  1. Dr. Martin Högl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof.Dr. Hans Georg Gemünden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Waldstr. 49, 53177, Bonn, Deutschland

    Horst Albach (Schriftleitung, o. Professor der Betriebswirtschaftslehre) (Schriftleitung, o. Professor der Betriebswirtschaftslehre)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Gabler-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Högl, M., Gemünden, H.G. (1999). Determinanten und Wirkungen der Teamarbeit in innovativen Projekten: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse. In: Albach, H. (eds) Innovation und Absatz. ZfB-Ergänzungshefte, vol 2. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89809-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89809-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-409-11455-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-89809-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation