Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theory and Rudiments of Participatory Online Planning

  • Chapter
Modell- und computer-gestützte Unternehmungsplanung

Part of the book series: Betriebswirtschaftliche Beiträge zur Organisation und Automation ((BOA,volume 22))

  • 134 Accesses

Abstract

Advanced research in online planning presupposes a theoretical framework for planning. One looks in vain for a substantive planning theory in the literature. For example, Branch (1966) speaks about a “comprehensive planning process”, but not a planning theory. Ayres (1969) discusses the “epistemology of forecasting”, but does not come up with any theory of planning. Emery (1965) describes a “formalization of the planning process”, but does not venture into planning theory. The record of the Commission on the Year 2000 (Daedalus, Summer 1967) does not lead to any planning theories among its numerous articles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Adams, Jeanne and Leonard Cohen, “Time-Sharing Vs. Instant Batch Process ing,” Computers and Automation, March 1969, pp. 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allport, Gordon W., “The Fruits of Electicism -Bitter or Sweet?” Proceedings of the XVIIth International Congress of Psychology, August 20–26, 1963, Washington, D. C., North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ayres, Robert U., Technological Forecasting and Long-Range Planning, McGraw-Hill, Book Company, New York, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barnard, D. J., Organization and Management, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bell, Daniel, “Twelve Modes of Prediction -A Preliminary Sorting of Approaches in the Social Sciences,” Daedalus, Summer 1964, pp. 845–880.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berger, R. M., J. P. Guilford, and P. R. Christensen, “A Factor-Analytic Study of Planning,” Psychological Monogr., 71, No. 6, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernstein, M. I., “The Design for an Interactive Flowchart Programming System,” Proceedings of the Third Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Part 2, 1970, pp. 894–897.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Branch, Melville C., Planning: Aspects and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bryan, D. G., “JOSS: 20,000 Hours at a Console -A Statistical Summary,” AFIPS Conference Proceedings, Vol. 31, 1967 Fall Joint Computer Conference, pp. 769–777.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bureau of the Budget, Planning-Programming-Budgeting, Bulletin No. 66–3, Washington, October 12, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clay, Sir Henry, Planning and Market Economy, American Economics Review, Vol. XL, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dalkey, Norman D., The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion, AD-60-498, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, June 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dewey, John, Logic: The Theory of Inquiry, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  14. De Jouvenel, Bertrand, The Art of Conjecture, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Jouvenel, Bertrand, “Utopia for Practical Purposes,” Daedalus, Vol. 95, No. 2, Spring 1965, pp. 437–453.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Einstein, Albert, and Leopold Infeld, The Evolution of Physics, Simon & Schuster, New York, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emery, James, The Planning Process and Its Formalization in Computer Models, Proceedings of the 2nd Congress of Information System Science, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Erikson, W. J., A Pilot Study of Interactive Versus Noninteractive Debugging, TM-3296, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California, December 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feingold, Samuel L., “PLANIT -A Flexible Language Designed for Computer Human Interaction,” Proceedings of the Fall Joint Computer Conference, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Florence, P. S., The Logic of British and American Industry, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frye, Charles H., and Elbert C. Pack, “A Comparison of Three Computer Operating Modes for High School Problem-Solving,” TM-4356/001/00, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gold, M., Methodology for Evaluating Time-Shared Computer Usage, Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grant, E. K, and H. Sackman, “An Exploratory Investigation of Programer Performance Under On-Line and Off-Line Conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-8, (1), March 1967, pp. 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guilford, J. P., The Nature of Human Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haefele, John W., Creativity and Innovation, Reinhold Publishing Corp., New York, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Helmer, Olaf, Social Technology, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Helmer, Olaf, “Systematic Use of Export Opinions,” P-372l, The RAND Corpo ration, Santa Monica, California, November 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Helmholtz, H. L. F., von, Vorträge and Reden, 1896.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jungk, R., “Forecasting as an Instrument of Social and Political Power,” Third International Conference on Science and Society, Herceg-Novi, Yugoslavia, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kahn, Herman and Anthony J. Wiener, The Year 2000, The Macmillan Company, New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Karush, A. D., “Project Plan for Regenerative Recording,” N-24317/002/00*, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kellogg, C., and J. Burger, “Progress in Natural Language Data Management,” Proceedings of the Third Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Part 2, 1970, pp. 846–849.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kelly, G. A., The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Norton, New York, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  34. LeBreton, Preston P., and Dale A. Henning, Planning Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lickhalter, R. A., “Display 70 -An Interactive Data Analysis System for Management Decision,” SP-3457, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  36. MacCorquodale, K., and P. E. Meehl, “Preliminary Suggestions as to Formalization of Expectancy Theory,” Psychological Review, 60, 1953, pp. 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mackworth, Norman H., “Orginality,” American Psychologist, Vol. 20, January 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mannheim, K., Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, London, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mason, Richard O., “A Dialectical Approach to Strategic Planning,” Management Science, Vol. 15, No. 8, April 1969, pp. B-403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mayo, E., The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization, Macmillan, New York, 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mclsaac, Paul V., Job Descriptions and Scheduling in the SDC Q-32 Time Sharing System, TM-2996, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California, June 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mead, G. H., Mind, Self and Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Millett, J., The Process and Organization of Government Planning, Columbia University Press, New York, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Miller, George A., Eugene Galanter and Karl H. Pribram, Plans and the Struc ture of Behavior, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mockler, Robert J., “Theory and Practice of Planning,” Harvard Business Review, March-April 1970, pp. 148–159.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mowrer, O. H., Learning Theory and Personality Dynamics, Ronald Press, New York, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Myerson, M., and E. C. Banfield, Politics, Planning and the Public Interest, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nadel, S. F., Foundations of Social Anthropology, Cohen & West, London, 1951, pp. 286–287.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Novick, David (ed.) Program Budgeting, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Osborn, Alex, Applied Imagination, Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Platt, John, “What We Must Do,” Science, Vol. 166, 1969, pp. 1115–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Raynaud, Thierry G., Operational Analysis of a Computer Center, Technical Report No. 32, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, July 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Roethlisberger, F. J., and W. J. Dickson, Management and the Worker, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Rosove, Perry E., The Use of Contextual Mapping to Support Long-Range Educational Policy Making, SP-3026, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California, December 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rossman, Joseph, The Psychology of the Inventor, Inventor’s Publishing Company, Washington, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rotter, J. B., Social Learning and Clinical Psychology, Prentice-Hall, New York, 1954.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Sackman, H., Computers, System Science, and Evolving Society, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sackman, H., Experimental Evaluation of Time-Sharing and Batch Processing in Teaching Computer Science, SP-3411, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California, October 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sackman, H. Man-Computer Problem Solving, Auerbach, Philadelphia, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Schatzoff, M., R. Tsao and R. Wiig, “An Experimental Comparison of Time Sharing and Batch Processing,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 10, No. 5, May 1967, pp. 261–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Scherr, Allan L., Analysis of Time-Shared Computer Systems, Research Monograph No. 36, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Shaw, J. W., “JOSS: Experience With an Experimental Computing Service for Users at Remote Typewriter Consoles,” P-3149, The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, May 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Steiner, George A., Top Management Planning, The Macmillan Company, London, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Stogdill, Ralph M., Individual Behavior and Group Achievement, Oxford University Press, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tolman, E. C., Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men, Appleton-Century, New York, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Totschek, Robert A., An Emperical Investigation into the Behavior of the SDC Time-Sharing System, SP-2191, System Development Corporation, Santa Mo nica, California, Juli 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Toward the Year 2000: Work in Progress, Daedalus, Summer 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wallas, Graham, Art of Thought, Harcourt, Brace, New York, 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Willmorth, N. E., System Programming Management, TM-L-222*, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, California, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Woodworth, Robert S., and Harold Schlosberg, Experimental Psychology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Young, J. W., Technique for Producing Ideas, Advertising Publications, Inc., Chicago, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Dr. Harold Sackman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Betriebswirtschaftlichen Instituts für Organisation und Automation, Universität zu Köln, Deutschland

    Erwin Grochla (Direktoren) & Norbert Szyperski (Direktoren) (Direktoren) &  (Direktoren)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1973 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler · Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sackman, H. (1973). Theory and Rudiments of Participatory Online Planning. In: Grochla, E., Szyperski, N. (eds) Modell- und computer-gestützte Unternehmungsplanung. Betriebswirtschaftliche Beiträge zur Organisation und Automation, vol 22. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89256-0_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-89256-0_38

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-409-34072-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-89256-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation