Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Der Wertkontext praxisorientierter Sozialforschung: Ein zusammenfassendes Modell

  • Chapter
Arbeitsperspektiven angewandter Sozialwissenschaft

Part of the book series: Beiträge zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung ((BEISOFO,volume 70))

Zusammenfassung

Die Tatsache, daß es in der soziologischen Fachsprache den Begriff der ‘praxisorientierten Sozialforschung’ gibt, ist ein Zeichen dafür, daß sich diese wissenschaftliche Tätigkeit von der sogenannten disziplinorientierten Sozialforschung unterscheidet. Bevor auf den Wertkontext praxisorientierter Sozialforschung eingegangen wird, ist es notwendig, einige Unterschiede zwischen praxisorientierter und disziplinorientierter Sozialforschung näher zu erläutern1. Ein wichtiger Unterschied liegt im Prozeß der Wissensanwendung. Ein Beispiel dafür ist der Effekt disziplinorientierter Sozialforschung, der oft mit Begriffen wie ‘enlightenment’ oder Aufklärung umschrieben wird (Janowitz 1971; Weiss 1978; Weiss und Bucuvalas 1980). Weiss (1978) zufolge hat ‘enlightenment’ einen dreifachen Einfluß auf die Verwaltungspolitik: Revision veralteter Auffassungen, Neuformulierung der Ziele, Neuordnung der Prioritäten. In den U.S.A., wo die Rolle der Sozialwissenschaften hauptsächlig auf den Unterricht beschränkt ist, wird diese aufklärende Funktion der Sozialforschung oft als einzige beobachtet — sogar in Kreisen praxisorientierter Wissenschaftler (Caplan 1976). Diese Auffassung geht allerdings an der Tatsache vorbei, daß praxisorientierte Sozialforschung immer mehr im Rahmen eines sogenannten ‘beratenden’ Modells der Wissensübertragung benutzt wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturliste

  • Arendt, Hannah (1969) ‘Truth and Politics’ in P. Laslett und W.G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society, Third Series, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, S. 104–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1972) The Applicability of Organizational Sociology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. (1980) Ideas and Intervention: Social Theory and Practice, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldamus, W. (1972) ‘The role of discoveries in social science’ in T. Shanin (ed.) The Rules of the Game: Cross-Disciplinary Essays on Models in Scholarly Thought, London, Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, J. (1973) ‘How to Organize Research in the Social Sciences’ Daedalus, Spring, S. 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R.A. (1977) ‘Discretionary Methodological Decisions in Applied Research’ Sociological Methods & Research 5 (3), S. 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, R.A. und P.H. Rossi (1976) ‘Doing Good or Worse: Evaluation Research Politically Re-Examined’ Social Problems 23 (3) S. 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressers, J.Th. (1983) Beleidseffektiviteit en Waterkwaliteitsbeleid,

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruder, W. (1980) Sozialw i ssenschaften und Politikberatung: Zur Nützung Sozialwissenschaftlicher Informationen in der Ministerialorganisation, Köln/Opladen, Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. und J. Stanley (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research, Chicago, RandMcNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N.S. et al. (1975) The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level’ Ann Arbor, University of Michican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, N.S. (1976) ‘Social research and National Policy: what gets used, by whom, for what purposes and with wath effects?’ International Social Science Jnl. (8) 1 S. 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, M. (1980) Rational techniques in Policy Analysis, London, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherns, A. (1969) ‘Social research and its Diffusion’, Human Relations, 22 (3) S. 209–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1972) Policy Research in the Social Sciences, Morristown, General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T.D. und D.T. Campbell (1974) Quasi-Experimentation, Chicago, RandMcNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. und M. Useem (1979) ‘Decentralized Applied Research: Factors Affecting the Use of Audience Research by Arts Organizations’ Jnl. of Applied Behavioral Science (15) 1 S. 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerbecker, C. (1979) ‘Het iteratieve zoekproces en het cognitieve kader van de client’, Tijdschrift v. Agologie, (355 e.v.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, Y. (1971) Design for Policy Sciences, N.Y., Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, Y. (1971a) Ventures in Policy Science: Concepts and Applications, N.Y., Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dor, Y. (1981) Public Policy-Making Reexamined, N.Y., Transaction Bks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, R. (1978) Theory Building, rev. ed., N.Y. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O.D. (1970) Toward Social Reporting: Next Steps, N.Y. Russel Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W.N. (1983) ‘Measuring Knowledge Use’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, (5) 1: 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, W.N. und F.W. Swierzek (1977) ‘Planned Organizational Change: Toward Grounded Theory’, Jnl. of Applied Behavioral Science (13): 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellemers, J. (1976) ‘Veel kunnen verklaren of iets kunnen veranderen: krachtige versus manipuleerbare variabelen’ Beleid en Maatschappij, (11): 281–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1971) ‘Policy Research’, American Sociologist, June. S. 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, G.W. und L.G. Tornatzky (1977) Experimental Methods for Social Policy Research, N.Y., Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finsterbusch, K. und M.R. Hamilton (1978) ‘The rationalization of social science research in policy studies’, International Jnl. of Comparative Sociology 19 (1–2): 88–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finsterbusch, K. und A.B. Motz (1980) Social Research for Policy Decisions, Belmont, Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J.E. und R.A. Smith (1976) ‘Social Scientists in the Policy Process’ Jnl. of Applied Behavioral Science, Febr., S. 104–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. und A.L. Strauss (1976) The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago, Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, E.M. und S.H. Taylor (1973) ‘Factors Influencing the Success of Applied Research’, American Psychologist, Febr., S. 140/6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, M.P. (1976) The Research Experience, Itasca Ill., Peacock Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hage, J. (1972) Techniques and Problems of Theory Construction in Sociology, N.Y., Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, J.S. (1971) ‘Action Research — An Overview’ (paper), London School of Economics, 17 Seiten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoesel, P. van und M. van de Vall (1982) Vergelijking van case-studies als methode (rapport), Leiden, LIPOS-Reihe Nr. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, E.R. (1980) Evaluating with Validity, Beverly Hills, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, M. (1971) Sociological Models and Social Policy, N.Y., General Learning Press, 8 Seiten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, I. (1976) ‘On the Applicability of Scientific Methods on the Problems of Law, Morality and Social Change’, Archiv f. Rechtsu. Sozialphilosophie, S. 512/27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.W., W.D. Frazier und M.F. Riddick Jr. (1983) ‘A Change Strategy for Linking the World of Academia and Practice’, The Jnl. of Applied Behavioral Science (19) 4: 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. (1964), The Conduct of Inquiry, San Francisco, Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Fred E. (1964) ‘Analytic and Applied Sociologists: A Sociological Essay on a Dilemma in Sociology’, Sociology and Social Research, 48 (4): 440/7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, K.D. (1977) ‘Policymakers’ use of social science knowledge: symbolic or instrumental?’, in Weiss, C.H. (ed.) a.a.O., S. 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, C. (1967) ‘Power and Participation in Decision Making in Formal Organizations’, AJS, 73 (2): 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, C. (1972) ‘Two conceptions of democratization in organizations’ in E. Pusic (ed.). Participation and Self-Management, Vol. 4, Zagreb, University of Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J.K. (1980) ‘Knowledge Utilization, What is it?’, Knowledge, Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, Vol. 1, No. 3, March: 421–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, O.N. (1975) ‘The Commission on Obscenity and Pornography: Form, Function, and Failure’ in Mirra Komarovsky (ed.) Sociology and Public Policy, Wlawciwe: 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P.F. und A. Barton (1951) ‘Qualitative Measurement in the Social Sciences’ in D. Lerner und H.D. Lasswell (eds.) The Policy Sciences, Stanford, Stanford University Press, S. 155–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, E.W. (1978) ‘Sociological Theory and Social Policy’, International Jnl. of Comparative Sociology, XIX (1–2): 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt, R. (1965) ‘The use of social research to improve social practice’, paper, 1965Annual Meeting of the American Orthopsychiatric Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lompe, K. (1966) ‘Notwendigkeit, Grenzen und Probleme der Zukunftsforschung’, Die Mitarbeit, 15 (5): 414–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Los, Maria (1979) ‘Applied Social Science and Values’, in A. Podgorecki und Maria Los, Multi-Dimensional Sociology, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, S. 290–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maestre, C. (1972) Analytical Methods in Government Science Policy, Paris, OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.R. und E. Greenwood (1980) The Design of Social Research, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McTavish O et al. (1977) ‘Assessing Research Methodology: the structure and professional assessment of methodology’, Sociological Methods & Research, 6 (1): 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, M.F. (1961) ‘Industry and Policy: the Relation of Knowledge to Action’, in E.T. Crawford und A.D. Biderman (eds.) Social Scientists and International Affairs, N.Y. Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, V. und G. Schienstock (1978) Der Innovationsprozess in West-Europäischen Industrieländern, Band 2, Berlin-München, Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Stuart S. und M. Neef (1979) Policy Analysis in Social Science Research, Beverly Hills, Sage, Ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, S. (ed.) (1980) Improving Policy Analysis, Beverly Hills, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuber, K.A. (1980) Needs Assessment: A Model for Community Planning, Beverly Hills, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuijten Edelbroek, L. und H. Spickenheuer (1982) ‘De politie en de beheer-sing van kleine criminaliteit’, Justitië1e Verkenningen (8): 5–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlans, H. (1973) Criteria of Choice in Social Science Research, Washington, Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsler, Ron (1978) ‘Sociological Research and its Implications for Social Policy’, International Jnl. of Comparative Sociology, XIX, 1–2: 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plantenga, J. (1981) ‘De keuze van het significantieniveau bij beleids-voorbereidend sociaal-wetenschappelijk onderzoek’, De Sociolo-gische Gids, nr. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riecken, H.W. et al. (1975) Social Experiments for Planning and Evaluation, N.Y., Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, Noralou P. (1973) ‘Evaluation, Quasi-Experimentation and Public Policy’, in J.A. Caporaso und Leslie L. Roos (eds) Quasi-Experimental Approaches: Testing Theory and Evaluating Policy, Evanston, North-Western University Press, S. 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H. (1981) ‘Postwar Applied Social Research: Growth and Opportunities’, American Behavioral Scientist 24 (3): 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P.H., H.E. Freeman und S.R. Wright (1979) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, Beverly Hills, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, J. et al. (1983) Marketing Human S e rvi ce Innovat ions, Beverly Hills, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuyt, C.J.M. (1984) ‘De Kloof tussen Weten en Willen’, Beleid en Maatschappij, (XI) 1–2: 21/8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R.A und A.R. Shore (1979) Why Sociology Does Not Apply: A Study of the Use of Sociology in Public Policy, N.Y., Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, J.H.G. (1981) ‘Sociaal Beleidsonderzoek’, Sociale Wetenschappen (24) 1: 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A.L. (1968) Constructing Social Theories, N.Y., Harcourt, Brace und World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, G.Ï. und R.D. Evered (1978) ‘An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research’, Administrative Science Quarterly, Dec, Vol. 23: 582–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1969) ‘Neutrality in Political Science’ in P. Laslett und W.G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society, Third Series, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, S. 25–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, Herbert J. (1984) Social Scientists in the Policy Process: A Theory of Sociological Practice, Publication date Fall 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utterbach, J. (1974) ‘Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology’, Science (183): 620–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vall, M. (1958) ‘Sociaal onderzoek en opdrachtgever’, in Prof. Sj. Groenman, Prof. Dr. W.H. Heere und Drs. E.W.V. Vercruijsse (eds.) Het Sociale Leven in Al Zijn Facetten, Assen, Van Gorcum, S. 1426–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vall, M und C. Bolas (1980) ‘Applied Social Discipline Research or Social Policy Research’, The American Sociologist (15): 128–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vall, M und C. Bolas (1981) ‘External vs. Internal Social Policy Researchers’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, (2) 4: 461–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vall, M. und C. Bolas (1982) ‘Using social policy research for reducing social problems: an empirical analysis of structure and functions’, The Jnl. of Applied Behavioral Science, 18 (1): 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vall, M. (1983). ‘Comments on “A Change Strategy for Linking the Worlds of Academia and Practice’“, The Jnl. of Applied Behavioral Science, (19) 4: 45–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1968) Economy and Society, ed. by G. Roth und C. Wittich, N.Y., Westminster Press, Vol. I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Carol H. (1972) ‘Research for Policy’s Sake: The Enlightenment Function of Social Research’ in H.E. Freeman (ed.) Policy Studies Review Annual, Vol. 2, Beverly Hills, Sage, S. 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Carol H. (1980) ‘Knowledge Creep and Deeision Accretion’, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1 (3): 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Carol H. und M.J. Bucuvalas (1980) Social Science Research and Deci s ion-Making, New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, W. (1971) ‘Implementation Analysis and Assessment’, in W. Williams und R.F. Elmore (eds.) Social Program Implementation, N.Y., Academic Press, Ch. 12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Mark van de Vall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Helmut Klages

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van de Vall, M. (1985). Der Wertkontext praxisorientierter Sozialforschung: Ein zusammenfassendes Modell. In: Klages, H. (eds) Arbeitsperspektiven angewandter Sozialwissenschaft. Beiträge zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung, vol 70. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88681-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88681-1_2

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-11728-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-88681-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation