Skip to main content

Empirische Umsetzung theoretischer Modelle

  • Chapter
Strukturalistische Handlungstheorie

Part of the book series: Beiträge zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung ((BEISOFO,volume 61))

  • 45 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Nach der Diskussion der theoretisch-logischen Komponenten in Parsons’ Werk soll nun die empirisch-referentielle Ebene eingehender untersucht werden. Im Schema der Theoriestruktur handelt es sich um “Problemlösungen” und “Fakten”, denen in Stegmüllers Ansatz “paradigmatische Beispiele” und “intendierte Anwendungen” entsprechen.1 Im Zusammenhang mit der funktionalen und neo-evolutionären Analyse wurde bisher das Verhältnis von Theorie und Empirie primär unter dem Aspekt der Anbindung empirischer Konstrukte an die Theorie erörtert; nun soll die empirische Ebene selbst genauer untersucht werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Die nachfolgende Kurzdarstellung meßtheoretischer Begriffe orientiert sich an: J. Bortz, Lehrbuch der Statistik. Für Sozialwissenschaftler, Berlin 1977, S. 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Parsons, “Some Comments on the State of the General Theory of Action”, ASR, 18, 1953, 618–631, S. 620.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Parsons, “A Revised Analytical Approach to the Theory of Social Stratification”, in: T. Parsons, Essays in Sociological Theory, New York 1964 (1953), 386–439.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Parsons, G.M. Platt, The American Academic Profession, A Pilot Study, Ms., Cambridge, Mass. 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Parsons, “The American Family: Its Relations to Personality and to the Social Structure”, in: T. Parsons, R.F. Bales, Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, London 1968 (1955), 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Parsons, “’Voting’ and the Equilibrium of the American Political System”, in: T. Parsons, Politics and Social Structure, New York 1969 (1959), 204–240.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Parsons, “The School Class as a Social System: Some of its Functions in American Society”, in: T. Parsons, Social Structure and Personality, London 1970 (1959), 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Munch, Legitimität und politische Macht, Opladen 1976, S. 128–134

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Luhmann, Legitimation durch Verfahren, Neuwied 1975 (1969), S. 155–173

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Giesen, Makrosoziologie, Eine evolutionstheoretische Einführung, Hamburg 1980, S. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M.J. Mulkey, Funktionalism, Exchange and Theoretical Strategy, London 1971, S. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. W. Gouldner, “Reciprocity and Autonomy in Functional Theory”, in: L. Gross (Hrsg.), Symposium on Sociological Theory, Evanston 1959, 241–270, S. 253

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.U. Martel, “Academentia Praecox: The Aims, Merits and Scope of Parsons’ Multisystemic Language Rebellion (1958–1968)”, in H. Turk, R.L. Simpson (Hrsg.), Institutions and Social Exchange, Indianapolis 1971, 175–211, S. 180.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Johnson, Functionalism in Modern Sociology: Understanding Talcott Parsons, Morristown, N.J. 1975, S. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Parsons, “Comment on Burger’s Critique”, AJS, 83, 1978, 335–339, S. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Parsons, “Comment on ‘Preface to a Metatheoretical Framework for Sociology’ by Llewellyn Gross”, AJS, 67, 1961, 136–140, S. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. Parsons, “General Theory in Sociology”, in: R. Merton et al. (Hrsg.), Sociology Today, Vol. I, New York 1959, 3–38, S. 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.C. Hayes, “A Semi-formal Explication of Talcott Parsons’s Theory of Action”, Sociological Inquiry, 50, 1980, 39–56, S. 55

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.S. Coleman, “Comment on ‘On the Concept of Influence’”, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, 1963, 63–82, S. 65–67.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A.T. Turk, “On the Parsonian Approach to Theory Construction”, Sociological Quartery, 8, 1967, 37–50, S. 49

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.H. Turner, L. Beeghley, “Current Folklore in the Criticisms of Parsonian Action Theory”, Sociological Inquiry, 44, 1974, 47–55, S. 53

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.J. Loubser, “Handlung und Erlebnis”, in: J.J. Loubser et al. (Hrsg.), Allgemeine Handlungstheorie, Frankfurt a.M. 1981, 328–394, S. 385–386.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Menzies, Talcott Parsons and the Social Image of Man, London 1977, S. 158–159

    Google Scholar 

  24. T.B. Bottomore, “Out of this World: The Sociological Theory of Talcott Parsons”, in: T.B. Bottomore, Sociology as Social Criticism, New York 1975 (1969), 29–43, S. 39–40

    Google Scholar 

  25. G.C. Homans, “Zeitgenössische soziologische Theorie”, in: G.C. Homans, Grundfragen soziologischer Theorie, Opladen 1972 (1964), 9–43, S. 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  26. T. Parsons, “On Building Social System Theory: A Personal History”, in: T. Parsons, Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory, New York 1977 (1970), 22–76, S. 33–34, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  27. T. Parsons, “Graduate Training in Social Relations at Harvard”, Journal of General Education, 5, 1951, 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.A. Kahl, The American Class Structure, New York 1967 (1957), S. 281–289

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.A. Kahl, “Educational and Occupational Aspirations of ‘Common Man’ Boys”, Harvard Educational Review, 23, 1953, 186–203.

    Google Scholar 

  30. T. Parsons et al., Working Papers in the Theory of Action, New York 1953, 163–269, S. 254–255

    Google Scholar 

  31. T. Parsons, “The Relation Between the Small Group and the Larger Social System”, in: G.R. Grinker (Hrsg.), Toward a Unified Theory of Human Behavior, 2nd ed., New York 1967 (1953–54), 190–200, S. 194–199

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Parsons, “Psychology and Sociology”, in: J. Gillin (Hrsg.), For a Science of Social Man, New York 1954, 67–101, S. 78–80

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Warner, D. Thissen, “Graphical Data Analysis”, Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 1981, 191–241

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. Gnanadesikan, Methods for Statistical Data Analysis of Multivariate Observations, New York 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  35. K.C. Land, “Identification, Parameter Estimation, and Hypothesis Testing in Recursive Sociological Models”, in: A.S. Goldberger, O.D. Duncan (Hrsg.), Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, New York 1973, 19–49.

    Google Scholar 

  36. O.D. Duncan, Introduction to Structural Equation Models, New York 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  37. H.M. Blalock, Jr., Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research, Chapel Hill, North Car. 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  38. P.M. Blau, O.D. Duncan, The American Occupational Structure, New York 1967, S. 170.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vgl. Fig. 1 in: K.L. Alexander, B.K. Eckland, L.J.Griffin, “The Wisconsin Model of Socioeconomic Achievement: A Replication”, AJS, 81, 1975, 324–342.

    Google Scholar 

  40. O.D. Duncan, A.O. Haller, A. Portes, “Einflüsse der Peers auf das Anspruchsniveau: eine Neuinterpretation”, in: H.J. Hummell, R. Ziegler (Hrsg.), Korrelation und Kausalität, Bd. 3, Stuttgart 1976, 370–400.

    Google Scholar 

  41. K.L. Alexander, B.K. Eckland, “Basic Attainment Process: A Replication and Extension”, Sociology of Education, 48, 1975, 457–495, S. 457

    Google Scholar 

  42. K.L. Alexander, E.L. McDill, “Selection and Allocation within Schools: Some Causes and Consequences of Curriculum Placement”, ASR, 41, 1976, 963–980, S. 964–956.

    Google Scholar 

  43. J.S. Coleman, “The Mathematical Study of Change”, in: H.M. Blalock, Jr., A.B. Blalock (Hrsg.), Methodology in Social Research, New York 1968, 428–478.

    Google Scholar 

  44. A.B. Sorensen, “The Structure of Intragenerational Mobility”, ASR, 40, 1975, 456–471.

    Google Scholar 

  45. N.B. Tuma, M.T. Hannan, L.V. Groeneveld, “Dynamic Analysis of Event Histories”, AJS, 84, 1979, 820–854.

    Google Scholar 

  46. K.G. Jöreskog, D. Sörbom, LISREL VS Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood and Least Squares Models, Chicago 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  47. O.D. Duncan, D.L. Featherman, B. Duncan, Socioeconomic Background and Achievement, Chapt. 7, New York 1972

    Google Scholar 

  48. L.H. Boyd, Jr., G.R. Iversen, Contextual Analysis: Concepts and Statistical Techniques, Belmont, Cal. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  49. T. Parsons, “Cause and Effect in Sociology”, in: D. Lerner (Hrsg.), Cause and Effect, New York 1965, 51–73, S. 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  50. P.F. Lazarsfeld, “Concept Formation and Measurement”, in: G.J. Di Renzo, Concepts, Theory and Explanation in the Behavioral Sciences, New York 1966, 144–202.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vgl. P. Suppes, “A Probabilistic Analysis of Causality”, in: H.M. Blalock et al. (Hrsg.), Quantitative Sociology, New York 1975, 49–77.

    Google Scholar 

  52. H.M. Blalock, “The Measurement Problem. A Gap between the Language of Theory and Research”, in: H.M. Blalock, Jr., A.B. Blalock (Hrsg.), Methodology in Social Research, New York 1968, 5–27

    Google Scholar 

  53. H.C. Costner, “Theory, Deduction, and Rules of Correspondence”, in: H.M. Blalock, Jr. (Hrsg.), Causal Models in the Social Sciences, Chicago 1971 (1969), 299–319.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vgl. K.G. Jöreskog, “A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System”, in: A.S. Goldberger, O.D. Duncan, Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, New York 1973, 85–112.

    Google Scholar 

  55. R.S. Burt, “Interpretational Confounding of Unobserved Variables in Structural Equation Models”, Sociological Methods and Research, 5, 1976, S. 3–52; Ubers. d. Verf.

    Google Scholar 

  56. T. Burger, “Talcott Parsons, The Problem of Order in Society, and the Program of an Analytical Sociology”, AJS, 83, 1977, 320–334, S. 329–330.

    Google Scholar 

  57. K.C. Land, “Formal Theory”, in: H.L. Costner (Hrsg.), Sociological Methodology 1971, San Francisco, Cal. 1971, 175–220.

    Google Scholar 

  58. N.J. Smelser, Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1976, S. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  59. E.A. Tiryakian, “Typologies”, in: D.L. Sills (Hrsg.), IESS, Bd. 16, New York 1968, 177–186

    Google Scholar 

  60. J.C. McKinney, “Sociological Theory and the Process of Typification”, in: J.C. Mc Kinney, E.A. Tiryakian (Hrsg.), Sociological Theory, New York 1970, 235–269

    Google Scholar 

  61. J. Janoska-Bendl, Methodologische Aspekte des Idealtypus, Berlin 1965; D. Martindale, “Sociological Theory and the Ideal Type”, in: L. Gross (Hrsg.), Symposium on Sociological Theory, New York 1959, 57–91

    Google Scholar 

  62. A.D. Grimshaw, “Specification of Boundaries of Constructed Types through Use of Pattern Variable”, The Sociological Quarterly, 3, 1962, 179–194.

    Google Scholar 

  63. C.G. Hempel, “Typological Methods in the Social Sciences”, in: M.A. Natanson (Hrsg.), Philosophy in the Social Sciences, New York 1953 (1952), 210–230

    Google Scholar 

  64. P.F. Lazarsfeld, Sow me Remarks on the Typological Procedures in Social Research“, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 6, 1937, 119–139

    Google Scholar 

  65. R. Ziegler, “Typologien und Klassifikationen”, in: G. Albrecht et al. (Hrsg.), Soziologie, Opladen 1973, 11–47

    Google Scholar 

  66. V. Capecchi, “On the Definition of Typology and Classification”, Quality and Quantity, 2, 1968, 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  67. C.C. Clogg, “New Developments in Latent Structure Analysis”, in: D.J. Jackson, E.F. Borgatta (Hrsg.), Factor Analysis and Measurement in Sociological Research, Beverly Hills 1981, 215–246.

    Google Scholar 

  68. M. Küchler, Multivariate Analyseverfahren, Stuttgart 1979

    Google Scholar 

  69. G. Arminger, “Multivariate Analyse von qualitativen abhängigen Variablen mit verallgemeinerten linearen Modellen”, ZfS, 12, 1983, 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  70. H.C. Selvin, “On Formalizing Theory”, in: L.A. Coser (Hrsg.), The Idea of Social Structure, New York 1975, 339–354.

    Google Scholar 

  71. T. Parsons, “The Prospects of Sociological Theory”, in: T. Parsons, Essays in Sociological Theory, New York 1964 (1950), 348–369, S. 352

    Google Scholar 

  72. T. Parsons, “An Outline of the Social System”, in: T. Parsons et al. (Hrsg.), Theories of Society, New York 1961, 30–79, S. 32; AU, S. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  73. T. Parsons, G.M. Platt, “Research Proposal Submitted to National Science Foundation”, Ms., Cambridge, Mass. 1968, S. III-19, III-20.

    Google Scholar 

  74. T. Parsons, G.M. Platt, “Considerations on the American Academic System”, Minerva, 6, 1968, 497–523

    Google Scholar 

  75. T. Parsons, G.M. Platt, “Decision-Making in the Academic System, Influence and Power Exchange”, in: C.D. Kruytbosch, S.L. Messinger (Hrsg.), The State of the University: Authority and Change, Beverly Hills 1970, 133–180.

    Google Scholar 

  76. G.M. Platt, T. Parsons, R. Kirshstein, “Faculty Teaching Goals, 1968–1973”, Social Problems, 24, 1976, 298–307.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ebenda, S. 299. Vgl. auch Frage 8 des Fragebogens in: À.E. Bayer, Teaching Faculty in Academe: 1972–1973, Washington, D.C. 1973, Appendix C.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Parsons verwendet die Formulierung “trustee of the cultural tradition”, T. Parsons, “Remarks on Education and the Profession”, International Journal of Ethics, 47, 1937, 365–369, S. 366.

    Google Scholar 

  79. T. Parsons, “Propaganda and Social Control”, in: T. Parsons, Essays in Sociological Theory, New York 1964 (1942), 142–176, S. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  80. T. Parsons, G.M. Platt, “Higher Education and Changing Socialization”, in: M.W. Riley et al. (Hrsg.), Aging and Society, Vol. III, New York 1972, 236–291, S. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  81. R. Münch, Theorie des Handelns, Frankfurt a.M. 1982, S. 172–190.

    Google Scholar 

  82. T. Parsons, “The Academic System: A Sociologist’s View”, The Public Interest, 13, 1968, 173–197, S. 175–176.

    Google Scholar 

  83. T. Parsons, “Some Problems of General Theory in Sociology”, in: T. Parsons, Social Systems and the Evolution Action Theory, New York 1977 (1970), 229–269, S. 252–253.

    Google Scholar 

  84. T. Parsons, “Social Structure and the Symbolic Media of Interchange”, in: T. Parsons, Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory, New York 1977 (1975), 204–228, S. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  85. T. Parsons, “The Future of the University”, in: T. Parsons, Action Theory and the Human Condition, New York 1978 (1977), 96–114, S. 113

    Google Scholar 

  86. T. Parsons, Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory, New York 1977 (1970), 321–380, S. 358; Übers. d. Verf.

    Google Scholar 

  87. T. Parsons, “The University ‘Bundle’: A Study of Balance between Differentiation and Integration”, in: N.J. Smelser, G. Almond (Hrsg.), Public Higher Education in California, Berkeley 1974, 275–299, S. 280–283.

    Google Scholar 

  88. J.C. Stanley, “Reliability”, in: R.L. Thorndike (Hrsg.), Educational Measurement, 2nd Ed., Washington, D.C. 1971, 356–442, S. 396–398.

    Google Scholar 

  89. A.W. Astin, “An Empirical Characterization of Higher Educational Institutions”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 1962, 224–232, S. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  90. O. Fulton, M. Trow, “Research Activities in American Higher Education”, Sociology of Education, 47, 1974, 29–73, S. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  91. N.J. Smelser, “Epilogue: Social-Structural Dimensions of Higher Education”, in: T. Parsons, G.M. Platt, The American University, Cambridge 1974 (1973), 389–422.

    Google Scholar 

  92. G.M. Platt, T. Parsons, R. Kirshstein, “Undergraduate Teaching Environments: Normative Orientations to Teaching among Faculty in the Higher Educational System”, Sociological Inquiry, 48, 1978, 3–21, S. 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Vgl. P.F. Lazarsfeld, H. Menzel, “On the Relation Between Individual and Collective Properties”, in: P.F. Lazarsfeld et al. (Hrsg.), Continuities in the Language of Social Research, New York 1972 (1961), 225–237, S. 227–229.

    Google Scholar 

  94. R. Blank, “An Organizational Model of Higher Education Institutions and Faculty Teaching Goals”, Sociological Inquiry, 48, 1978, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  95. P.M. Blau, “Recruiting Faculty and Students”, Sociology of Education, 47, 1974, 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  96. P.M. Blau, “Levels and Types of Structural Effects: The Impact of University and Professional Schools”, in: W.E. Snizek et al. (Hrsg.) Contemporary Issues in Theory and Research, A Metatheoretical Perspective, London 1979, 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  97. R. Munch, Theorie des Handelns, Frankfurt a.M. 1982, S. 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  98. T. Parsons, “Stability and Change in the American University”, Daedalus, Fall 1974, 269–277, 2. 276.

    Google Scholar 

  99. J.R. Gusfield, “Review of ‘The American University’ by Talcott Parsons and Gerald M. Platt”, Contemporary Sociology, 3, 1974, 291–295

    Google Scholar 

  100. P. Sexton, “Review of ‘The American University’ by Talcott Parsons and Gerald M. Platt”, Contemporary Sociology, 3, 1974, 296–300.

    Google Scholar 

  101. G. Grant, “Review of ‘The American University’ by Talcott Parsons and Gerald M. Platt”, Harvard Educational Review, 44, 1974, 314–318.

    Google Scholar 

  102. K. Menzies, Talcott Parsons and the Social Image of Man, London 1977, S. 158–159

    Google Scholar 

  103. J. Habermas, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, Bd. 2, Frankfurt a.M. 1981, S. 373–374

    Google Scholar 

  104. H. Joas, “Universität und Rationalität. über Talcott Parsons’ Beitrag zur Soziologie der Universität” in: G. Grohs, J. Schwerdtfeger, T. Strohm (Hrsg.), Kulturelle Identität im Wandel, Stuttgart 1980, 236–250;

    Google Scholar 

  105. G. Burkart, “Strukturtheoretische Vorüberlegungen zur Analyse universitärer Sozialisationsprozesse”, KZfSS, 34, 1982, 444–464.

    Google Scholar 

  106. G. Grant, D. Riesman, “An Ecology of Academic Reform”, Daedalus, Winter 1975, 166–191.

    Google Scholar 

  107. R. Bellah, “The World is the World through Its Theorists - In Memory of Talcott Parsons”, The American Sociologist, 15, 1980, 60–62, S. 61. Übers. und Einschub in Klammern d. Verf.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Vgl. R.K. Merton, “Discussion of ‘The Position of Sociological Theory’ by Talcott Parsons”, AJS, 13, 1948, 164–168, S. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  109. T. Parsons, “The Point of View of the Author”, in: M. Black (Hrsg.), The Social Theories of Talcott Parsons, London und Amsterdam 1976 (1961), 311–363, S. 322–323.

    Google Scholar 

  110. R.K. Merton, “Funktionale Analyse”, in: H. Hartmann (Hrsg.), Moderne amerikanische Soziologie, Stuttgart 1973 (1957), 171–214.

    Google Scholar 

  111. R. K. Merton, “Structural Analysis in Sociology”, in: R.K. Merton, Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays, New York 1976, 109–144, S. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  112. R. Houdon, “Die Krise der Soziologie”, in: R. Boudon, Widersprüche sozialen Handelns, Darmstadt 1979 (1971), 13–47, S. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  113. J.J. Loubser, “Handlung und Erlebnis”, in: J.J. Loubser et al. (Hrsg.), Allgemeine Handlungstheorie, Frankfurt a.M. 1981 (1976), 328–394.

    Google Scholar 

  114. V. Lidz, “Introduction, Part II: General Action Analysis”, in: J.J. Loubser et al. (Hrsg.), Explorations in General Theory in Social Science, Vol. I, New York 1976, 124–150, S. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  115. W. Loh, Kombinatorische Systemtheorie: Evolution, Geschichte und logisch-mathematischer Grundlaqenstreit, Frankfurt 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  116. W. Loh, “AGIL-Dimensionen im Spätwerk von T. Parsons und Kombinatorik”, KZfSS, 32, 1980, 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  117. T. Parsons, “Family Structure and the Socialization of the Child”, in: T. Parsons, R.F. Bales, Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, London 1968 (1955), 35–131, S. 47. Vgl. auch Kap. 2. 2. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  118. J. Laulicht, “Role Conflict, The Pattern Variable Theory and Scalogram Analysis”, Social Forces, 33, 1955, 250–254, S. 253

    Google Scholar 

  119. H.A. Scarr, “Measures of Particularism”, Sociometry, 27, 1964, 413–432, S. 432

    Google Scholar 

  120. J.A. Kahl, “Some Measurements of Achievement Orientation”, AJS, 70, 1965, 669–681, S. 671.

    Google Scholar 

  121. P.M. Blau, “Operationalizing a Conceptual Scheme: The Universalism-Particularism Pattern Variable”, ASR, 27, 1962, 159–169, S. 168–169.

    Google Scholar 

  122. G.L. Buck, A.L. Jacobson, “Social Evolution and Structural-Functional Analysis: An Empirical Test”, ASR, 33, 1968, 343–355

    Google Scholar 

  123. A.L. Jacobson, “A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Social Change and Conflict Based on Talcott Parsons’ Ideas”, in: H. Turk, R.L. Simpson (Hrsg.), Institutions and Social Exchange, Indianapolis 1971, 344–360.

    Google Scholar 

  124. T. Parsons, “Commentary”, in: H. Turk, R.L. Simpson (Hrsg.), Institutions and Social Exchange, Indianapolis 1971, 380–399, S. 396.

    Google Scholar 

  125. z.B. M.M. Tatsuoka, Multivariate Analysis: Techniques for Educational and Psychological Research, New York 1971

    Google Scholar 

  126. F.U. Pappi, E.O. Laumann, Gesellschaftliche Wertorientierungen und Politisches Verhalten, ZfS, 3, 1974, 157–188.

    Google Scholar 

  127. A.P.M. Coxon, C.L. Jones, “Multidimensional Scaling”, in: C.A. O’Muirchartaigh, C. Payne (Hrsg.), The Analysis of Survey Data, Vol. I, Exploring Data Structures, New York, 1977, 159–182.

    Google Scholar 

  128. A.P.M. Coxon, C.L. Jones, Multidimensional Scaling: Exploration to Confirmation, Quality and Quantity, 14, 1980, 31–73

    Google Scholar 

  129. J.C. Lingoes, E.E. Roskam, I. Borg (Hrsg.), Geometric Representations of Relational Data, Readings in Multidimensional Scaling, Ann Arbor 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  130. T. Parsons, “Review of Harold J. Bershady, ‘Ideology and Social Knowledge’” in: T. Parsons, Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory, New York 1977 (1974), 122–134, S. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  131. T. Parsons, “The Present Status of ‘Structural-Functional’ Theory in Sociology”, in: T. Parsons, Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory, New York 1977 (1975), 100–117, S. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  132. U.Oevermann, T.Allert, E.Konau, J. Krambeck, “Die Methodologie einer ‘objektiven Hermeneutik’ und ihre allgemeine forschungslogische Bedeutung in den Sozialwissenschaften”, in: H.G. Soeffner (Hrsg.), Interpretative Verfahren in den Text-und Sozialwissenschaften, Stuttgart 1979, 352–434.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1984 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Miebach, B. (1984). Empirische Umsetzung theoretischer Modelle. In: Strukturalistische Handlungstheorie. Beiträge zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung, vol 61. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88677-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88677-4_5

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-11696-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-88677-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics