Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quellen

  • Chapter
Englische Rhetorik und Poetik 1479 – 1660

Part of the book series: Forschungsberichte des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen ((FOLANW))

  • 24 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Cranz, F.E. A Bibliography of Aristotle Editions, 1501–1600, Baden-Baden 1971; ed. Ch.B. Schmitt 2 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erickson, K.V. Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Five Centuries of Philological Research, Metuchen, N.J., 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herrick, M.T. “The Early History of Aristotle’s Rhetoric in England”, PN 5 (1926), 242–257.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hultzén, L.S. Aristotle’s “Rhetoric” in England to 1600, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lohr, C.H. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors A-B”, SRen 21 (1974). 228–289.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lohr, C.H. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors C”, RenQ 28 (1975), 689–741.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lohr, C.H. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors D-F”, RenQ 29 (1976), 714–745.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lohr, C.H. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors G-K”, RenQ 30 (1977), 681–741.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lohr, C.H. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors L-M”, RenQ 31 (1978), 532–603.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lohr, C.H. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors N-Ph”, RenQ 32 (1979), 529–580.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lohr, C.H. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors Pi-Sm”, RenQ 33 (1980), 623–734.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lohr, C.H. “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors So-Z”, RenQ 35 (1982), 164–256.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hultzén, L.S. “Charles Butler on Memory”, SM 6 (1939), 44–65.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clark, A.C. “Ciceronianism”, in: G.S. Gordon (ed.), English Literature and the Classics, Oxford 1912, pp. 118–145.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grosser, D. Studies in the Influence of “Rhetorica ad Herennium”, and Cieero ss “De ‘Inventione’,”Ph.D. disc., Cornell University 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy, W.H.J. The Influence of Cicero in England During the SixteentTi Century, Pí1.D. diss., Harvard University 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Modersohn, A.-B. “Cicero im englischen Geistesleben des 16. Jahrhunderts”, Archiv 149 (1926), 33–51, 219–245.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scott, I. Controversies over the Imitation of Cicero as a Model for Style and Some Phases of their Influence on the SchoóT of theîRnaissance; New York 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scott, I. Controversies over the Imitation of Cicero as a Model for Style and Some Phases of their Influence on the SchoóT of theîRnaissance; New York 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vos, A. “’Good Matter and Good Utterance’: The Character of English Ciceronianism”, SEL 19 (1979), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ward, J.O. “Renaissance Commentators on Ciceronian Rhetoric”, in: Murphy (ed.), Renaissance Eloquence (Nr. C. 110 ), pp. 126–173.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zielinski, Th. Cicero im Wandel der Jahrhunderte, Leipzig 4 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zielinski, Th. Cicero im Wandel der Jahrhunderte, Darmstadt 6 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dockhorn, K. “Rhetorica movet: Protestantischer Humanismus und karolingische Renaissance”, in: H. Schanze (ed.), Rhetorik: Beiträge zu ihrer Geschichte in Deutschland vom 16.-20. Jahrhunairt, Frankfurt 1974, pp. 17–42.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nadeau, R.E. “A Renaissance Schoolmaster on Practice”, SM 17 (1950), 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nadeau, R.E. “Thomas Farnaby: Schoolmaster and Rhetorician of the English Renaissance”, QJS 36 (1950), 340–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nadeau, R.E. The “Index Rhetoricus” of Thomas Farnaby, Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan Graduate School 1950.–DA 11 (1951), 462–463.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nadeau, R.E. The “Index Rhetoricus” of Thomas Farnaby, Ph.D. diss., University of Michigan Graduate School 1950.–SM 19 (1952), 127–128.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nadeau, R.E. “Talaeus versus Farnaby on Style”, SM 21 (1954), 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dodd, M.C. “The Rhetorics in Molesworth’s Edition of Hobbes”, MP 50 (1952), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ong, W.J. “Hobbes and Talon’s Ramist Rhetoric in English”, TCBS I /3 (1951), 260–269.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Harding, H.F. “Quintilian’s Witnesses”, SM 1 (1934), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harding, H.F. “Quintilian’s Witnesses”, SM 1 (1934), in Howes (ed.), Historical Studies Wir. C.107, pp. 90–106 (391–395).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Farris, G. Umanesimo e Religione in Lorenzo Guglielmo Traversagni 2 1425–1505, Mailand 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Martin, R.H. “The Eppitome Margaritae Eloquentiae of Laurentius Gulielmus Saona”, PLPLS-LHS 14/4 (1971), 103–126 (“Introduction”).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mortimer, J.E. “An Unrecorded Caxton at Ripon Cathedral”, Library, 5th Ser., 8 (1953), 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Murphy, J.J. “Caxton’s Two Choices: ‘Modern’ and ‘Medieval’ Rhetoric in Traversagni’s Nova Rhetorica and the Anonymous Court of Sapience”, MandH, NS, 3 (1972), 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ruysschaert, J. “Lorenzo Guglielmo Traversagni de Savone (1425–1503), un humaniste franciscain oublié”, AFH 46 (1953), 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rademaker, C.S.M. Gerardus Joannes Vossius (1577–1649), Zwolle 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rademaker, C.S.M. Life and Works of Gerardus Joannes Vossius (1577–16)(Respublica Literaria Neerlandica, 5), Assen 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Craig, H. “Shakespeare and Wilson’s Arte of Rhetorique” (Nr. C. 798. 29 ).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Engelhardt, G.J. “The Relation of Sherry’s Treatise of Schemes and Tropes to Wilson’s Arte of Rhetorique” TNr. B. 161. 77

    Google Scholar 

  43. Nowottny, W.M.T. “Some Features of Shakespeare’s Language” (Nr. C. 798. 129 ).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Reed, A.W. “Nicholas Udall and Thomas Wilson” (Nr. C. 807. 2 ).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schmidt, A.J. Thomas Wilson, Tudor Scholar and Statesman, Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania 1953.–DA 13 (1953), 786–787.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schmidt, A.J. “A Treatise on England’s Perils, 1578”, ARG 46 (1955), 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schmidt, A.J. “A Household Inventory, 1581”, PAPS 101 (1957), 459–480.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Schmidt, A.J. “Some Notes on Dr. Wilson and his Lincolnshire Connections”, Linc Hist II /4 (1957), 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Schmidt, A.J. “Thomas Wilson, Tudor Scholar-Statesman”, HLQ 20 (1956–1957), 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schmidt, A.J. “Thomas Wilson and the Tudor Commonwealth: An Essay in Civic Humanism”, HLQ 23 (1959–1960), 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schmidt, A.J. “A Humanist Describes and Prescribes: Thomas Wilson and Medicine”, BHM 34 /5 (1960), 414–418.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wagner, R.H. Thomas Wilson’s “Arte of Rhetorique”, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1928.–QJS 15 (1929), 139–142.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wagner, R.H. “Wilson and His Sources”, QJS 15 (1929), 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wagner, R.H. “The Text and Editions of Wilson’s Arte of Rhetorique”, MLN 44 (1929), 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wagner, R.H. “Thomas Wilson’s Contributions to Rhetoric”, in: Bryant (ed.), Papers in Rhetoric (Nr. C. 101 ), pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wagner, R.H. “Thomas Wilson’s Contributions to Rhetoric”, in: Bryant (ed.), in: Historical Studies (Nr. C. 107 ), pp. 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wagner, R.H. “Thomas Wilson’s Speech Against Usury”, QJS 38 (1952), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wagner, R.H. “Thomas Wilson’s Arte of Rhetorique”, SM 27 (1960), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sprunger, K.L. “Ames, Ramus and the Method of Puritan Theology”, HTR 59 (1966), 133–151.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sprunger, K.L. The Learned Doctor William Ames: Dutch Backgrounds of En lish and American Puritanism, Urbana, Ill, 1

    Google Scholar 

  61. Irvine, J.R. “A New Doctrine of Scriptural Interpretation: The Basis for Hemmingsen’s Reformation Rhetoric”, SSJ 36 (1971), 333–343.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Breward, I. “Perkins and the Origins of Reformed Casuistry”,.Evangq 40 (1968), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Porter, H.C. Reformation and Reaction in Tudor Cambridge, Cambridge 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Porter, H.C. Reformation and Reaction in Tudor Cambridge, Cambridge Hamden, Conn., 1972, Kap. 12: “The Theology of William Perkins” (pp. 288–313).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rechtien, J.G. “The Visual Memory of William Perkins and the End of Theological Dialogue”, JAAR 45/1 Suppl. (March 1977), D: 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wright, L.B. “William Perkins: Elizabethan Apostle of ‘Practical Divinity’”, HLQ 3 (1939–1940), 171–196.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rechtien, J.G. “Antithetical Literary Structures in the Reformation Theology of Walter Travers”, SCJ 8 (1977), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Shapiro, B.J. John Wilkins 1614–1672: An Intellectual Biography, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London T9–69.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Haba, J.Ch. A Study of Abraham Wright’s “Five Sermons, in Five Several Styles; Or Waies of Preachin ”, Ph.D. Tss., Cornell University, 1967. - DA 28 (1967), 1396A - 1397A.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Clarke, Sir E. “The English Secretorie, 1586”, SEC VIII /12 (1911), 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Gerlo, A. “The Opus de Conscribendis Epistolis of Erasmus and the Tradition of the ‘Ars Epistolica’”, in: R.R. Bolgar (ed.), Classical Influences on European Culture A.D. 500–1500, Cambridge 1971, pp. 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Henderson, J.R. “Erasmus on the Art of LetterWriting”,in: Murphy (ed.), Renaissance Eloquence (Nr. C. 110 ), pp. 331–355.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Dodson, S.C. “Abraham Fleming, Writer and Editor”, TUSE 34–35 (1955–1956), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Miller, W.E. Abraham Fleming, Elizabethan Man of Letters: A Biographical and Critical Stud, Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania 1957. - DA 17 (57), 2613.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Best, Th.W. Macropedius, New York 1972. - Vgl. B.63

    Google Scholar 

  76. Clark, D.L. “The Rise and Fall of Progymnasmata in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Grammar Schools” (Nr. C.163).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Fader, D.N. Aphthonius and Elizabethan Prose Romance, Ph.D. diss., Stanford University 1963.–DA 24 (1964), 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Johnson, F.R. - Vgl. Nr. 8. 89. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Johnson, F.R. “Two Renaissance Textbooks of Rhetoric: Aphthonius’ Progymnasmata and Rainolde’s A booke called the Foundacion of Rhetorike”, HLQ 6 (1942–1943), 427–444.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Camp, T.W. William Baldwin and His Treatise of Moral Philosophy, Ph.D. diss., ale University 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Robertson, J. “Nicholas Breton’s Collections of Proverbs”, HLQ 7 (1943–1944), 307–315.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Mayor, J.E.B. “Latin English and English Latin Lexicography”, JCSP 4 (1859), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Starnes, D.T. “Thomas Cooper’s Thesaurus: A Chapter in Renaissance Lexicography”, UTSE 28 (1949), 15–48.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Starnes, D.T. “Thomas Cooper and the Bibliotheca Eliotae”, UTSE 30 (1951), 40–60.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Davril, R.E. Les essais de Sir William Cornwallis: Etude critique, Diss. Paris 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Rauchbauer, O.H. Die Essays von Sir William Cornwallis und das Essay seiner Zeit, Diss. Wien 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Förster, M. Das Elisabethanische Sprichwort nach Thomas Draxe’Treasurie of ancient Ada ies“ (1616), Halle/S. 1918 (Sonderdruck aus: Anglia 42 (1918. 1, 361–4ï4).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Starr, G.A. “Antedatings from Nicholas Udall’s Translation of Erasmus’s Apophthegmes” (Nr. B. 147. 1 ).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Baskervill, Ch.R. “Taverner’s Garden of Wisdom and the Apophthegmata of Erasmus” (Nr. B. 144. 1 ).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Appelt, T.C. Studies in the Content and Sources of Erasmu..s’s “Adagia” with particular reléTence to te first Edition, 1500, and the edition of 1525,Thicago 1942

    Google Scholar 

  91. Kinney, D. “Erasmus’ Adagia: Midwife to the Rebirth of Learning”, JMRS 11 /2 (1981), 169–192.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Nolde, Sr. M.S. Whitney’s “A Choice of Emblemes” and Three Commonplace Collections of Erasmus: A Study in Interaction of the Emblematic and Commonplace Traditions, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1964.–DA 25 (1965), 4691–4692.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Phillips, M.M. The “Adages” of Erasmus: A Study with Translations, Cambridge 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Schoell, F.L. “George Chapman et les Adages d’Erasmus” (Nr. C. 752. 4 ).

    Google Scholar 

  95. White, 0.B. “Richard Taverner’s Interpretation of Erasmus in Proverbes or Adagies” (Nr. B.144.2).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Stern, V.F. “The Bibliotheca of Gabriel Harvey”, RenQ 25 (1972), 1–62.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Stern, V.F. Gabriel Harvey: His Life, Marginalia and Library, Oxford 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Wilson, H.S. “Gabriel Harvey’s Method of Annotating his Books”, HLB 2 (1948), 344–361.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Allen, D.C. “The Classical Scholarship of Francis Meres”,PMLA 48 (1933), 418–425.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Matthes, H.Ch. “Francis Meres und Erasmus von Rotterdam”, Anglia 63 (1939), 426–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Matthes, H.Ch. “Zum Quellenproblem der Palladis Tamia”, Anglia 65 (1941), 104–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Kelley, M. “Milton’s Commonplace Book, Folio 20”, MLN 62 (1947), 192–194.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Mohl, R. John Milton and His Commonplace Book, New York 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Parker, W.R. “Milton’s Commonplace Book: An Index and Notes”, MiltonN 3 (1969), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Turner, C. Anthony Munday, An Elizabethan Man of Letters, Berkeley 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Baskervill, Ch.R. “Taverner’s Garden of Wisdom and the Apophthegmata of Erasmus”, SP 29 (1932), 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  107. White, O.B. “Richard Taverner’s Interpretation of Erasmus in Proverbes or Adagies”, PMLA 59 (1944), 928–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Lievsay, J.L. “Tuvill’s Advancement of Bacon’s Learning”, HLQ 9 (1945–1946), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Starr, G.A. “Antedatings from Nicholas Udall’s Translation of Erasmus’s Apophthegmes”, NandQ, NS, 14 (1967), 444–452.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Engelhardt, G.J. “Mediaeval Vestiges in the Rhetoric of Erasmus”, PMLA 63 (1948), 739–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Rix, H.D. “The Editions of Erasmus’ De Copia”, SP 43 (1946), 595–618.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Sowards, J.K. “Erasmus and the Apologetic Textbook: A Study of the De Duplici Copia Verborum ac Rerum”, SP 55 (1958), 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Vallese, G. “Erasme et le De duplici Copia verborum ac rerum”, in: Colloquia Erasmiana Turonensia, 2 vol., Paris 1972, vol. I, pp. 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Grund, G.R. John Hoskyns, Elizabethan Rhetoric, and the Development of English Prose, Ph.D. diss., Htrvar University 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Osborn, L.B. “Ben Jonson and Hoskyns”, TLS 15. 1930, p. 370.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Osborn, L.B. The Life, Letters, and Writins of John Hoskyns 15b6–1638, pp. 1–102 (2–25).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Kremer, U.M. “Mosellanus: Humanist zwischen Kirche und Reformation”, ARG 73 (1982), 20–33.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Engelhardt, G.J. “The Relation of Sherry’s Treatise of Schemes and Tropes to Wilson’s Arte of Rhetorique”, PMLA 62 (1967 Y, 76–82).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Hildebrandt, H.W. “Sherry: Renaissance Rhetorician”, CSSJ 11 (1960), 204–209.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Hildebrandt, H.W. “Amplification in a Rhetoric of Style”, SSJ 30 (1965), 294–307.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Sizemore, Ch.W. “The Authorship of The Mystery of Rhetoric Unveiled”, PBSA 69 (1975), 79–81.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Brennan, J.X. “Joannes Susenbrotus: A Forgotten Humanist”, PMLA 75 (1960), 485–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Brennan, J.X. “The Epitome Troporum ac Schematum: The Genesis of a Renaissance Rhetorical Text”, QJS 46 (1960), 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Fox, P. “Hans Susenbrot, ein verschollener schwäbischer Humanist und lateinischer Schulmeister”, Diöc A Schwab 25 (1907), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Madan, F.F. “Milton, Salmasius, and Dugard”, Library 4 (1923), 119–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Rostenberg, L. “William Dugard, Pedagogue and Printer to the Commonwealth”, PBSA 52 (1958), 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Yates, F.A. Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, London 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Yates, F.A. Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, Chicago 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Cleary, J.W. “John Bulwer: Renaissance Communicationist”, QJS 45 (1959), 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Clark, A.M. “Thomas Heywood as a Critic”, MLN 37 (1922), 217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Eisenhart, N.N. “Petrus Ravennas”, in: Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, vol. XXV, Leipzig 1887.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Eisenhart, N.N. “Petrus Ravennas”, in: Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie, vol. XXV, Berlin 1970, pp. 529–539.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Bernad, M.A. “The Treatise on Imitation of Blessed Edmund Campion”, Folio 6 (1952), 100–114.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Duhamel, P.A. “The Ciceronianism of Gabriel Harvey”, SP 49 (1952), 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Webster, J. “Gabriel Harvey’s Ciceronianus: An Emerging Renaissance Aesthetic”, in: D.A. Richardson (ed.), Spenser at Kalamazoo, 1978: Proceedings from a S ecial Session at the 13th Conference on Medieval Stu ies in Kalamazoo, Cleveland 1978, pp. 1–19, 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Wilson, H.S. “Gabriel Harvey’s Orations on Rhetoric”, ELH 12 (1945), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Wilson, H.S. “The Humanism of Gabriel Harvey”, J.Q. Adams Memorial Studies, Washington 1948, pp. 707–721.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Wilson, H.S. “The Cambridge Comedy Pedantius and Gabriel Harvey’s Ciceronianus”, SP 45 (1948), 578–591.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Hudson, H.H. “Jewel’s Oration Against Rhetoric: A Translation”, QJS 14 (1928), 374–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Nauert, Ch.G. A ri ppa and the Crisis of Renaissance Thougt, iTrbâna, I11., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Korkowski, E. “Agrippa as Ironist”, Neophil 60 (1976), 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Zambelli, P. “Agrippa von Nettesheim in den neueren kritischen Studien und in den Handschriften”, AKG 51 (1969), 264–2. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Firestine, M.W. The Doctrine of Imitation in the English Renaissance (Nr. C.f54)

    Google Scholar 

  144. Hoffman, C.F. Roger Ascham and Humanist Education in Sixteenth Century England, Ph.D. diss., University T Pennsylvania 1953.–DA 13 (1953), 796–797.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Parks, G.B. “The First Draft of Ascham’s Scholemaster”, HLQ 1 (1937/1938), 313–327.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Rosenzweig, S. “Ascham’s Scholemaster and Spenser’s February Eclogue”, SAB 15 (1940), 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Ryan, L.V. Roger Ascham, Stanford 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Ryan, L.V. Roger Ascham, London 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Staton, W.F. “Roger Ascham’s Theory of History Writing”, SP 56 (1959), 125–137.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Strozier, R.M. “Theory and Structure in Roger Ascham’s The Scholemaster” (Nr. C. 746. 7 ).

    Google Scholar 

  151. Trousdale, M. “Recurrence and Renaissance: Rhetorical Imitation in Ascham and Sturm”, ELR 6 (1976), 156–179.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Vos, A. “’Good Matter and Good Utterance’” (Nr. B. 3. 6 ).

    Google Scholar 

  153. Anceschi, L. L’estetica dell’empirismo inglese, I: “Da Bacone a Shaftesbury”, Bologna 1959, pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  154. Andrews, J. “Bacon and the ‘Dissociation of Sensibility’’, NandQ 199 (1954), 484–486, 530–532.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Bevilacqua, V.M. “Baconian Influences in the Development of Scottish Rhetorical Theory”, PAPS 111 (1967), 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  156. Bundy, M.W. “Bacon’s True Opinion of Poetry”, SP 27 (1930), 244–264.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Dean, L.F. “Sir Francis Bacon’s Theory of Civil History-Writing”, ELH 8 (1941), 161–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Dean, L.F. “Sir Francis Bacon’s Theory of Civil History-Writing”, ELH 8 (1941), in: Vickers (ed.), Essential Articles (Nr. B.197. 21 ), pp. 211–235.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Fieler, F.B. “The Impact of Bacon and the New Science Upon Jonson’s Critical Thought in Timber”, RenP (for 1958–1960), 1961, pp. 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Fisch, H., H.W. Jones. “Bacon’s Influence on Sprat’s Histor of the Royal Society”, MLQ 12–13 (1951–1952), 10.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Guibbory, A. “Francis Bacon’s View of History: The Cycles of Error and the Progress of Truth”, JEGP 74 (1975), 336–350.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Harrison, J.L. “Bacon’s View of Rhetoric, Poetry, and the Imagination”, HLQ 20 (1956–1957), 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Harrison, J.L. “Bacon’s View of Rhetoric, Poetry, and the Imagination”, HLQ 20 (1956–1957), in: Vickers (ed.), Essential Articles (Nr. B.197. 21 ), pp. 253–271.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Jardine, L. Francis Bacon: Discovery and the Art of Discourse, Cambridge 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  165. Kocher, P.H. “Francis Bacon on the Drama”, in: R. Hosley (ed.), Essays on Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama ( FS Craig ), London 1963, pp. 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  166. McCreary, E.P. “Bacon’s Theory of Imagination Reconsidered”, HLQ 36 (1972–1973), 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  167. McNamee, M.B. Francis Bacon’s Attitude Toward Grammar and Rhetoric in the Light of Tra1ition, Ph.D. diss., St. Louis University 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Morrison, J.C. “Philosophy and History in Bacon”, JHI 38 (1977), 585–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Probst, R.E. “The Influence of Bacon’s Concept of Knowledge on the Evolution of Seventeenth-Century Criticism, RLV 38 (1972), 565–584.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Rossi, P. Francesco Bacone: Della magia alla scienza, Turin 1974 (11957).

    Google Scholar 

  171. Rossi, P. Francesco Bacone: Della magia alla scienza, Turin 1974 engl. Ubers.-1-rancis Bacon: From Magic to Science, übers. S. Rabinovitch, Chicago 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  172. Stephens, J.W. The Origins and Influence of Bacon’s Theory of Rhetoric, Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin 1968. - DA 29 (1968), 914A - 915A.

    Google Scholar 

  173. Stephens, J.W. “Science and the Aphorism: Bacon’s Theory of the Philosophical Style”, SM 37 (1970), 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  174. Stephens, J.W. “Bacon’s New English Rhetoric and the Debt to Aristotle”, SM 39 (1972), 248–259.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Stephens, J.W. Francis Bacon and the Style of Science, Chicago 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  176. Vickers, B. (ed.). Essential Articles for the Study of Francis Bacon, Hamden, Conn., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Vickers, B. (ed.). Essential Articles for the Study of Francis Bacon, London 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Wallace, K.R. Bacon’s Theory of Public Address, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1933. - SM 2 (1935), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  179. Wallace, K.R. “Bacon’s Conception of Rhetoric”, SM 3 (1936), 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Wallace, K.R. “Bacon’s Conception of Rhetoric”, SM 3 (1936), in: Howes (ed.), Historical Studies (Nr. C.107), pp. 114–138 (395–396).

    Google Scholar 

  181. Wallace, K.R. “Bacon’s Contribution to the Theory of Rhetoric and Public Address”, in: Humanistic Studies in Honor of John Metcalf ( University of Virginia Studies, TY, ârlottesville, Va., 1941, pp. 282–313.

    Google Scholar 

  182. Wallace, K.R. Francis Bacon on Communication and Rhetoric, or: The Art of Applying Reason to Imagination for the Better Moving of the Will, CEapel Hill, N.C., 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Wallace, K.R. “Aspects of Modern Rhetoric in Francis Bacon”, QJS 42 (1956), 398–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Wallace, K.R. “Imagination and Francis Bacon’s View of Rhetoric”, in: R.E. Nebergall (ed.), Dimensions of Rhetorical Scholarship, Norman, Okla., 1963, pp. 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Wallace, K.R. Francis Bacon on the Nature of Man, Urbana, Ill., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  186. Wallace, K.R. “Francis Bacon on Understanding, Reason, and Rhetoric”, SM 38 (1971), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Wallace, K.R. “Francis Bacon and Method: Theory and Practice”, SM 40 (1973), 243–272.

    Google Scholar 

  188. Walton, C. “Ramus and Bacon on Method”, JHP 9 (1971), 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Wheeler, Th. “Sir Francis Bacon’s Concept of the Historian’s Task”, RenP (1955), 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  190. Wheeler, Th. “Sir Francis Bacon’s Historical Imagination”, TSL 14 (1969), 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  191. Wiley, M.L. “Francis Bacon: Induction and/or Rhetoric”, SLitI 4 (1971), 65–79.

    Google Scholar 

  192. Wolff, E. Francis Bacon und seine Quellen (Literarhistorische Forschungen, 40, Berlin 1910, pp. 27–30, 54–60, 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Zappen, J.P. “Francis Bacon and the Rhetoric of Science”, CCC 26 (1975), 244–247.

    Google Scholar 

  194. Zappen, J.P. “Science and Rhetoric from Bacon to Hobbes: Responses to the Problem of Eloquence”, in: Rhetoric 78: Proceedings of Theory of Rhetoric. An Interdisciplinary Conference, ed. R.L. Brown, M. Steinmann, Minneapolis 1979, pp. 399–419.

    Google Scholar 

  195. McClelland, G.W. “John Brinsley and His Educational Treatises”, Schelling Anniversary Papers. By His Former Students, New York 1923, pp. 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  196. Salmon, V. “John Brinsley: 17th-Century Pioneer in Applied Linguistics”, HL 2 (1975), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  197. Salmon, V. “John Brinsley: 17th-Century Pioneer in Applied Linguistics”, in: Salmon, The Study UT Language in 17th-Century England, Amsterdam 1979, pp. 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  198. Howell, W.S. “Nathaniel Carpenter’s Place in the Controversy between Dialectic and Rhetoric”, SM 1 (1934), 20–41.

    Google Scholar 

  199. Hanning, R.W., D. Rosand (eds.). Castiglione: The Ideal and the Real in Renaissance Culture, New Haven/ London 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  200. Javitch, D. “Rival Arts of Conduct in Elizabethan England” (Nr. B. 214. 1 ).

    Google Scholar 

  201. Kudchedkar, S.L. “Castiglione’s Courtier and Elizabethan Literature”, IJES 3 (1962), 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  202. Lipking, L. “The Dialectic of I1 Cortegiano”, PMLA 81 (1966), 355–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  203. Loos, E. Baldassare Castigliones “Libro del Cortegiano”, Frankfurt 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  204. Mazzacurati, G. “Baldassar Castiglione e la teoria cortigiana: Ideologia di classe e dottrina critica”, MLN 83 (1968), 16–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  205. Mazzeo, J.A. “Castiglione’s Courtier: The Self as a Work of Art”, in: Mazzeo, Renaissance and Revolution, New York 1965, pp. 131–160.

    Google Scholar 

  206. Rebhorn, W.A. Courtly Performances: Masking and Festivity in Castiglione’s “Book of the Courtier”, Detroit 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  207. Rebhorn, W.A. “The Enduring Word: Language, Time, and History in I1 Libro del Cortegiano”, MLN 96 (1981), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. Ruutz-Rees, C. “Some Notes of Gabriel Harvey’s in Hoby’s Translation of Castiglione’s Courtier”, PMLA 25 (1910), 608–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. Saccone, E. “Grazia, Sprezzatura, and Affettazione in Castiglione Bsook of the Courtier”, Glyph: John Hopkins Textual StUcu ies (T979), 34–54.

    Google Scholar 

  210. Salamon, L.B. “The Courtier and The Scholemaster”, CL 25 (1973), 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  211. Schenk, W. “The Cortegiano and the Civilization of the Renaissance”, Scrutiny 16 (1949), 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  212. Schrinner, W. Castiglione und die englische Renaissance, Berlin 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  213. Trafton, D.A. “Structure and Meaning in The Courtier”, ELR 2 (1972), 283–297.

    Google Scholar 

  214. Woodhouse, J.R. Baldesar Castiglione: A Reassessment of “The Courtier” (Writers of Italy Series,7), Edinburgh 078

    Google Scholar 

  215. Blake, N.F. “Caxton and Courtly Style”, EandS, NS, 21 (1968), 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  216. Sandys, D.B. “Caxton as a Literary Critic”, PBSA 51 (1957), 312–318.

    Google Scholar 

  217. Foreman, J.E. The Contributions of Plato, Cicero and Quintilian to Sir Thomas Elyot’s Theory of Language, Ph.D.aiss., George Washington University 1975. - DAI 36 (1976), 7383A - 7384A.

    Google Scholar 

  218. Lehmberg, S.E. Sir Thomas Elyot: Tudor Humanist, Austin, Tex., 1906 New York 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  219. Major, J.M. Sir Thomas Elyot and Renaissance Humanism, LinaTin, Nebr., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  220. Stenberg, Th. “Sir Thomas Elyot’s Defense of the Poets”, UTSE 6 (1926), 121–145.

    Google Scholar 

  221. Koller, K. “Abraham Fraunce and Edmund Spenser”, ELH 7 (1940), 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  222. Javitch, D. “Rival Arts of Conduct in Elizabethan England: Guazzo’s Civile Conversation and Castiglione’s Courtier”, YIS 1 (1971), 178–198.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Lievsay, J.L. Stefano Guazzo and the En lish Renaissance: 1575–1675, Chapel-Hill 119

    Google Scholar 

  224. Mohrmann, G.P. “The Civile Conversation: Communication in the Renaissance”, SM 39 (1972), 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  225. Matter, H. Untersuchungen der Quelle von Stephen Hawes’ allegorischem Gedicht “Pastime FT-Pleasure”, Diss. München 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  226. Iriarte, M. de. Dr. Juan Huarte de San Juan und sein “Examen de Ingeniös: Ein Beitra zur Geciichte der differentiéllen Psychologie paniscie Forschungen der Görresgesellschaft, (II/4), Münster 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  227. Irvine, J.R. “Juan Huarte: A Mentalist Concept of Rhetoric”, SM 38 (1971), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  228. Bühler, C.F. The Sources of the Court of Sapience (Beiträge zur Englischen P iilologie, 223) Leipzig 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  229. Murphy, J.J. “Caxton’s Two Choices” (Nr. B. 10. 4 ).

    Google Scholar 

  230. Fleming, R. Plutarch in the English Renaissance, Ph.D. diss., Cornell University 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  231. Lawton, H.W. Térence en France au XVIe Siècle: Liftions et Traductions, Paris 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  232. Lawton, H.W. Térence en France au XVIe Siècle: Liftions et Traductions, Genf 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  233. McNally, J.R. An Appraisal of Rudolph Agricola’s “De inventione dialectica libri tres” as a Philosophy of Artistic Discourse, Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa 1966. DA 27 (1966), 1465A - 1466A.

    Google Scholar 

  234. McNally, J.R. An Appraisal of Rudolph Agricola’s “De inventione dialectica libri tres” as a Philosophy of Artistic Discourse, Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa 1966. SM 34 (1967), 255.

    Google Scholar 

  235. McNally, J.R. “Dux illa directrixque artium: Rudolph Agri-cola’s Dialectical System”, QJS 52 (1966), 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  236. McNally, J.R. “Prima pars dialecticae: The Influence of Agricolan Dialectic upon English Accounts of Invention”, RenQ 21 (1968), 166–177.

    Google Scholar 

  237. Ong, W.J. “Agricola Check-List”, in: Ramus and Talon Inventory (Nr. A.43),-pp. 534–558.

    Google Scholar 

  238. Vasoli, C. “Dialettica e retorica in Rodolfo Agricola”, ATSL 22 (1957), 305–355.

    Google Scholar 

  239. Velden, H.E.J.M. van der. Rodolphus Agricola een Nederlandsch humanist der viejftiende eeuw, Leiden (1911). [23: 101.4.Rhet.]

    Google Scholar 

  240. Ketuli, P. “Rhétorique et Poésie: Le De Eloquentia sacra et humana (1618) du P. Caussin”, TLL 14 (1976), 21–50.

    Google Scholar 

  241. Rochemonteix, C. de. Nicolaus Caussin, Confesseur de Louis XIII,et le Cardinal Richelieu, Paris 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  242. Sieveke, F.G. “Eloquentia sacra. Zur Predigttheorie des Nicolaus Caussinus S.J.”, in: H. Schanze (ed.), Rhetorik. Beiträge zu ihrer Geschichte in Deutschland vom 16–20. Jahrhunartankfurt 1974, pp. 43–68.

    Google Scholar 

  243. Berg, S. van den. “The Play of Wit and Love: Demetrius’ On Style and Jonson’s A Celebration of Charis”, ELH 41 (1974), 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  244. Devereux, E.J. “English Translators of Erasmus 1522–1557”, in: R.J. Schoeck (ed.), Editing Sixteenth Century Texts, Toronto 1966, pp. 43–5W

    Google Scholar 

  245. Devereux, E.J. A Check-List of EnEnglish Translations of Erasmus to 1700 (Oxfo3 Bibliographical Society, Occasional PUETications, 3), Oxford 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  246. Exner, H. Der Einfluß des Erasmus auf die englische Bildungsidea(Neue Deutc1ie Forschungen, 222), Berlin 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  247. Kleinhans, R.G. Erasmus’ Doctrine of Preaching. A Study of “Ecclesiastes, Sive De Ratióne Concionandi”, Th.D. Tss., Princeton Theological Seminary 1968. - DAI 29 (1969), 2790A.

    Google Scholar 

  248. Larkin, J.F. Erasmus’ “De ratione studii”: Its Relationship to Sixteentíh Century En lish Literature, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 942. - Abstract: Urbana, Ill., 1942 (15 pp.).

    Google Scholar 

  249. Mallison, V. “Erasme d’Angleterre et sa révolution pédagogique”, RG (Jan. 1975), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  250. Marcel, R. “Les ‘Découvertes’ d’Erasme en Angleterre”, BHR 14 (1952), 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  251. Phillips, M.M. Erasmus and the Northern Renaissance, New York 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  252. Phillips, M.M. Erasmus and the Northern Renaissance, Woodbri gce 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  253. Pigman, G.W. “Imitation and the Renaissance Sense of the Past: The Reception of Erasmus’ Ciceronianus”, JMRS 9 (1979), 155–177.

    Google Scholar 

  254. Pollet, M. “Erasme en Angleterre”, in: Colloquia Erasmiana Turonensia, 2 vol., Toronto 1972, vol. I, pp. 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  255. Sowards, J.K. Erasmus in England, 1509–1514, University of Wichita Bulletin 37/2 (University Studies, No. 51 ), Wichita, Kan., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  256. Thompson, C.R. “Erasmus and Tudor England”, in: Actes du Conrès Erasme (Rotterdam 27–29 octobre 1969), Amster dam/London 1971, pp. 29–68.

    Google Scholar 

  257. Weiss, J.M. “Ecclesiastes and Erasmus. The Mirror and the Image ARG 65 (1974), 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  258. Westney, L.I. Erasmus’s “Parabolae sive Similia”: Its Relationship to Sixteenth Century En lish Literature. An English Translation With a Critical Introduction (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Elizabethan and Renaissance Studies, 100), Salzburg 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  259. Patterson, A.M. Hermogenes and the Renaissance: Seven Ideas of Style, Princeton, N.J., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  260. Croll, M.W. “Juste Lipse et le Mouvement Anticiceronien à la Fin du XVIe et au Debut de XVIIe Siècle”, RSS 2 (1914), 200–242.

    Google Scholar 

  261. Croll, M.W. “Juste Lipse et le Mouvement Anticiceronien à la Fin du XVIe et au Debut de XVIIe Siècle”, RSS 2 (1914), in: Croll, Style, Rhetoric, and Rhythm (Nr. C.104), pp. 7–43 (Einl.: J.M. Wallace, pp. 3–6 ).

    Google Scholar 

  262. Dunn, E.C. “Lipsius and the Art of Letter-Writing”, SRen 3 (1956), 145–156.

    Google Scholar 

  263. Breen, Q. “The Subordination of Philosophy to Rhetoric in Melanchthon”, ARG 43 (1952), 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  264. Schnell, U. Die homiletische Theorie Philipp Melanchthons i-beiten zur Geschichte un T eologie des Luthertums, 20), Hamburg 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  265. Flynn, L.J. “The De Arte Rhetorica of Cyprian Soarez, S.J.”, QJS 42 (1956), 367–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  266. Flynn, L.J. “Sources and Influence of Soarez’ De Arte Rhetorica, QJS 43 (1957), 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  267. Monfasani, J. George of Trebizond. A Biography and a Study of his Rhetoric and Logic (Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition, 1), Leiden 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  268. Wilson, H.S. “George of Trebizond and Early Humanist Rhetoric”, SP 40 (1943), 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  269. Gooder, R.D. The Rhetorical Work of Juan Luis Vives: A Study in the Background to Ben Jonson’s Timber Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University 1968–1969.

    Google Scholar 

  270. Kohut, K. “Literaturtheorie und Literaturkritik bei Juan Luis Vives”, in: A. Buck (ed.), Juan Luis Vives (Wolfenbütteler Abhandlungen zur Renâissanceforschung, 3), Hamburg 1981 ), pp. 35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  271. Noreüa, C.G. Juan Luis Vives (International Archives of the History 6T I eas, 34), Den Haag 1970, bes. Kap. 5, 8, 9, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  272. Stein, R. A Study of the First Seven Books of J.L. Vives, “De Causis Corruptarum Artiúm”, in RRelation to EnggliTi Literary Criticism of the Renaissance, PE.D. tesis, Oxford University 19–1953.

    Google Scholar 

  273. Thomas, M.J. The Rhetoric of Juan Luis Vives, Ph.D. diss., Pennsylvania State University 1967. - DA 28 (1968), 4305A - 4306A.

    Google Scholar 

  274. Uhlig, C., Arnold, Ch.K. “Vives in England”, in: A. Buck (ed.), Juan Luis Vives (Nr. B.260. 2 ), pp. 141–164.

    Google Scholar 

  275. Vocht, H. de. “Vives and his Visits to England”,in: Monumenta Humanistica Lovaniensia, Löwen/London 1934, pp. 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  276. Watson, F. Les relacions de Joan Lluis Vives amb els anglesos i amb’ l’Anglaterra, Barcelona 19T

    Google Scholar 

  277. Gebert, C. (ed.). An Anthology of Elizabethan Dedications and Prefaces, Philadelphia 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  278. Gebert, C. (ed.). An Anthology of Elizabethan Dedications and Prefaces, New York 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  279. Gilbert, A.H. (ed.). Literary Criticism: Plato to Dryden, New York 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  280. Gilbert, A.H. (ed.). Literary Criticism: Plato to Dryden, Detroit 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  281. Hardison, O.B. (ed.). English Literary Criticism: The Renaissance, London 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  282. Hardison, O.B. (ed.). English Literary Criticism: The Renaissance, London 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  283. Haslewood, J. (ed.). Ancient Critical Essays Upon Lnglish Poets and Poësy, 2 vol., London 1811–1815.

    Google Scholar 

  284. Hazlitt, W.C. (ed.). The English Drama and Stage under the Tudor and Stuart Princes 1543–1664: Illustrated by a Series of Documents, Treatises, and Poems, London 1869.

    Google Scholar 

  285. Hazlitt, W.C. (ed.). The English Drama and Stage under the Tudor and Stuart Princes 1543–1664: Illustrated by a Series of Documents, Treatises, and Poems, New York 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  286. Jones, E.D. (ed.). English Critical Essays (Sixteenth, Seventeenth, and Eighteenth Centuries ), London 1922.

    Google Scholar 

  287. Jones, E.D. (ed.). English Critical Essays (Sixteenth, Seventeenth, and Eighteenth Centuries ), London 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  288. Klein, D. (ed.). The Elizabethan Dramatists as Critics, New York 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  289. Klein, D. (ed.). The Elizabethan Dramatists as Critics, Westport, Conn., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  290. Kuhn, U. English Literary Terms in Poetological Texts of the Sixteenth Century, 3 vol. (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Elizabethan and Renaissance Studies, 32–34), Salzburg 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  291. Platz, N.H. (ed.). English Dramatic Theories, I: From Elyot to the Age of Dryden 1531–1668, Tübingen 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  292. Smith, G.G. (ed.). Elizabethan Critical Essays, 2 vol., Oxford 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  293. Smith, G.G. (ed.). Elizabethan Critical Essays, 2 vol., Oxford 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  294. Spingarn, J.E. (ed.). Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century, 3 vol., Oxford 1908/9.

    Google Scholar 

  295. Spingarn, J.E. (ed.). Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century, 3 vol., Bloomington 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  296. Tayler, E.W. (ed.). Literary Criticism of Seventeenth-Century England, New York 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  297. Cooper, L./A. Gudeman. A Bibliography of the Poetics of Aristotle (Yale Studies in English, 11), New Haven 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  298. Gallagher, M. “Goulston’s Poetics and Tragic ‘Admiratio’”, RLC 39 (1965), 614–619.

    Google Scholar 

  299. Herrick, M.T. “Sir John Cheke and Aristotle’s Poetics”, CW 18 (1925), 134–135.

    Google Scholar 

  300. Herrick, M.T. The Poetics of Aristotle in England (Cornell Studies ii English, 17), New Haven 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  301. Herrick, M.T. The Poetics of Aristotle in England (Cornell Studies ii English, 17), Staten Island, N.Y., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  302. Herrick, M.T. “A Supplement to Cooper and Gudeman’s Bibliography of the Poetics of Aristotle”, AJP 52 (1931), 168–174.

    Google Scholar 

  303. Tigerstedt, E.N. “Observations on the Reception of the Aristotelian Poetics in the Latin West”, SRen 15 (1968), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  304. Weinberg, B. “From Aristotle to Pseudo-Aristotle”, CL 5 (1953), 97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  305. Weinberg, B. “From Aristotle to Pseudo-Aristotle”, CL 5 (1953), in: E. Olson (ed.), Aristotle’s Poetics and English Literature, Chicago 1965, pp. 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  306. Benham, A.R. “Horace and His Ars Poetica in English: A Bibliography”, CW 4 (1955), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  307. Gilbert, A.H., H.L. Snuggs. “On the Relation of Horace to Aristotle in Literary Criticism”, JEGP 46 (1947), 233–247.

    Google Scholar 

  308. Herrick, M.T. The Fusion of Horatian and Aristotelian Literary Criticism, 1531–1555 (Illinois Studies in Language and Literature, 32/1), Urbana, Ill., 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  309. Jiriczek, O.L. “Der Elisabethanische Horaz”, ShJ 47 (1911), 42–68.

    Google Scholar 

  310. Henn, T.R. Longinus and English Criticism, Cambridge 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  311. Nitchie, E. “Longinus and the Theory of Poetic Imitation in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century England”, SP 32 (1935), 580–597.

    Google Scholar 

  312. Ringler, W. “An Early Reference to Longinus”, MLN 53 (1938), 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  313. Rosenberg, A. Longinus in England bis zum Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts, Diss. Berlin 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  314. Spencer, T.J.B. “Longinus in English Criticism: Influences Before Milton”, RES, NS, 8 (1957), 137–143.

    Google Scholar 

  315. St. Martin, D. Bibliography of the “Essay on the Sublime”, Leiden 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  316. Weinberg, B. “Translations and Commentaries of Longinus, On the Sublime, to 1600: A Bibliography”, MP 47 (1957), 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  317. Wood, Th.E.B. The Word ‘Sublime’ and Its Context 1650–1760 (De proprietatibus litterarum, series maior, 7), Den Haag/Paris 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  318. Bryan, M.B. “Recent Studies in Campion”, ELR 4 (1974), 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  319. Doughtie, E. “Sibling Rivalry: Music vs. Poetry in Campion and Others”, Criticism 20 (1978), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  320. Fenyo, J.K. “Grammar and Music in Thomas Campion’s Observations in the Art of English Poesie”, SRen 17 (1970), 46–72.

    Google Scholar 

  321. Kastendieck, M.M. England’s Musical Poet: Thomas Campion, New York 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  322. Kastendieck, M.M. England’s Musical Poet: Thomas Campion, New York 1963, Kap. 5: “The Poet’s Art of English Poesy” (pp. 71–102).

    Google Scholar 

  323. Richardson, D.A. “The Golden Mean in Campion’s Airs”, CL 30 (1978), 108–132.

    Google Scholar 

  324. Short, R.W. “The Metrical Theory and Practice of Thomas Campion”, PMLA 59 (1944), 1003–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  325. Hulse, S.C. “Samuel Daniel: The Poet as Literary Historian”, SEL 19 (1979), 55–69.

    Google Scholar 

  326. Johnson, M.M. The Well-Rimed Daniel: An Examination of “Delia” and “A Defence of Ryme”, Ph.D. diss., University 6Ar1ansas 1965. - DA 26 (1966), 4661.

    Google Scholar 

  327. Stewart, J.I.M. “Montaigne’s Essays and A Defence of Ryme”, RES 9 (1933), 311–312.

    Google Scholar 

  328. Ellrodt, R. “Sir John Harington and Leone Ebreo”, MLN 65 (1950), 109–110.

    Google Scholar 

  329. Nelson, T.G.A. “Sir John Harington as a Critic of Sir Philip Sidney”, SP 67 (1970), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  330. Sellin, P.R. Daniel Heinsius and Stuart England: With a Short-Title Checklist of the Works of Daniel Heinsius, Leiden 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  331. G.B. Harrison, Bodley Head Quartos, London 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  332. G.B. Harrison, Bodley Head Quartos, London: Elizabethan and Jacobean Quartos, Nr. 15, Edinburgh 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  333. Goldberg, J. James I and the Politics of Literature, Baltimore/London 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  334. Jack, R.D.S. “James VI and Renaissance Poetic Theory”, English 16 (1967), 208–211.

    Google Scholar 

  335. Aronstein, Ph. “Ben Jonson’s Theorie des Lustspiels”, Anglia 17 (1895), 466–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  336. Barish, J.A. Ben Jonson and the Language of Prose Comedy (Nr. C. 778. 3 ).

    Google Scholar 

  337. Berringer, R.W. “Jonson’s Cynthia’s Revels and the War of the Theatres”, Pg 22 (1943), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  338. Bredvold, L.I. “The Rise of English Classicism: Study in Methodology”,CL 2 (1950), 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  339. Briggs, W.D. “Notes on the Sources of Jonson’s Discoveries”, MLN 23 (1908), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  340. Bryant, J.A. “The Significance of Ben Jonson’s First Requirement for Tragedy: ‘Truth of Argument’”, SP 49 (1952), 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  341. Calder, D.G. “The Meaning of ‘Imitation’ in Jonson’s Discoveries”, NM 70 (1969), 435–440.

    Google Scholar 

  342. Clark, D.L. “The Requirements of a Poet..A Note on the Sources of Ben Jonson’s Timber, Paragraph 130”, MP 16 (1918–19), 413–429.

    Google Scholar 

  343. Elliott, L.H. Engagement and Detachment: The Function of the Induction in Ben Jonson’s lys, Ph.D. diss., University of California, Santa Barbara, 1972. - DAI 33 (1973), 5675A.

    Google Scholar 

  344. Ewbank, I.-S. “The Eloquence of Masques’: A Retrospective View of Masque Criticism”, RenD, NS, 1 (1968), 307–327.

    Google Scholar 

  345. Fieler, F.B. “The Impact of Bacon and the New Science upon Jonson’s Critical Thought in Timber”, RenP (19581960), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  346. Firestine, M.W. The Doctrine of Imitation in the English Renaissance (Nr. C.454).

    Google Scholar 

  347. French, J.Th. “Ben Jonson: His Aesthetic of Relief”, TSLL 10 (1968), 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  348. Gordon, D.J. “Poet and Architect: The Intellectual Setting of the Quarrel between Ben Jonson and Inigo Jones”, JWCI 12 (1949), 152–178.

    Google Scholar 

  349. Gordon, D.J. “Poet and Architect: The Intellectual Setting of the Quarrel between Ben Jonson and Inigo Jones”, JWCI in: Gordon, The Renaissance Imagination, ed. St. Orgel, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 1980, pp. 77–101 (294–297).

    Google Scholar 

  350. Gottwald, M. “Ben Jonson’s Theory of Comedy”, AUW 45 (1966), 31–53.

    Google Scholar 

  351. Greenfield, T.N. “The Critical Induction”, in: Greenfield, The Induction in Elizabethan Drama, Eugene, Ore., 1969, pp. 67–95.

    Google Scholar 

  352. Haworth, W. Ben Jonson’s Criticism: A Study of Its Place in t e Development of English Literary Criticism Ti Th7 Sixteenth ana-Seventeenth Centuries, Up to 1650, Manchester 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  353. Jusserand, J.J. “Ben Jonson’s Views on Shakespeare’s Art”, in: Jusserand, The School for Ambassadors and Other Essays, London 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  354. Jusserand, J.J. “Ben Jonson’s Views on Shakespeare’s Art”, in: Jusserand, The School for Ambassadors and Other Essays, Freeport, N.Y., 1968, pp. 255–288.

    Google Scholar 

  355. McGinnis, P.J. “Ben Jonson’s Discoveries”, NandQ 202 (1957), 162–163.

    Google Scholar 

  356. McPherson, D. “Some Renaissance Sources for Jonson’s Early Comic Theory”, ELN 8 (1971), 180–182.

    Google Scholar 

  357. Moore, N.A.N. Ben Jonson’s Concept of Decorum: A Study of His Theory and Threeeomedies, Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois 1968. - DAI 30 (1969), 286A.

    Google Scholar 

  358. Musial, Th.J. The Evolution of Ben Jonson’s Dramatic Theory: A Study in the Development of a Moral Art, Ph.D. diss., Univ. of Notre Dame 1970. - DAI 31 (1971) 4729A.

    Google Scholar 

  359. Orgel, St. “To Make Boards to Speak: Inigo Jones’s Stage and the Jonsonian Masque”, RenD, NS, 1 (1968), 121–152.

    Google Scholar 

  360. Osborn, L.B. “Ben Jonson and Hoskyns” (Nr. B. 155. 2 ).

    Google Scholar 

  361. Overall, F.M.B. Ben Jonson: A Study of His Comic Theory, Ph.D. diss., Vanderbilt University 1962.–DA 23 (1962), 1352–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  362. Papajewski, H. “Ben Jonsons Laudatio auf Shakespeare. Kategorien des literarischen Urteils in der Renaissance”, Poetica 1 (1967), 483–507.

    Google Scholar 

  363. Pebworth, T.-L. “Jonson’s Timber and the Essay Tradition”, in: Essa s in Honor of Esmond Linworth Marilla, ed. T.A. Kir y7W.J7-UTive, Baton Rouge, La., 1970, pp. 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  364. Platz, N.H. “Jonson’s Ars Poetica: An Interpretation of Poetaster in its Historical Context”, in: Salzburg Studies in Enlish Literature (Elizabethan and Renaissancetks, 12), Salzburg 1973, pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  365. Presley, H. E. “O Showes, Showes, Mighty Showes”: A Study of the Relationship of the Jones Jonson Controversy to the Rise of Illusionistic Stagin in Seventeenth-CenturyBritish Drama, Ph.D. iss., University of Kansas 1966. - DA 28 (1967), 1056A.

    Google Scholar 

  366. Redwine, J.D. Ben Jonson’s Criticism of the Drama, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1963.–DA 24 (1964), 4683–4684.

    Google Scholar 

  367. Reinsch, H. Ben Jonsons Poetik und seine Beziehungen zu Horaz (Münchener Beiträge zur romanischen und englischen Philologie, 16), Erlangen/Leipzig 1899.

    Google Scholar 

  368. Sellin, P.R. Daniel Heinsius and Stuart England (Nr. B.284. 1 ), pp. 147–163.

    Google Scholar 

  369. Shillinglaw, A.T. “New Light on Ben Jonson’s Discoveries”, Eng St 71 (1937), 356–359.

    Google Scholar 

  370. Simpson, P. “Tanquam Explorator: Jonson’s Method in the Discoveries”, MLR 2 (1906–1907), 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  371. Snuggs, H.L. “The Source of Jonson’s Definition of Comedy”, MLN 65 (1950), 543–544.

    Google Scholar 

  372. Spingarn, J.E. “The Sources of Jonson’s Discoveries”, MP 2 (1904–1905), 451–460.

    Google Scholar 

  373. Sturmberger, I.M. The Comic Elements in Ben Jonson’s Drama (Salibrg Studies in Englisni Literature: Jacobean Drama Studies, 54–55), 2 vol., Salzburg 1975, vol. I, pp. 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  374. Talbert, E.W. “New Light on Ben Jonson’s Workmanship”, SP 40 (1943), 154–185.

    Google Scholar 

  375. Talbert, E.W. “The Interpretation of Jonson’s Courtly Spectacles”, PMLA 61 (1946), 454–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  376. Talbert, E.W. “The Purpose and Technique of Jonson’s Poetaster”, SP 42 (1945), 225–252.

    Google Scholar 

  377. Trimpi, W. Ben Jonson’s Poems: A Study of the Plain Style, Stanfoi 1962, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  378. Walker, R.S. “Literary Criticism in Jonson’s Conversations with Drummond”, English 8 (1951), 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  379. Walker, R.S. “Ben Jonson’s Discoveries: A New Analysis”, EandS, NS, 5 (1952), 32–51.

    Google Scholar 

  380. Ringler, W. “The Source of Lodge’s Reply to Gosson”, RES 15 (1939), 164–171.

    Google Scholar 

  381. Wilson, J.D. “The Missing Title of Lodge’s Reply to Gosson’s School of Abuse”, MLR 3 (1908), 166–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  382. Eagle, R.L. “The Authorship of The Arte of En lish Poesie (1589)”, Baconiana, 3rd ser., 27 (1943), 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  383. Eagle, R.L. “The Arte of English Poesie (1589)”, NandQ, NS, 3 (1956), 188–190.

    Google Scholar 

  384. Galyon, L. “Puttenham’s Enargeia and Energeia: New Twists for Old Terms”, Pq 60 (1981), 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  385. Hook, La Rue van. “Greek Terminology in Puttenham’s The Arte of English Poesie”, TAPA 45 (1916), 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  386. Javitch, D. “Poetry and Court Conduct: Puttenham’s Arte of English Poesie in the Light of Castiglione’s Cortegiano”, MLN 87 (1972), 865–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  387. Javitch, D. Poetry and Courtliness in Renaissance England, Princeton, N.J., 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  388. Knauf, D.M. “George Puttenham’s Theory of Natural and Artificial Discourse”, SM 34 (1967), 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  389. Korn, A.L. “Puttenham and the Oriental Pattern Poem”, CL 6 (1954), 289–303.

    Google Scholar 

  390. Leisher, J.F. “George Puttenham and Emblemata”, BUSE 1 (1955), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  391. Madden, W.H. Die Sprache in George Puttenhams “The Arte of English Poesie”, Diss. Tübingen 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  392. Palmer, E.A. George Puttenham and Henry Peacham: ‘copia’ and ‘decorum’ in Sixteenti Century Literature, M.Phil. thesis, University of London, Warnburg Institute 1968–1969.

    Google Scholar 

  393. Plett, H.F. “Elisabethanische Hofpoetik. Gesellschaftlicher Code und ästhetische Norm in Puttenhams Arte of En English Poesie”, in: A. Buck et al. (eds.), Europâiscce Ho kultur im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert, 3 vol., Hamburg 1981, vol. II, pp. 11–50.

    Google Scholar 

  394. Rushton, W.L. Shakespeare and “The Arte of English Poesie” (Nr. C. 798. 153 ).

    Google Scholar 

  395. Traci, Ph.J.“The Literary Qualities of Puttenham’s Arte of English Poesie”, RenP (1957), 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  396. Ward, B.M. “The Authorship of The Arte ofEn lish Poesie: A Suggestion”, RES 1 (1925), 284–30

    Google Scholar 

  397. Cinquemani, A.M. “Henry Reynolds’ Mythomystes and the Continuity of Ancient Modes of Allegoresis in Seven-teenth-Century England”, PMLA 85 (1970), 1041–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  398. Barnes, C. “The Hidden Persuader: The Complex Speaking Voice of Sidney’s Defence of Poetry”, PMLA 86 (1971), 422–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  399. Baxter, J. “Sidney’s Defence and Greville’s Mustapha”, in: Baxter, Shakespeare’s Poetic Styles (Nr. C.798.13), Kap. 2 (pp. 7–45 [223–226]).

    Google Scholar 

  400. Beach, D.M. “The Poetry of Idea: Sir Philip Sidney and the Theory of Allegory”, TSLL 13 (1971), 365–389.

    Google Scholar 

  401. Biagi, A. Sir Philip Sidney: L’Areopago e “La Difesa della Poesia”, Neapel 1.

    Google Scholar 

  402. S. Blackburn, Th.H. “Edmund Bolton’s The Cabanet Royal: A Belated Reply to Sidney’s Apologyr Poetry”, SRen 14 (1967), 159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  403. Böhler, R. Die Funktion der Dichtung in der Theorie Sir Philip STaHeys, Diss. Erlangen 197–TASG 1973, 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  404. Bronowski, J. The Poet’s Defence, Cambridge 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  405. Bronowski, J. The Poet’s Defence, Westport, Conn., 1979, pp. 19–56.

    Google Scholar 

  406. Bryant, D.C. “’A Peece of a Logician’: The Critical Essayist as Rhetorician”, in: Bryant (ed.), The Rhetorical Idiom (Nr. C. 100 ), pp. 293–303.

    Google Scholar 

  407. Bryant, D.C. als: “The Critical Essayist as Rhetorician”, in: H. Weber (Hrsg.), Der englische Essay: Analysen ( Ars Interpretandi,p, Darmstadt 1975, pp. 38–48.

    Google Scholar 

  408. Cawley, R.R. “’Areytos’ in Sidney’s Defence of Poesy”, MLN 39 (1924), 121–123.

    Google Scholar 

  409. Cerny, L. ‘Beautie and the use thereof (Nr. C.799.4), Kap. 1: “’Bild’ und ‘Ziel’ in Sidneys Dichtungstheorie” (pp. 3–74).

    Google Scholar 

  410. Coogan, R. “The Triumph of Reason: Sidney’s Defense and Aristotle’s Rhetoric”, PLL 17 (1981), 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  411. Coogan, R. “More Dais than Dock: Greek Rhetoric and Sidney’s Encomium on Poetry”, SLitI 15 (1982), 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  412. Costa, R.H. “Intimations of Don uixote in Sidney’s Defense of Poetry”, BSUF 11 (1970), 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  413. Craig, D.H. “A Hybrid Growth: Sidney’s Theory of Poetry in An Apology for Poetry”, ELR 10 (1980), 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  414. Daiches, D. “The Poet as Moral Teacher”, in: Daiches, Critical Approaches to Literature, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1956, Kap. 3 (pp. 50–72 ).

    Google Scholar 

  415. Davies, W. Idea and Act in Elizabethan Fiction, Princeton, N.J., 1969, Kap. 2: “Acting Out Ideas in Sidney’s Theory” (pp. 28–44).

    Google Scholar 

  416. DeNeef, A.L. “Rereading Sidney’s Apology”, JMRS 10 (1980), 155–191.

    Google Scholar 

  417. Devereux, J.A. “The Meaning of Delight in Sidney’s Defence of Poesy”, SLitI 15 (1982), 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  418. Ditlevsen, T. “’Truth’s Journey to Word’: On the Concept of ‘Imitation’ in Sidney’s Apology for Poetry”, LangandL 2 (1973), 54–70.

    Google Scholar 

  419. Donno, E.St. “Old Mouse-Eaten Records: History in Sidney’s Apology”, SP 72 (1975), 275–298.

    Google Scholar 

  420. Dorsten, J.A. van. Poets, Patrons, and Professors: Sir Philip Sidney, Daniel Roger, andfhe Leiden Humanists, Le /London 1996,’1973.

    Google Scholar 

  421. Dowlin, C.M. “Sidney’s Two Definitions of Poetry”, MLQ 3 (1942), 573–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  422. Dowlin, C.M. “Sidney and Other Men’s Thought”, RES 20 (1944), 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  423. Elia, R.L. “Platonic Irony in Sidney’s An Apology for Poetry”, RLV 36 (1970), 401–405.

    Google Scholar 

  424. Evans, F.B. “The Concept of the Fall in Sidney’s Apologie”, RenP (1970), 9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  425. Ferguson, M.W. Trials of Desire: Renaissance Defenses of Poetry, New Haven/London 1983, pp. 137–162: “Sir Philip Sidney: Pleas for Power”.

    Google Scholar 

  426. Firestine, M.W. The Doctrine of Imitation in the English Renaissance (Nr. C.4541)

    Google Scholar 

  427. Foster, L.D. “’I speak of the art, and not of the artificer’: The Logical Structare of Sidney’s Defence of Poetry and the Concessive Arguments”, HUSL 5 (1977), 155–181.

    Google Scholar 

  428. Goldman, M.S. “Sidney and Harington as Opponents of Superstition”, JEGP 54 (1955), 526–548.

    Google Scholar 

  429. Hallam, G.W. “Sidney’s Supposed Ramism”, RenP (1963), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  430. Hamilton, A.C. “Sidney and Agrippa”, RES, NS, 7 (1956), 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  431. Hamilton, A.C. “Sidney’s Idea of the ‘Right Poet’”, CL 9 (1957), 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  432. Hamilton, A.C. The Structure of Allegory in “The Faerie Queene”, Oxford 1961, pp. 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  433. Hamilton, A.C. Sir Philip Sidney: A Study of his Life and Works, CamGridge 1977, Kap. 4: “Sidney’s Potics” (pp. 107–122, 198–200 ).

    Google Scholar 

  434. Hardison, O.B. “The Two Voices of Sidney’s Apology for Poetry”, ELR 2 (1972), 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  435. Hearsey, M. “Sidney’s Defense of Poesy and Amyot’s Preface in North’s Plutarch: A Relationship”, SP 30 (1933), 535–550.

    Google Scholar 

  436. Heninger, S.K. “’Metaphor’ and Sidney’s Defence of Poesie”, JDJ 1 (1982), 117–149.

    Google Scholar 

  437. Heninger, S.K. “Sidney and Serranus’ Plato”, ELR 13 (1983), 146–161.

    Google Scholar 

  438. Heninger, S.K. “Speaking Pictures: Sidney’s Rapprochement between Poetry and Painting”, in: G.F. Waller/M.D. Moore (eds.), Sir Philip Sidney and the Interpretation of Renaissance Culture: The Poet-TE Time and Ours, London/Totowa, N.J., 198 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  439. Hogan, P.G. “Sidney and Titian: Painting in the Arcadia and the Defence”, SCB 27 (1967), 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  440. Hyman, V.R. “Sidney’s Definition of Poetry”, SEL 10 (1970), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  441. Kinney, A.F. “Parody and Its Implications in Sidney’s Defense of Poesie”, SEL 12 (1972), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  442. Kishler, Th.C. “Aristotle and Sidney on Imitation”, ClassJ 59 (1963), 63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  443. Kohl, N. “Zur Rezeption der Antike in Sir Philip Sidneys Defence of Poesie”, LJb, NF, 21 (1980), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  444. Krouse, F.M. “Plato and Sidney’s Defence of Poesie”, CL 6 (1954), 138–147.

    Google Scholar 

  445. Lebel, M. “Sir Philip Sidney (1554–1586) et son Plaidoyer pour la Poésie (1595)”, PTRSC, 4th ser., 1 (1963), 177–1$3.

    Google Scholar 

  446. Levao, R. “Sidney’s Feigned Apology”, PMLA 94 (1979), 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  447. Levy, F.J. “Sir Philip Sidney and the Idea of History”, BHR 26 (1964), 608–617.

    Google Scholar 

  448. Mainusch, H. Die Dichtungstheorie Sir Philip Sidneys, Diss. Münster M6.

    Google Scholar 

  449. Malloch, A.E. “’Architectonic’ Knowledge and Sidney’s Apologie”, ELH 20 (1953), 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  450. McIntyre, J.P. “Sidney’s ‘Golden World’”, CL 14 (1962), 356–365.

    Google Scholar 

  451. McIntyre, J.P. Poetry as Gnosis: The Literary Theory of Sir Philip Sidney, Ph.D. University of Toronto 1969. - DAI 31 (1970), 733A.

    Google Scholar 

  452. Montgomery, R.L. Symmetry and Sense: The Poetry of Sir Philip Sidney (Nr. C.797.24), bes. Kap. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  453. Moore, J.W. “Sir Philip Sidney: The Role of Prophecy and Delight in Moral Education”, JGE 23 (1971), 322327 [Rez. der Ausgabe von F.G. Ro5inson].

    Google Scholar 

  454. Myrick, K.O. Sir Philip Sidney as a Literary Craftsman (Nr. C.7997Zb), Kap. 2: “The Defence of Poesie as a Classical Oration” (pp. 46–83).

    Google Scholar 

  455. Newels, K. “Eine spanische Übersetzung der Defence of Poesie von Sir Philip Sidney”,Anglia 72 (1954), 463–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  456. Padelford, F.M. “Sidney’s Indebtedness to Sibilet”, JEGP 7 (1907–1908), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  457. Partee, M.H. “Sir Philip Sidney and the Renaissance Knowledge of Plato”, ES 51 (1971), 411–424.

    Google Scholar 

  458. Partee, M.H. “Anti-Platonism in Sidney’s Defence”, EM 22 (1971), 7–29.

    Google Scholar 

  459. Phillips, J.E. “George Buchanan and the Sidney Circle”, HLQ 12 (1948–1949), 23–55.

    Google Scholar 

  460. Pond, V.T. Imagination in the Poetic Theory of Pierre de Ronsard and Sir iPhiSidney, Ph.D. diss., University FNorth Carolina, Chapel Hill 1981. - DAI 42 (1982), 5113A.

    Google Scholar 

  461. Pontedera, C. “Poetica e poesia nell’Apology for Poetry”, ACF 6 (1967), 125–147.

    Google Scholar 

  462. Raitiere, M.N. “The Unity of Sidney’s Apology for Poetry”, SEL 21 (1981), 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  463. Roberts, M. “The Pill and the Cherries: Sidney and the Neo-Classical Tradition”, EIC 16 (1966), 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  464. Robertson, D.W. “Sidney’s Metaphor of the Ulcer”, MLN 56 (1941), 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  465. Robinson, F.G. ’The Shape of Thin s Known’: Sidney’s “Apology” in its Philosophical Tradition, Cambridge, Mass., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  466. Rudenstine, N. Sidney’s Poetic Development (Nr. C.799.31), Kap. 4, 9, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  467. Samuel, I. “The Influence of Plato on Sir Philip Sidney’s Defense of Poesy”, MLQ 1 (1940), 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  468. Sinfield, A. “The Cultural Politics of the Defence of Poetry”, in: G.F. Waller/M.D. Moore (eds.), Sir Philip Sidney and the Interpretation of Renaissance Culture: The Poet in His Time and Ours, London/Totowa, N.J., 1984, pp 12143.

    Google Scholar 

  469. Snare, G. “Dissociation of Sensibility and the A olog for Poetry in the Twentieth Century”, L 59S2), 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  470. Strozier, R.M. “Poetic Conception in Sir Philip Sidney’s An Apology for Poetry”, YES 2 (1972), 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  471. Stump, D.V. “Sidney’s Concept of Tragedy in the Apology and in the Arcadia”, SP 79 (1982), 41–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  472. Tatlock, J.S.P. “Bernardo Tasso and Sidney”, Italica 12 (1935), 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  473. Thaler, A. Shakespeare and Sir Philip Sidney (Nr. C. 798. 167 ).

    Google Scholar 

  474. Tillyard, E.M.W. “Sidney’s Apology”, TLS 14. 6. 1941, pp. 287–290.

    Google Scholar 

  475. Uhlig, C. “Sidney’s Defence of Poesie und die Poetik der Renaissance”, in: Ahrens/Wolff (eds.), Englische und amerikanische Literaturtheorie (Nr. C.97), vol. I, pp. 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  476. Ulreich, J.C. “’The Poets only Deliver’: Sidney’s Conception of Mimesis”, SLitI 15 (1982), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  477. Vanderheyen, J.F. “De Vertaling van Sir Philip Sidney’s Defense of Poesie door Joan de Haes (1712)”, VMKVA (1964), 315–351.

    Google Scholar 

  478. Viebrock, H. Defence of Poeettryy. Englische Argumente für den Bildungswert vonic tung (Sitzungsber. d. WissTes. a.d. Johann Aolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, 14.2), Wiesbaden 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  479. Washington, M.A. Sir Philip Sidney (Nr. C.799.37),Kap.6.

    Google Scholar 

  480. Webster, J. “Oration and Method in Sidney’s Apology: A Contemporary’s Account” (Nr. B. 293. 2 ).

    Google Scholar 

  481. Weiner, A.D. “Moving and Teaching: Sidney’s Defence of Poesie as a Protestant Poetic”, JMRS 2 (1972), 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  482. Weiner, A.D. “Moving and Teaching: Sidney’s Defence of Poesie as a Protestant Poetic”, JMRS 2 (1972), in: Weiner, Sir Philip Sidney and the Poetics of Protestantism (Nr. C.799.38), Kap. 1/ITT(pp. 28–50 [197–201]).

    Google Scholar 

  483. Witstein, S.F. “Bronnen en bewerkingswijze van de ontleende gedeelten in Rodenburghs Eglentiers Patens Borst-werin hh (1619): Het Proza-betoog en de Emblemata”, AWALM 27/6 (1964), 227–281 (336).

    Google Scholar 

  484. Wolfley, L.Ch. “Sidney’s Visual-Didactic Poetic: Some Complexities and Limitations”, JMRS 6 (1976), 217–241.

    Google Scholar 

  485. Zolbrbd, P.G. The Poet’s Golden World: Classical Bases for Sir Philip Sidney’s Literary Theory, Ph.D. diss., University of Pittsburgh 1967. - DA 28 (1968), 5033A.

    Google Scholar 

  486. Thorne, J.P. “A Ramistical Commentary on Sidney’s An Apologie for Poetrie”, MP 54 (1957), 158–164.

    Google Scholar 

  487. Webster, J. “Oration and Method in Sidney’s Apology: A Contemporary’s Account”, MP 79 (1981–1982), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  488. Young, K. “An Elizabethan Defence of the Stage”, Shakespeare Studies bE Members of the Department of English of the University of Wisconsin, Madison 1D3T6, pp. 103-T74

    Google Scholar 

  489. Young, K. “William Gager’s Defence of the Academic Stage”, TWASAL 18 /2 (1916), 593–638.

    Google Scholar 

  490. Binns, J.W. “Alberico Gentili in Defense of Poetry and Acting”, SRen 19 (1972), 224–272.

    Google Scholar 

  491. Binns, J.W. “Women or Transvestites on the Elizabethan Stage?: An Oxford Controversy” (Nr. C.326).

    Google Scholar 

  492. Molen, G.H.J. van der. Alberico Gentili and the Development of International Law, Leiden 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  493. Hilliard, S.S. “Stephen Gosson and the Elizabethan Distrust of the Effects of Drama”, ELR 9 (1979), 225–239.

    Google Scholar 

  494. Kinney, A.F. “Stephen Gosson’s Art of Argumentation in The Schoole of Abuse”, SEL 7 (1967), 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  495. Orwen, W.R. “Spenser and Gosson”, MLN 52 (1937), 574–576.

    Google Scholar 

  496. Ringler, W.A. Ste hen Gosson: A Biographical and Critical Stu y, Princeton 1942

    Google Scholar 

  497. Ringler, W.A. Ste hen Gosson: A Biographical and Critical Stu y, New York 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  498. Zitner, S.P. “Gosson, Ovid, and the Elizabethan Audience”, SQ 9 (1958), 206–208.

    Google Scholar 

  499. Wiener, F. N4o eorgus im England der Reformationszeit, Diss. Berlin 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  500. Lounsbury, Th.R. “A Puritan Censor of the Stage”, YR 12 (1923), 790–810.

    Google Scholar 

  501. Campbell, L.B. Tudor Conceptions of History and Tra ed in “A Mirror for Magistrates”, Berkele7 Lon on 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  502. Thaler, A. “Literary Criticism in A Mirror for Magistrates”, JEGP 49 (1950), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  503. Barberi, S.G. “Per una descrizione e interpretazione della poetica di Giordano Bruno”, SSe 1 (1960), 39–60.

    Google Scholar 

  504. Yates, F.A. “The Emblematic Conceit in Giordano Bruno’s De gli eroici furori and in the Elizabethan Sonnet Sequences”, JWCI 6 (1943), 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  505. Bottrall, M. “George Chapman’s Defence of Difficulty in Poetry”, Criterion 16 (1937), 638–654.

    Google Scholar 

  506. Cannon, Ch.L “Chapman on the Unity of Style and Meaning”, JEGP 68 (1969), 245–264.

    Google Scholar 

  507. Herzing, Th.W. “George Chapman: The Doctrine of Functional Obscurity”, EN 3 (1969), 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  508. Elledge, S. “Cowley’s Ode of Wit and Longinus on the Sublime: A Study of one Definition of the Word ‘Wit’”, MLQ 9 (1948), 185–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  509. Goldstein, H.D. “Discordia Concors, Decorum, and Cowley”, ES 49 (1968), 481–489.

    Google Scholar 

  510. Hinman, R.B. “’Truth Is Truest Poesy’: The Influence of the New Philosophy on Abraham Cowley”, ELH 23 (1956), 194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  511. Korshin, P.J. “The Theoretical Bases of Cowley’s Later Poetry”, SP 66 (1969), 756–776.

    Google Scholar 

  512. Nethercot, A.H. “Abraham Cowley’s Discourse Concerning Style”, RES 2 (1926), 385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  513. Dowlin, C.M. Sir William Davenant’s “Gondibert”, Its Preface, and Hobbes’s Answer: A Study in English Neoclassicism, Philaa elphia 1934. - Vgl. HOBBES, THOMAS (Nr. B.349.A)

    Google Scholar 

  514. Stiebel, A.M. Critical Contexts for Renaissance Readers: The Poetic Theory and Practice of Sir Kenelme y and Sir Henry Wotton, Ph.D. 3iss., University of Columbia 1981. - DAI 42 (1981), 2691A.

    Google Scholar 

  515. Wurtsbaugh, J. “Digby’s Criticism of Spenser”, RES 11 (1935), 192–195.

    Google Scholar 

  516. Bawcutt, P. Gavin Douglas: A Critical Study, Edinburgh 1976, bes. Kap. 6

    Google Scholar 

  517. Kinneavy, G.B. Gavin Dou las, Poet and Critic: A Study of His Poetry and Critici al TTieorÿ in R lation to Mediéval Poetics, Ph.D. diss., Pennsylvania State University 1967. - DA 29 (1968), 264A - 265A.

    Google Scholar 

  518. Grundy, J. “’Brave Translunary Things’”, MLR 59 (1964), 501–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  519. Simpson, P. “The Genuineness of the Drummond ‘Conversations’”, RES 2 (1926), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  520. Bergman, Ch.A. “’Alarums to Desire’” (Nr. C. 769. 2 ).

    Google Scholar 

  521. Dwyer, J. “Fulke Greville’s Aesthetic: Another Perspective”, SP 78 (1981), 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  522. Farmer,N.K. “Fulke Greville and the Poetic of the Plain Style”, TSLL 11 (1969–1970), 657–670.

    Google Scholar 

  523. Fietz, L. “Die Grundlagen der Wissenschaftskritik in Fulke Grevilles A Treatise of Humane Learning”, Anglia 99 (1981), 312–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  524. Maclean, H.N. “Greville’s ‘Poetic’”, SP 61 (1964), 170–191.

    Google Scholar 

  525. Roberts, D.A. “Fulke Greville’s Aesthetic Reconsidered”, SP 74 (1977), 388–405.

    Google Scholar 

  526. Harris, V. All Coherence Gone, Chicago 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  527. Harris, V. All Coherence Gone, London 1966, pp. 47–85.

    Google Scholar 

  528. Hepburn, R.W. “George Hakewill: The Virility of Nature”, JHI 16 (1955), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  529. Jones, R.F. Ancients and Moderns: A Study of the Rise of the Scientific Movement in T7th Century England, St. Loúit1961.

    Google Scholar 

  530. Jones, R.F. Ancients and Moderns: A Study of the Rise of the Scientific Movement in T7th Century England, New York 1982, pp. 29–37, 39 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  531. Berli, H. Gabriel Harvey-der Dichterfreund and Kritiker, Diss. Zürich 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  532. Johnson, F.R. “The First Edition of Gabriel Harvey’s Fovre Letters”, Library, 4th ser., 15 (1935), 212–223.

    Google Scholar 

  533. Snare, G. “Satire, Logic and Rhetoric in Harvey’s Earthquake Letter to Spenser”, TSE 18 (1970), 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  534. Anceschi, L. “Hobbes, Locke, e la ‘discretion’ della poesia”, RdE 6 (1961), 397–413.

    Google Scholar 

  535. Caramés Lage, J.L. “Thomas Hobbes, teórico de la literatura (en el tercer aniversario de su muerte)”, Arbor 410 (1980), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  536. Gang, T.M. “Hobbes and the Metaphysical Conceit–A Reply”, JHI 17 (1956), 418–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  537. Hinnant, Ch.H. “Hobbes on Fancy and Judgment”, Criticism 18 (1976), 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  538. Kishler, Th.C. “Hobbes’s ‘Answer’ to Davenant: Some Aspects of the Style”, LangandS 9 (1976), 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  539. Thorpe, C.D. The Aesthetic Theory of Thomas Hobbes. With Special RTrence to His Contribution tto the Psychological Approach in English Literary Critncism, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  540. Thorpe, C.D. The Aesthetic Theory of Thomas Hobbes. With Special RTrence to His Contribution tto the Psychological Approach in English Literary Critncism, Ann Arbor, New York 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  541. Watson, G. “Hobbes and the Metaphysical Conceit”, JHI 16 (1955), 558–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  542. Cornelius, P.S. E.K.’s Commentary on “The Shepheardes Calender” (Salzburg Studies in English Literature: Elizabethan and Renaissance Studies, 31), Salzburg 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  543. Fletcher, J.B. “Areopagus and Pléiade”, JEGP 2 (1898), 429–453.

    Google Scholar 

  544. Hard, F. “E.K.’s Reference to Painting: Some Seventeenth Century Adaptations”, ELH 7 (1940), 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  545. Starnes, D.T. “Spenser and E.K.”,SP 41 (1944), 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  546. Stephenson, E.A. “Some Stylistic Links between Spenser and E.K. RenP (1956), 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  547. Blau, S.D. “Milton’s Salvational Aesthetic”, JR 46 (1966), 282–295.

    Google Scholar 

  548. Clark, A.M. “Milton and the Renaissance Revolt Against Rhyme”, in: Clark, Studies in Literary Modes, Edinburgh/ London 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  549. Clark, A.M. “Milton and the Renaissance Revolt Against Rhyme”, in: Clark, Studies in Literary Modes, Folcroft, Pa., 1971, pp. 105–141.

    Google Scholar 

  550. Clark, D.L. John Milton at St. Paul’s School: A Study of Ancient Rhetoric in Englis-h Renâissance Education, New York/London 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  551. Clark, D.L. John Milton at St. Paul’s School: A Study of Ancient Rhetoric in Englis-h Renâissance Education, New York/London 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  552. Clark, D.L. “John Milton and ‘the fitted style or lofty, mean, or lowly’”, SCN 11 /4 (1953), 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  553. Clark, D.L. “Milton’s Rhetorical Exercises”, QJS 46 (1960), 297–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  554. Das Gupta, R.K. Milton’s Theor of Poetry, Ph.D. thesis, Oxford University 7–1938.

    Google Scholar 

  555. Drawver, P.S. Milton’s Knowledge and Use of Aristotle, Ph.D. diss., University of IllinoiT964.–DA 25 (1965), 4684–4685.

    Google Scholar 

  556. Duhamel, P.A. “Milton’s Alleged Ramism”, PMLA 67 (1952), 1035–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  557. Fink, Z.S. “Milton’s Retirement to Horton and Renaissance Literary Theory”, ES 22 (1940), 137–138.

    Google Scholar 

  558. Flower, A.C. “The Critical Context of the Preface to Samson Agonistes”, SEL 10 (1970), 409–423.

    Google Scholar 

  559. Grierson, H. “John Milton and the Renaissance Theory of Poetry”, in: Grierson, Milton and Wordsworth: Poets and Prophets, Cambridge 1937, pp. 76–47.

    Google Scholar 

  560. Hanford, J.H. “Milton and the Return to Humanism”, SP 16 (1919), 126–147.

    Google Scholar 

  561. Hughes, M.Y. “The Christ of Paradise Re ained and the Renaissance Heroic Tradition”, SP 35 (1938), 254–277.

    Google Scholar 

  562. Huntley, J. F. “The Images of Poet and Poetry in Milton’s The Reason of Church-Government”, in: M. Lieb, J.T. Slcross (ers.), Achievements of the Left Hand: Essays on the Prose of John Milton, Amherst, Mass., 1974, pp. 83–120.

    Google Scholar 

  563. Koehler, G.S. “Milton on ‘Numbers’, ‘Quantity’, and ’Rime’”, SP 55 (1958), 201–217.

    Google Scholar 

  564. Langdon, I. Milton’s Theory of Poetry and Fine Art: An Essay, with a Collection of Illustrative Passa es from his Wor1cs (Cornell Studies in English, 8, New Haven 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  565. Langdon, I. Milton’s Theory of Poetry and Fine Art: An Essay, with a Collection of Illustrative Passa es from his Wor1cs (Cornell Studies in English, 8, New York 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  566. Lewalski, B.K. “Milton on Learning and the Learned-Ministry Controversy”, HLQ 24 (1961), 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  567. Looten, C. “Milton et l’idée du poète”, RAA (1931), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  568. Major, J.M. “Milton’s View of Rhetoric”, SP 64 (1967), 685–711.

    Google Scholar 

  569. Moore Smith, G.C. “A Note on Milton’s Art of Logic”, RES 13 (1937), 335–340.

    Google Scholar 

  570. Mueller, M. “Sixteenth-Century Italian Criticism and Milton’s Theory of Catharsis”, SEL 6 (1966), 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  571. Neilson, W.A. “On Milton’s Conception of Poetry”, in: Studies in the History of Culture: The Discipline of the Humanities, Menasha, Wis., 1942, pp. 156–160.

    Google Scholar 

  572. Ogden, H.V.S. “The Principles of Variety and Contrast in Seventeenth Century Asthetics, and Milton’s Poetry” (Nr. C.212).

    Google Scholar 

  573. Petit, H.H. “Milton, Aristotle, and the Modern Critics”, CB 25 (1948), 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  574. Rajan, B. “’Simple, Sensuous, and Passionate’”, RES 21 (1945), 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  575. Ross, M.M. “John Milton and the Protestant Aesthetic:The Early Poems”, UTQ 17 (1948), 340–360.

    Google Scholar 

  576. Samuel, I. Plato and Milton (Cornell Studies in English, 35), caca, N.Y., 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  577. Samuel, I. Plato and Milton (Cornell Studies in English, 35), caca, N.Y., 1965, bes. Kap. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  578. Samuel, I. “Milton on Style”, CLJ 9 (1969), 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  579. Samuel, I. “Milton and the Ancients on the Writing of History”, MiltonS 2 (1970), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  580. Samuel, I. “The Development of Milton’s Poetics”, PMLA 92 (1977), 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  581. Samuel, I. “Milton on the Province of Rhetoric”, MiltonS 10 (1977), 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  582. Scott, W.O. “Ramism and Milton’s Concept of Poetic Fancy”, P4 42 (1963), 182–189.

    Google Scholar 

  583. Sellin, P.R. “Sources of Milton’s Catharsis: A. Reconsideration”, JEGP 60 (1961), 712–730.

    Google Scholar 

  584. Sellin, P.R. “Milton and Heinsius: Theoretical Homogeneity”, USCSCL 1 (1967), 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  585. Sloane, Th.O. “Rhetoric, ‘Logic’ and Poetry: The Formal Cause”, in: C.A. Patrides/R.B. Waddington (eds.), The Age of Milton: Backgrounds to Seventeenth-Century Literature, Manchester/Totowa, N.J., 1980, pp. 307–337.

    Google Scholar 

  586. Steadman, J.M. “Chaste Muse and ‘Casta Juventus’: Milton, Minturno, and Scaliger on Inspiration and the Poet’s’Character”, Italica 40 (1963), 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  587. Tuve, R. “Baroque and Mannerist Milton?”, JEGP 60 (1961), 817–833.

    Google Scholar 

  588. Willey, B. The Seventeenth-Century Background, London 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  589. Willey, B. The Seventeenth-Century Background, London Harmondsworth 1962, Kap. 10: “The Heroic Poem in a Scientific Age” (pp. 185–237).

    Google Scholar 

  590. Wittreich, J.A. “Milton’s Idea of the Orator”, MiltonQ 6 (1972), 38–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  591. Wittreich, J.A. “’The Crown of Eloquence’: The Figure of the Orator in Milton’s Prose Works”, in: M. Lieb/ J.T. Shawcross (eds.), Achievements of the Left Hand: Essays on the Prose of John Milton, Amherst, Mass., 1974, pp. 3–54.

    Google Scholar 

  592. Stewart, J.I.M. “Montaigne’s Essays and A Defence of Ryme” (Nr. B. 280. 3 ).

    Google Scholar 

  593. Arnold, A. Thomas Nashe’s Criticism of the State of Learning in En land, Ph.D. diss., University of OE icago 1937.–Abstract: 1937, pp. 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  594. Sackton, A.H. “Thomas Nashe as an Elizabethan Critic”, SE 26 (1947), 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  595. Rollins, H.E. “Samuel Sheppard and his Praise of Poets”, SP 24 (1927), 509–555.

    Google Scholar 

  596. Bennett, J.W. ‘Letter-Book’ “Spenser and Gabriel Harvey’s MP 29 (1931), 163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  597. Bruten, A.G. Poetic, Ph.D. “Res” and “Verba” in Spenser’s t is,-Cambridge University 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  598. Bullock, W. “A Comment on Criticism in the Cinquecento”, PMLA 42 (1927), 1057–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  599. Clark, E.J. Spenser’s Theory of the English Poet, Ph.D. diss., Loyola University of Chicago 195 Index 16 (1955–1956), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  600. Donnelly, M. “’Dialectical Poetics’ and the Alleged Influence of Ramism on Spenser: A Reply” (Nr. C. 802. 15 ).

    Google Scholar 

  601. Evans, R.O. “Spenser’s Role in the Controversy over Quantitative Verse”, NM 57 (1956), 246–256.

    Google Scholar 

  602. Hamilton, A.C. “Spenser’s Letter to Ralegh”, MLN 73 (1958), 481–485.

    Google Scholar 

  603. Langdon, I. Materials for a Study of Spenser’s Theory of Fine Art, Ithaca, N.Y., 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  604. Langdon, I. Materials for a Study of Spenser’s Theory of Fine Art, Ithaca, N.Y., 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  605. Mallette, R. “Spenser’s Portrait of the Artist in The Shepheardes Calender and Colin Clouts Come Home Againe”, SEL 19 (1979), 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  606. Maynadier, H. “The Areopagus of Sidney and Spenser” MLR 4 (1908–1909), 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  607. Mills, J.L. “Spenser, Lodowick Bryskett,and the Mortalist Controversy: The Faerie Queene, Il.ix.22.”, Eg 52 (1973), 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  608. Mills, J.L. “Spenser’s Letter to Raleigh and the Averroistic Poetics”, ELN 14 (1977), 246–249.

    Google Scholar 

  609. Orwen, W.R. “Spenser and Gosson”, MLN 52 (1937), 574–576.

    Google Scholar 

  610. Owen, W.J.B. “Spenser’s Letter to Ralegh–A Reply”, MLN 75 (1960), 195–197.

    Google Scholar 

  611. Pope, E.F. The Reflection of Renaissance Criticism in Edmund Spenser’s “Faerie Queene”, Ph.D. diss., University of Chicago 1920. - Abstract: Humanistic Series 2 (1923–1924), 393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  612. Pope, E.F. “Renaissance Criticism and the Diction of The Faerie Queene”, PMLA 41 (1926), 575–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  613. Pope, E.F. “’A Comment on Criticism in the Cinquecento’: A Reply”, PMLA 46 (1931), 276–288.-Vgl. Nr. B. 359. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  614. Renwick, W.L. Edmund Spennsser: An Essay on Renaissance Poetry, London 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  615. Renwick, W.L. Edmund Spennsser: An Essay on Renaissance Poetry, London 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  616. Renwick, W.L. “The Critical Origins of Spenser’s Diction”, MLR 17 (1922), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  617. Ringler, W. “Master Drant’s Rules”, PQ 29 (1950), 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  618. Smith, Ch.G. “Sententious Theory in Spenser’s Legend of Friendship”, ELH 2 (1935), 165–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  619. Webb, W.St. “Vergil in Spenser’s Epic Theory”, ELH 4 (1937), 62–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  620. Wurtsbaugh, J. “Digby’s Criticism of Spenser” (Nr. B. 337. 2 ).

    Google Scholar 

  621. Benham, A.R. “Sir John Suckling, A Sessions of the Poets: Some Notes and Queries”, MLQ 6 (1945), 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  622. Hay, D. Polydore Ver il: Renaissance Historian and Man of Letters, Oxofrd 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  623. Izard, Th.C. George Whetstone, Mid-Elizabethan Gentleman of Letters, Ph.D. diss., Columbia University 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  624. Cheshire, C.L. Introduction and Annotations to George Wither’s “A Preparation to the Psalter”, Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, MaaT on 1983. - DAI 44 (1983) 1797A.

    Google Scholar 

  625. Wimmer, J. George Withers Leben und Werke, Diss. Wien 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  626. Blackburn, Th.H. Edmund Bolton, Critic, Antiquary, and Historian: A Biographical and Critical Study with an Edition of “Hypercritica”, Pl D. diss., StanfoiUniversity 1963. - DA 24 (1963), 738.

    Google Scholar 

  627. Blackburn, Th.H. “The Date and Evolution of Edmund Bolton’s Hypercritica”, SP 63 (1966), 196–202.

    Google Scholar 

  628. Hearsey, M. “Sidney’s Defense of Poesy and Amyot’s Preface in North’s Plutarch” (Nr. B. 292. 36 ).

    Google Scholar 

  629. Duncan-Jones, K. “Two Elizabethan Versions of Giovio’s Treatise on Imprese”, ES 52 (1971), 118–123.

    Google Scholar 

  630. Kau, J.L.Ch. “Daniel’s Delia and the Imprese of Bishop Paolo Giovio”.(Nr. C. 757. 4 ).

    Google Scholar 

  631. Koppenfels, W.v. “Two Notes on Imprese in Elizabethan Literature: Daniel’s Additions to The Worthy Tract of Paulus Iouius; Sidney’s Arcadia ana -The Tournament Eene in The Unfortunate Traveller”, RenQ 24 (1971), 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  632. Zimmermann, T.C.P. “Paolo Giovio and the Evolution of Renaissance Art Criticism”, in: C.H. Clough (ed.), Cultural Aspects of the Italian Renaissance (FS Kristeller),ework 1976, pp. 406–424.

    Google Scholar 

  633. Gent, L. “Haydocke’s Copy of Lomazzo’s Trattato”, Library, 6thser., 1 (1979), 78–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  634. Hard, F. “Richard Haydocke and Alexander Browne: Two Half-Forgotten Writers on the Art of Painting”, PMLA 55 (1940), 727–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  635. Höltgen, K.J. “Richard Haydocke: Translator, Engraver, Physician”, Library, 5th ser., 33 (1978), 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  636. Auerbach, E. Nicholas Hilliard, London 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  637. Edmond, M. Hilliard and Oliver: The Lives and Works of Two Great Miniaturists, London 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  638. Pope-Hennessy, J. “Nicholas Hilliard and Mannerist Art-Theory”, JWCI 6 (1943), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  639. Strong, R.C. Nicholas Hilliard, London 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  640. Ackerman, G.M. The Structure of Lomazzo’s Treatise on Paintin, Ph.D. diss., Princeton University 1964.–DA 25, 3506–3507.

    Google Scholar 

  641. Moffat, A. Lomazzo’s Treatises in England in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries, M.PE sis, Universityeì London 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  642. Levy, F.J. “Henry Peacham and the Art of Drawing”, JWCI 37 (1974), 174–190.

    Google Scholar 

  643. Hard, F. “Ideas from Bacon and Wotton in William Sanderson’s Graphice”, SP 36 (1939), 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  644. Caldwell, M.P. Sir Henr Wotton: Aspects of English Taste in trie Ear y Seventeenth Century, M.Phil. thesis, University of London, T eWarburg Institute 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  645. Hard, F. “Ideas from Bacon and Wotton in William Sanderson’s Graphite” (Nr. B. 390. 1 ).

    Google Scholar 

  646. Stiebel A.M. Critical Contexts for Renaissance Readers (Nr. B. 337. 1 ).

    Google Scholar 

  647. Buck, A., K. Reitmann, W. Mettmann (eds.). Dichtungslehren der Romania aus der Zeit der Renaissance und des Barock (Dokumente zur europäischen Poetik, 3), Frankfurt 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  648. Holyoke, S.J. (ed.). An Introduction to French Sixteenth Century Poetic Theory, Manchester/New York 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  649. Weinberg, B. (ed.). Critical Prefaces of the French Renaissance, Evanston, Iii., 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  650. Weinberg, B. (ed.). Critical Prefaces of the French Renaissance, New York 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  651. Weinberg, B. (ed.). Trattati di Poetica e Retorica del Cinquecento (Scrittori d’Italia, 247, 248, 253, 258), Bari I: 1970, II: 1970, III: 1972, IV: 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  652. Wright, H.G. Boccaccio in England from Chaucer to Tennyson, London 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  653. Charlton, H.B. Castelvetro’s Theory of Poetry, Manchester 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  654. Fusco, A. La poetica di L. Castelvetro, Neapel 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  655. Guerrieri-Crocetti, C. C.B. Giraldi e il pensiero critico del secolo XVI, una/Rom/Mailai 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  656. Rossi, V. Battista Guarini ed “Il Pastor Fido”, Turin 1886.

    Google Scholar 

  657. Ulivi, F. “La poetica del Guarini e il Pastor Fido”, Humanitas 6 (1951), 88–103.

    Google Scholar 

  658. Meter, J.M. De Literaire Theoriedn van Daniél Heinsius: Een onderzoek naar de klassieke en humanistische bronnen van “De Tragoediae Constitutione” en andere geschrTfen,Amsterdam 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  659. Sellin, P.R. “Milton and Heinsius” (Nr. B. 352. 34 ).

    Google Scholar 

  660. Steadman, J.M. “Chaste Muse” (Nr. B. 352. 36 ).

    Google Scholar 

  661. Brinkschulte, E. Julius Caesar Scaligers kunsttheoretische Anschauungen und deren Hauptquellen (Renaissance und Philosophie, 10), Bonn 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  662. Costanzo, M. Dallo Scaligero al Quadrio, Mailand 1961, pp. 9–66.

    Google Scholar 

  663. Ferraro, R.M. Giudizi critici e criteri estetici nei “Poetices Libri Septem” (1561) di Giulio Cesare Scaligero rispetto alla teoria letteraria del Rinascimento, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  664. Hall, V. “Scaliger’s Defense of Poetry”, PMLA 63 (1948), 1125–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  665. Steadman, J.M. “Chaste Muse” (Nr. B. 352. 36 ).

    Google Scholar 

  666. Weinberg, B. “Scaliger versus Aristotle on Poetics”, MP 39 (1941–1942), 337–360.

    Google Scholar 

  667. Brand, C.P. Torquato Tasso: A Study of the Poet and his Contribution to English Literature, Cambridge 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  668. Greco, F.G. Torquato Tasso’s Theory of the Epic and Its Influence on Edmund.—Spenser’s “The Faerie Queene”, TD. diss., Duquesne University 1969. - DAI 30 (1970), 2967A - 2968A.

    Google Scholar 

  669. Herrick, M.T. “Trissino’s Art of Poetry”, in: R. Hosley (ed.), Essays on S âkespeare and Elizabethan Drama (FS Craig), London 19637 pp. 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  670. Black, M.W. Richard Brathwait: An Account of His Life and Works, Philadelphia 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  671. Höltgen, K.J. “Sir Robert Dallington (1561–1637): Author, Traveler, and Pioneer of Taste”, HLQ 47 (1984), 147–177.

    Google Scholar 

  672. Campbell, L.B. “The Christian Muse”, HLB 8 (1935), 29–70.

    Google Scholar 

  673. Weller, Ph. Joshuah Sylvesters englische Übersetzungen der religiösen Epeníces Du Bartas, Diss. Tübingen 190.

    Google Scholar 

  674. Jürgens, G. Die “Epistolae Ho-Elianae”: Ein Beitrag zur engl si Ehen Litterâturgeschichte Marburger Studien zur englischen Philologie, 1, Marburg 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  675. Henderson, J.R. “Defining the Genre of the Letter: Juan Luis Vives’ De Conscribendis Epistolis”, RenandR 19 (1983), 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich 3, Universität — Gesamthochschule — Essen, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Heinrich F. Plett

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Heinrich F. Plett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Plett, H.F. (1985). Quellen. In: Englische Rhetorik und Poetik 1479 – 1660. Forschungsberichte des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88195-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-88195-3_4

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-03201-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-88195-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation